![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||
Copyright © Copyright 2004 by RNA Society Trans-splicing and polyadenylation of let-7 microRNA primary transcripts Department of Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093, USA 1These authors contributed equally. Reprint requests to: Amy E. Pasquinelli, Department of Biology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; e-mail: apasquin/at/ucsd.edu. fax: (858) 822-3021. Received June 25, 2004; Accepted July 9, 2004. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Members of the microRNA (miRNA) class of 22-nucleotide RNAs regulate the expression of target genes that contain sequences of antisense complementarity. Maturation of miRNAs involves cleavage of longer primary transcripts, but little is yet understood about how miRNA genes are transcribed and enter the processing pathway. We find that relatively long, polyadenylated transcripts encoded by the Caenorhabditis elegans let-7 gene undergo trans-splicing to the spliced leader 1 (SL1) RNA. Deletions, including removal of the trans-splice site, upstream of mature let-7 sequence result in stable accumulation of primary transcripts and compromised production of mature let-7 RNA in vivo. Our data show that multiple steps of let-7 miRNA biogenesis can be uncoupled, allowing for complex regulation in the production of a functional miRNA. Finally, the observation that let-7 primary transcripts undergo splicing highlights the importance of identifying the sequence of endogenous pri-miRNA substrates recognized by the cellular processing machinery. Keywords: microRNAs, let-7, trans-splicing, polyadenylation, miRNAs INTRODUCTION The newly established class of regulatory RNAs, called microRNAs (miRNAs), is comprised of ~22-nucleotide RNAs that control expression of target genes via antisense base-pairing (Lai 2003; Bartel 2004). All multicellular organisms are believed to express miRNAs and the Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila, and human genomes each have been predicted to encode more than 100 different miRNAs (Grad et al. 2003; Lai et al. 2003; Lim et al. 2003a,b). Already members of this new class of tiny regulatory RNAs have been implicated in diverse biological roles, including temporal patterning, cell death regulation, and control of fat metabolism (Ambros 2003; Bartel 2004). The founding members of the microRNA gene family, lin-4 and let-7, were identified as essential regulators of temporal development in the nematode C. elegans (Pasquinelli and Ruvkun 2002). The developmental function of lin-4 and let-7 RNAs is related to the timing of their expression: Mature lin-4 RNA first appears midway through the first larval stage to regulate early larval cell divisions (Lee et al. 1993; Feinbaum and Ambros 1999), and mature let-7 RNA is undetectable until the last larval stages when it is needed to direct larval to adult cellular transitions (Reinhart et al. 2000). The let-7 RNA sequence, its general temporal expression pattern, proteins involved in its maturation, and genes controlled by this small RNA are conserved from nematodes to humans (Pasquinelli et al. 2000; Grishok et al. 2001; Hutvagner et al. 2001; Ketting et al. 2001). The Dicer RNase processes let-7, and likely all other miRNA precursors (pre-miRNAs), to the mature ~22-nt forms (Grishok et al. 2001; Hutvagner et al. 2001; Ketting et al. 2001; Lee et al. 2003; Lund et al. 2004). Members of the extensive and highly conserved PAZ (Piwi, Argonaute, Zwille) /Piwi Domain (PPD) protein family (Cerutti et al. 2000; Schwarz and Zamore 2002) also function in the maturation of miRNAs (Grishok et al. 2001; Hutvagner and Zamore 2002; Mourelatos et al. 2002). The nuclear export receptor Exportin-5 is responsible for delivering the ~65-nt stem-loop structured pre-miRNAs to the cytoplasm for this maturation step (Yi et al. 2003; Bohnsack et al. 2004; Lund et al. 2004). Longer primary transcripts, called pri-miRNAs, serve as the initial substrates for processing by the nuclear Drosha RNase to generate the miRNA precursor forms (Lee et al. 2002; Basyuk et al. 2003; Lee et al. 2003; Zeng and Cullen 2003). Although sequences outside of the pre-miRNA hairpin have been shown to be important for RNA processing or stability (Lee et al. 2003; Zeng and Cullen 2003; Chen et al. 2004), little is yet known about the actual composition of pri-miRNAs. Hundreds of miRNAs have now been isolated from diverse species, but the genomic codes that signal their production are yet to be defined. Some miRNA sequences are embedded in protein coding genes and, thus, may rely on the host gene regulatory elements for transcription (Aravin et al. 2003; Lagos-Quintana et al. 2003; Lai et al. 2003; Lim et al. 2003b). For many miRNA genes, though, there is no evidence for coexpression with messenger RNAs (mRNAs) and, thus, transcription is predicted to be directed by independent promoter elements. Regulatory motifs in miRNA genes that specify transcription by a particular polymerase have remained, for the most part, elusive. There are numerous examples of temporally or spatially restricted miRNAs, which is suggestive of Pol-II-directed transcriptional regulation. The temporal regulatory element (TRE) in the C. elegans let-7 gene can direct developmentally controlled expression of a protein-coding gene (Johnson et al. 2003), implicating Pol-II-mediated synthesis from this promoter. Nonetheless, Pol III promoters have been used to produce functional miRNAs ectopically (Zeng and Cullen 2003; Chen et al. 2004). Determination of the natural transcriptional start sites may facilitate the identification of important elements controlling expression of miRNA genes. In this article we report the identification of the complete primary transcripts for the let-7 miRNA in C. elegans. We define two polyadenylated transcripts that likely serve as substrates for a trans-splicing reaction that appends Spliced Leader 1 (SL1) sequence to the 5′ end of the let-7 pri-miRNA. We present evidence that trans-splicing is important for generation of mature let-7 RNA and that the SL1-appended form of let-7 is a substrate for processing by a C. elegans Drosha homolog. In contrast, factors involved in the terminal steps of let-7 maturation and stabilization, the dicer (dcr-1) and argonaute (alg-1) homologs, do not influence the transcription or initial processing events. These data identify cis-acting sequences and trans-acting factors important for specific steps of let-7 miRNA biogenesis. RESULTS The let-7 miRNA gene encodes long, polyadenylated primary transcripts In C. elegans, ~2460 nt of genomic DNA sequence containing let-7 is sufficient to fully rescue the let-7(mn112) putative null mutant of this gene (Reinhart et al. 2000). Prior to this study, the 65-nt precursor and 22-nt mature RNAs were the only transcripts detected from the let-7 gene. The let-7 pri-miRNAs may be rapidly processed and difficult to detect by standard Northern analyses. Thus, we employed reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) methods to identify potential let-7 pri-miRNAs. Using a let-7-specific primer in the first strand RT reaction followed by PCR with forward and reverse primers corresponding to this miRNA gene, we detected the expected size product from wild-type adult but not egg-stage RNA preparations (Fig. 1A ![]() ![]() ![]()
One hundred nucleotides upstream of the 3′ terminus of the 2460-nt let-7 rescue fragment is a canonical polyadenylation signal (AATAAA), raising the possibility that let-7 primary transcripts contain poly(A) tails. To test this hypothesis, total RNA preparations were subjected to RT using oligo deoxythymidine (oligo dT) as the primer for first-strand synthesis, which is expected to prime polyadenylated transcripts. The RT reactions were subjected to PCR using primers complementary to let-7 and a control mRNA transcript, translation elongation factor 2 (eft-2). Similar levels of the eft-2 product were detected in all samples, but the let-7 product in the same PCR reactions was once again undetectable in egg stage and several-fold more concentrated in adult RNA from the let-7(mn112) mutant strain compared to wild type (Fig. 1B ![]() Based on our finding that let-7 transcripts contain poly(A) tails, we predicted that these RNAs might also have 5′ cap structures that would facilitate identification of the 5′ and 3′ termini by standard rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) methods. From wild-type RNA samples, three 5′ and one 3′ RACE products were readily detected (Fig. 1C ![]() ![]() ![]() Trans-splicing is important for generation of mature let-7 RNA Deletions upstream of mature let-7 RNA sequence were originally predicted to interfere with transcription of the RNA gene because less 22-nt let-7 RNA is observed in such mutant backgrounds (Reinhart et al. 2000). The let-7(mg279) (27-nt deletion) or let-7(mn112) (193-nt deletion; see Fig. 1D ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Recent studies have shown that sequences and structures flanking the miRNA precursor hairpin are important for maturation (Lee et al. 2003; Zeng and Cullen 2003; Chen et al. 2004). The let-7(mn112) deletion disrupts the sequence and predicted structure immediately upstream of the let-7 hairpin, supporting the idea that elements outside of the precursor sequence participate in processing recognition (Lee et al. 2003; Zeng and Cullen 2003; Chen et al. 2004). The 27-nt lesion in let-7(mg279) is located 13 nt upstream of the let-7 hairpin and is predicted to support the same five flanking base pairs as the wild-type sequence (Fig. 3A ![]() ![]() ![]()
Splicing of the SL1 RNA to let-7 primary transcripts is predicted to alter the structure adjacent to the precursor hairpin (Fig. 3 ![]() Temporally regulated transcription and processing of let-7 primary transcripts Accumulation and trans-splicing of the predicted let-7 primary transcripts precede the appearance of mature let-7 RNA. In developmentally staged RNA samples, the 22-nt let-7 RNA first appears late in the third larval stage (L3), accumulates in L4, and persists to adulthood (Fig. 4A ![]() ![]()
The role of trans-acting factors in the biogenesis of let-7 RNA in vivo The ribonuclease III-type enzymes Drosha and Dicer and members of the Argonaute family function to produce mature miRNAs (Grishok et al. 2001; Hutvagner et al. 2001; Ketting et al. 2001; Hutvagner and Zamore 2002; Mourelatos et al. 2002; Lee et al. 2003). We tested whether depletion of these factors would affect the expression of the primary let-7 transcripts that enter the processing pathway. Drosha is a nuclear RNase required for efficient production of precursor miRNAs from primary transcripts in human cells (Lee et al. 2003). The C. elegans gene F26E4.10 is a predicted homolog of Drosha (Lee et al. 2003). If F26E4.10 processes miRNA primary transcripts, then let-7 pri-miRNAs might accumulate upon depletion of this putative RNase. In contrast, the RNase III Dicer, encoded by dcr-1 in C. elegans, functions downstream from Drosha processing and, thus, loss of its activity should not affect processing of let-7 primary transcripts. The rrf-3(pk1426) C. elegans strain, which is hypersensitive to RNA interference (RNAi; Simmer et al. 2002), was subjected to RNAi targeting F26E4.10 or dcr-1. This procedure resulted in the specific reduction of dcr-1 or F26E4.10 mRNA levels (Fig. 5A ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Previously, Grishok et al. (2001) demonstrated that the argonaute-like gene alg-1 is important for accumulation of mature miRNAs. Depletion of alg-1 by RNAi results in diminished levels of 22-nt let-7 RNA without an apparent buildup of the precursor form (Grishok et al. 2001). Thus, alg-1 was proposed to be important for the stabilization of the precursors and/or mature forms of let-7 (Grishok et al. 2001). If alg-1 primarily functions at the final steps of let-7 biogenesis, then the nuclear synthesis and initial processing steps of this pathway are predicted to be unaffected by alg-1 depletion. RNAi of alg-1 potently reduced alg-1 mRNA levels, which resulted in diminished mature let-7 RNA levels (Fig. 5B ![]() ![]() DISCUSSION Transcription of let-7 primary RNAs This study reports one of the first complete primary transcripts for an animal microRNA gene. The proposal that the ~1731-nt and ~890-nt RNAs serve as let-7 primary transcripts is supported by the observation that these RNAs stably accumulate in let-7 deletion mutants that produce compromised levels of mature let-7. Additionally, the timing of expression of the primary transcripts correlates well with the temporal appearance of 22-nt let-7 RNA in vivo. The let-7 primary transcripts in C. elegans have the hallmarks of Pol-II-directed synthesis—they are apparently 5′-end capped, 3′-end polyadenylated, and substrates for splicing. However, it is yet to be experimentally determined which polymerase is responsible for transcribing let-7 or any miRNA gene. A recent report from the Slack laboratory defined a regulatory element responsible for restricting let-7 expression in the hypodermis to the last larval and adult stages (Johnson et al. 2003). A 116-bp region located ~1200 nt upstream of the mature let-7 RNA coding sequence was found to be essential for full let-7 activity. Interestingly, this region, called the temporal regulatory element (TRE), can also restrict hypodermal expression of a protein-coding gene to the same time in development as the appearance of let-7 RNA (Johnson et al. 2003). The TRE is ~200 nt upstream of the initiation site for transcription of the longest let-7 primary transcript. It remains to be determined whether the TRE regulates the expression of either or both of the endogenous pri-let-7 transcripts. In addition to the TRE, the let-7 genes in C. elegans and C. briggsae also share a highly homologous region ~200 nt upstream of the transcriptional start site for the ~890-nt pri-let-7 RNA. Perhaps independent regulatory elements afford tissue as well as temporally regulated transcription of let-7 RNAs. Our demonstration that let-7 primary transcripts in C. elegans are polyadenylated and undergo splicing provides additional support to the indirect evidence that at least some miRNAs are transcribed by Pol II (Bartel 2004): Predicted miRNA promoter regions can produce temporally or spatially regulated expression of proteins (Johnson et al. 2003; Johnston and Hobert 2003), some miRNA sequences match ESTs (Lagos-Quintana et al. 2002; Aukerman and Sakai 2003; Smalheiser 2003), long miRNA primary transcripts might not be supported by Pol III, and some miRNAs can be processed from heterologous Pol II synthesized transcripts (Zeng et al. 2002; Zeng and Cullen 2003). If Pol II generally directs expression of miRNA genes, then how are pri-miRNA transcripts distinguished from messenger RNAs (mRNAs) in the cell? Usually, capping, splicing, and polyadenylation events facilitate export of mRNAs to the cytoplasm for translation to protein (Reed 2003). Pri-miRNAs may contain sequence or structural elements that direct them to the nuclear processing pathways instead of the mRNA export route. For some miRNAs, efficient excision of the precursor hairpin may be sufficient to circumvent export of the pri-miRNA substrate. Stepwise maturation of let-7 miRNA The elaborate transcription and processing steps expended to eventually yield a 22-nt RNA could provide additional levels for regulation. Alteration of pri-miRNA sequence or structure beyond the precursor hairpin can affect the processing or stability of the RNA in vitro or in vivo when expressed ectopically from a transgene (Lee et al. 2003; Zeng and Cullen 2003; Chen et al. 2004). Additionally, depletion of Drosha, Dicer, Argonaute, and Exportin-5 proteins can interfere with specific steps of miRNA biogenesis (Grishok et al. 2001; Hutvagner et al. 2001; Ketting et al. 2001; Lee et al. 2003; Yi et al. 2003; Bohnsack et al. 2004; Lund et al. 2004). We show that the let-7 primary transcripts, SL1-appended form, and precursor RNA can each stably accumulate in vivo when distinct processing steps are blocked by alteration of the RNA sequence or by depletion of transacting factors (Figs. 1 ![]() ![]() ![]() The specific accumulation of the SL1-spliced form of let-7 upon depletion of the predicted C. elegans Drosha homolog, F26E4.10 (Fig. 5A ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Depletion of alg-1 by RNAi results in a significant reduction in the accumulation of let-7 and lin-4 mature RNAs (Grishok et al. 2001). In the case of lin-4, this defect can be attributed to inefficient processing of pre-lin-4 (Grishok et al. 2001). However, there is no apparent precursor buildup for let-7 (Fig. 5B ![]() ![]() Splicing of let-7 primary transcripts Trans-splicing of Spliced Leader (SL) sequences to the 5′ end of mRNAs is a common phenomenon in C. elegans (Blumenthal 1995). Despite the observation that about 70% of C. elegans pre-mRNAs undergo this process, a definitive function for trans-splicing is yet to be revealed. Nonetheless, deletion of genes encoding the SL1 RNA produces embryonic lethality (Ferguson et al. 1996), and it has been proposed that SL1 trans-splicing may help optimize translation of some mRNAs (Blumenthal 1995). If trans-splicing by SL1 RNA onto some pri-miRNAs influences processing, then miRNA biogenesis could be another important function of trans-splicing in C. elegans. Conservation of the trans-splice site in C. elegans and C. briggsae and the demonstration that removal of the splice site compromises the rescuing activity of the let-7 gene suggest that trans-splicing may be an important step in the biogenesis of let-7 RNA in C. elegans. What function could trans-splicing serve in the let-7 processing pathway? Sequence or structural alteration of let-7 primary transcripts may be important for subsequent processing steps. The predicted secondary structures produced by folding the entire 890-nt let-7 RNA, or the longer 1731-nt RNA (data not shown), and SL1 spliced version reveal possible structural alterations immediately adjacent to the stem-loop precursor containing the mature RNA (Fig. 3 ![]() Sequences and structures flanking the miRNA hairpin influence maturation to the 22-nt form (Lee et al. 2003; Zeng and Cullen 2003; Chen et al. 2004). Splicing of miRNA primary transcripts could significantly change the nucleotide and structural elements surrounding the hairpin precursor. Although ectopic expression of truncated miRNA transcripts supports production of the mature form of some miRNAs (Zeng and Cullen 2003; Chen et al. 2004), the natural pri-miRNA transcripts may include sequences or structures that regulate expression of specific miRNAs. Thus, identification of endogenous pri-miRNA transcripts is important for understanding how members of this new RNA family are recognized in vivo as substrates for the miRNA processing pathway. MATERIALS AND METHODS RT-PCR analyses Total RNA from indicated stages of worm strains was extracted using TRIzol reagent (GIBCO-BRL), including a deoxyribonuclease step (RQ1 DNase, Promega). First-strand cDNA synthesis was performed with 5 μg RNA and SUPERSCRIPT II (Invitrogen) reagents, according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. RNA ligase-mediated rapid amplification of 5′ and 3′ cDNA ends (RLM-RACE) was accomplished with the GeneRacer Kit (Invitrogen), using 5 μg of total RNA from L3 stage worms. Primer sequences of oligonucleotides used in the RT-PCR reactions are as follows: A62: 5′-GGCTCCATGGATACATTACTCAACAG-3′ A63: 5′-GGATCATCAATCAAGTGTGCACTG-3′ A76: 5′-TGTGAGAGAGCAAGACGACGCAGCTTCG-3′ A127: 5′-GAGTAGCCCACCTAGCAGCGGTCG-3′ A90 (SL1): 5′-GGTTTAATTACCCAAGTTTGAG-3′ A112 (F-F26E4.10): 5′-TCAGATGTTCCAGCTCGTTCTTCG-3′ A113 (R-F26E4.10): 5′-CAGCATTGCCATTTGGAGATTCTCC-3′ A211 (F-dcr-1): 5′-GCTGCAGATGGAATGTCATTAGAGAGATTC-3′ A212 (R-dcr-1): 5′-AGTAGCTTTCGCGATTCGATAGTTCCTTCC-3′ A116 (F-eft-2): 5′-GGTCAACTTCACGGTCGATG-3′ A117 (R-eft-2): 5′-TCCGAGCTTCTCAACAAGAGC-3′ A110 (F-alg-1): 5′-CAAGTGGACCGATTAGTTCGACG-3′ A111 (R-alg-1): 5′-TCATTGCTGGGTTGATGGTGATT-3′. Northern analyses Detection of small RNA species (<200 nt) was carried out by polyacrylamide Northern methods, as previously detailed (Pasquinelli et al. 2003). Analyses of larger RNAs were performed by separating 8 μg of total RNA in 1.2% agarose gels under denaturing conditions. RNA was transferred and UV cross-linked to nylon membranes (Zeta-Probe GT, Biorad), which were then hybridized to PCR-generated DNA probe (A63 + A62) radiolabeled using Prime-It II Random Primer Labeling Kit (Stratagene). Hybridization and wash conditions were performed as previously described (Pasquinelli et al. 2003) except that procedures were carried out at 58°C. Transgenics For rescue experiments, the wild-type (pAEP19) or 3′ splice site deleted (pSEH6) clones were injected at 5 ng/μL with a GFP marker construct (myo-2::yC2.1) into the SP231 (mnDp1(X/V)/+ V; unc-3(e151) let-7(mn112) X) strain (Meneely and Herman 1979). Transgenic, coiling, homozygous let-7(mn112) progeny were scored for rescue: The wild-type construct rescued the lethality in 100/101 of the transgenics; the pSEH6 construct showed no (0/94) rescuing activity. Expression of pri-let-7 from pSEH6 was verified by performing RT-PCR from RNA isolated from trans-genic worms; the RNA encoded by the transgene is 187 nt longer than that synthesized by the let-7(mn112) allele and is thus distinguishable from the genomic expression of let-7(mn112). RNAi The rrf-3(pk1426) L4 stage worms were cultured on RNAi plates seeded with bacteria containing vector control plasmid or plasmids expressing double-stranded RNA corresponding to the F26E4.10 or dcr-1 or alg-1 genes (Kamath et al. 2003). Progeny from these worms were reared on the same type of RNAi food and collected at the L4 stage of development for RNA isolation and analyses. Acknowledgments We thank members of our laboratory and J. Posakony, W. Mc-Ginnis, J. Dahlberg, and E. Lund for suggestions and critical reading of the manuscript. J.B. and S.H. were supported by funds from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Cellular and Molecular Biology Graduate Student Training Grant. The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 USC section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. Notes Article published online ahead of print. Article and publication date are at http://www.rnajournal.org/cgi/doi/10.1261/rna.7122604. REFERENCES
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||
Curr Biol. 2003 Dec 2; 13(23):R925-36.
[Curr Biol. 2003]Cell. 2004 Jan 23; 116(2):281-97.
[Cell. 2004]Mol Cell. 2003 May; 11(5):1253-63.
[Mol Cell. 2003]Genome Biol. 2003; 4(7):R42.
[Genome Biol. 2003]Science. 2003 Mar 7; 299(5612):1540.
[Science. 2003]Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2002; 18():495-513.
[Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2002]Cell. 1993 Dec 3; 75(5):843-54.
[Cell. 1993]Dev Biol. 1999 Jun 1; 210(1):87-95.
[Dev Biol. 1999]Nature. 2000 Feb 24; 403(6772):901-6.
[Nature. 2000]Nature. 2000 Nov 2; 408(6808):86-9.
[Nature. 2000]Cell. 2001 Jul 13; 106(1):23-34.
[Cell. 2001]Science. 2001 Aug 3; 293(5531):834-8.
[Science. 2001]Genes Dev. 2001 Oct 15; 15(20):2654-9.
[Genes Dev. 2001]Nature. 2003 Sep 25; 425(6956):415-9.
[Nature. 2003]Science. 2004 Jan 2; 303(5654):95-8.
[Science. 2004]Dev Cell. 2003 Aug; 5(2):337-50.
[Dev Cell. 2003]RNA. 2003 Feb; 9(2):175-9.
[RNA. 2003]Genome Biol. 2003; 4(7):R42.
[Genome Biol. 2003]Genes Dev. 2003 Apr 15; 17(8):991-1008.
[Genes Dev. 2003]Dev Biol. 2003 Jul 15; 259(2):364-79.
[Dev Biol. 2003]Nature. 2000 Feb 24; 403(6772):901-6.
[Nature. 2000]Dev Biol. 2003 Jul 15; 259(2):364-79.
[Dev Biol. 2003]Nature. 2000 Feb 24; 403(6772):901-6.
[Nature. 2000]Nature. 2003 Sep 25; 425(6956):415-9.
[Nature. 2003]RNA. 2003 Jan; 9(1):112-23.
[RNA. 2003]Science. 2004 Jan 2; 303(5654):83-6.
[Science. 2004]Nature. 2000 Feb 24; 403(6772):901-6.
[Nature. 2000]Nature. 2000 Feb 24; 403(6772):901-6.
[Nature. 2000]Dev Biol. 2003 Jul 15; 259(2):364-79.
[Dev Biol. 2003]Cell. 2001 Jul 13; 106(1):23-34.
[Cell. 2001]Science. 2001 Aug 3; 293(5531):834-8.
[Science. 2001]Genes Dev. 2001 Oct 15; 15(20):2654-9.
[Genes Dev. 2001]Science. 2002 Sep 20; 297(5589):2056-60.
[Science. 2002]Genes Dev. 2002 Mar 15; 16(6):720-8.
[Genes Dev. 2002]Cell. 2001 Jul 13; 106(1):23-34.
[Cell. 2001]Dev Biol. 2003 Jul 15; 259(2):364-79.
[Dev Biol. 2003]Cell. 2004 Jan 23; 116(2):281-97.
[Cell. 2004]Dev Biol. 2003 Jul 15; 259(2):364-79.
[Dev Biol. 2003]Nature. 2003 Dec 18; 426(6968):845-9.
[Nature. 2003]Curr Biol. 2002 Apr 30; 12(9):735-9.
[Curr Biol. 2002]Plant Cell. 2003 Nov; 15(11):2730-41.
[Plant Cell. 2003]Nature. 2003 Sep 25; 425(6956):415-9.
[Nature. 2003]RNA. 2003 Jan; 9(1):112-23.
[RNA. 2003]Science. 2004 Jan 2; 303(5654):83-6.
[Science. 2004]Cell. 2001 Jul 13; 106(1):23-34.
[Cell. 2001]Science. 2001 Aug 3; 293(5531):834-8.
[Science. 2001]Cell. 2001 Jul 13; 106(1):23-34.
[Cell. 2001]Science. 2001 Aug 10; 293(5532):1146-50.
[Science. 2001]Science. 2002 Sep 20; 297(5589):2056-60.
[Science. 2002]Genes Dev. 2002 Mar 15; 16(6):720-8.
[Genes Dev. 2002]Trends Genet. 1995 Apr; 11(4):132-6.
[Trends Genet. 1995]Genes Dev. 1996 Jun 15; 10(12):1543-56.
[Genes Dev. 1996]Nature. 2003 Sep 25; 425(6956):415-9.
[Nature. 2003]RNA. 2003 Jan; 9(1):112-23.
[RNA. 2003]Science. 2004 Jan 2; 303(5654):83-6.
[Science. 2004]Evol Dev. 2003 Jul-Aug; 5(4):372-8.
[Evol Dev. 2003]Genetics. 1979 May; 92(1):99-115.
[Genetics. 1979]Nature. 2003 Jan 16; 421(6920):231-7.
[Nature. 2003]Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Jul 1; 31(13):3406-15.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2003]