• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of jeabehavJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Web SiteSubscriber LoginJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis Web SiteSubscription InformationInformation for AuthorsJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Web Site
J Exp Anal Behav. Nov 1984; 42(3): 397–406.
PMCID: PMC1348111

Melioration and self-experimentation


Operant researchers rarely use the arena of applied psychology to motivate or to judge their research. Absence of tests by application weakens the field of basic operant research. Early in their development, the physical and biological sciences emphasized meliorative aspects of research. Improvement of human life was a major goal of these young sciences. This paper argues that if basic operant researchers analogously invoked a melioration criterion, the operant field might avoid its tendency toward ingrowth and instead generate a broadly influential science. Operant researchers could incorporate melioration by (a) creating animal models to study applied problems; (b) confronting questions raised by applied analysts and testing hypotheses in applied settings; or (c) performing self-experiments—that is, using experimental methods and behavioral techniques to study and change the experimenter's behavior.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.4M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Altman LK. Auto-experimentation. An unappreciated tradition in medical science. N Engl J Med. 1972 Feb 17;286(7):346–352. [PubMed]
  • ANTONITIS JJ. Response variability in the white rat during conditioning, extinction, and reconditioning. J Exp Psychol. 1951 Oct;42(4):273–281. [PubMed]
  • Baum M. Extinction of avoidance responding through response prevention (flooding). Psychol Bull. 1970 Oct;74(4):276–284. [PubMed]
  • Blough DS. The reinforcement of least-frequent interresponse times. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Sep;9(5):581–591. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Grosch J, Neuringer A. Self-control in pigeons under the Mischel paradigm. J Exp Anal Behav. 1981 Jan;35(1):3–21. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • HERRNSTEIN RJ. Stereotypy and intermittent reinforcement. Science. 1961 Jun 30;133(3470):2067–2069. [PubMed]
  • Hursh SR. Economic concepts for the analysis of behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1980 Sep;34(2):219–238. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • KOHLER I. Experiments with goggles. Sci Am. 1962 May;206:62–72. [PubMed]
  • Nevin John A. On resisting extinction: A review of Jonathan Schell's The Fate of the Earth. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Nov;38(3):349–353. [PMC free article]
  • Pryor KW, Haag R, O'reilly J. The creative porpoise: training for novel behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Jul;12(4):653–661. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Rachlin H, Green L. Commitment, choice and self-control. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Jan;17(1):15–22. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Schwartz B. Failure to produce response variability with reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1982 Mar;37(2):171–181. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


  • PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...