pmc logo image
Logo of jeabehavJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Web SiteSubscriber LoginJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis Web SiteSubscription InformationInformation for AuthorsJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Web SiteJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Web Site

Formats:

J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 May; 65(3): 549–560.
doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-549.
PMCID: PMC1349951
Response-independent food delivery and behavioral resistance to change
David N. Harper
Abstract
Response-independent food was delivered during a dark-key phase between two multiple-schedule components to explore its disruptive effects on responding. Responding in components was maintained by separate variable-interval 120-s schedules, with a 2-s reinforcer in Component 1 and a 6-s reinforcer in Component 2. Across conditions the rate and duration of response-independent food presentations were manipulated. The results showed that response rates in both components decreased as a function of the duration and the rate of response-independent food presentations; moreover, the decrease in response rate relative to the baseline level was larger in Component 1 than in Component 2. These findings were consistent with expectations from behavioral momentum theory, which predicts that if equal disruption (response-independent food in this case) is applied to responding in two components, then the ratio of response-rate change in Component 1 versus Component 2 should remain constant, irrespective of the magnitude of that disruption.
Full text
Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.5M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Bouzas Arturo. The relative law of effect: effects of shock intensity on response strength in multiple schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1978 Nov;30(3):307–314. [PubMed]
  • Fath Stephen J, Fields Lanny, Malott M Kay, Grossett Deborah. Response rate, latency, and resistance to change. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Mar;39(2):267–274. [PubMed]
  • Harper David N, McLean Anthony P. Resistance to change and the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 May;57(3):317–337. [PubMed]
  • Nevin John A. On the form of the relation between response rates in a multiple schedule. J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Mar;21(2):237–248. [PubMed]
  • Nevin JA. An integrative model for the study of behavioral momentum. J Exp Anal Behav. 1992 May;57(3):301–316. [PubMed]
  • Nevin John A, Mandell Charlotte, Atak Jean R. The analysis of behavioral momentum. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Jan;39(1):49–59. [PubMed]
  • Nevin JA, Tota ME, Torquato RD, Shull RL. Alternative reinforcement increases resistance to change: Pavlovian or operant contingencies? J Exp Anal Behav. 1990 May;53(3):359–379. [PubMed]
  • Pliskoff SS, Shull RL, Gollub LR. The relation between response rates and reinforcement rates in a multiple schedule. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3):271–284. [PubMed]