pmc logo image
Logo of jeabehavJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Web SiteSubscriber LoginJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis Web SiteSubscription InformationInformation for AuthorsJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Web SiteJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Web Site

Formats:

J Exp Anal Behav. 1996 May; 65(3): 495–512.
doi: 10.1901/jeab.1996.65-495.
PMCID: PMC1349948
Drug discrimination under a concurrent schedule.
S H Snodgrass and D E McMillan
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock 72205, USA.
Abstract
Three pigeons were trained to discriminate a 5.0 mg/kg dose of pentobarbital from saline under a two-key concurrent schedule with responding on the key associated with the presession injection, under both stimulus conditions, producing four times as many reinforcers as responding on the other key. This concurrent schedule resulted in approximately 70% responding to the higher reinforcement key under the pentobarbital stimulus and approximately 30% responding to that key under the saline stimulus. During testing, then, the pigeons were able to dose-dependently emit higher (>70%) or lower (<30%) values than were established under the control conditions. Dose-response curves were determined for pentobarbital (twice), methamphetamine, phencyclidine, chlordiazepoxide, and the combination of pentobarbital and the barbiturate antagonist bemegride. The results obtained with pentobarbital and chlordiazepoxide showed that, as the dose increased, pentobarbital-appropriate responding also increased. Methamphetamine produced relatively flat dose--response curves, whereas phencyclidine administration produced inconsistent effects on responding. The combination of the training dose of pentobarbital with increasing doses of bemegride produced a decrease in pentobarbital-appropriate responding. The results also showed that the dose-response curves for pentobarbital and chlordiazepoxide, instead of being all or none, were graded functions of the drug dose.
Full text
Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (2.3M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Alsop B, Davison M. Effects of varying stimulus disparity and the reinforcer ratio in concurrent-schedule and signal-detection procedures. J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Jul;56(1):67–80. [PubMed]
  • Baum WM. Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice. J Exp Anal Behav. 1979 Sep;32(2):269–281. [PubMed]
  • Catania AC, Reynolds GS. A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3 Suppl):327–383. [PubMed]
  • Colpaert FC. The discriminative response: an elementary particle of behavior Commentary on Stolerman "Measures of stimulus generalization in drug discrimination experiments". Behav Pharmacol. 1991 Nov;2(4-5):283–286. [PubMed]
  • Davison Michael, McCarthy Dianne. Reinforcement for errors in a signal-detection procedure. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Jul;34(1):35–47. [PubMed]
  • FLESHLER M, HOFFMAN HS. A progression for generating variable-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Oct;5:529–530. [PubMed]
  • Herling S, Valentino RJ, Winger GD. Discriminative stimulus effects of pentobarbital in pigeons. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1980;71(1):21–28. [PubMed]
  • Herling S, Winger G. Selective blockade of the discriminative stimulus effects of pentobarbital in pigeons. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1981;75(3):321–323. [PubMed]
  • Herrnstein RJ, Loveland Donald H. Maximizing and matching on concurrent ratio schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1975 Jul;24(1):107–116. [PubMed]
  • Logue AW. Signal detection and matching: analyzing choice on concurrent variable-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1983 Jan;39(1):107–127. [PubMed]
  • Massey BW, McMillan DE, Wessinger WD. Discriminative-stimulus control by morphine in the pigeon under a fixed-interval schedule of reinforcement. Behav Pharmacol. 1992 Oct;3(5):475–488. [PubMed]
  • McMillan DE, Wenger GR. Bias of phencyclidine discrimination by the schedule of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Jul;42(1):51–66. [PubMed]
  • Nevin JA, Jenkins P, Whittaker S, Yarensky P. Reinforcement contingencies and signal detection. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Jan;37(1):65–79. [PubMed]
  • Overton DA. Influence of shaping procedures and schedules of reinforcement on performance in the two-bar drug discrimination task: a methodological report. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1979 Nov;65(3):291–298. [PubMed]
  • Overton DA. Similarities and differences between behavioral control by drug-produced stimuli and by sensory stimuli. Psychopharmacol Ser. 1988;4:176–198. [PubMed]
  • Snodgrass SH, McMillan DE. Effects of schedule of reinforcement on a pentobarbital discrimination in rats. J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Sep;56(2):313–329. [PubMed]
  • Stolerman IP. Discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine in rats trained under different schedules of reinforcement. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1989;97(1):131–138. [PubMed]
  • Stoleman IP. Measures of stimulus generalization in drug discrimination experiments. Behav Pharmacol. 1991 Nov;2(4-5):265–282. [PubMed]
  • Willetts J, Balster RL. Pentobarbital-like discriminative stimulus effects of N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1989 May;249(2):438–443. [PubMed]
  • Young AM. The time is ripe for an experimental analysis of measurement issues Commentary on Stolerman "Measurement issues in drug discrimination". Behav Pharmacol. 1991 Nov;2(4-5):287–291. [PubMed]