pmc logo image
Logo of jeabehavJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Web SiteSubscriber LoginJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis Web SiteSubscription InformationInformation for AuthorsJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Web SiteJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Web Site

Formats:

J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 July; 20(1): 137–153.
doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-137.
PMCID: PMC1334111
The correlation-based law of effect1
William M. Baum
1Preparation of this paper was supported by grants from the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, and the National Institute of Mental Health to Harvard University. The author thanks R. J. Herrnstein and H. Rachlin for their helpful advice and criticism. Reprints may be obtained from the author, Dept. of Psychology, Harvard University, William James Hall, 33 Kirkland St., Cambridge, Mass. 02138.
Abstract
It is commonly understood that the interactions between an organism and its environment constitute a feedback system. This implies that instrumental behavior should be viewed as a continuous exchange between the organism and the environment. It follows that orderly relations between behavior and environment should emerge at the level of aggregate flow in time, rather than momentary events. These notions require a simple, but fundamental, change in the law of effect: from a law based on contiguity of events to a law based on correlation between events. Much recent research and argument favors such a change. If the correlation-based law of effect is accepted, it favors measures and units of analysis that transcend momentary events, extending through time. One can measure all consequences on a common scale, called value. One can define a unit of analysis called the behavioral situation, which circumscribes a set of values. These concepts allow redefinition of reinforcement and punishment, and clarification of their relation to discriminative stimuli.
Full text
Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (2.6M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • ANGER D. The role of temporal discriminations in the reinforcement of Sidman avoidance behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Jul;6(3):477–506. [PubMed]
  • Baum William M, Rachlin Howard C. Choice as time allocation. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Nov;12(6):861–874. [PubMed]
  • BOREN JJ, SIDMAN M. A discrimination based upon repeated conditioning and extinction of avoidance behavior. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1957 Feb;50(1):18–22. [PubMed]
  • Bower G, McLean J, Meacham J. Value of knowing when reinforcement is due. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1966 Oct;62(2):184–192. [PubMed]
  • Brownstein Aaron J, Pliskoff Stanley S. Some effects of relative reinforcement rate and changeover delay in response-independent concurrent schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Nov;11(6):683–688. [PubMed]
  • BULLOCK DH, SMITH WC. An effect of repeated conditioning-extinction upon operant strength. J Exp Psychol. 1953 Nov;46(5):349–352. [PubMed]
  • CATANIA AC. Concurrent performances: reinforcement interaction and response independence. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Apr;6:253–263. [PubMed]
  • CATANIA AC. Concurrent performances: a baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude. J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Apr;6:299–300. [PubMed]
  • Catania AC, Reynolds GS. A quantitative analysis of the responding maintained by interval schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3 Suppl):327–383. [PubMed]
  • Chung Shin-Ho, Herrnstein RJ. Choice and delay of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Jan;10(1):67–74. [PubMed]
  • Davison MC. Preference for mixed-interval versus fixed-interval schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Mar;12(2):247–252. [PubMed]
  • De Villiers Peter A. Reinforcement and response rate interaction in multiple random-interval avoidance schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Nov;18(3):499–507. [PubMed]
  • DEWS PB. Free-operant behavior under conditions of delayed reinforcement. I. CRF-type schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1960 Jul;3:221–234. [PubMed]
  • DEWS PB. The effect of multiple S delta periods on responding on a fixed-interval schedule. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Jul;5:369–374. [PubMed]
  • Dews PB. The effect of multiple S-delta periods on responding on a fixed-interval schedule: 3. Effect of changes in pattern of interruptions, parameters and stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1965 Nov;8(6):427–435. [PubMed]
  • Duncan Barbara, Fantino Edmund. Choice for periodic schedules of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Jul;14(1):73–86. [PubMed]
  • Fantino E. Effects of required rates of responding upon choice. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Jan;11(1):15–22. [PubMed]
  • HERRNSTEIN RJ. Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4:267–272. [PubMed]
  • HERRNSTEIN RJ. SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT AND RATE OF PRIMARY REINFORCEMENT. J Exp Anal Behav. 1964 Jan;7:27–36. [PubMed]
  • Herrnstein RJ. Method and theory in the study of avoidance. Psychol Rev. 1969 Jan;76(1):49–69. [PubMed]
  • Herrnstein RJ. On the law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):243–266. [PubMed]
  • Herrnstein RJ, Hineline PN. Negative reinforcement as shock-frequency reduction. J Exp Anal Behav. 1966 Jul;9(4):421–430. [PubMed]
  • Holz WC. Punishment and rate of positive reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3):285–292. [PubMed]
  • Killeen P. On the measurement of reinforcement frequency in the study of preference. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3):263–269. [PubMed]
  • Neuringer AJ. Effects of reinforcement magnitude on choice and rate of responding. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Sep;10(5):417–424. [PubMed]
  • Rachlin Howard, Baum William M. Response rate as a function of amount of reinforcement for a signalled concurrent response. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Jan;12(1):11–16. [PubMed]
  • Rachlin Howard, Baum William M. Effects of alternative reinforcement: does the source matter? J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Sep;18(2):231–241. [PubMed]
  • Schneider Bruce A. A two-state analysis of fixed-interval responding in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Sep;12(5):677–687. [PubMed]
  • Schneider JW. Choice between two-component chained and tandem schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1972 Jul;18(1):45–60. [PubMed]
  • Schuster Richard, Rachlin Howard. Indifference between punishment and free shock: evidence for the negative law of effect. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Nov;11(6):777–786. [PubMed]
  • Shull RL, Pliskoff SS. Changeover delay and concurrent schedules: some effects on relative performance measures. J Exp Anal Behav. 1967 Nov;10(6):517–527. [PubMed]
  • SIDMAN M. Two temporal parameters of the maintenance of avoidance behavior by the white rat. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1953 Aug;46(4):253–261. [PubMed]
  • Ten Eyck Robert L. Effects of rate of reinforcement-time upon concurrent operant performance. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Nov;14(3):269–274. [PubMed]
  • Wilton RN, Clements RO. Observing responses and informative stimuli. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Mar;15(2):199–204. [PubMed]