• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of brjgenpracRCGP homepageJ R Coll Gen Pract at PubMed CentralBJGP at RCGPBJGP at RCGP
Br J Gen Pract. May 2000; 50(454): 371–374.
PMCID: PMC1313700

Practical aspects of conducting a pragmatic randomised trial in primary care: patient recruitment and outcome assessment.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Conducting a pragmatic randomised trial in primary care is often accompanied by practical problems. Such problems are seldom reported and may constitute useful lessons for researchers planning future trials. AIM: To address the difficulties involved in patient recruitment and to present measures to minimise bias during outcome assessment. METHOD: A recently conducted trial comparing the effects of corticosteroid injections and physiotherapy for painful stiff shoulder was used to illustrate problems related to patient recruitment and outcome assessment. RESULTS: Recruitment of patients was not without difficulties despite careful preparation. Recruitment was discontinued after 20 months, when 109 of the intended 120 patients had been admitted to the trial. The shoulder trial mainly included patient-oriented subjective outcome measures. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that patient preferences might have had some influence on outcome. CONCLUSIONS: General practitioners might be willing or unwilling to participate in research for many reasons. The researcher should take these motivations into account when inviting physicians to take part in research. Strategies to enhance enrolment should be prepared before the start of the trial. When blinding of patients is problematic, patient preferences should be assessed before randomisation and their influence on the outcome studied. Although involving a blinded independent observer enables a more objective assessment of outcome, the success of blinding should be clearly evaluated.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (44K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Gore SM. Assessing clinical trials--first steps. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1981 May 16;282(6276):1605–1607. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Tognoni G, Alli C, Avanzini F, Bettelli G, Colombo F, Corso R, Marchioli R, Zussino A. Randomised clinical trials in general practice: lessons from a failure. BMJ. 1991 Oct 19;303(6808):969–971. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Charlton BG. Understanding randomized controlled trials: explanatory or pragmatic? Fam Pract. 1994 Sep;11(3):243–244. [PubMed]
  • Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA. 1995 Feb 1;273(5):408–412. [PubMed]
  • van der Windt DA, Koes BW, Devillé W, Boeke AJ, de Jong BA, Bouter LM. Effectiveness of corticosteroid injections versus physiotherapy for treatment of painful stiff shoulder in primary care: randomised trial. BMJ. 1998 Nov 7;317(7168):1292–1296. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • van der Windt DA, Koes BW, de Jong BA, Bouter LM. Shoulder disorders in general practice: incidence, patient characteristics, and management. Ann Rheum Dis. 1995 Dec;54(12):959–964. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • van der Windt DA, Koes BW, Boeke AJ, Devillé W, De Jong BA, Bouter LM. Shoulder disorders in general practice: prognostic indicators of outcome. Br J Gen Pract. 1996 Sep;46(410):519–523. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Silagy CA, Carson NE. Factors affecting the level of interest and activity in primary care research among general practitioners. Fam Pract. 1989 Sep;6(3):173–176. [PubMed]
  • Borgiel AE, Dunn EV, Lamont CT, MacDonald PJ, Evensen MK, Bass MJ, Spasoff RA, Williams JI. Recruiting family physicians as participants in research. Fam Pract. 1989 Sep;6(3):168–172. [PubMed]
  • Jonker PL, Sumajow CA. Randomised clinical trials in general practice. BMJ. 1992 Feb 22;304(6825):508–508. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Taylor KM, Kelner M. Interpreting physician participation in randomized clinical trials: the Physician Orientation Profile. J Health Soc Behav. 1987 Dec;28(4):389–400. [PubMed]
  • Murphy E, Spiegal N, Kinmonth AL. 'Will you help me with my research?' Gaining access to primary care settings and subjects. Br J Gen Pract. 1992 Apr;42(357):162–165. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Sutton-Tyrrell K, Crow S, Hankin B, Trudel J, Faille C. Communication during the recruitment phase of a multicenter trial: the recruitment hotline. Control Clin Trials. 1996 Oct;17(5):415–422. [PubMed]
  • Peto V, Coulter A, Bond A. Factors affecting general practitioners' recruitment of patients into a prospective study. Fam Pract. 1993 Jun;10(2):207–211. [PubMed]
  • Deyo RA, Walsh NE, Schoenfeld LS, Ramamurthy S. Can trials of physical treatments be blinded? The example of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for chronic pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1990 Feb;69(1):6–10. [PubMed]
  • Rabkin JG, Markowitz JS, Stewart J, McGrath P, Harrison W, Quitkin FM, Klein DF. How blind is blind? Assessment of patient and doctor medication guesses in a placebo-controlled trial of imipramine and phenelzine. Psychiatry Res. 1986 Sep;19(1):75–86. [PubMed]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...