• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of jphysiolThe Journal of Physiology SiteMembershipSubmissionJ Physiol
J Physiol. Apr 1971; 214(2): 265–294.1.
PMCID: PMC1331836

Receptive fields of cones in the retina of the turtle

Abstract

1. Intracellular recordings have been made of the responses to light of single cones in the retina of the turtle. The shape of the hyperpolarizing response to a flash depends on the pattern of retinal illumination as well as the stimulus intensity.

2. Although changes in the stimulus pattern can produce changes in the effective stimulus intensity, the responses to certain patterns cannot be matched by any adjustment of stimulus intensity.

3. The initial portion of responses to large or small stimulating spots is proportional to light intensity; this allows comparison of responses when the amount of light on a cone is kept constant but the light on surrounding cones is changed. For equal light intensity on the cone, the response to a spot 2 or 4 μ in radius is smaller than that to a spot 70 μ in radius.

4. Responses to spots 70 and 600 μ in radius coincide over their rising phases and peaks without any adjustment of stimulus intensity. The responses to the larger spot, however, contain a delayed depolarization not present with the smaller spot.

5. During steady illumination of a cone with a small central spot, the response to transient illumination superimposed on the same area is greatly reduced. Illumination of cones in the near surround, however, produces a hyperpolarizing response, and illumination of cones in the more distant surround generates a delayed depolarization.

6. The results described above suggested that synaptic signals might impinge on cones. This possibility was tested by electrically polarizing one retinal cell while recording from another.

7. Currents passed through a cone within 40 μ of another cone can change the membrane potential of the latter. Not all cones within this distance show the interaction, however, and it has never been detected at distances greater than 50 μ.

8. Hyperpolarization of a horizontal cell with applied current can produce a depolarization of a cone in the vicinity. During this depolarization, the response of the cone to a flash is reduced in size and altered in shape.

9. It is concluded that the response of a cone to light may be modified by synaptic mechanisms which are activated by peripheral illumination.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (2.8M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Images in this article

Click on the image to see a larger version.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Baylor DA, Fuortes MG. Electrical responses of single cones in the retina of the turtle. J Physiol. 1970 Mar;207(1):77–92. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Bortoff A. Localization of slow potential responses in the Necturus retina. Vision Res. 1964 Dec;4(11):627–635. [PubMed]
  • Bortoff A, Norton AL. An electrical model of the vertebrate photoreceptor cell. Vision Res. 1967 Mar;7(3):253–263. [PubMed]
  • Brown KT. A linear area centralis extending across the turtle retina and stabilized to t horizon by non-visual cues. Vision Res. 1969 Sep;9(9):1053–1062. [PubMed]
  • Byzov AL, Trifonov JA. The response to electric stimulation of horizontal cells in the carp retina. Vision Res. 1968 Jul;8(7):817–822. [PubMed]
  • FUORTES MG, HODGKIN AL. CHANGES IN TIME SCALE AND SENSITIVITY IN THE OMMATIDIA OF LIMULUS. J Physiol. 1964 Aug;172:239–263. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kaneko A. Physiological and morphological identification of horizontal, bipolar and amacrine cells in goldfish retina. J Physiol. 1970 May;207(3):623–633. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kaneko A, Hashimoto H. Recording site of the single cone response determined by an electrode marking technique. Vision Res. 1967 Nov;7(11):847–851. [PubMed]
  • Tomita T, Kaneko A. An intracellular coaxial microelectrode--its construction and application. Med Electron Biol Eng. 1965 Oct;3(4):367–376. [PubMed]
  • Werblin FS, Dowling JE. Organization of the retina of the mudpuppy, Necturus maculosus. II. Intracellular recording. J Neurophysiol. 1969 May;32(3):339–355. [PubMed]

Articles from The Journal of Physiology are provided here courtesy of The Physiological Society

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • Cited in Books
    Cited in Books
    PubMed Central articles cited in books
  • Compound
    Compound
    PubChem Compound links
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles
  • Substance
    Substance
    PubChem Substance links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...