![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology Use of Ramification Amplification Assay for Detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Other E. coli Shiga Toxin-Producing Strains Department of Pathogenobiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, China,1 Department of Pathology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York,2 Department of Nutrition and Food Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland3 *Corresponding author. Mailing address: Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, Box 1122, One Gustave Levy Place, Box 1122, New York, NY 10029. Phone: (212) 659-8173. Fax: (212) 427-2082. E-mail: David.Zhang/at/mssm.edu. Received February 10, 2005; Revised April 28, 2005; Accepted August 17, 2005. Abstract Escherichia coli O157:H7 and other Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) strains are important human pathogens that are mainly transmitted through the food chain. These pathogens have a low infectious dose and may cause life-threatening illnesses. However, detection of this microorganism in contaminated food or a patient's stool specimens presents a diagnostic challenge because of the low copy number in the sample. Often, a more sensitive nucleic acid amplification method, such as PCR, is required for rapid detection of this microorganism. Ramification amplification (RAM) is a recently introduced isothermal DNA amplification technique that utilizes a circular probe for target detection and achieves exponential amplification through the mechanism of primer extension, strand displacement, and ramification. In this study, we synthesized a circular probe specific for the Shiga toxin 2 gene (stx2). Our results showed that as few as 10 copies of stx2 could be detected, indicating that the RAM assay was as sensitive as conventional PCR. We further tested 33 isolates of E coli O157:H7, STEC, Shigella dysenteriae, and nonpathogenic E. coli by RAM assay. Results showed that all 27 STEC isolates containing the stx2 gene were identified by RAM assay, while S. dysenteriae and nonpathogenic E. coli isolates were undetected. The RAM results were 100% in concordance with those of PCR. Because of its simplicity and isothermal amplification, the RAM assay could be a useful method for detecting STEC in food and human specimens. Escherichia coli O157:H7 and other Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) strains have emerged as significant food-borne pathogens since their early identification in 1982 (7). They can cause severe clinical manifestations, including bloody diarrhea, hemorrhagic colitis, and postinfection hemolytic-uremic syndrome, symptoms associated with high morbidity and mortality. Cytotoxins, Shiga toxin types 1 and 2, produced by E. coli O157:H7 and STEC are responsible for these clinical symptoms (6). Infection with E. coli O157:H7 and STEC can occur sporadically, in small clusters, or in large outbreaks. The bacteria may be transmitted in a variety of ways, most commonly through food and water. Ruminants have been established as important reservoirs of E. coli O157:H7, and consequently, foods derived from or contaminated by these animals and their products are the major vehicles of transmission (5). A number of methods have been developed for detecting the pathogens in food and clinical specimens, including culture isolation using selective media, such as sorbitol-substituted MacConkey agar and methylumbelliferyl-β-d-glucuronide agar, serological tests to detect O157 and H7 antigens, and immunological detection of Shiga toxins (5). To achieve sensitive, specific, and rapid detection of STEC and E. coli O157:H7 strains in clinical specimens and food products, several research teams have employed the PCR technique (1, 2). However, a number of drawbacks associated with such a PCR approach have limited its routine use in many laboratories (2). We have recently developed a novel isothermal DNA amplification technology, termed ramification amplification or RAM (8). In this study, we developed a detection assay by combining magnetic bead-based DNA isolation, DNA amplification by RAM, and real-time fluorescence detection (9). The technique uses a circularizable probe to detect the target with subsequent amplification of the circular probe generated by a target-dependent ligation through a mechanism of primer extension, strand displacement, and ramification to achieve a billionfold amplification under isothermal conditions (Fig. (Fig.1)1
MATERIALS AND METHODS Sample preparation. Bacterial isolates were obtained from the University of Maryland (18 isolates) and Center for Disease Control, China (12 isolates). All E. coli isolates were characterized by culture on sorbitol-substituted MacConkey agar and serologically typed for O and H antigens (Table 1). The presence of Shiga toxin genes (stx1 and stx2) was determined by PCR for all isolates. Of the 32 E. coli isolates, 23 were sorbitol negative and 22 were serologically determined to be E. coli O157:H7. Seven isolates were serologically determined to be non-O157 strains, of which six were sorbitol fermenters and only one was a nonfermenter. Three nonpathogenic E. coli isolates and one Shigella dysenteriae isolate obtained from the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Mount Sinai Hospital, were included as controls in this study.
The bacteria were inoculated onto a blood agar plate and incubated at 37°C overnight. A single colony was picked and suspended in water in a centrifuge tube. For the RAM assay, the bacteria were washed twice with saline and lysed in 100 μl of 5 M guanidium thiocyanate (GTC; Sigma, St. Louis, MO), 0.5% bovine serum albumin (Sigma), 80 mM EDTA, 400 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), and 0.5% sodium-N-lauroylsarcosine (Sigma) (9). The lysates were incubated at 100°C for 10 min and then at 60°C overnight. The lysed specimens were stored at −20°C until later use. For PCR assay, the bacteria were resuspended in 200 μl of distilled water, heated to 99°C for 10 min, and then centrifuged for 2 min at 12,000 rpm in an Eppendorf centrifuge. The resulting supernatant was used for PCR assay. For quantitative analysis of E. coli O157:H7, a bacterial colony was picked and dissolved in saline. The bacterial density was determined by densitometry, and the concentration was determined by comparing the optical density value with those of standards of known bacterial concentrations. The bacteria were diluted with saline in a series of 10-fold dilutions, starting from 105 to 10 bacteria/μl. One microliter of suspension was inoculated onto MacConkey agar, and the number of colonies formed was determined to confirm the number of bacteria in initial dilutions. The supernatant was removed, and 5 M GTC was added to each tube, boiled at 100°C for 10 min, and incubated at 60°C overnight. PCR assay. PCR was carried out in a 50-μl reaction mixture composed of 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM concentrations of each deoxynucleoside triphosphate, 10 pmol of each primer (Table 2), 1 unit of Taq DNA polymerase (Roche, Indianapolis, IN), and 10 μl of bacterial lysate (2). The reaction was performed in a thermal cycler (GeneAmp 2700 PCR system; Perkin Elmer, Boston, MA) for 30 cycles of 94°C, 55°C, and 72°C for 1 min each. Fifteen microliters of PCR products was analyzed by gel electrophoresis using a 2.0% agarose gel and visualized after staining with 0.5 μg/ml of ethidium bromide. The expected PCR products are 614 bp for stx1 and 779 bp for stx2.
RAM assay. The RAM assay consists of steps, including hybridization of C-probe and capture probe to a target, capture of the hybrid onto magnetic beads, washing of the beads to remove unbound probes and cellular components, ligation of the 3′ and 5′ ends to form a closed C-probe, and amplification by primer extension, strand displacement, and ramification (Fig. (Fig.1)1 Real-time RAM. The RAM reactions were carried out as described above except that 2.5 μl of 1:5,000 diluted SYBR Green I (Roche) was added to each reaction mixture. SYBR Green I is a fluorochrome that, upon binding to the minor groove of double-stranded DNA, emits an intense green fluorescent signal which can be readily detected using a fluorometer. The reactions were monitored at 37°C for 2 h in a SmartCycler (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION RAM technology employs a circular probe for target detection and amplification, which offers several unique features (Fig. (Fig.1)1 We initially determined the analytical sensitivity of the RAM assay using a synthetic stx2 DNA target (Table 2). The DNA was diluted in 100-fold serial dilutions from 105 to 103 to 101 molecules/2 μl and was used to initiate the RAM reaction. The lowest number of targets detected by RAM assay was 10 molecules (Fig. (Fig.2A),2A
To determine the assay specificity, we tested several bacterial strains, including E. coli O157:H7, E. coli O46:H38, E. coli O111:NM, three nonpathogenic E. coli isolates, and S. dysenteriae by RAM assay to determine the assay specificity. As expected, E. coli O157:H7, E. coli O46:H38, and E. coli O111:NM were positive for the stx2 gene, while S. dysenteriae and the three nonpathogenic E. coli isolates were negative (Fig. (Fig.3).3
We then tested 29 pathogenic E. coli isolates from human and food samples for the presence of stx genes (Table 1). The presence of stx genes was determined by PCR using primers specific for stx1 and stx2 (Table 2). Since the C-probe was designed specifically to recognize stx2, it was expected that the presence of stx2 would give a positive result by RAM assay. All 27 Shiga toxin 2-producing E. coli isolates were positive by RAM assay, irrespective of their serological types (Table 1). Two pathogenic E. coli isolates containing only stx1 were negative by RAM assay, thus confirming the specificity of the C-probe. It will be desirable to detect the RAM reaction by real-time monitoring instead of gel electrophoresis. We applied SYBR Green I dye in our RAM reactions. The initial experiment was performed using a lysed E. coli O157:H7 sample. Our results showed that as few as 10 bacteria could be detected and that the time needed for the emergence of a detectable signal was dependent on the target concentration (Fig. (Fig.4A).4A
This study demonstrated that RAM assay could be another DNA amplification method to detect STEC. The high sensitivity and specificity of the RAM assay coupled with its ease of application encourage further investigation and improvement of this technique. Future study will focus on designing several C-probes to target other virulence genes, such as the stx1, hly, and eae genes, for multiplex RAM assay. We also hope, in the near future, to conduct a larger clinical study to determine assay sensitivity and specificity for complex clinical samples such as stool and food. Acknowledgments This work was supported in part by grants from the United States Department of Agriculture (2003-35201-12856) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (30271251). REFERENCES 1. Chen, S., R. Xu, A. Yee, K. Wu, C. Wang, S. Read, and S. De Grandis. 1998. An automated fluorescent PCR method for detection of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in foods. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:4210-4216. [PubMed] 2. Cui, S., C. Schroeder, D. Zhang, and J. Meng. 2003. Rapid sample preparation method for PCR-based detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in ground beef. J. Appl. Microbiol. 95:129-134. [PubMed] 3. Hsuih, T. C. H., Y. N. Park, C. Zaretsky, F. Wu, S. Tyagi, F. R. Kramer, R. Sperling, and D. Y. Zhang. 1996. Novel, ligation-dependent PCR assay for detection of hepatitis C virus in serum. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34:501-507. [PubMed] 4. Landegren, U., R. Kaiser, J. Sanders, and L. Hood. 1988. A ligase-mediated gene detection technique. Science 241:1077-1080. [PubMed] 5. Meng, J., M. Doyle, and M. Doyle. 2001. Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli, p. 193-213. In M. P. Doyle, L. R. Beuchat, and T. J. Montville (ed.), Food microbiology: fundamentals and frontiers. ASM Press, Washington, D.C. 6. O'Brien, A. D., V. L. Tesh, A. Donohue-Rolfe, M. P. Jackson, S. Olsnes, K. Sandvig, A. A. Lindberg, and G. T. Keusch. 1992. Shiga toxin: biochemistry, genetics, mode of action, and role in pathogenesis. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 180:65-94. [PubMed] 7. Riley, L., R. Remis, S. Helgerson, H. McGee, J. Wells, B. Davis, R. Hebert, E. Olcott, L. Johnson, N. Hargrett, P. Blake, and M. Cohen. 1983. Hemorrhagic colitis associated with a rare Escherichia coli serotype. N. Engl. J. Med. 308:681-685. [PubMed] 8. Zhang, D. Y., M. Brandwein, T. Hsuih, and H. B. Li. 2001. Ramification amplification: a novel isothermal DNA amplification method. Mol. Diagn. 6:141-150. [PubMed] 9. Zhang, D. Y., W. Zhang, X. Li, and Y. Konomi. 2001. Detection of rare DNA targets by isothermal ramification amplification. Gene 274:209-216. [PubMed] 10. Zhang, D. Y., M. Brandwein, T. C. H. Hsuih, and H. Li. 1998. Amplification of target-specific, ligation-dependent circular probe. Gene 211:277-285. [PubMed] 11. Zhang, W., M. Cohenford, B. Lentrichia, H. D. Isenberg, E. Simson, H. Li, J. Yi, and D. Y. Zhang. 2002. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by isothermal ramification amplification method: a feasibility study. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40:128-132. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||
N Engl J Med. 1983 Mar 24; 308(12):681-5.
[N Engl J Med. 1983]Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1992; 180():65-94.
[Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 1992]Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Nov; 64(11):4210-6.
[Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998]J Appl Microbiol. 2003; 95(1):129-34.
[J Appl Microbiol. 2003]Mol Diagn. 2001 Jun; 6(2):141-50.
[Mol Diagn. 2001]Gene. 2001 Aug 22; 274(1-2):209-16.
[Gene. 2001]J Clin Microbiol. 2002 Jan; 40(1):128-32.
[J Clin Microbiol. 2002]Gene. 2001 Aug 22; 274(1-2):209-16.
[Gene. 2001]J Appl Microbiol. 2003; 95(1):129-34.
[J Appl Microbiol. 2003]Mol Diagn. 2001 Jun; 6(2):141-50.
[Mol Diagn. 2001]Gene. 1998 May 12; 211(2):277-85.
[Gene. 1998]J Clin Microbiol. 2002 Jan; 40(1):128-32.
[J Clin Microbiol. 2002]J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Mar; 34(3):501-7.
[J Clin Microbiol. 1996]Science. 1988 Aug 26; 241(4869):1077-80.
[Science. 1988]