• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of ajhgLink to Publisher's site
Am J Hum Genet. Apr 2006; 78(4): 604–614.
Published online Mar 1, 2006. doi:  10.1086/502981
PMCID: PMC1424698

Hypomethylation of the H19 Gene Causes Not Only Silver-Russell Syndrome (SRS) but Also Isolated Asymmetry or an SRS-Like Phenotype


The H19 differentially methylated region (DMR) controls the allele-specific expression of both the imprinted H19 tumor-suppressor gene and the IGF2 growth factor. Hypermethylation of this DMR—and subsequently of the H19 promoter region—is a major cause of the clinical features of gigantism and/or asymmetry seen in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome or in isolated hemihypertrophy. Here, we report a series of patients with hypomethylation of the H19 locus. Their main clinical features of asymmetry and growth retardation are the opposite of those seen in patients with hypermethylation of this region. In addition, we show that complete hypomethylation of the H19 promoter is found in two of three patients with the full clinical spectrum of Silver-Russell syndrome. This syndrome is also characterized by growth retardation and asymmetry, among other clinical features. We conclude that patients with these clinical features should be analyzed for H19 hypomethylation.

Silver-Russell syndrome (SRS [MIM 180860]) is a clinically heterogeneous syndrome, first described by Silver et al. (1953) and Russell (1954). Diagnosis can be difficult, and at least four of the following criteria should be present: intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR), poor postnatal growth, relatively normal head circumference, classic facial phenotype, and asymmetry (Price et al. 1999). At the genetic level, the syndrome is heterogeneous: although mostly sporadic, in familial cases, the syndrome can be transmitted in an autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, and/or X-linked dominant way (Duncan et al. 1990; Teebi 1992; Al-Fifi et al. 1996; Ounap et al. 2004). In most patients, the molecular pathology of SRS is unknown; however, abnormalities have been described for chromosome 7 (especially maternal uniparental disomy [mUPD], in ~10% of cases) (Monk et al. 2002). Although, in general, complete mUPD 7 is found in these cases, a single case was reported with a partial mUPD 7q31-qter (Hannula et al. 2001). Analysis of genes in this region did not lead to the identification of a candidate gene involved in the syndrome. Various other chromosomal abnormalities have been described, including trisomy 1q32.1-q42.1 (van Haelst et al. 2002), deletion of chromosome 15q or ring chromosome 15 (Rogan et al. 1996), 18p− (Christensen and Nielsen 1978), translocations involving breakpoints 17q25 (Ramirez-Duenas et al. 1992) and 17q23–24 (Dorr et al. 2001), and, finally, a paternally inherited deletion of the CSH1 gene at chromosome 17q22-24 (Eggermann et al. 1998).

In 2002, Fisher et al. (2002) reported three patients with a phenotype that includes growth retardation. These patients presented with maternal duplications of chromosome 11p15. In 2005, Eggermann et al. (2005) described two patients with maternal duplications of 11p15 and SRS. Recently, Gicquel and coworkers (2005) published a series of patients with SRS who had hypomethylation of the H19 region at 11p15 (MIM 103280).

The 11p15 region is also associated with the Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome (BWS [MIM 130650]), characterized by macroglossia, omphalocele, fetal gigantism, and other abnormalities, including various childhood tumors (DeBaun et al. 2002). In many cases, the overgrowth is asymmetric, producing hemihypertrophy, which is probably more accurately termed “hemihyperplasia.” The syndrome can be caused by various molecular defects, which lead to altered expression of imprinted genes on chromosome 11p15, including H19 and IGF2 (MIM 147470) (Bliek et al. 2001) (fig. 1a). Given the opposite phenotypes of SRS and BWS, Chitayat et al. hypothesized, as long ago as 1988, that the growth abnormality and asymmetry in both disorders might be caused by disregulation of the same gene (Chitayat et al. 1988). Here, we report support for that hypothesis from a series of patients with H19 hypomethylation and clinical features ranging from isolated asymmetry to the full clinical spectrum of SRS.

Figure  1
a, Schematic representation of the H19/IGF2 region of chromosome 11p15. Probe 1 is the deletion detection probe, probe 2, the promoter methylation detection probe. CTCF-binding sites within the DMR are indicated by blackened circles. b, Results of the ...

Material and Methods

Methylation and Deletion Studies

Methylation indices of both H19 and KCNQ1OT1 (MIM 604115) were measured in blood lymphocytes as described elsewhere (Bliek et al. 2001). In brief, DNA was digested overnight with a methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme (NotI for KCNQ1OT1 and SmaI for the H19 promoter), was precipitated, and was digested overnight with a second restriction enzyme (BamHI for KCNQ1OT1 and PstI for H19). Completion of digestion of the methylation-sensitive enzyme was monitored by the use of control probes that recognize the nonmethylated restriction site. After Southern blotting, the filters were hybridized with the probes listed below. Hybridization was measured in a phosphoimager (Amersham). The Imagequant program (Amersham) was used to measure the intensity of the radioactive bands. The mean methylation index (intensity of the measured band divided by the intensity of both bands) (±SD) for control individuals for H19 is 0.5 (±0.03) and for KCNQ1OT1 is 0.51 (±0.025). Normal methylation was defined as the mean ±2 SD.

Deletion studies were performed on patient DNA digested with ApaI. After Southern blotting, the filter was hybridized with the following probes and primer sets: deletion detection probe (probe 1 in fig. 1a), forward 5′-ATTTCCTGAGTCTCCCCTTGG-3′ and reverse 5′-TCGGCAAACCCTCTGTTCC-3′; methylation detection probe (in first exon of H19) (probe 2 in fig. 1a), forward 5′-GTGGGAGCCAAGGAGCACCTTGGACATCTG-3′ and reverse 5′-TCCTGGTGACGTCCTGCTGCAACTCCCCGA-3′; and methylation detection probe (KCNQ1OT1), forward 5′-CCAGGTGAGAGGTAGTGGTAGAAGTC-3′ and reverse 5′-TCTTTGCATTCCTAGAGCAATCC-3′.

UPD Analyses

DNA containing CA repeats was amplified using standard PCR methods. Markers were taken from the ABI PRISM Linkage Mapping Sets version 2.5 kit or were retrieved from the National Center for Biotechnology Information Web site. The PCR was done with Cy5-dCTP, and the fragments were analyzed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis with ALFexpress (Amersham Pharmacia). The PCR products generated with the ABI PRISM Linkage Mapping Sets version 2.5 kit were analyzed by capillary electrophoresis by use of Genetic Analyzer ABI310 (Applied Biosystems).

Mutation Analyses

Three primer sets were used to amplify all seven CTCF-binding sites, described elsewhere (Bell and Felsenfeld 2000), in the differentially methylated region (DMR) between the IGF2 and the H19 genes. The first three sites were amplified with the primers CTCFS1-3F, 5′-GCCCATCTTGCTGACCTCAC-3′, and CTCFS1-3R, 5′-AGAAGACCTCCGAGAACCCTG-3′. For CTCF site 4–6, the following primers were used: CTCFS4-6F, 5′-GGTAGGACCCTTGTACGAGCC-3′, and CTCFS4-6R, 5′-GACCTGAAGATCTGGTGCGG-3′. For CTCF site 4, we used the following primer set: CTCFS7F, 5′-ATTTCCTGAGTCTCCCCTTGG-3′, and CTCFS7R, 5′-TCGGCAAACCCTCTGTTCC-3′. Two additional sequence primers were used: CTCFS site 2R, 5′-AATGTGGCTCCCATGAGTG-3′, for CTCF site 2, and CTCF site 5R, 5′-AGAAGGGTTTCACACTAGGGCCG-3′, for CTCF site 5.

PCR reactions were done in a total volume of 25 μl with MgCl2 (1.5 μM), dNTP (0.24 mM), Betaine (50 mM), primers (1.2 μM), and 0.3 U Amplitaq Gold (Applied Biosysytems), with an annealing temperature of 60°C. After purifying the PCR product with QIAquick PCR Purification Kit 250 (QIAGEN), a sequence reaction was performed using the BigDye Terminator v1.1. Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems), with an annealing temperature of 60°C. Samples were analyzed on an ABI 310 genetic analyzer after ethanol precipitation.


Patient 1

The patient was the third child of healthy parents. She was born after a pregnancy of 40 wk and 2 d. Birth weight was 1,870 g (−3.6 SD), birth length was 41 cm (−4.6 SD), and skull circumference was 33.5 cm (−1 SD). In the first weeks, nasogastric tube feeding was necessary, and, in the first months, there was a failure to thrive. At age 7 mo, a ventrical septal defect was detected. At age 8 mo, she developed circulatory and respiratory insufficiency after gastroenteritis, followed by multiorgan failure and postanoxic encephalopathy. Because of severe feeding problems, she was fed by percutaneous gastrostomia from age 2.5 years onward. Mental development is retarded because of encephalopathy.

Physical examination at age 2 years and 9 mo showed a height of 87 cm (−2 SD). Unfortunately, skull circumference was not measured. She had dysmorphic features suggestive of SRS. An iris coloboma was noted in the left eye. There was asymmetry of the arms and legs in (left side larger) and bilateral mild ulnar deviation of the third, fourth, and fifth fingers (fig. (fig.2a2a2c).

Figure  2
a, Patient 1, aged 2 years and 9 mo. Note triangular, asymmetric face, long eyelashes, thin lips, and mild retrognathia. A coloboma is present in the left eye. b, Asymmetry of the legs (left leg larger). c, Mild ulnar deviation of digits 3, 4, and 5, ...

Patient 2

The patient was born after a spontaneous gemelli pregnancy. The twin sister is healthy. Because of IUGR of the patient, a cesarean section was performed at 35 wk and 6 d of pregnancy. The proband had a birth weight of 1,310 g (−2.4 SD) and a skull circumference of 32 cm (−0.8 SD). Length at age 2 wk was 38 cm (−6.5 SD). Pathologic examination showed dichorionic, diamniotic placentas. The placenta of the patient was smaller than the placenta of her healthy twin sister (1:2). DNA analysis confirmed dizygosity. Postpartum, features compatible with arthrogryposis multiplex congenita were present. The proband had ulnar deviation of the hands; flexion deformity of the fingers, especially on her right hand; and camptodactyly of the index finger. A luxation of the left hip, bilateral knee luxation, and bilateral pes equinovarus deformity were noted. In the first years, she had a severe failure to thrive. Partial nasogastric tube feeding was necessary until age 1 year and 9 mo. Mental development was normal.

Physical examination at age 4 years and 1 mo showed a height of 84.5 cm (−5 SD), a head circumference of 49.5 cm (−0.3 SD), and a weight of 9.6 kg (−2.4 SD for her length). She had facial features that suggested SRS. Two café-au-lait spots were present. Total hand length, leg length, and leg circumference were smaller on the right side than on the left side (fig. (fig.2d2d2f).

Cardiac evaluation showed two small ventricular septal defects. Metabolic studies were normal except for a temporary, isolated elevation of pipecolinic acid. An electromyography showed no abnormalities compatible with neuropathy.

Patient 3

The patient was born after a pregnancy of 39 wk and 3 d, with a birth weight of 1,780 g (−3.6 SD), a birth length of 40 cm (−5.5 SD), and a skull circumference of 33 cm (−2 SD). After birth, she underwent surgery because of ambiguous genitalia with a large clitoris. In the first weeks, she was fed partially by nasogastric tube. At age 14 years, her development is completely normal. Because of absence of breast development and hypergonadotropic hypogonadism, magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen was performed and showed absence of ovaries and a hypoplastic uterus. She has been treated with growth hormone; her height is currently 1.60 m.

Physical examination at age 2 years showed a slender girl with a height of 77 cm (−3.3 SD), head circumference of 47.5 cm (−0.3 SD), and a weight of 8,050 g (−2.6 SD for her length). She had facial characteristics of SRS. There was asymmetry of the body (left side larger). Physical examination at age 14 years was not allowed.

Patient 4

Patient 4 was born after a pregnancy of 41 wk, with a birth weight of 1,800 g (−4.2 SD), a birth length of 42 cm (−5 SD), and a skull circumference of 34 cm (−1 SD). He had ambiguous genitalia consisting of severe periscrotal hypospadias and a small introitus. An atrial septal defect was detected. Hepatosplenomegaly and a conjugated hyperbilirubinemia with progressive liver function disturbance was present. Liver biopsy at age 3.5 mo showed nonspecific fibrosis and ductular proliferation. The patient had a severe failure to thrive. Nasogastric tube feeding was necessary. He died at age 7 mo, probably as a result of an influenza pneumoniae.

Physical examination shortly after birth showed several dysmorphic features suggestive of SRS (fig. 2g). Metabolic and endocrine investigations showed no abnormalities. Obduction showed mild asymmetry of the arms and legs (left side larger), severe liver cirrhosis without biliary atresia, and fibrous material in the pericardiac sac.

Patient 5

Patient 5 was born after a pregnancy of 39 wk and 2 d, with a birth weight of 2,260 g (−2.5 SD) and a birth length of 47.5 cm (−1.75 SD). Skull circumference was 32.2 cm (−2.2 SD). No feeding problems were present in the neonatal period. Psychomotor development was normal. At age 10 years, she was referred to the orthopedic surgeon because of leg length discrepancy and asymmetry of the arms (right side larger). No clinical features of SRS were present.

Patient 6

The parents of patient 6 are of Turkish descent. The patient was born after a pregnancy of 41 wk and 3 d, with a birth weight of 2,800 g (−1.8 SD) and a birth length of 50 cm (−1 SD). Skull circumference was 35.5 cm (+0.4 SD). Feeding problems started at age ~4 mo, when she often refused fluids. At age 8 years, she was referred to the Department of Medical Genetics because of growth retardation in combination with discrepancy of leg length and circumference (left side larger). Mental development was normal.

Physical examination at age 8 years showed a height of 119.2 cm (−2 SD according to the growth curve for Turkish children). Head circumference was 51 cm (−0.5 SD). No facial abnormalities were present except a slightly narrow face with thin lips. She had three small café-au-lait spots.

Patient 7

This patient was born after a pregnancy of 41 wk and 3 d, complicated with a beginning HELLP syndrome (hemolysis, elevated liver enzyme levels, and a low platelet count), which prompted inducing labor. She had a birth weight of 2,560 g (−2 SD). Birth length was 46 cm (−3 SD). The neonatal period was uneventful. At age 7 wk, her occipital-frontal circumference was 38.3 cm (0 SD). Asymmetry was noticed from birth and involved limbs and face, which clinically looked more like a rightsided hemihypotrophy than hemihypertrophy. At age 1 year, her height was 72 cm (−1.5 SD), and, at age 4 years and 9 mo, it was 109 cm (0 to −1 SD). Apart from bilateral fifth finger clinodactyly, no SRS-like features were present. The right hand showed a variant simian crease. Otherwise, she is a healthy young girl of mixed Dutch-Angolese descent. Her mental and motor development has been completely normal. Methylation studies were performed for this patient because of body asymmetry.

Patient 8

This patient was born after a pregnancy of 38 wk, with a birth weight of 1,500 g (−3.4 SD). Information about his birth length and skull circumference was not available. An asymmetry (left side larger) of the body was present. Since age 23 years, he has suffered from progressive muscle weakness in his right arm. At age 38 years, he developed insulin-dependent diabetes. Recently, it was discovered that his creatine kinase (CK) is elevated (1,264 U); the explanation of the elevated levels is still unknown. Intelligence is normal. Height currently is 1.70 m. He has no dysmorphic features suggestive of SRS.

Patient 9

This pregnancy was achieved after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. The patient was born after a pregnancy of 40 wk and 3 d, with a birth weight of 2,500 g (−2 SD) and a birth length of 49 cm (−1 SD). No feeding problems were present in the neonatal period. Shortly after birth, a leg length discrepancy of 3 cm was noted (right leg larger). Height was 90.5 cm at age 3 years and 3 mo (−2.2 SD). Physical examination showed mild dysmorphic features (fig. (fig.2h2h2j). Her mental development has been normal.

For patients 1 and 3, a diagnosis of SRS was made. For patients 2 and 4, the clinical features were suggestive of SRS; however, the additional features of severe arthrogryposis multiplex congenital and liver cirrhosis have not been described before in patients with SRS. In the remaining patients, the diagnosis of SRS could not be made.

Chromosome analysis was performed for patients 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 9 and showed a normal karyotype. Comparative genome hybridization was performed for patient 2 and patient 4, and no abnormalities were detected.


Methylation Studies

Methylation studies of the H19 gene on chromosome 11p15 are routinely performed in our laboratory as part of a diagnostic test for BWS (Bliek et al. 2001). We noticed that, in seven patients with asymmetry, the H19 promoter was hypomethylated rather than hypermethylated (fig. 1b, patients 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9). All seven patients also exhibited IUGR or postnatal growth retardation (table 1 and fig. 2). This suggested to us that the asymmetry in the patients could be due to hemihypotrophy rather than hemihypertrophy. In addition, patients 2 and 4 had an SRS-like phenotype (table 1). Therefore, we examined patients 1 and 3 and one additional patient, whose diagnoses were clearly SRS, according to the criteria of Price et al. (1999). Among these patients, patients 1 and 3 had a complete hypomethylation of the H19 gene (fig. 1). The third patient with SRS had no methylation defect.

Table 1
Clinical Features of Patients with Hypomethylation of H19[Note]

UPD Analyses

Hypermethylation of H19 is often seen in patients with BWS in conjunction with hypomethylation of the imprinted KCNQ1OT1 gene, as a result of a UPD, mostly in a mosaic form (Bliek et al. 2001). All H19 hypomethylated patients had a normal methylation pattern at the KCNQ1OT1 locus (fig. 1), so we exclude mUPD of a large part of chromosome 11p15 as an explanation for the methylation defects seen in these patients. To further exclude a small mUPD around the H19 gene, we analyzed a series of polymorphic markers in this region (fig. 3 and table 2). In all patients, biallelic signals with normal intensity were found, excluding uniparental isodisomy in all cases. For patients 1, 2, 3, 6, and 7, parents were available and uniparental heterodisomy could be excluded. Additionally, we found no evidence of UPD-7 in any of our patients (table 2). We conclude that UPD around H19 is not the mechanism that leads to the H19 hypomethylation in our patient group.

Figure  3
a, Chromosomal order (given in megabases, from the telomere of the short arm) of chromosome 7 markers used for UPD screening. b, Chromosomal order (given in megabases, from the telomere of the short arm) of chromosome 11 markers used for UPD screening. ...
Table 2
UPD Screening Results[Note]

Deletion Studies

Sparago et al. (2004) and Prawitt et al. (2005) demonstrated that maternal inheritance of small deletions (2–3 kb) at the H19 DMR could cause hypermethylation of H19 in patients with BWS. In our patient group, we could exclude the existence of such deletions (fig. 1); therefore, it is unlikely that paternal inheritance of an H19 DMR deletion would prevent methylation of this locus during spermatogenesis and so cause the hypomethylation defects observed in our patients.

Sequence Analyses of the CTCF-Binding Sites

Imprinted expression of the H19/IGF2 locus depends on a DMR that acts both as a maternal-specific, methylation-sensitive insulator and as a paternal-specific site of hypermethylation (Bell and Felsenfeld 2000). In humans, seven repeats in DMR bind the CTCF-binding factor on the hypomethylated maternal allele and have been proposed as attracting methylation on the paternal allele (Bell and Felsenfeld 2000). Binding of CTCF to the DMR mediates the insulator function of this region and controls the reciprocal expression of the H19 and IGF2 genes in both mouse and human. Engel and coworkers (2004) introduced point mutations into the mouse DMR to deplete the repeats of CpGs while retaining ctcf binding and enhancer blocking activity. Maternal inheritance of the mutations left h19 and Igf2 expression intact, consistent with the idea that the DMR acts as an insulator. Conversely, paternal inheritance of these mutations disrupted maintenance of DMR methylation, resulting in biallelic h19 expression. Furthermore, an insulator was established on the paternally inherited mutated allele in vivo, which reduced Igf2 expression and resulted in a 40% reduction in size of newborn offspring. Additionally, Sparago et al. (2004) and Gicquel et al. (2005) demonstrated aberrant methylation of CTCF binding sites in patients with BWS or SRS, suggesting that mutations in the DMR repeats could account for the loss of methylation in the H19 region in our patients. We therefore sequenced the DMR repeat in our patients and found all were normal (table 3).

Table 3
Sequence of the CTCF-Binding Sites in Patients 1–9[Note]


It is striking that two patients with SRS have complete hypomethylation of the H19 region and that the two patients with SRS-like features have lower methylation indexes in blood tissue compared with the patients with asymmetry and growth retardation without additional SRS features. In the study by Gicquel et al. (2005), a correlation between the degree of hypomethylation in patients with SRS and the severity of the phenotype is also present, but no case of complete demethylation was reported. The complete demethylation of the patients with SRS in our studies suggests lack of somatic mosaicism, at least in major parts of the fetus, and suggests that it may have occurred prefertilization. We suggest that the severity of the phenotype may be a result of the tissues that are affected and how that tissue is influenced by a change in methylation. In addition, the possibility exists that normal cells would have a growth advantage relative to H19 hypomethylated cells in a time- and tissue-dependent manner and generate tissues with apparent varying proportions of H19 hypomethylation. Under this hypothesis, placental hypomethylation of H19 might be responsible for decreased placenta size and hence decreased body size of the fetus, as seen in the twin described in this study. In placentas of sporadic IUGR, downregulation of IGF2 and other paternally imprinted genes, in conjunction with upregulation of maternally imprinted genes, has been described by McMinn et al. (2005). Interestingly, one of these upregulated imprinted genes was the MEST gene (MIM 601029), localized to the SRS region of chromosome 7.

In contrast to patients with SRS, there seems to be no correlation between the degree of mosaicism and the severity of the clinical features of patients with BWS and hemihypertrophy (J.B., unpublished material).

In the present study, every patient with hypomethylation of the H19 locus had prenatal and/or postnatal growth retardation and asymmetry, an observation also made, with the exception of one individual who lacked asymmetry, by Gicquel et al. (2005). Therefore, hypo- or hypermethylation of the H19 region is not necessarily associated with asymmetry in SRS or BWS. In patients of both studies, feeding problems were often present. Besides features that can be present in SRS, additional features were seen (table 1) that have not been previously described in the syndrome, including iris coloboma, structural heart malformations, arthrogryposis multiplex congenita, absent ovaries, hypoplastic uterus, and hepatomegaly (cirrhosis). The birth prevalence of iris coloboma is ~1 in 10,000 births (EUROCAT), and it is possible that this is a chance occurrence.

The birth prevalences of ventrical septal defect and atrial septal defect are 26 in 10,000 and 11 in 10,000, respectively (EUROCAT). Two of our patients have a ventrical septal defect, and one had an atrial septal defect, and it is possible that, compared with the general population, patients with H19 hypomethylation have a higher risk for these heart defects.

Over 20% of patients with SRS have generalized camptodactyly, many with signs of distal arthrogryposis (Price et al. 1999). Physical examination clearly showed bilateral ulnar deviation of the third, fourth, and fifth fingers in patient 1 and arthrogryposis in patient 2, and it is possible that these features also belong to the anomalies caused by H19 hypomethylation, with arthrogryposis multiplex congenita as the most severe end of the spectrum. Genital anomalies are common in male patients with SRS, often cryptorchism, sometimes hypospadias or ambiguous genitalia (Price et al. 1999); Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome (MIM 277000) has been reported in a female with SRS with ectopic localization of the ovaries and primary amenorrhea of adrenal origin (Bellver-Pradas et al. 2001) and in another female with a bicornuate uterus (Price et al. 1999). Elevated urinary gonadotropins were described in the first reported patients with SRS and also in later reports (Silver et al. 1953; Curi et al. 1967). We suggest that at least some females with hypomethylation of the H19 locus do have uterus anomalies and/or ovarian insufficiency. The cause of hepatomegaly and cirrhosis in patient 4 remains unknown. Cholestasis and cirrhosis are sometimes seen in infants with total parenteral feeding; however, patient 4 was largely fed by nasogastric tube. It seems logical that the generalized growth defects seen in the patients described in this study are due to the methylation defect at 11p15, but no data are available from the literature that hypomethylation of H19 also accounts for other SRS or non-SRS features. Some of these features might very well occur by chance.

Unlike the present study, Gicquel et al. (2005) selected their patients on the basis of the SRS diagnosis. This explains the more frequent occurrence of facial abnormalities in their study. In the study reported here, patients were selected on the basis of asymmetry and growth retardation, and we have show that the H19 hypomethylation found in SRS can also be found in patients with asymmetry and pre- and/or postnatal growth retardation only. In seven of the nine patients, asymmetry was with the left side larger; whether this is a chance occurrence remains unknown. In previous reports (Price et al. 1999; Gicquel et al. 2005), the sidedness of the asymmetry was not mentioned.

SRS has been described elsewhere in MZ twins, all of them discordant for the SRS phenotype (Samn et al. 1990; Bailey et al. 1995). A preponderance of female MZ twins among patients with BWS has been described (Weksberg et al. 2002), with the twins being discordant for the imprinting defect at the KCNQ1OT1 locus. Weksberg et al. (2002) further suggested that it is possible that unequal splitting of the inner cell mass during twinning leads to differential maintenance of imprinting of the H19 locus, and we suggest that a similar mechanism might apply in SRS. However, data on the methylation status of H19 in discordant MZ SRS twins are not yet available.

DeBaun et al. (2003) found increased prevalence of assisted reproductive technology (ART) (4.6%) in mothers of patients with BWS compared with the control population (0.8%). It has been suggested that different factors—for example ART embryo culture conditions or the treatment for infertility—could theoretically have an effect on epigenetic alterations (Maher 2005), and there is an increased incidence of IUGR in children conceived by ART (Schieve et al. 2002). Recently, two cases of SRS after ART were reported (Källén et al. 2005; Svensson et al. 2005). Patient 9 in our series is the third reported patient. Since H19 hypomethylation is seen not only in patients with classic SRS but also in patients with growth retardation and asymmetry, it seems wise to perform methylation studies of the H19 locus in patients conceived by ART who have growth retardation of unknown cause.

Mulibrey nanism (muscle-liver-brain-eye [MIM 253250]) has several features that overlap with SRS—for example, pre- and postnatal growth retardation, triangular face, frontal bossing, and asymmetry. Some features—like pericarditis, yellow dots in the fundi, fibrous dysplasia of long bones, and hepatomegaly—do not occur in SRS. About 4% of patients with Mulibrey nanism develop Wilms tumor (Karlberg et al. 2004a). Recently, hypergonadotropic premature ovarian failure with incomplete breast development was described in Mulibrey nanism (Karlberg et al. 2004b). Homozygous mutations in the TRIM37 gene (MIM 605073) that are localized close to an SRS translocation on chromosome 17q23-q24 give rise to Mulibrey nanism (Avela et al. 2000). Because patient 4 has some severe features of SRS in combination with hepatomegaly, which can be present in Mulibrey nanism, one can hypothesize that both disorders are part of the same genetic pathway.

A remaining question is whether patients with hypomethylation of the H19 locus should be screened for intra-abdominal embryonal tumors by ultrasound screening. Although it is not to be expected that overexpression of H19, a tumor-suppressor gene, and subsequent reduction of IGF2 expression would lead to tumor development, hypomethylation of H19 has been found in human bladder cancer (Takai et al. 2001). In addition, tumors have been described in association with SRS. Testicular cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, testicular seminoma, craniopharyngoma, and Wilms tumor have been reported in patients with SRS (Chitayat et al. 1988; Dang et al. 2004) but are rare. However, neither our patients nor those reported by Gicquel et al. (2005) developed tumors.

In conclusion, we believe it is appropriate to perform methylation studies of the H19 locus in all patients with short stature and asymmetry, full SRS, or SR-like syndrome, especially when these are accompanied by feeding problems. Ultrasound screening has a great impact on the patients and their parents. In our opinion, it is not justified to continue ultrasound screening for embryonal tumors conform the BWS protocol in SRS or SRS-like patients with hypomethylation of the H19 locus.


We thank Karin van der Lip and Sebastiaan de Leng, for excellent technical assistance, and the physicians who referred their patients to our clinic. We are grateful for the willingness of the patients and their parents to contribute to this study. We are most grateful to Prof. Dr. P. F. R. Little for critically reading the manuscript. This work was supported by Netherlands Organization of Scientific Research grant 901-04-208.

Web Resources

The URLs for data presented herein are as follows:

National Center for Biotechnology Information, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Omim/ (for SRS, BWS, H19, IGF2, KCNQ1OT1, MEST, Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome, Mulibrey nanism, and TRIM37)


Al-Fifi S, Teebi AS, Shevell M (1996) Autosomal dominant Russell-Silver syndrome. Am J Med Genet 61:96–97 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]10.1002/ajmg.1320610108
Avela K, Lipsanen-Nyman M, Idanheimo N, Seemanova E, Rosengren S, Makela TP, Perheentupa J, Chapelle AD, Lehesjoki AE (2000) Gene encoding a new RING-B-box-coiled-coil protein is mutated in Mulibrey nanism. Nat Genet 25:298–301 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]10.1038/77053
Bailey W, Popovich B, Jones KL (1995) Monozygotic twins discordant for the Russell-Silver syndrome. Am J Med Genet 58:101–105 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]10.1002/ajmg.1320580202
Bell AC, Felsenfeld G (2000) Methylation of a CTCF-dependent boundary controls imprinted expression of the Igf2 gene. Nature 405:482–485 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]10.1038/35013100
Bellver-Pradas J, Cervera-Sanchez J, Boldo-Roda A, Martin-Cortes A, Ferreres-Gomez L, Serra-Serra V, Romeu-Sarrio A (2001) Silver-Russell syndrome associated to Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome, diabetes and hirsutism. Arch Gynecol Obstet 265:155–157 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]10.1007/s004040100172
Bliek J, Maas SM, Ruijter JM, Hennekam RC, Alders M, Westerveld A, Mannens MM (2001) Increased tumour risk for BWS patients correlates with aberrant H19 and not KCNQ1OT1 methylation: occurrence of KCNQ1OT1 hypomethylation in familial cases of BWS. Hum Mol Genet 10:467–476 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]10.1093/hmg/10.5.467
Chitayat D, Friedman JM, Anderson L, Dimmick JE (1988) Hepatocellular carcinoma in a child with familial Russell-Silver syndrome. Am J Med Genet 31:909–914 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]10.1002/ajmg.1320310425
Christensen MF, Nielsen J (1978) Deletion short arm 18 and Silver-Russell syndrome. Acta Paediatr Scand 67:101–103 [PubMed]
Curi JF, Vanucci RC, Grossman H, New M (1967) Elevated serum gonadotrophins in Silver’s syndrome. Am J Dis Child 114:658–661 [PubMed]
Dang YN, Shin IC, Gordon RA, Karcioglu ZA (2004) Bilateral reactive lymphoid hyperplasia of the orbit in a child with Russell-Silver syndrome. J AAPOS 8:588–591 [PubMed]
DeBaun MR, Niemitz EL, Feinberg AP (2003) Association of in vitro fertilization with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and epigenetic alterations of LIT1 and H19. Am J Hum Genet 72:156–160 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
DeBaun MR, Niemitz EL, McNeil DE, Brandenburg SA, Lee MP, Feinberg AP (2002) Epigenetic alterations of H19 and LIT1 distinguish patients with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome with cancer and birth defects. Am J Hum Genet 70:604–611 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Dorr S, Midro AT, Farber C, Giannakudis J, Hansmann I (2001) Construction of a detailed physical and transcript map of the candidate region for Russell-Silver syndrome on chromosome 17q23-q24. Genomics 71:174–181 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]10.1006/geno.2000.6413
Duncan PA, Hall JG, Shapiro LR, Vibert BK (1990) Three-generation dominant transmission of the Silver-Russell syndrome. Am J Med Genet 35:245–250 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]10.1002/ajmg.1320350220
Eggermann T, Eggermann K, Mergenthaler S, Kuner R, Kaiser P, Ranke MB, Wollmann HA (1998) Paternally inherited deletion of CSH1 in a patient with Silver-Russell syndrome. J Med Genet 35:784–786 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Eggermann T, Meyer E, Obermann C, Heil I, Schuler H, Ranke MB, Eggermann K, Wollmann HA (2005) Is maternal duplication of 11p15 associated with Silver-Russell syndrome? J Med Genet 42:e26 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]10.1136/jmg.2004.028936
Engel N, West AG, Felsenfeld G, Bartolomei MS (2004) Antagonism between DNA hypermethylation and enhancer-blocking activity at the H19 DMD is uncovered by CpG mutations. Nat Genet 36:883–888 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]10.1038/ng1399
Fisher AM, Thomas NS, Cockwell A, Stecko O, Kerr B, Temple IK, Clayton P (2002) Duplications of chromosome 11p15 of maternal origin result in a phenotype that includes growth retardation. Hum Genet 111:290–296 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]10.1007/s00439-002-0787-2
Gicquel C, Rossignol S, Cabrol S, Houang M, Steunou V, Barbu V, Danton F, Thibaud N, Le MM, Burglen L, Bertrand AM, Netchine I, Le BY (2005) Epimutation of the telomeric imprinting center region on chromosome 11p15 in Silver-Russell syndrome. Nat Genet 37:1003–1007 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]10.1038/ng1629
Hannula K, Lipsanen-Nyman M, Kontiokari T, Kere J (2001) A narrow segment of maternal uniparental disomy of chromosome 7q31-qter in Silver-Russell syndrome delimits a candidate gene region. Am J Hum Genet 68:247–253 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Källén B, Finnström O, Nygren KG, Olausson PO (2005) In vitro fertilization (IVF) in Sweden: risk for congenital malformations after different IVF methods. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 73:162–169 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]10.1002/bdra.20107
Karlberg N, Jalanko H, Perheentupa J, Lipsanen-Nyman M (2004a) Mulibrey nanism: clinical features and diagnostic criteria. J Med Genet 41:92–98 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]10.1136/jmg.2003.014118
Karlberg S, Tiitinen A, Lipsanen-Nyman M (2004b) Failure of sexual maturation in Mulibrey nanism. N Engl J Med 351:2559–2560 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]10.1056/NEJM200412093512423
Maher ER (2005) Imprinting and assisted reproductive technology. Hum Mol Genet Spec 14:R133–R138 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]10.1093/hmg/ddi107
McMinn J, Wei M, Schupf N, Cusmai J, Johnson EB, Smith AC, Weksberg R, Thaker HM, Tycko B (2005) Unbalanced placental expression of imprinted genes in human intrauterine growth restriction. Placenta (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6WPD-4GY893H-2&_coverDate=08%2F24%2F2005&_alid=367534473&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_qd=1&_cdi=6988&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000001358&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=5745&md5=cb441b9679541ac3b7fc7232f578d2c3) (electronically published August 24, 2005; accessed February 17, 2006) [PubMed]
Monk D, Bentley L, Hitchins M, Myler RA, Clayton-Smith J, Ismail S, Price SM, Preece MA, Stanier P, Moore GE (2002) Chromosome 7p disruptions in Silver Russell syndrome: delineating an imprinted candidate gene region. Hum Genet 111:376–387 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]10.1007/s00439-002-0777-4
Ounap K, Reimand T, Magi ML, Bartsch O (2004) Two sisters with Silver-Russell phenotype. Am J Med Genet A 131:301–306 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]10.1002/ajmg.a.30379
Prawitt D, Enklaar T, Gartner-Rupprecht B, Spangenberg C, Oswald M, Lausch E, Schmidtke P, Reutzel D, Fees S, Lucito R, Korzon M, Brozek I, Limon J, Housman DE, Pelletier J, Zabel B (2005) Microdeletion of target sites for insulator protein CTCF in a chromosome 11p15 imprinting center in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and Wilms’ tumor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:4085–4090 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]10.1073/pnas.0500037102
Price SM, Stanhope R, Garrett C, Preece MA, Trembath RC (1999) The spectrum of Silver-Russell syndrome: a clinical and molecular genetic study and new diagnostic criteria. J Med Genet 36:837–842 [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Ramirez-Duenas ML, Medina C, Ocampo-Campos R, Rivera H (1992) Severe Silver-Russell syndrome and translocation (17;20) (q25;q13). Clin Genet 41:51–53 [PubMed]
Rogan PK, Seip JR, Driscoll DJ, Papenhausen PR, Johnson VP, Raskin S, Woodward AL, Butler MG (1996) Distinct 15q genotypes in Russell-Silver and ring 15 syndromes. Am J Med Genet 62:10–15 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19960301)62:1<10::AID-AJMG3>3.0.CO;2-#
Russell A (1954) A syndrome of intra-uterine dwarfism recognizable at birth with cranio-facial dysostosis, disproportionately short arms, and other anomalies (5 examples). Proc R Soc Med 47:1040–1044 [PubMed]
Samn M, Lewis K, Blumberg B (1990) Monozygotic twins discordant for the Russell-Silver syndrome. Am J Med Genet 37:543–545 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]10.1002/ajmg.1320370424
Silver HK, Kiyasu W, George J, Beamer WC (1953) Syndrome of congenital hemihypertrophy, shortness of stature, and elevated urinary gonadotropins. Pediatrics 12:368–376 [PubMed]
Schieve LA, Meikle SF, Ferre C, Peterson HB, Jeng G, Wilcox LS (2002) Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology. N Engl J Med 346:731–737 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]10.1056/NEJMoa010806
Sparago A, Cerrato F, Vernucci M, Ferrero GB, Silengo MC, Riccio A (2004) Microdeletions in the human H19 DMR result in loss of IGF2 imprinting and Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. Nat Genet 36:958–960 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]10.1038/ng1410
Svensson J, Björnståhl A, Ivarsson SA (2005) Increased risk of Silver-Russell syndrome after in vitro fertilization? Acta Paediatr 94:1163–1165 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]10.1080/08035250510030125
Takai D, Gonzales FA, Tsai YC, Thayer MJ, Jones PA (2001) Large scale mapping of methylcytosines in CTCF-binding sites in the human H19 promoter and aberrant hypomethylation in human bladder cancer. Hum Mol Genet 10:2619–2626 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]10.1093/hmg/10.23.2619
Teebi AS (1992) Autosomal recessive Silver-Russell syndrome. Clin Dysmorphol 1:151–156 [PubMed]
van Haelst MM, Eussen HJ, Visscher F, de Ruijter JL, Drop SL, Lindhout D, Wouters CH, Govaerts LC (2002) Silver-Russell phenotype in a patient with pure trisomy 1q32.1-q42.1: further delineation of the pure 1q trisomy syndrome. J Med Genet 39:582–585 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Cross Ref]10.1136/jmg.39.8.582
Weksberg R, Shuman C, Caluseriu O, Smith AC, Fei YL, Nishikawa J, Stockley TL, Best L, Chitayat D, Olney A, Ives E, Schneider A, Bestor TH, Li M, Sadowski P, Squire J (2002) Discordant KCNQ1OT1 imprinting in sets of monozygotic twins discordant for Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. Hum Mol Genet 11:1317–1325 [PubMed] [Cross Ref]10.1093/hmg/11.11.1317

Articles from American Journal of Human Genetics are provided here courtesy of American Society of Human Genetics
PubReader format: click here to try


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


  • MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...