Logo of jcmPermissionsJournals.ASM.orgJournalJCM ArticleJournal InfoAuthorsReviewers
J Clin Microbiol. 2002 Nov; 40(11): 4191–4196.
PMCID: PMC139659

Novel Allelic Variants of Mycobacteria Isolated in Brazil as Determined by PCR-Restriction Enzyme Analysis of hsp65


Human isolates of Mycobacterium collected in 16 different states of Brazil were submitted to PCR-restriction analysis (PRA) of a 439-bp fragment of the hsp65 gene with HaeIII and BstEII. Fourteen allelic variants not described in clinical isolates so far were observed among 36 (10%) of 356 Brazilian strains, including a new pattern for Mycobacterium scrofulaceum, M. intracellulare, and M. flavescens, two new patterns for M. fortuitum, three new patterns each for M. gordonae and M. terrae, and one new pattern for M. avium complex-like strains. Two unidentified strains each also presented a new pattern, strongly suggesting that Mycobacterium genotypes are distributed biogeographically. The PRA procedure was also performed with 43 reference isolates belonging to 34 species, adding a further six new patterns to the identification algorithm. A database containing the normalized restriction patterns of both enzymes was constructed. Patterns available on the Internet can be introduced into this database, which will make possible the comparison of genotypes from isolates from different parts of the world.

Identification of mycobacteria to the species level is relevant for patient management and is traditionally performed by evaluation of the morphological and biochemical characteristics of the organism. This is, however, a time-consuming and laborious process, and accurate identification is often not possible due to the increasing number of Mycobacterium species with overlapping phenotypic characteristics (20). During the last decade, nucleic acid sequence-based identification procedures have been developed, and commercially available systems such as Accuprobe (Gen-Probe, San Diego, Calif.) and INNO LiPA Mycobacterium (Innogenetics NV, Ghent, Belgium) are important new acquisitions for the diagnostic laboratory but characterize a limited number of species (13, 19).

Restriction enzyme analysis of Mycobacterium-specific PCR products generates mostly species-specific DNA patterns, and one approach, analysis of part of the hsp65 gene by PCR-restriction analysis (PRA) (23), has been used for diagnosis (6, 23), taxonomic evaluations (15), and characterization of isolates with novel characteristics (12, 14). Originally, a PRA identification algorithm for 24 different Mycobacterium species was developed (23), and this was very recently expanded to 54 different species (2). In earlier studies with Mycobacterium strains isolated in Brazil, five undescribed hsp65 patterns—three for Mycobacterium avium (11, 14), one for M. fortuitum, and one for M. gordonae (4)—were observed. Because those studies mainly concentrated on strains from Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo and geography-related variability in genotypes has been reported (5, 12), we analyzed a large number of strains from different states of Brazil.

Due to the growing number of hsp65 alleles being described in the literature, visual interpretation is becoming more cumbersome and the use of computer-assisted pattern recognition for identification of a limited number of slowly growing Mycobacterium species had already been suggested in 1992 (16). At that time, however, no sophisticated software for pattern recognition was available, and although more recently a PRA database was presented for clinically significant actinomycetes, the genotypes of only nonpigmented rapidly growing mycobacteria were included (25). We therefore constructed a database with the BstEII and HaeIII patterns obtained for clinical and reference isolates with GelCompar software (Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium).


Culture of Mycobacterium strains and DNA extraction.

The Mycobacterium reference strains used in this study are listed in Table Table1.1. Clinical isolates from humans were obtained from the National Reference Center for Tuberculosis or from the Hospital Clementin Fraga Filho, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. As demonstrated in Fig. Fig.1,1, the 358 isolates were obtained from 16 different states from Brazil's five main regions (the number of strains isolated and the state populations as a proportion of the national population are given in parentheses), as follows: from the northern region, Amazonas (1 strain; 1.6% of the national population) and Pará (2 strains; 3.6%); from the central-east region, Distrito Federal (19; 1.2%), Goiás (3 strains; 2.9%), and Mato Grosso do Sul (3 strains; 1.2%); from the northeast region, Alagoas (2 strains; 1.6%), Bahia (13 strains; 7.6%), Ceará (2 strains; 4.4%), Pernambuco (3 strains; 4.6%), and Rio Grande do Norte (2 strains; 1.6%); from the southeast region, Espírito Santo (5 strains; 1.8%), Minas Gerais (6 strains; 10.5%), Rio de Janeiro (223 strains; 8.5%), and São Paulo (36 strains; 21.8%); and from the southern region, Rio Grande do Sul (11 strains; 5.9%) and Santa Catarina (5 strains; 3.2%); 21 strains were of unknown origin.

FIG. 1.
Political map of Brazil showing the states where mycobacterial strains were isolated. Northern region, Amazonas (AM) and Pará (PA); central-east region, Distrito Federal (DF), Goiás (GO), and Mato Grosso do Sul (MS); northeast region, ...
PRA patterns observed in 356 clinical mycobacterial isolates

Identification of mycobacterial isolates by conventional or commercially available methods.

All clinical isolates had been submitted to conventional identification procedures as described by Kent and Kubica (9). Some Mycobacterium samples that could not be identified by conventional testing were sent to Specialty Laboratories (Santa Monica, Calif.) for analysis of mycolic acids with a Beckman System Gold high-pressure liquid chromatography instrument and pattern recognition with Infometrix Pirouette software. A small number of strains were identified by the INNO LiPA Mycobacterium assay (Innogenetics NV, Zwijnaarde, Belgium) or were submitted to sequencing of the 16S-23S internal transcribed spacer region.

DNA extraction, PCR, and restriction enzyme analysis.

High-quality DNA from Mycobacterium reference cultures was prepared as described earlier (18), while the extraction of nucleic acid from clinical isolates was performed by submitting 50 μl of a liquid culture or a loopful of a Mycobacterium mass from solid cultures to three cycles of freezing-boiling (5 min at −70°C and 10 min at 100°C) in 0.5 ml of 10 mM Tris-HCl-1 mM EDTA-1% Triton X-100. PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis was performed as described earlier (4). In summary, 10 ng of purified mycobacterium DNA or 2 μl of frozen-boiled material was added to a 50-μl PCR mixture containing 50 mM KCl (pH 8.3), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 10% glycerol, 200 μM each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 0.5 μM each primer Tb11 and Tb12 (24), and 1.25 U of Taq polymerase. Amplification consisted of 45 cycles of 1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 65°C, and 1 min at 72°C, followed by a final extension step at 72°C for 7 min. Fifteen microliters of amplified product was digested with 10 U of HaeIII or 6 U of BstEII under mineral oil. Analysis of the restriction enzyme products was done by gel electrophoresis on a 5% agarose with a 50- or 25-bp DNA ladder (Gibco BRL, Gaithersburg, Md.) as a molecular size marker.

Construction of PRA pattern database.

For evaluation of the influence of the electrophoresis matrix on DNA fragment size determination, restriction fragments of M. avium and M. tuberculosis were separated in 8% polyacrylamide and 4% Nusieve agarose-1% agarose (4:1; FMC BioProducts, Rockland, Maine), 5% agarose (Gibco BRL), 4% MS12 agarose (Hispanagar S. A., Burgos, Spain), or 3 or 4% MS8 agarose (Hispanagar). Molecular sizes, calculated from the band positions, were compared after they were normalized against pUC18, PBR322, and a 25-, 50-, or 100-bp ladder (Gibco BRL). Electrophoresis conditions were standardized to ensure reproducibility within and between gels. The photographs were scanned at 300 dots per inch, and the images were introduced into GelCompar software (version 4.2; Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium). Conversion and normalization were performed as described in the manufacturer's manual by using 700 dots as a working frame on the y axis, and similarity between restriction patterns was defined by using the Dice similarity coefficient. The position tolerance applied for correct identification of identical patterns was determined separately for each restriction enzyme and on pairs of patterns containing bands in different molecular size ranges. The reproducibility of the whole procedure was evaluated by comparing the restriction patterns for M. tuberculosis and M. avium applied in different gels against the database. The patterns were also compared with those present on the Internet (http://www.hospvd.ch:8005), after the images were downloaded as TIF files and converted and normalized with GelCompar software.


Identification patterns of clinical isolates.

Genetic patterns were obtained for 357 clinical isolates, including published and new patterns, and the pattern distribution is presented for each species in Table Table1.1. The clinical samples containing M. leprae had the pattern published by Rastogi et al. (17), confirming the lack of genetic variability in this species. Isolates of the M. tuberculosis complex, M. szulgai, M. triviale, and M. marinum, had PRA pattern as described by Telenti et al. (24). Among the strains of M. gordonae, the recently described pattern M. gordonae VII (4) was observed in a single strain, while three patterns that have so far been undescribed were observed in eight strains (42%). The first new pattern is identical to pattern M. gordonae III except for the presence of an extra HaeIII band of 60 bp, while the third new pattern is similar to pattern 8 present on the PRA website (http://www.hospvd.ch:8005) and to the pattern described by Brunello et al. (2), except that it lacks the bands of 70 and 55 bp. Among the strains identified as M. chelonae or M. abscessus, all were M. abscessus (6) and presented bands of 70 or 60 bp and 55 bp upon digestion with HaeIII. The largest group consisted of isolates belonging to the M. avium complex (MAC), including 170 strains (89%) of M. avium and 22 strains (11%) of M. intracellulare. Among the strains of M. avium, pattern M. avium I was observed in 75% of the strains, while a smaller fraction had the recently described patterns M. avium II (31 strains; 18.1%) and M. avium III (11 strains; 6.4%). Among the strains of M. intracellulare, half had pattern M. intracellulare I, while the other half had a new pattern that lacked the 60-bp band upon digestion with HaeIII. Among five strains of M. scrofulaceum, four (80%) had a new pattern. Among 10 strains that had initially been conventionally identified as MAC, 2 were characterized by PRA as having pattern M. lentiflavum I and 4 were identified as having pattern M. simiae I; 4 strains presented with unpublished patterns. When the conventional identification procedure was repeated for these strains, some characteristics were not consistent with those of MAC (positive Tween 80 test), and sequencing of the internal transcribed spacer of one of these strains demonstrated similarities of 96.8% with those of MAC-like strains, 94.3% with those of M. scrofulaceum strains, 90.4% with those of M. avium strains, and 89.9% with those of M. intracellulare strains (W. Mijs, personal communication); we therefore consider these strains MAC-like. Among the 11 strains of the M. fortuitum-M. peregrinum complex, 7 were M. fortuitum, including 3 strains with pattern M. fortuitum I (containing 60- and 55-bp fragments in the HaeIII digest), 3 strains with Brazilian pattern M. fortuitum III, which was observed previously (4), and 1 strain of M. fortuitum with a new pattern. Among the four strains of M. peregrinum, one had pattern M. peregrinum I with a band of 55 bp upon digestion with HaeIII, as described by Brunello et al. (2) and as present on the PRA website; one had pattern M. peregrinum II, as described by Devallois et al. (6) (pattern 235/205-140/120/100/60, also present on the website); and two had a new pattern identical to that of pattern M. peregrinum I except for the presence of a band of 60 bp instead of one of 55 bp. Among two strains of M. flavescens, one had a new pattern. The three strains characterized as M. terrae each had a different new pattern; the third pattern was almost identical to that obtained with our reference strain of M. chitae, except for a band in the 50- to 40-bp range. The pattern for M. chitae was identical to that present on the PRA website and recently published by Brunello et al. (2), but neither of those sources reported bands smaller than 50 bp. Finally, two strains that had been conventionally identified as MAC could not be characterized to the species level and had new patterns; reidentification by conventional procedures indicated that the phenotypic characteristics of the strains did not match those of any known species (data not shown).

Identification patterns of reference strains.

The genetic patterns for 44 reference isolates belonging to 35 different species were determined, as demonstrated in Table Table1.1. The identification patterns for species that had been published before (6, 23, 24) were mostly confirmed except for those for M. chelonae, M. flavescens, and M. xenopi type strains, which had an additional HaeIII band of 60 bp, and for M. fortuitum, which had two unreported bands of 60 and 55 bp. Brunello et al. (2) very recently published identification patterns for 54 mycobacterial species and calculated restriction fragment profiles after polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and sequencing analysis. In the present study, the molecular sizes interpolated after electrophoresis in agarose gels were very similar to those determined by Brunello et al. (2) after sequence analysis; and we confirmed their patterns for M. agri, M. aichiense, M. chitae, M. diernhoferi, M. obuense, M. rhodesiae, and M. thermoresistibile; M. smegmatis, however, had an HaeIII band of 145 bp both in our study and on the PRA website instead of the band of 154 bp reported by Brunello et al. (2). The PRA patterns that we obtained for M. aurum and M. tokaiense were different from those described by Brunello et al. (2) (Table (Table2),2), but the pattern for one of our M. aurum strains was identical to pattern M. aurum 2, available on the PRA website. We have no explanation for the fact that the second M. aurum isolate, apparently with the same American Type Culture Collection strain number, had a different pattern. We also determined restriction profiles for M. chelonae subsp. niacinogenes, M. chubuense, and M. komossense, species for which no identification patterns have been reported earlier (Table (Table22).

Restriction patterns of 43 reference isolates from 34 Mycobacterium species

Construction of a database.

Although the band position on the gel was particular to each gel matrix, no influence of gel composition on band position was observed after normalization against external molecular size markers (data not shown) and the type of molecular size markers had no influence on the final band position; the 25- and 50-bp ladders were, however, more practical for visual recognition of band position. Staining with ethidium bromide before, during, or after electrophoresis also had no influence on the final band position. For automated recognition of PRA patterns with GelCompar software, optimal tolerance positions of 1.5% for HaeIII fragments and 2% for BstEII fragments were adopted; the use of more stringent or more relaxed tolerance position settings resulted in a failure to notice identical patterns or the consideration of similar patterns as identical, respectively (data not shown). By use of these stringency conditions, the HaeIII and BstEII patterns for all M. tuberculosis (n = 15) and M. avium (n = 16) strains that had been applied on seven different gels were 100% identical to their respective patterns in the database (data not shown). Also, the restriction patterns for species present on the PRA website, when identical, were 100% identical to those present in the database (data not shown). The molecular sizes interpolated with GelCompar software were very similar to those deduced from sequencing analysis by Brunello et al. (2).

Upon comparison of the patterns obtained in this study, those published by Brunello et al. (2), and those available and downloaded from the PRA website, we found that 13 patterns either are shared (9 patterns) or have differences of only 5 to 10 bp (4 patterns) and could be considered identical by visual or automated evaluation (Table (Table33).

Species with identical or similar restriction patterns


Brazil has a vast territory of 8,547,404 km2, and a considerable part of the country has a warm and humid climate, conditions favorable for the growth of mycobacteria. A systematic study of mycobacteria from the environment and sputum samples performed in India, in which soil, dust, and water samples were analyzed, suggested a relation between the Mycobacterium species present in water samples and in the sputa of humans with symptoms of lung infection (8). Favorable environmental conditions permitting the existence of a large variety of environmental strains could be one of the reasons why 10% of the clinical isolates in this study had PRA patterns that have so far not been published. The distribution of genetic subtypes by biogeography has been described for species such as M. intracellulare (5), M. kansasii (1), M. simiae (11), and M. ulcerans (7). In the present study and in accordance with the work of Telenti et al. (24), we almost exclusively encountered the M. kansasii I genotype; this is in contrast to the findings from other studies (6, 15), in which a considerable part of the M. kansasii strains had other genotypes, probably because isolates came from different continents. Significant genetic variability has also been described for M. gordonae, and although M. gordonae I is the most frequent allele in most studies (23, 24), other genotypes such as M. gordonae III and a previously undescribed pattern occur more frequently in Brazil. Also, in contrast to studies performed in other countries (6, 22, 23, 25), no PRA patterns were observed for M. chelonae, showing that M. abscessus is mostly responsible for infections caused by organisms of the M. chelonae-M. abscessus complex in Brazil. Although several reports have indicated that M. chelonae is pathogenic, the present observation suggests the need for a comparison of the clinical significance of the two species. Recently published identification algorithms describe a single allelic form for M. scrofulaceum, but significant phenotypic and genetic variability has been described for this species (10). In our study, four of the five M. scrofulaceum strains tested had a new unique pattern, and although this pattern could be one of the patterns described by Khosravi et al. (10), the molecular sizes presented in their paper are different from the ones that we determined and a comparison is not possible; this demonstrates the necessity for standardization of the PRA identification procedure (4).

Among organisms belonging to MAC, the largest group analyzed in the present study, 75% of the M. avium strains had pattern M. avium I, while the rest had patterns that have so far been described only in Brazil: patterns M. avium II and M. avium III (11). This suggests that particular genetic subtypes of this species are circulating in the country, but because M. avium II differs from M. avium I only by the presence of a 60-bp band in the HaeIII digest, lack of consideration of this band could also be responsible for this genotype not having been observed in other studies. When the identification algorithm originally published by Telenti et al. (24) was compared with the most recent version of the identification algorithm (2) by using our present data, it was found that bands in the 55- to 70-bp range have been added, demonstrating observer-associated variability in pattern interpretation and, once more, the need for standardization of the methodology. Additionally, we have demonstrated here that patterns that differ only by the presence of a 60- and/or a 55-bp band coexist in species such as M. avium, M. intracellulare, M. gordonae, and M. peregrinum; and this could have phylogenetic importance.

An increase in the accuracy of identification to the species level by conventional identification by PRA was most pronounced for MAC strains, as 10% of MAC strains were neither M. avium nor M. intracellulare upon genotyping. This was partly due to misinterpretation of M. scrofulaceum, M. simiae, and M. lentiflavum as members of MAC, to the presence of MAC-like organisms, and to the presence of mixtures of MAC strains with other species. The presence of mixtures of MAC strains with other species was determined by the detection of mixed PRA patterns or during reidentification after contradictory results were obtained by both identification procedures (data not shown). Evaluation of PRA as an identification procedure in Brazil has been performed earlier by either commercial identification procedures (4) or conventional phenotypic identification (3) for comparison.

Because of the growing amount of reported PRA restriction patterns, a database containing DNA patterns was constructed by using GelCompar software. Plikaytis et al. (16) used computer-mediated identification of restriction fragments of clinically significant mycobacteria using a position tolerance of 0.6%, independent of the restriction enzyme; that tolerance was different from the position tolerances of 1.5 and 2% for HaeIII and BstEII, respectively, used in the present study. The former study, however, besides using restriction enzymes that generated DNA fragments in the 800- to 100-bp range that were separated on polyacrylamide gels, used internal size standards, and conversion and normalization were not fully automated. A more recent study on the semiautomated identification of aerobic Actinomyces isolates by PCR-restriction enzyme analysis gave no information on the stringency of analysis (25). Besides aiding in identification, we believe that the construction of databases permits, with the use of proper molecular size markers, the introduction of patterns that have been printed in the literature and that are available on the Internet, as verified by the use of patterns downloaded from the PRA website.

Although shared patterns between species have so far been reported only for M. gastri-M. kansasii and M. avium-M. paratuberculosis, with the introduction of foreign patterns (i.e., patterns not generated in our laboratory) into the database, more shared or almost identical patterns between species were observed, with the most striking example being the pattern shared by M. avium, M. intracellulare, M. simiae, M. intermedium, and M. interjectum. Unfortunately, no data on the correctness of the species determination before the introduction of patterns into the PRA website are available. If our observation is correct, the consequences of shared patterns on the use of PRA as a single identification procedure will depend on the frequency of occurrence of such genotypes in the region of interest, and the introduction of an additional identification procedure of either a conventional or a genetic nature will be necessary in these cases. Fortunately, several of the shared patterns have been observed in species that are not isolated frequently.


We thank Wouter Mijs (Innogenetics NV) for permission to use sequence information.

This study was partially supported by scholarships from FAPERJ, CNPq, PRONEX 661028/1998-4, and INCO-DEV Concerted Action Project ICA4-CT-2001-10087.


1. Alcaide, F., I. Richter, C. Bernasconi, B. Springer, C. Hagenau, R. Schultze-Robbecke, E. Tortoli, R. Martin, E. C. Bottger, and A. Telenti. 1997. Heterogeneity and clonality among isolates of Mycobacterium kansasii: implications for epidemiological and pathogenicity studies. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:1959-1964. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Brunello, F., M. Ligozzi, E. Cristelli, S. Bonora, E. Tortoli, and R. Fontana. 2001. Identification of 54 mycobacterial species by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the hsp65 gene. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:2799-2806. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Da Silva, F. C., S. Y. M. Ueki, D. C. P. Geiger, and S. C. Leão. 2001. Hsp65 PCR-restriction enzyme analysis (PRA) for identification of mycobacteria in the clinical laboratory. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo 43:25-28. [PubMed]
4. Da Silva Rocha, A., C. da Costa Leite, H. Magarinos Torres, A. B. de Miranda, M. Q. Pires Lopes, W. M. Degrave, and P. N. Suffys. 1999. Use of PCR-restriction fragment polymorphism analysis of the hsp65 gene for rapid identification of mycobacteria in Brazil. J. Microbiol. Methods 37:223-229. [PubMed]
5. Devallois, A., M. Picardeau, C. N. Paramasivan, V. Vincent, and N. Rastogi. 1997. Molecular characterization of Mycobacterium avium complex isolates giving discordant results in AccuProbe tests by PCR-restriction enzyme analysis, 16S rRNA gene sequencing, and DT1-DT6 PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:2767-2772. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
6. Devallois, A., K. Seng Goh, and N. Rastogi. 1997. Rapid identification of mycobacteria to the species level by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the hsp65 gene and proposition of an algorithm to differentiate 34 mycobacterial species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:2969-2973. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Huys, G., L. Rigouts, K. Chemlal, F. Portaels, and J. Swings. 2000. Evaluation of amplified fragment length polymorphism analysis for inter- and intraspecific differentiation of Mycobacterium bovis, M. tuberculosis, and M. ulcerans. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:3675-3680. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
8. Kamala, T., C. N. Paramasivan, D. Herbert, P. Venkatesan, and R. Prabhakar. 1994. Isolation and identification of environmental mycobacteria in the Mycobacterium bovis BCG trial area of South India. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60:2180-2183. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Kent, P. T., and G. P. Kubica. 1985. Public health mycobacteriology. A guide for the level III laboratory. Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Ga.
10. Khosravi, A. D., J. L. Stanford, H. D. Donoghue, and G. A. W. Rook. 1997. Variation within Mycobacterium scrofulaceum. J. Appl. Microbiol. 83:596-602. [PubMed]
11. Leão, S. C., M. R. S. Briones, M. P. Sircili, S. C. Balian, N. Mores, and J. S. Ferreira-Neto. 1999. Identification of two novel Mycobacterium avium allelic variants in pig and human isolates from Brazil by PCR-restriction enzyme analysis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:2592-2597. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Legrand, E., K. S. Goh, C. Sola, and N. Rastogi. 2000. Description of a novel Mycobacterium simiae allelic variant isolated from Caribbean AIDS patients by PCR-restriction enzyme analysis and sequencing of hsp65 gene. Mol. Cell. Probes 14:355-363. [PubMed]
13. Miller, N., S. Infante, and T. Cleary. 2000. Evaluation of the LiPA Mycobacteria assay for identification of mycobacterial species from BACTEC 12B bottles. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:1915-1919. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
14. Oliveira, R. S., M. P. Sircili, S. Y. M. Ueki, M. A. S. Telles, B. Schnabel, M. R. S. Briones, and S. C. Leão. 2000. PCR-restriction enzyme analysis of a bone marrow isolate from a human immunodeficiency virus-positive patient discloses polyclonal infection with two Mycobacterium avium strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38:4643-4645. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
15. Picardeau, M., G. Prod'hom, L. Raskine, M. P. LePennec, and V. Vincent. 1997. Genotypic differentiation of five subspecies of Mycobacterium kansasii. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:25-32. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
16. Plikaytis, B. D., B. B. Plikaytis, and T. M. Shinnick. 1992. Computer-assisted pattern recognition model for the identification of slowly growing mycobacteria including Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Gen. Microbiol. 138:2265-2273. [PubMed]
17. Rastogi, N., K. S. Goh, and M. Berchel. 1999. Species-specific identification of Mycobacterium leprae by PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the hsp65 gene. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:2016-2019. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
18. Santos, A. R., A. B. De Miranda, L. M. Lima, P. N. Suffys, and W. M. Degrave. 1992. Method for high yield preparation in large and small scale of nucleic acids from mycobacteria. J. Microbiol. Methods 28:1236-1243.
19. Scarparo, C., P. Piccoli, A. Rigon, G. Ruggiero, D. Nista, and C. Piersimoni. 2001. Direct identification of mycobacteria from MB/BacT Alert 3D bottles: comparative evaluation of two commercial probe assays. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:3222-3227. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Springer, B., L. Stockman, K. Teschner, G. D. Roberts, and E. C. Bottger. 1996. Two-laboratory collaborative study on identification of mycobacteria: molecular versus phenotypic methods. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:296-303. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
21. Springer, B., W.-K. Wu, T. Bodmer, G. Haase, G. E. Pfyffer, R. M. Kroppenstedt, K.-H. Schroder, S. Emler, J. O. Kilburn, P. Kirschner, A. Telenti, M. B. Coyle, and E. C. Bottger. 1996. Isolation and characterization of a unique group of slowly growing mycobacteria: description of Mycobacterium lentiflavum sp. nov. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:1100-1107. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
22. Steingrube, V. A., J. L. Gibson, B. A. Brown, Y. Zhang, R. W. Wilson, M. Rajagopalan, and R. J. Wallace, Jr. 1995. PCR amplification and restriction endonuclease analysis of a 65-kilodalton heat shock protein gene sequence for taxonomic separation of rapidly growing mycobacteria. J. Clin. Microbiol. 33:149-153. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
23. Taylor, T. B., C. Patterson, Y. Hale, and W. W. Safranek. 1997. Routine use of PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis for identification of mycobacteria in liquid media. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:79-85. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Telenti, A., F. Marchesi, M. Balz, F. Bally, E. Bottger, and T. Bodmer. 1993. Rapid identification of mycobacteria to the species level by polymerase chain reaction and restriction enzyme analysis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 31:175-178. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Wilson, R. W., V. A. Steingrube, B. A. Brown, and R. J. Wallace, Jr. 1998. Clinical application of the PCR-restriction enzyme pattern analysis for rapid identification of aerobic Actinomyces isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:148-152. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)
PubReader format: click here to try


Save items

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


  • EST
    Expressed Sequence Tag (EST) nucleotide sequence records reported in the current articles.
  • Gene (nucleotide)
    Gene (nucleotide)
    Records in Gene identified from shared sequence and PMC links.
  • MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles
  • Substance
    PubChem chemical substance records that cite the current articles. These references are taken from those provided on submitted PubChem chemical substance records.

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...