pmc logo image
Logo of jeabehavJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Web SiteSubscriber LoginJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis Web SiteSubscription InformationInformation for AuthorsJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Web SiteJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Web Site

Formats:

J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 March; 65(2): 375–388.
doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-375.
PMCID: PMC1350153
Effects of cocaine on briefly signaled versus completely signaled delays to reinforcement.
D J Walker and M N Branch
Department of Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611, USA.
Abstract
Key pecking by 4 pigeons was maintained by a multiple schedule consisting of two variable-interval 60-s schedules wherein each food presentation followed a nonresetting 27-s delay that was either briefly signaled at its outset or completely signaled. Brief-signal duration was adjusted so that response rates maintained by the briefly and completely signaled delays of reinforcement were similar. In general, acute administration of small to intermediate doses (0.3 to 3.0 mg/kg) of cocaine produced either small increases in response rates in both components or no change, and larger doses (5.6 to 13.0 mg/kg) decreased response rates. Chronic (i.e., daily) cocaine administration (10.0 mg/kg) resulted in tolerance to the rate-decreasing effects in both components. Cocaine's effects were generally similar whether delays were completely or briefly signaled. Discontinuation of cocaine administration and subsequent removal of the delay signals also had similar effects in both components of the multiple schedule. Taken together, these results are consistent with the view that the two types of delay signals were equally effective in maintaining responding during the variable-interval schedules.
Full text
Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.6M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Beninger RJ, Hanson DR, Phillips AG. The effects of pipradrol on the acquisitionof responding with conditioned reinforcement: a role for sensory preconditioning. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1980;69(3):235–242. [PubMed]
  • Branch MN. Consequent events as determinants of drug effects on schedule-controlled behavior: modification of effects of cocaine and d-amphetamine following chronic amphetamine administration. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1979 Sep;210(3):354–360. [PubMed]
  • Branch MN. Rate dependency, behavioral mechanisms, and behavioral pharmacology. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Nov;42(3):511–522. [PubMed]
  • Branch MN, Dearing ME. Effects of acute and daily cocaine administration on performance under a delayed-matching-to-sample procedure. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1982 May;16(5):713–718. [PubMed]
  • Catania AC, Reynolds GS. A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3 Suppl):327–383. [PubMed]
  • Cohen SL, Branch MN. Food-paired stimuli as conditioned reinforcers: effects of d-amphetamine. J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Sep;56(2):277–288. [PubMed]
  • FERSTER CB. Sustained behavior under delayed reinforcement. J Exp Psychol. 1953 Apr;45(4):218–224. [PubMed]
  • Files FJ, Branch MN, Clody D. Effects of methylphenidate on responding under extinction in the presence and absence of conditioned reinforcement. Behav Pharmacol. 1989;1(2):113–121. [PubMed]
  • Kelleher RT, Morse WH. Determinants of the specificity of behavioral effects of drugs. Ergeb Physiol. 1968;60:1–56. [PubMed]
  • Lattal Kennon A. Signal functions in delayed reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Sep;42(2):239–253. [PubMed]
  • Richards Ralph W. A comparison of signaled and unsignaled delay of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Mar;35(2):145–152. [PubMed]
  • Robbins TW. The acquisition of responding with conditioned reinforcement: effects of pipradrol, methylphenidate, d-amphetamine, and nomifensine. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1978 Jun 15;58(1):79–87. [PubMed]
  • Robbins TW, Koob GF. Pipradrol enhances reinforcing properties of stimuli paired with brain stimulation. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1978 Mar;8(3):219–222. [PubMed]
  • Schaal David W, Branch Marc N. Responding of pigeons under variable-interval schedules of unsignaled, briefly signaled, and completely signaled delays to reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1988 Jul;50(1):33–54. [PubMed]
  • Schaal DW, Branch MN. Responding of pigeons under variable-interval schedules of signaled-delayed reinforcement: effects of delay-signal duration. J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 Jan;53(1):103–121. [PubMed]
  • Schama KF, Branch MN. Tolerance to cocaine's rate-increasing effects upon repeated administration. J Exp Anal Behav. 1994 Jul;62(1):45–56. [PubMed]
  • Schuster CR, Dockens WS, Woods JH. Behavioral variables affecting the development of amphetamine tolerance. Psychopharmacologia. 1966;9(2):170–182. [PubMed]
  • Schuster CR, Thompson T. Self administration of and behavioral dependence on drugs. Annu Rev Pharmacol. 1969;9:483–502. [PubMed]
  • Sizemore OJ, Lattal Kennon A. Dependency, temporal contiguity, and response-independent reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1977 Jan;27(1):119–125. [PubMed]