• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of ajhgLink to Publisher's site
Am J Hum Genet. May 2000; 66(5): 1616–1630.
Published online Apr 12, 2000. doi:  10.1086/302891
PMCID: PMC1378020

Power of linkage versus association analysis of quantitative traits, by use of variance-components models, for sibship data.

Abstract

Optimal design of quantitative-trait loci (QTL) mapping studies requires a precise understanding of the power of QTL linkage versus QTL association analysis, under a range of different conditions. In this article, we investigate the power of QTL linkage and association analyses for simple random sibship samples, under the variance-components model proposed by Fulker et al. After a brief description of an extension of this variance-components model, we show that the powers of both linkage and association analyses are crucially dependent on the proportion of phenotypic variance attributable to the QTL. The main difference between the two tests is that, whereas the power of association is directly related to the QTL heritability, the power of linkage is related more closely to the square of the QTL heritability. We also describe both how the power of linkage is attenuated by incomplete linkage and incomplete marker information and how the power of association is attenuated by incomplete linkage disequilibrium.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (243K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Allison DB, Neale MC, Zannolli R, Schork NJ, Amos CI, Blangero J. Testing the robustness of the likelihood-ratio test in a variance-component quantitative-trait loci-mapping procedure. Am J Hum Genet. 1999 Aug;65(2):531–544. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Allison DB, Thiel B, St Jean P, Elston RC, Infante MC, Schork NJ. Multiple phenotype modeling in gene-mapping studies of quantitative traits: power advantages. Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Oct;63(4):1190–1201. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Almasy L, Blangero J. Multipoint quantitative-trait linkage analysis in general pedigrees. Am J Hum Genet. 1998 May;62(5):1198–1211. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Amos CI. Robust variance-components approach for assessing genetic linkage in pedigrees. Am J Hum Genet. 1994 Mar;54(3):535–543. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Botstein D, White RL, Skolnick M, Davis RW. Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet. 1980 May;32(3):314–331. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Chapman NH, Wijsman EM. Genome screens using linkage disequilibrium tests: optimal marker characteristics and feasibility. Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Dec;63(6):1872–1885. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Comuzzie AG, Mahaney MC, Almasy L, Dyer TD, Blangero J. Exploiting pleiotropy to map genes for oligogenic phenotypes using extended pedigree data. Genet Epidemiol. 1997;14(6):975–980. [PubMed]
  • Dolan CV, Boomsma DI. Optimal selection of sib pairs from random samples for linkage analysis of a QTL using the EDAC test. Behav Genet. 1998 May;28(3):197–206. [PubMed]
  • Eaves L, Meyer J. Locating human quantitative trait loci: guidelines for the selection of sibling pairs for genotyping. Behav Genet. 1994 Sep;24(5):443–455. [PubMed]
  • Eaves LJ, Neale MC, Maes H. Multivariate multipoint linkage analysis of quantitative trait loci. Behav Genet. 1996 Sep;26(5):519–525. [PubMed]
  • Fulker DW, Cherny SS. An improved multipoint sib-pair analysis of quantitative traits. Behav Genet. 1996 Sep;26(5):527–532. [PubMed]
  • Fulker DW, Cherny SS, Cardon LR. Multipoint interval mapping of quantitative trait loci, using sib pairs. Am J Hum Genet. 1995 May;56(5):1224–1233. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Fulker DW, Cherny SS, Sham PC, Hewitt JK. Combined linkage and association sib-pair analysis for quantitative traits. Am J Hum Genet. 1999 Jan;64(1):259–267. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Halushka MK, Fan JB, Bentley K, Hsie L, Shen N, Weder A, Cooper R, Lipshutz R, Chakravarti A. Patterns of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in candidate genes for blood-pressure homeostasis. Nat Genet. 1999 Jul;22(3):239–247. [PubMed]
  • Harpending HC, Batzer MA, Gurven M, Jorde LB, Rogers AR, Sherry ST. Genetic traces of ancient demography. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Feb 17;95(4):1961–1967. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Haseman JK, Elston RC. The investigation of linkage between a quantitative trait and a marker locus. Behav Genet. 1972 Mar;2(1):3–19. [PubMed]
  • Jorde LB, Watkins WS, Carlson M, Groden J, Albertsen H, Thliveris A, Leppert M. Linkage disequilibrium predicts physical distance in the adenomatous polyposis coli region. Am J Hum Genet. 1994 May;54(5):884–898. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kruglyak L. Prospects for whole-genome linkage disequilibrium mapping of common disease genes. Nat Genet. 1999 Jun;22(2):139–144. [PubMed]
  • Kruglyak L, Lander ES. Complete multipoint sib-pair analysis of qualitative and quantitative traits. Am J Hum Genet. 1995 Aug;57(2):439–454. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Martin N, Boomsma D, Machin G. A twin-pronged attack on complex traits. Nat Genet. 1997 Dec;17(4):387–392. [PubMed]
  • MORTON NE. Sequential tests for the detection of linkage. Am J Hum Genet. 1955 Sep;7(3):277–318. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Morton NE, Wu D. Alternative bioassays of kinship between loci. Am J Hum Genet. 1988 Jan;42(1):173–177. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ohta T, Kimura M. Linkage disequilibrium at steady state determined by random genetic drift and recurrent mutation. Genetics. 1969 Sep;63(1):229–238. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ott J, Rabinowitz D. The effect of marker heterozygosity on the power to detect linkage disequilibrium. Genetics. 1997 Oct;147(2):927–930. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Risch N, Merikangas K. The future of genetic studies of complex human diseases. Science. 1996 Sep 13;273(5281):1516–1517. [PubMed]
  • Risch N, Zhang H. Extreme discordant sib pairs for mapping quantitative trait loci in humans. Science. 1995 Jun 16;268(5217):1584–1589. [PubMed]
  • Risch NJ, Zhang H. Mapping quantitative trait loci with extreme discordant sib pairs: sampling considerations. Am J Hum Genet. 1996 Apr;58(4):836–843. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Schork NJ. Extended multipoint identity-by-descent analysis of human quantitative traits: efficiency, power, and modeling considerations. Am J Hum Genet. 1993 Dec;53(6):1306–1319. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sved JA. Linkage disequilibrium and homozygosity of chromosome segments in finite populations. Theor Popul Biol. 1971 Jun;2(2):125–141. [PubMed]
  • Todorov AA, Vogler GP, Gu C, Province MA, Li Z, Heath AC, Rao DC. Testing causal hypotheses in multivariate linkage analysis of quantitative traits: general formulation and application to sibpair data. Genet Epidemiol. 1998;15(3):263–278. [PubMed]
  • Vogler GP, Tang W, Nelson TL, Hofer SM, Grant JD, Tarantino LM, Fernandez JR. A multivariate model for the analysis of sibship covariance structure using marker information and multiple quantitative traits. Genet Epidemiol. 1997;14(6):921–926. [PubMed]

Articles from American Journal of Human Genetics are provided here courtesy of American Society of Human Genetics

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...