• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of jeabehavJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Web SiteSubscriber LoginJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis Web SiteSubscription InformationInformation for AuthorsJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Web Site
J Exp Anal Behav. Jul 1993; 60(1): 3–15.
PMCID: PMC1322142

Adaptation, teleology, and selection by consequences

Abstract

This paper presents and defends the view that reinforcement and natural selection are selection processes, that selection processes are neither mechanistic nor teleological, and that mentalistic and vitalistic processes are teleological but not mechanistic. The differences between these types of processes are described and used in discussing the conceptual and methodological significance of “selection type theories” and B. F. Skinner's radical behaviorist view that “operant behavior is the field of intention, purpose, and expectation. It deals with that field precisely as the theory of evolution has dealt with another kind of purpose” (1986, p. 716). The antimentalism of radical behaviorism emerges as a post-Darwinian extension of Francis Bacon's (and Galileo's) influential view that “[the introduction of final causes] rather corrupts than advances the sciences” (Bacon, 1905, p. 302).

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (2.2M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Catania A Charles. Some Darwinian lessons for behavior analysis: A review of Bowler's The Eclipse of Darwinism. J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Mar;47(2):249–257. [PMC free article]
  • Lenski RE, Mittler JE. The directed mutation controversy and neo-Darwinism. Science. 1993 Jan 8;259(5092):188–194. [PubMed]
  • Lubinski D, Thompson T. An animal model of the interpersonal communication of interoceptive (private) states. J Exp Anal Behav. 1987 Jul;48(1):1–15. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • MAYR E. Cause and effect in biology. Science. 1961 Nov 10;134(3489):1501–1506. [PubMed]
  • Rescorla RA. Pavlovian conditioning. It's not what you think it is. Am Psychol. 1988 Mar;43(3):151–160. [PubMed]
  • Skinner BF. Selection by consequences. Science. 1981 Jul 31;213(4507):501–504. [PubMed]
  • Skinner BF. The evolution of behavior. J Exp Anal Behav. 1984 Mar;41(2):217–221. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sohn D. Two concepts of adaptation: Darwin's and psychology's. J Hist Behav Sci. 1976 Oct;12(4):367–375. [PubMed]
  • Staddon JE, Hinson JM. Optimization: a result or a mechanism? Science. 1983 Sep 2;221(4614):976–977. [PubMed]
  • Williams BA. Enduring problems for molecular accounts of operant behavior. J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1990 Apr;16(2):213–221. [PubMed]
  • Williams BA. Choice as a function of local versus molar reinforcement contingencies. J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Nov;56(3):455–473. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior are provided here courtesy of Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...