• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of amjphAmerican Journal of Public Health Web SiteAmerican Public Health Association Web SiteSubmissionsSubscriptionsAbout Us
Am J Public Health. 1997 June; 87(6): 922–925.
PMCID: PMC1380923

Ethical dilemmas in current planning for polio eradication.

Abstract

Intensification of polio eradication efforts worldwide raises concerns about costs and benefits for poor countries. A major argument for global funding is the high benefit-cost ratio of eradication; however, financial benefits are greatest for rich countries. By contrast, the greatest costs are borne by poor countries; the Pan American Health Organization has estimated that host countries bore 80% of costs for polio eradication in the Americas. The 1988 World Health Assembly resolution setting up the Polio Eradication Initiative carried the proviso that programs should strengthen health infrastructures. Drastic cuts in donor funding for health make this commitment even more important. Two international evaluations have reported both positive and negative effects of polio and Expanded Programme on Immunization programs on the functioning and sustainability of primary health care. Negative effects were greatest in poor countries with many other diseases of public health importance. If poor countries are expected to divert funds from their own urgent priorities, donors should make solid commitments to long-term support for sustainable health development.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.0M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Hull HF, Ward NA, Hull BP, Milstien JB, de Quadros C. Paralytic poliomyelitis: seasoned strategies, disappearing disease. Lancet. 1994 May 28;343(8909):1331–1337. [PubMed]
  • Sutter RW, Onorato IM, Patriarca PA. Current poliomyelitis immunization policy in the United States. Pediatr Ann. 1990 Dec;19(12):702–706. [PubMed]
  • Bart KJ, Foulds J, Patriarca P. Global eradication of poliomyelitis: benefit-cost analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 1996;74(1):35–45. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Rodríguez Cruz R. Cuba: mass polio vaccination program, 1962-1982. Rev Infect Dis. 1984 May-Jun;6 (Suppl 2):S408–S412. [PubMed]
  • Evans I. SAPping maternal health. Lancet. 1995 Oct 21;346(8982):1046–1046. [PubMed]
  • Abel-Smith B. The world economic crisis. Part 1: Repercussions on health. Health Policy Plan. 1986 Sep;1(3):202–213. [PubMed]
  • de Quadros CA, Olivé JM, Hersh BS, Strassburg MA, Henderson DA, Brandling-Bennett D, Alleyne GA. Measles elimination in the Americas. Evolving strategies. JAMA. 1996 Jan 17;275(3):224–229. [PubMed]

Articles from American Journal of Public Health are provided here courtesy of American Public Health Association

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • Cited in Books
    Cited in Books
    PubMed Central articles cited in books
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...