pmc logo image
Logo of jeabehavJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Web SiteSubscriber LoginJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis Web SiteSubscription InformationInformation for AuthorsJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Web SiteJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Web Site

Formats:

J Exp Anal Behav. 1973 January; 19(1): 65–72.
doi: 10.1901/jeab.1973.19-65.
PMCID: PMC1334052
The maintenance of key pecking by stimulus-contingent and response-independent food presentation
Elkan Gamzu and Barry Schwartz
Abstract
Three naive pigeons were exposed to a series of two-component multiple schedules of response-independent food presentation. The component schedules were sometimes identical (non-differential procedures) and sometimes different (differential procedures). High rates of key pecking were maintained in all the differential procedures, and pecking decreased substantially in non-differential procedures, even when the frequency of food presentation in non-differential procedures was higher than in differential procedures. It is suggested that the high rates of key pecking were maintained not by adventitious response-reinforcer contingencies, but by differential contingencies between the stimulus (keylight) and food. The role of such contingencies in the phenomenon of behavioral contrast is discussed.
Full text
Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.0M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • APPEL JB, HISS RH. The discrimination of contingent from noncontingent reinforcement. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1962 Feb;55:37–39. [PubMed]
  • BRETHOWER DM, REYNOLDS GS. A facilitative effect of punishment on unpunished behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1962 Apr;5:191–199. [PubMed]
  • Brown PL, Jenkins HM. Auto-shaping of the pigeon's key-peck. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Jan;11(1):1–8. [PubMed]
  • EGGER MD, MILLER NE. Secondary reinforcement in rats as a function of information value and reliability of the stimulus. J Exp Psychol. 1962 Aug;64:97–104. [PubMed]
  • Gamzu E, Williams DR. Classical conditioning of a complex skeletal response. Science. 1971 Mar 5;171(974):923–925. [PubMed]
  • Gardner William M. Auto-shaping in bobwhite quail. J Exp Anal Behav. 1969 Mar;12(2):279–281. [PubMed]
  • HERRNSTEIN RJ, MORSE WH. Some effects of response-independent positive reinforcement on maintained operant behavior. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1957 Oct;50(5):461–467. [PubMed]
  • Lachter Gerald D. Some temporal parameters of non-contingent reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Sep;16(2):207–217. [PubMed]
  • Lattal KA, Maxey GC. Some effects of response independent reinforcers in multiple schedules. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Sep;16(2):225–231. [PubMed]
  • Neuringer Allen J. Superstitious key pecking after three peck-produced reinforcements. J Exp Anal Behav. 1970 Mar;13(2):127–134. [PubMed]
  • REYNOLDS GS. Behavioral contrast. J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jan;4:57–71. [PubMed]
  • Sidman M, Fletcher FG. A demonstration of auto-shaping with monkeys. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 May;11(3):307–309. [PubMed]
  • Smith Stanley G, Borgen Lowell A, Davis W Marvin, Pace Henry B. Automatic magazine and bar-press training in the rat. J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Mar;15(2):197–198. [PubMed]
  • Terrace HS. Discrimination learning, the peak shift, and behavioral contrast. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Nov;11(6):727–741. [PubMed]
  • Zeiler MD. Fixed and variable schedules of response-independent reinforcement. J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Jul;11(4):405–414. [PubMed]