• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of amjphAmerican Journal of Public Health Web SiteAmerican Public Health Association Web SiteSubmissionsSubscriptionsAbout Us
Am J Public Health. 2001 April; 91(4): 584–590.
PMCID: PMC1446631

Promoting breast and cervical cancer screening at the workplace: results from the Woman to Woman Study.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This article reports findings from a peer-delivered intervention designed to increase use of breast and cervical cancer screening. METHODS: Twenty-six worksites were randomly assigned to the intervention or comparison group. The 16-month intervention consisted of group discussions, outreach, and educational campaigns. Data were collected from a random sample of women employees stratified by age (baseline n = 2943; final n = 2747). Cross-sectional analyses were conducted to evaluate the impact of the intervention on screening behaviors. RESULTS: Relative to comparison worksites, the intervention group experienced greater increases in the percentage of women who reported a recent mammogram (7.2% vs 5.6%), clinical breast examination (5.8% vs 2.1%), and Papanicolaou (Pap) test (4.7% vs 1.9%). After worksite cluster and age strata were controlled for, the observed increase in Pap tests was significantly greater in the intervention group (odds ratio [OR] = 1.28; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.01, 1.62); however, differences in mammography screening rates (OR = 1.14; 95% CI = 0.90, 1.44) and clinical breast examination (OR = 1.19; 95% CI = 0.96, 1.49) were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Intervention activities produced a modest increase in cervical cancer screening, but they did not accelerate breast cancer screening rates above the observed secular trend.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (102K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Fletcher SW, Black W, Harris R, Rimer BK, Shapiro S. Report of the International Workshop on Screening for Breast Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Oct 20;85(20):1644–1656. [PubMed]
  • Koss LG. The Papanicolaou test for cervical cancer detection. A triumph and a tragedy. JAMA. 1989 Feb 3;261(5):737–743. [PubMed]
  • Martin LM, Calle EE, Wingo PA, Heath CW., Jr Comparison of mammography and Pap test use from the 1987 and 1992 National Health Interview Surveys: are we closing the gaps? Am J Prev Med. 1996 Mar-Apr;12(2):82–90. [PubMed]
  • Anderson LM, May DS. Has the use of cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening increased in the United States? Am J Public Health. 1995 Jun;85(6):840–842. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Suarez L, Roche RA, Pulley LV, Weiss NS, Goldman D, Simpson DM. Why a peer intervention program for Mexican-American women failed to modify the secular trend in cancer screening. Am J Prev Med. 1997 Nov-Dec;13(6):411–417. [PubMed]
  • Urban N, Taplin SH, Taylor VM, Peacock S, Anderson G, Conrad D, Etzioni R, White E, Montano DE, Mahloch J, et al. Community organization to promote breast cancer screening among women ages 50-75. Prev Med. 1995 Sep;24(5):477–484. [PubMed]
  • Zapka JG, Costanza ME, Harris DR, Hosmer D, Stoddard A, Barth R, Gaw V. Impact of a breast cancer screening community intervention. Prev Med. 1993 Jan;22(1):34–53. [PubMed]
  • Harris RP, O'Malley MS, Fletcher SW, Knight BP. Prompting physicians for preventive procedures: a five-year study of manual and computer reminders. Am J Prev Med. 1990 May-Jun;6(3):145–152. [PubMed]
  • Rimer BK, Ross E, Balshem A, Engstrom PF. The effect of a comprehensive breast screening program on self-reported mammography use by primary care physicians and women in a health maintenance organization. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1993 Sep-Oct;6(5):443–451. [PubMed]
  • Snell JL, Buck EL. Increasing cancer screening: a meta-analysis. Prev Med. 1996 Nov-Dec;25(6):702–707. [PubMed]
  • Trock B, Rimer BK, King E, Balshem A, Cristinzio CS, Engstrom PF. Impact of an HMO-based intervention to increase mammography utilization. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1993 Mar-Apr;2(2):151–156. [PubMed]
  • Heaney CA, Goetzel RZ. A review of health-related outcomes of multi-component worksite health promotion programs. Am J Health Promot. 1997 Mar-Apr;11(4):290–307. [PubMed]
  • Wilson MG, Holman PB, Hammock A. A comprehensive review of the effects of worksite health promotion on health-related outcomes. Am J Health Promot. 1996 Jul-Aug;10(6):429–435. [PubMed]
  • Allen JD, Sorensen G, Stoddard AM, Colditz G, Peterson K. Intention to have a mammogram in the future among women who have underused mammography in the past. Health Educ Behav. 1998 Aug;25(4):474–488. [PubMed]
  • Stoddard AM, Rimer BK, Lane D, Fox SA, Lipkus I, Luckmann R, Avrunin JS, Sprachman S, Costanza M, Urban N. Underusers of mammogram screening: stage of adoption in five U.S. subpopulations. The NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium. Prev Med. 1998 May-Jun;27(3):478–487. [PubMed]
  • Caplan LS, Coughlin SS. Worksite breast cancer screening programs: a review. AAOHN J. 1998 Sep;46(9):443–453. [PubMed]
  • Mayer JA, Jones JA, Eckhardt LE, Haliday J, Bartholomew S, Slymen DJ, Hovell MF. Evaluation of a worksite mammography program. Am J Prev Med. 1993 Jul-Aug;9(4):244–249. [PubMed]
  • Kurtz ME, Kurtz JC, Given B, Given CC. Promotion of breast cancer screening in a work site population. Health Care Women Int. 1994 Jan-Feb;15(1):31–42. [PubMed]
  • Vernon SW, Vogel VG, Halabi S, Jackson GL, Lundy RO, Peters GN. Breast cancer screening behaviors and attitudes in three racial/ethnic groups. Cancer. 1992 Jan 1;69(1):165–174. [PubMed]
  • Paskett ED, White E, Urban N, Gey GO, Hornecker J, Meadows S, Sifferman FR. Implementation and evaluation of a worksite breast self-examination training program. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1990;339:281–302. [PubMed]
  • Parkinson RS, Denniston RW, Baugh T, Dunn JP, Schwartz TL. Breast cancer: health education in the workplace. Health Educ Q. 1982 Fall;9(SPEC):61–72. [PubMed]
  • Eng E. The Save our Sisters Project. A social network strategy for reaching rural black women. Cancer. 1993 Aug 1;72(3 Suppl):1071–1077. [PubMed]
  • Eng E, Smith J. Natural helping functions of lay health advisors in breast cancer education. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1995 Jul;35(1):23–29. [PubMed]
  • Fox SA, Stein JA. The effect of physician-patient communication on mammography utilization by different ethnic groups. Med Care. 1991 Nov;29(11):1065–1082. [PubMed]
  • Lerman C, Rimer B, Trock B, Balshem A, Engstrom PF. Factors associated with repeat adherence to breast cancer screening. Prev Med. 1990 May;19(3):279–290. [PubMed]
  • Rimer BK, Keintz MK, Kessler HB, Engstrom PF, Rosan JR. Why women resist screening mammography: patient-related barriers. Radiology. 1989 Jul;172(1):243–246. [PubMed]
  • Fisher EB., Jr The results of the COMMIT trial. Community Intervention Trial for Smoking Cessation. Am J Public Health. 1995 Feb;85(2):159–160. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Marcus AC, Bastani R, Reardon K, Karlins S, Das IP, Van Herle MP, McClatchey MW, Crane LA. Proactive screening mammography counseling within the Cancer Information Service: results from a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1993;(14):119–129. [PubMed]
  • Janz NK, Schottenfeld D, Doerr KM, Selig SM, Dunn RL, Strawderman M, Levine PA. A two-step intervention of increase mammography among women aged 65 and older. Am J Public Health. 1997 Oct;87(10):1683–1686. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Skinner CS, Strecher VJ, Hospers H. Physicians' recommendations for mammography: do tailored messages make a difference? Am J Public Health. 1994 Jan;84(1):43–49. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Rakowski W, Ehrich B, Goldstein MG, Rimer BK, Pearlman DN, Clark MA, Velicer WF, Woolverton H., 3rd Increasing mammography among women aged 40-74 by use of a stage-matched, tailored intervention. Prev Med. 1998 Sep-Oct;27(5 Pt 1):748–756. [PubMed]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...