pmc logo image
Logo of jeabehavJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Web SiteSubscriber LoginJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis Web SiteSubscription InformationInformation for AuthorsJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Web SiteJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Web Site

Formats:

J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 January; 6(1): 1–27.
doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-1.
PMCID: PMC1404228
Discrimination learning with and without “errors”1
H. S. Terrace
1This paper is based on a portion of a dissertation submitted to the Department of Psychology, Harvard University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree. The research was supported by NSF grant G8621 and was conducted while the author was a PHS pre-doctoral fellow.
Abstract
Responses to S− (“errors”) are not a necessary condition for the formation of an operant discrimination of color. Errors do not occur if discrimination training begins early in conditioning and if S+ and S− initially differ with respect to brightness, duration and wavelength. After training starts, S−'s duration and brightness is progressively increased until S+ and S− differ only with respect to wavelength. Errors do occur if training starts after much conditioning in the presence of S+ has occurred or if S+ and S− differ only with respect to wavelength throughout training. Performance following discrimination learning without errors lacks three characteristics that are found following learning with errors. Only those birds that learned the discrimination with errors showed (1) “emotional” responses in the presence of S−, (2) an increase in the rate (or a decrease in the latency) of its response to S+, and (3) occasional bursts of responses to S−.
Full text
Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (3.3M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • BLOUGH DS. Generalization and preference on a stimulus-intensity continuum. J Exp Anal Behav. 1959 Oct;2:307–317. [PubMed]
  • FERSTER CB. Withdrawal of positive reinforcement as punishment. Science. 1957 Sep 13;126(3272):509–509. [PubMed]
  • GUTTMAN N, KALISH HI. Discriminability and stimulus generalization. J Exp Psychol. 1956 Jan;51(1):79–88. [PubMed]
  • HANSON HM. Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization. J Exp Psychol. 1959 Nov;58:321–334. [PubMed]
  • HULL CL. Simple qualitative discrimination learning. Psychol Rev. 1950 Sep;57(5):303–313. [PubMed]
  • JENKINS HM, HARRISON RH. Effect of discrimination training on auditory generalization. J Exp Psychol. 1960 Apr;59:246–253. [PubMed]
  • JENKINS HM. The effect of discrimination training on extinction. J Exp Psychol. 1961 Feb;61:111–121. [PubMed]
  • LAWRENCE DH. The transfer of a discrimination along a continuum. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1952 Dec;45(6):511–516. [PubMed]
  • MARGOLIUS G. Stimulus generalization of an instrumental response as a function of the number of reinforced trials. J Exp Psychol. 1955 Feb;49(2):105–111. [PubMed]
  • PIERREL R, SHERMAN JG. Generalization and discrimination as a function of the S-D-S delta intensity difference. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Jan;5:67–71. [PubMed]
  • REID RL. Discrimination-reversal learning in pigeons. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1958 Dec;51(6):716–720. [PubMed]
  • REYNOLDS GS. Behavioral contrast. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jan;4:57–71. [PubMed]
  • SPIKER CC. Effects of stimulus similarity on discrimination learning. J Exp Psychol. 1956 Jun;51(6):393–395. [PubMed]