• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of ajhgLink to Publisher's site
Am J Hum Genet. Sep 1999; 65(3): 847–857.
PMCID: PMC1377991

Direct power comparisons between simple LOD scores and NPL scores for linkage analysis in complex diseases.

Abstract

Several methods have been proposed for linkage analysis of complex traits with unknown mode of inheritance. These methods include the LOD score maximized over disease models (MMLS) and the "nonparametric" linkage (NPL) statistic. In previous work, we evaluated the increase of type I error when maximizing over two or more genetic models, and we compared the power of MMLS to detect linkage, in a number of complex modes of inheritance, with analysis assuming the true model. In the present study, we compare MMLS and NPL directly. We simulated 100 data sets with 20 families each, using 26 generating models: (1) 4 intermediate models (penetrance of heterozygote between that of the two homozygotes); (2) 6 two-locus additive models; and (3) 16 two-locus heterogeneity models (admixture alpha = 1.0,.7,.5, and.3; alpha = 1.0 replicates simple Mendelian models). For LOD scores, we assumed dominant and recessive inheritance with 50% penetrance. We took the higher of the two maximum LOD scores and subtracted 0.3 to correct for multiple tests (MMLS-C). We compared expected maximum LOD scores and power, using MMLS-C and NPL as well as the true model. Since NPL uses only the affected family members, we also performed an affecteds-only analysis using MMLS-C. The MMLS-C was both uniformly more powerful than NPL for most cases we examined, except when linkage information was low, and close to the results for the true model under locus heterogeneity. We still found better power for the MMLS-C compared with NPL in affecteds-only analysis. The results show that use of two simple modes of inheritance at a fixed penetrance can have more power than NPL when the trait mode of inheritance is complex and when there is heterogeneity in the data set.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (303K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Badner JA, Gershon ES, Goldin LR. Optimal ascertainment strategies to detect linkage to common disease alleles. Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Sep;63(3):880–888. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Davis S, Weeks DE. Comparison of nonparametric statistics for detection of linkage in nuclear families: single-marker evaluation. Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Dec;61(6):1431–1444. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Durner M, Greenberg DA. Effect of heterogeneity and assumed mode of inheritance on lod scores. Am J Med Genet. 1992 Feb 1;42(3):271–275. [PubMed]
  • Durner M, Vieland VJ, Greenberg DA. Further evidence for the increased power of LOD scores compared with nonparametric methods. Am J Hum Genet. 1999 Jan;64(1):281–289. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Dizier MH, Babron MC, Clerget-Darpoux F. Conclusion of LOD-score analysis for family data generated under two-locus models. Am J Hum Genet. 1996 Jun;58(6):1338–1346. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Goldin LR, Weeks DE. Two-locus models of disease: comparison of likelihood and nonparametric linkage methods. Am J Hum Genet. 1993 Oct;53(4):908–915. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Greenberg DA. A simple method for testing two-locus models of inheritance. Am J Hum Genet. 1981 Jul;33(4):519–530. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Greenberg DA, Abreu P, Hodge SE. The power to detect linkage in complex disease by means of simple LOD-score analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 1998 Sep;63(3):870–879. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Greenberg DA, Berger B. Using lod-score differences to determine mode of inheritance: a simple, robust method even in the presence of heterogeneity and reduced penetrance. Am J Hum Genet. 1994 Oct;55(4):834–840. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Greenberg DA, Doneshka P. Partitioned association-linkage test: distinguishing "necessary" from "susceptibility" loci. Genet Epidemiol. 1996;13(3):243–252. [PubMed]
  • Greenberg DA, Hodge SE. Linkage analysis under "random" and "genetic" reduced penetrance. Genet Epidemiol. 1989;6(1):259–264. [PubMed]
  • Hodge SE, Abreu PC, Greenberg DA. Magnitude of type I error when single-locus linkage analysis is maximized over models: a simulation study. Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Jan;60(1):217–227. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hodge SE, Elston RC. Lods, wrods, and mods: the interpretation of lod scores calculated under different models. Genet Epidemiol. 1994;11(4):329–342. [PubMed]
  • Kong A, Cox NJ. Allele-sharing models: LOD scores and accurate linkage tests. Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Nov;61(5):1179–1188. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kruglyak L, Daly MJ, Reeve-Daly MP, Lander ES. Parametric and nonparametric linkage analysis: a unified multipoint approach. Am J Hum Genet. 1996 Jun;58(6):1347–1363. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Vieland VJ, Greenberg DA, Hodge SE. Adequacy of single-locus approximations for linkage analyses of oligogenic traits: extension to multigenerational pedigree structures. Hum Hered. 1993 Nov-Dec;43(6):329–336. [PubMed]
  • Vieland VJ, Hodge SE, Greenberg DA. Adequacy of single-locus approximations for linkage analyses of oligogenic traits. Genet Epidemiol. 1992;9(1):45–59. [PubMed]
  • Whittemore AS, Halpern J. Probability of gene identity by descent: computation and applications. Biometrics. 1994 Mar;50(1):109–117. [PubMed]
  • Whittemore AS, Halpern J. A class of tests for linkage using affected pedigree members. Biometrics. 1994 Mar;50(1):118–127. [PubMed]

Articles from American Journal of Human Genetics are provided here courtesy of American Society of Human Genetics

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...