• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of brjgenpracRCGP homepageJ R Coll Gen Pract at PubMed CentralBJGP at RCGPBJGP at RCGP
Br J Gen Pract. May 2000; 50(454): 387–389.
PMCID: PMC1313704

Research in primary care: extent of involvement and perceived determinants among practitioners from one English region.


The lack of research evidence relevant to and generated by general practitioners (GPs) has been a concern in the context of a putative primary care-led National Health Service (NHS). However, very little has been published on the current extent or determinants of research activity among United Kingdom primary care doctors. We surveyed all (n = 2770) service GPs in the West Midlands Region in order to quantify their research involvement and to explore determinants of this. The response rate was 49% (n = 1351). A total of 84% of responders reported participating in research or audit, with 16% having initiated their own research; 9% of GPs had been published in a peer-reviewed journal; 6% had generated research funding; and 3% had held a research training fellowship. The characteristics positively associated with initiating research included an involvement in teaching, having research-active partners, the availability of protected time, and working in a larger practice. The most commonly perceived barriers to undertaking research were lack of time (92%), lack of staff to collect data (73%), and a lack of funding (71%). In all, 41% of responders reported no interest in research. Overall, the extent of research activity among responding GPs appears to be greater than is often assumed. Recent NHS research and development proposals to strengthen and develop research in primary care are, therefore, relevant in highlighting changes to address these issues.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (37K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Gray DP. Research in general practice: law of inverse opportunity. BMJ. 1991 Jun 8;302(6789):1380–1382. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Howie JG. Addressing the credibility gap in general practice research: better theory; more feeling; less strategy. Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Aug;46(409):479–481. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Silagy CA, Carson NE. Factors affecting the level of interest and activity in primary care research among general practitioners. Fam Pract. 1989 Sep;6(3):173–176. [PubMed]
  • de la Fuente JA, Mercader J, Borrell C, Martín C, Birulés M, Marcos L, Fernández de Sanmamed MJ. Factores relacionados con la actividad investigadora de los médicos de atención primaria. Aten Primaria. 1997 Apr 15;19(6):283–289. [PubMed]
  • Giveon S, Kahan E, Kitai E. Factors associated with family physicians' involvement in research in Israel. Acad Med. 1997 May;72(5):388–390. [PubMed]
  • Stange KC. Primary care research: barriers and opportunities. J Fam Pract. 1996 Feb;42(2):192–198. [PubMed]
  • Schroeder SA. Scientific evidence and research in primary care. Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1998 Feb 7;128(6):178–183. [PubMed]
  • Townsend P, Simpson D, Tibbs N. Inequalities in health in the city of Bristol: a preliminary review of statistical evidence. Int J Health Serv. 1985;15(4):637–663. [PubMed]
  • Hicks C, Hennessy D, Cooper J, Barwell F. Investigating attitudes to research in primary health care teams. J Adv Nurs. 1996 Nov;24(5):1033–1041. [PubMed]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


  • PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...