![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright : © 2005 Ringnér and Krogh. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Folding Free Energies of 5′-UTRs Impact Post-Transcriptional Regulation on a Genomic Scale in Yeast Complex Systems Division, Department of Theoretical Physics, Lund University, Lund, Sweden Gary Stormo, Editor Washington University in St. Louis, United States of America * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: markus/at/thep.lu.se Received August 29, 2005; Accepted November 9, 2005. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Using high-throughput technologies, abundances and other features of genes and proteins have been measured on a genome-wide scale in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In contrast, secondary structure in 5′–untranslated regions (UTRs) of mRNA has only been investigated for a limited number of genes. Here, the aim is to study genome-wide regulatory effects of mRNA 5′-UTR folding free energies. We performed computations of secondary structures in 5′-UTRs and their folding free energies for all verified genes in S. cerevisiae. We found significant correlations between folding free energies of 5′-UTRs and various transcript features measured in genome-wide studies of yeast. In particular, mRNAs with weakly folded 5′-UTRs have higher translation rates, higher abundances of the corresponding proteins, longer half-lives, and higher numbers of transcripts, and are upregulated after heat shock. Furthermore, 5′-UTRs have significantly higher folding free energies than other genomic regions and randomized sequences. We also found a positive correlation between transcript half-life and ribosome occupancy that is more pronounced for short-lived transcripts, which supports a picture of competition between translation and degradation. Among the genes with strongly folded 5′-UTRs, there is a huge overrepresentation of uncharacterized open reading frames. Based on our analysis, we conclude that (i) there is a widespread bias for 5′-UTRs to be weakly folded, (ii) folding free energies of 5′-UTRs are correlated with mRNA translation and turnover on a genomic scale, and (iii) transcripts with strongly folded 5′-UTRs are often rare and hard to find experimentally. Synopsis In cells, proteins are made from messenger RNA copied from genes in the DNA. The amount of each protein needs to be controlled by cells. For this purpose, cells use a strategy that includes decomposing RNA and varying the number of proteins made from each RNA. One part of the RNA molecule is called the 5′–untranslated region (UTR), and it is known that this region can fold into a three-dimensional structure. For some genes, such structures are important for protein production. In this article, structures in 5′-UTRs are calculated for all genes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The authors show that structures in 5′-UTRs likely play a role in RNA decomposition and protein production for many genes in the genome: RNA molecules with weakly folded 5′-UTRs live relatively longer and produce more proteins. This study provides an example of how genome-wide computational analysis complements experimental results. Introduction Regulation of gene expression is important for many cellular processes. Numerous studies have focused on the transcriptional level to investigate under what conditions a gene is transcribed and to what extent. These investigations have led to descriptions of system architectures, in which the activity of specific transcription factors regulates the activity of downstream target genes in such a way that the combined activity results in large developmental or physiological programs. In recent years, such descriptions have benefited from DNA microarray technology, which has provided overall mRNA levels for many systems. However, much less is known about the system architecture of regulation of gene expression at the post-transcriptional level, including regulation of mRNA subcellular localization, stability, and translation rate. mRNA consists of three parts: a 5′–untranslated region (UTR) beginning with a 7-methyl-guanosine cap, a coding region, and a 3′-UTR ending in a poly(A) tail (Figure 1
The purpose of mRNA degradation is 2-fold: to regulate transcript abundance and to destroy faulty transcripts. Degradation of mRNA in yeast occurs via 5′ to 3′ exonucleotic, 3′ to 5′ exonucleotic, and endonucleotic pathways [16–19]. Regulation of transcript abundance via the exonucleotic pathways occurs by first shortening the poly(A) tail followed either by removal of the 5′ cap, resulting in rapid 5′ to 3′ degradation, or by degradation from the 3′ end without prior decapping [18,20]. The dual importance of the cap structure, for translation initiation and 5′ to 3′ mRNA decay, has led to the hypothesis that there is a competition between translation and decay for access to the cap [13,20,21]. Transcripts with 5′-UTRs that hamper their translation often encode for proteins that need to be strongly and finely regulated, such as growth factors, transcription factors, and proto-oncogenes [14], suggesting that 5′-UTRs are sometimes structured in a way to prevent harmful overproduction of regulatory proteins. Indeed, some diseases are caused by mutations in 5′-UTRs [22,23]. In agreement with this picture, proteins involved in the regulation of dynamic cellular processes such as transcription, signal transduction, cell cycle control, and metabolism have long UTRs [2]. To our knowledge no one has found genome-wide associations between secondary structure in 5′-UTRs and mRNA half-life, translation rates, or other transcript features. For example, Bernstein et al. [24] performed a genome-wide experiment of mRNA decay in Escherichia coli and found no association to secondary structure in UTRs. To study the regulatory effects of secondary structure in UTRs, we performed genome-wide computations of secondary structures and their folding free energies in 5′-UTRs for 5,888 verified genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The folding free energy is the difference in free energy between the unfolded and folded state. For a given mRNA length, a lower folding free energy corresponds to a more stable secondary structure. We analyzed associations between folding free energies and various transcript features including translation and decay rates. One result of our analysis is that low folding free energy of 5′-UTRs is, on average, associated with low translation rates and high transcript turnover, in concordance with previous results for single genes (e.g., [13]). We also found that 5′-UTRs on average are more weakly folded than random sequences with the same dinucleotide frequencies, and than intergenic, coding, and 3′-UTR sequences. Strikingly, genes with unknown function were enriched among genes with strongly folded 5′-UTRs. Results Folding Free Energies of 5′-UTRs To investigate secondary structure in 5′-UTRs, we used the Vienna RNA package [25] to compute secondary structures and the corresponding free energy changes for folding (ΔG). The lower ΔG is, the more strongly folded is the secondary structure. Using 5′-UTRs of length 50 nt, the average ΔG was −4.3 kcal/mol (standard deviation [SD] = 2.9 kcal/mol) for the 5,888 open reading frames (ORFs) investigated. The range of ΔG was from −18.1 kcal/mol to 0 kcal/mol. The lowest value of ΔG, −18.1 kcal/mol, was obtained for the gene YBR296C-A, whose computed 5′-UTR secondary structure is illustrated in Figure 1 Folding Free Energies of Other Genomic Regions Folding free energies were computed for three control groups, all containing 5,888 sequences of length 50 nt. The first group consisted of randomly chosen sequences from intergenic regions and had an average ΔG of −5.4 kcal/mol (SD = 3.4 kcal/mol). The second group consisted of the first 50 nt of the 3′-UTR of each ORF and had an average ΔG of −4.5 kcal/mol (SD = 3.1 kcal/mol). The third group consisted of the 50 nt located after the start codon of each ORF and had an average ΔG of −6.3 kcal/mol (SD = 3.2 kcal/mol). The free energies of the 5′-UTRs were significantly higher than those of the three other groups (3′-UTR: p < 3 × 10−4, intergenic: p < 2 × 10−70, coding: p < 3 × 10−253; Mann–Whitney U test). Figure 2
Folding Free Energies of Randomized Sequences The free energy of secondary structure in RNA is highly dependent on nucleotide composition. A base pair stacking term that depends on dinucleotides contributes to the free energy. We obtained the free energy contributions for each of the 16 possible dinucleotides from Xia et al. [26]. We calculated the dinucleotide frequencies in the four groups of sequences and used the dinucleotide energy contributions as weights in a weighted average of the dinucleotide frequencies. This calculation gave us a rudimentary measure for the contribution to the free energies coming from dinucleotide composition without actually folding the structures. The weighted dinucleotide composition for the four groups was −1.74 kcal/mol for 3′-UTRs, −1.81 kcal/mol for 5′-UTRs, −1.81 kcal/mol for intergenic sequences, and −1.95 kcal/mol for coding sequences. The dinucleotides with lowest free energy are GC, CC, GG and CG, so GC-content is an even simpler measure for the relative contribution of nucleotide composition to the free energy. The GC-content of the four groups was 31% for 3′-UTRs, 34% for 5′-UTRs, 34% for intergenic sequences, and 40% for coding sequences. Interestingly, the two measures are in perfect agreement. We checked whether the folding free energies of 5′-UTRs were not only higher than for the other groups of sequences, but also different from what was expected from 5′-UTR dinucleotide composition [27]. For this purpose, we used a dinucleotide shuffling algorithm [28,29]. Native 5′-UTR sequences were shuffled 100 times each, and minimum free energies were calculated for all randomized sequences. The mean free energy of the randomized sequences was −4.4 kcal/mol as compared to −4.3 kcal/mol for the native sequences. Z-scores were calculated to compare the folding free energy of each 5′-UTR with the free energies of its randomized sequences. 5′-UTRs with positive Z-scores had higher folding free energies than the average of their randomized sequences and are therefore thought to have less secondary structure. We found an overabundance of 5′-UTRs with positive Z-scores (Figure 2 Folding Free Energies of 5′-UTRs and Transcript Features We investigated the correlation between ΔG and the ribosome density measured by Arava et al. [30]. We observed a small but significant correlation (Figure 3
As expected, we observed a large correlation between ΔG and GC-content for the 5′-UTRs. The Pearson correlation was 0.48 (p < 3 × 10−16). To rule out that our observed correlations between ΔG and transcript features were merely a consequence of GC-content, we investigated whether ΔG was correlated with the transcript features independently of GC-content. We regressed the transcript features as a function of GC-content and free energy in a multivariate model. First, significance was calculated for the correlation between GC-content and a transcript feature. Second, significance was calculated for free energy being correlated to the transcript features after subtraction of the GC-content effect. For ribosome density, we obtained p = 5 × 10−4 for GC-content and p < 5 × 10−14 for free energy. For mRNA half-life, we obtained p < 10−15 for GC-content and p < 0.004 for free energy. For the combined protein abundance dataset [31], we obtained p < 2 × 10−12 for GC-content and p < 0.0002 for free energy. Similar results were obtained when correcting for weighted dinucleotide composition instead of for GC-content. Fast and Slowly Decaying Genes In order to check whether the relations between various transcript features depended on the half-life of the mRNA, we designated the 1,013 genes with a half-life below 13 min as fast decaying, and the 1,058 genes with a half-life above 33 min as slowly decaying. These cutoffs were chosen to get closest to, and above, 1,000 genes. The only correlations between ΔG and any of the other nine transcript features in Table 1 that changed significantly (p < 0.001) were with half-life and heat shock: in the fast decaying group of genes, ΔG and half-life had a correlation of −0.06, which is significantly different from their correlation of 0.10 among all genes (p < 8 × 10−7). Similarly in the fast decaying group of genes, ΔG and heat shock had a correlation of −0.01, which is significantly different from their correlation of 0.10 among all genes (p < 6 × 10−4). Correlation between Decay and Translation It has been argued that translational efficiency of a transcript is a determinant of mRNA half-life: decreased translation leads to decreased half-life. Evidence for this model has come from yeast strains either mutated in translation initiation factors [33] or with translation of individual mRNAs inhibited [13]. To see whether such an effect is present globally in yeast without such modifications, we calculated the correlations between half-life on the one hand and ribosome density and ribosome occupancy on the other hand. We found a small, but significant, correlation among all genes. However, for the fast decaying genes the correlations were much stronger, especially between half-life and ribosome occupancy, for which the correlation was 0.24 (Figure 5
Gene Ontology Analysis To see whether folding free energies of 5′-UTRs were associated with functional annotations, we mapped the 5,888 genes to 3,678 Gene Ontology (GO) categories [34]. The genes were ranked according to ΔG in both increasing and decreasing order, and a Wilcoxon rank sum test was employed for each GO category [35]. The significant categories, using a very stringent p-value cutoff of 10−8, corresponding to a Bonferroni corrected cutoff of 4 × 10−5, are listed in Table 2. Among genes with strongly folded 5′-UTRs, three categories were significant and no other categories were close to being this significant. Remarkably, these three categories were “molecular function unknown,” “biological process unknown,” and “cellular component unknown.” Among genes with weakly folded 5′-UTRs, 12 categories were significantly overrepresented. Chief among these were categories related to retrotransposons.
RNA-Binding Proteins Affinity tagging of RBPs followed by microarray hybridizations has been used to obtain genome-wide lists of bound transcripts. We obtained the lists of bound transcripts for the RBPs Yra1, Mex67 [6], and for five members of the Puf family [7]. Furthermore, we identified all the genes whose 3′-UTR contained the consensus motifs for Puf3p, Puf4p, and Puf5p. For each of these ten gene sets, we examined whether there was a significant difference in the number of fast decaying genes relative to slowly decaying genes, and whether there was a significant difference in the number of genes having strongly folded 5′-UTRs relative to genes with weakly folded 5′-UTRs (Table 3). The most significant associations were that transcripts bound by Puf3p, Puf4p, and Puf5p were fast decaying. The Puf3p, Puf4p, and Puf5p motifs confirm this picture. The most significant associations with folding free energy were that Mex67 and Yra1 preferentially bind transcripts with weakly folded 5′-UTRs.
Comparison with Longer Upstream Regions The 5′-UTRs of yeast genes vary in length. In this study, we used the 50 nt upstream of the start codon as a representation of the 5′-UTR. Since 50 nt is shorter than many 5′-UTRs, we also used 100- and 200-nt 5′-UTRs for comparison. The correlation between ΔG and ribosome density decreases for longer regions, but is still significant for 100 nt (Table 4). Similar behavior was observed for other transcript features.
Discussion We carried out genome-wide computations of secondary structures in 5′-UTRs of mRNA in yeast, and correlated 5′-UTR folding free energy with various other transcript features. We chose somewhat arbitrarily to fold sequences of length 50 nt upstream of the coding start, because these sequences are almost certainly inside the 5′-UTR. We also folded 100- and 200-nt sequences, and had similar but weaker results (Table 4). Folding of RNA is somewhat local in sequence: when folding 100- or 200-nt upstream sequences, the last 50 nt were typically computed to fold into the same structure as when the 50-nt upstream sequences were folded. Translation has been shown to be most sensitive to secondary structure close to the 5′ end of mRNA [12]. Hence, we think that the weaker results obtained for longer upstream sequences reflect an increase of sequence spanning genomic DNA not being transcribed, and not that secondary structure close to the translation start is most important for the transcript features we have investigated. We used 5′-UTRs of fixed length to avoid comparing free energies for sequences of different lengths. Bernstein et al. [24] used predicted UTRs for each gene in E. coli and found no association between secondary structure in UTRs and mRNA half-life. Our different findings may be due to differences between pro- and eukaryotes, or difficulties in comparing UTRs of different length. To compare 5′-UTRs with other genomic regions, 50-nt sequences from intergenic regions, coding regions, and 3′-UTRs were also folded. These three sets of sequences had significantly lower free energies than the 5′-UTR sequences (see Figure 2 In line with our observation that 5′-UTRs tend to be weakly folded is our finding that uncharacterized ORFs are overrepresented among the genes with strongly folded 5′-UTRs. Assuming that uncharacterized genes typically are expressed at low levels or under rare conditions, or even are pseudogenes, this finding hints at a larger selective pressure for absence of secondary structure for commonly or highly expressed genes. Confirming this picture is our finding that 5′-UTR folding free energy is significantly positively correlated with mRNA copy number and protein abundance (see Table 1). Since we only investigated verified genes, we could look into the source of the verification of the genes with strongly folded 5′-UTRs. The 5′-UTR of the gene YBR296C-A (see Figure 1 The three most significant GO categories among the genes with weakly folded 5′-UTRs were related to Ty element retrotransposons (see Table 2). Ty element retrotransposons are stretches of DNA that replicate and move in the genome through RNA intermediates [38]. The Ty elements contain various genes in their sequences, e.g., proteases, integrases, and reverse transcriptases. The fact that they have weakly folded 5′-UTRs suggests that folding of their RNA is detrimental to their function or integration in the genome. Interestingly, Ty elements showed up in a study of RNA half-life where different methods of transcriptional inhibition were compared [39]. The RNA transcripts whose stability differed most between rpb1–1 inhibition on the one hand and Thiolutin, 1,10-phenanthroline, and 6-azauracil on the other hand were predominantly Ty elements. It may be worth investigating whether there is a connection between this difference in transcript stability and the lack of 5′-UTR secondary structure. We found that 5′-UTR folding free energy was significantly positively correlated with both translational activity and mRNA half-life (see Table 1). These correlations were still significant after correction for GC-content, indicating that the correlations are not simply a secondary effect caused by nucleotide frequencies. Parker and colleagues showed that the insertion of secondary structures into the 5′-UTR of PGK1 yeast mRNA inhibited translation and stimulated decay of PGK1 [13]. Together, these findings suggest a widespread use of 5′-UTR secondary structure in post-transcriptional regulation. Our correlations may not be caused by any biochemical mechanism, e.g., transcripts of one evolutionary origin could have both strongly folded 5′-UTRs and low translation rates, whereas transcripts of another evolutionary origin could have weakly folded 5′-UTRs and high translation rates. Nevertheless, we believe that the correlations do reflect more direct connections. Our findings may be explained by an inhibitory effect of 5′-UTR secondary structure on translation initiation combined with competition between translation and decay. However, more direct biochemical pathways preferentially degrading mRNA with 5′-UTR secondary structure might also exist. Early support for the inhibitory effect of 5′-UTR secondary structure on translation came from insertion of hairpin loops into 5′-UTRs [9,10]. Later studies have shown connections between mRNA 5′ secondary structure and proteins important for translation such as eIF4A [15]. Competition between translation and decay has been proposed because both may require cap access [20,33]. Moreover, during translation the mRNA is circularized through interactions between cap-binding translation initiation factors and the poly(A)-binding protein (PABP). This conformation presumably protects mRNA from degradation by preventing access to both the cap and the poly(A) tail, suggesting that also the poly(A) tail is important for competition [17]. We expected that such competition would be more easily seen for short-lived transcripts because degradation takes up a larger part of their lives. Indeed, our global analysis revealed that transcript half-life is positively correlated with both ribosome density and ribosome occupancy, in particular for short-lived transcripts (see Figure 5 A major mediator of heat shock response is mRNA decay [40], and the mRNA decay profile is similar to the heat response [39]. In line with these observations, we found a positive correlation between 5′-UTR free energy and mRNA response to heat shock (Table 1), i.e., transcripts with weakly folded 5′-UTRs are, in addition to being relatively long-lived, relatively upregulated after a heat shock. Given that transcripts that are upregulated by heat shock have weakly folded 5′-UTRs, it is expected that they would be translated at relatively high rates. Indeed, the correlation between ribosome occupancy and relative upregulation 10 min after heat shock was 0.23 (p < 2 × 10−60; similar for 5 min). Of interest, the heat shock mRNA Hsp90 in Drosophila has extensive secondary structure in its 5′-UTR. Hsp90 translation is inefficient at normal growth temperature, and is activated by heat shock, perhaps by thermal destabilization of the secondary structure in the 5′-UTR [41]. It may be worthwhile to perform genome-wide protein abundance experiments of heat shock response to investigate whether preferential heat shock translation is a common mechanism. We assessed whether transcripts associated with RBPs, or with sequence motifs associated with these RBPs in their 3′-UTRs, were over- or underrepresented among fast decaying transcripts or among transcripts with strongly folded 5′-UTRs. Puf proteins are known to enhance mRNA turnover or repress translation [42]. We found targets of Puf3p, Puf4p, and Puf5p proteins to be significantly associated with fast decay, extending an earlier study [43]. Perhaps of interest, we note that the three Puf proteins for which Gerber et al. identified sequence motifs [7] were associated with fast decaying transcripts, while the remaining two Puf proteins, as well as Mex67 and Yra1, instead tended to be associated with weakly folded 5′-UTRs. To summarize, we found that (i) 5′-UTRs have higher folding free energies than other genomic regions and than expected from their nucleotide composition, (ii) secondary structures in 5′-UTRs likely play a role in mRNA translation and turnover on a genomic scale, and (iii) genes with strongly folded 5′-UTRs are generally rarer, harder to find experimentally, and less annotated. It is important to keep in mind that the highly significant correlations we have found are small, showing that folding of 5′-UTRs is, as expected, only one aspect of post-transcriptional regulation. However, the correlations may be larger in subgroups of mRNAs, such as mRNAs targeted by individual decay pathways [44] and specific RBPs [45]. An example of a larger correlation in a subgroup is our observation that translational activity and mRNA decay are highly correlated for mRNAs with short half-lives. Materials and Methods Untranslated regions. The exact 5′- and 3′-UTR lengths are unknown for most yeast genes. Mignone et al. [1] estimated the average lengths for yeast as 134 nt for 5′-UTRs and 237 nt for 3′-UTRs. With these numbers in mind, we retrieved 50, 100, and 200 nt of predicted 5′-UTRs and 237 nt of predicted 3′-UTRs from SGD for the 5,888 ORFs annotated as verified in SGD. As three additional control groups of 50-nt sequences, we retrieved nt 4–53 downstream (the first 50 nt following the start codon) for each of the 5,888 ORFs, the first 50 nt of the 3′-UTR region for each of the 5,888 ORFs, and 5,888 randomly chosen 50-nt sequences from intergenic regions from SGD. Folding of RNA secondary structures. We used the RNAfold program in the Vienna RNA package [25] with default values for parameters (T = 37 °C) to compute secondary structures from RNA sequences. For each sequence, we used the free energy of the minimum free energy structure (the most negative ΔG) as a measure for secondary structure formation. For a given sequence, there may be other structures with similar ΔG, but we are interested in the possible free energy change in folding and not the secondary structure itself. A low ΔG corresponds to a strongly folded UTR, while a high ΔG corresponds to a weakly folded UTR. To avoid any pitfalls with using the free energy of the most strongly folded structure for each sequence, we also performed our analysis using the ensemble free energies [25], and none of the conclusions presented in this study changed. In fact, the correlations were typically somewhat more significant using ensemble averages. The free energies for all 5,888 genes are available in Dataset S1. Transcript feature datasets. Translation profiles measured by Arava et al. [30] were downloaded from http://genome-www.stanford.edu/yeast_translation/. From this dataset, the number of bound ribosomes, the ribosome density (number of ribosomes per unit ORF length), and the ribosome occupancy (the fraction of the transcripts engaged in translation) were extracted for 5,700 genes, together with the mRNA copy number for 5,643 genes. Half-lives for 4,687 genes measured by Wang et al. [32] were downloaded from http://genome-www.stanford.edu/turnover/. A second dataset of mRNA half-lives for 6,092 genes [39] was obtained from http://hugheslab.med.utoronto.ca/Grigull/. For this dataset, the decay ratios 5 min after temperature shift of the rpb1–1 strain were used. Changes in transcript abundance in cells responding to heat shock for 5,259 genes measured by Gasch et al. [46] were downloaded from http://www-genome.stanford.edu/yeast_stress/. A dataset containing protein abundance information for 2,044 genes, constructed by Greenbaum et al. [47] by merging publicly available two-dimensional electrophoresis and MudPit data, was downloaded from http://bioinfo.mbb.yale.edu/expression/prot-v-mrna. Another dataset containing protein abundance information for 1,669 genes was obtained from the experiment by Ghaemmaghami et al. [48]. A merger of these two protein abundance datasets was obtained from Beyer et al. [31], along with a set of ribosome densities normalized by transcript length instead of ORF length. Dinucleotide shuffling. Each native 5′-UTR sequence was shuffled 100 times keeping the dinucleotide frequencies constant using a publicly available implementation [28] of an algorithm developed by Altschul and Erickson [29]. For each 5′-UTR, the mean and the SD of the free energies of its randomized sequences were calculated. A Z-score was defined for each 5′-UTR as the free energy of the native sequence minus the mean of its randomized sequences divided by the SD of its randomized sequences [49]. Statistical analysis. Pearson correlations, Spearman rank correlations, Fisher's exact tests on 2 × 2 contingency tables, Mann–Whitney U tests, t-tests, and corresponding p-values were calculated using the statistics package R [50]. For Pearson correlations, p-values were calculated as the probability of obtaining a better correlation by chance if the two vectors were drawn independently from a Gaussian distribution. The multivariate linear model was done in R as well, and p-values were obtained with the ANOVA test of a linear model. All p-values were two-sided. GO analysis. The 5,888 genes were mapped to 3,678 GO categories [34] using annotations from SGD. The genes were ranked according to ΔG in both increasing and decreasing order, separately, and a Wilcoxon rank sum test was employed for each GO category using Catmap [35]. Catmap outputs p-values calculated as the probability that a random ordering of the genes produces a lower, or equally low, Wilcoxon rank sum as the ordering investigated. The p-values were multiplied with the number of categories (3,678) to obtain Bonferroni corrected p-values. Dataset S1: Calculated Folding Free Energies for All 5,888 Genes (487 KB TXT) Click here for additional data file.(488K, tds) Acknowledgments We thank Peter Johansson and Kasper Astrup Eriksen for valuable discussions, three anonymous reviewers for helpful suggestions, and Peter Schuster for giving a talk that inspired us to enter the world of RNA folding. This work was in part supported by the Swedish Research Council and the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation through the Swegene consortium. Abbreviations
Footnotes Competing interests. The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Author contributions. MR and MK conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper. A previous version of this article appeared as an Early Online Release on November 9, 2005 (DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010072.eor). Citation: Ringnér M, Krogh M (2005) Folding free energies of 5′-UTRs impact post-transcriptional regulation on a genomic scale in yeast. PLoS Comput Biol 1(7): e72. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Genome Biol. 2002; 3(3):REVIEWS0004.
[Genome Biol. 2002]Genome Biol. 2003; 5(1):R2.
[Genome Biol. 2003]Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001 Apr; 2(4):247-56.
[Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jun 19; 98(13):7025-8.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001]Mol Cell. 2002 Jun; 9(6):1161-7.
[Mol Cell. 2002]Genes Dev. 1994 Apr 1; 8(7):855-66.
[Genes Dev. 1994]Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2004 Feb; 11(2):121-7.
[Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2004]Trends Biochem Sci. 2005 Sep; 30(9):506-14.
[Trends Biochem Sci. 2005]Annu Rev Biochem. 2000; 69():571-95.
[Annu Rev Biochem. 2000]Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Apr; 15(4):2145-56.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1995]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jul 23; 99(15):9697-702.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002]Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Apr; 15(4):2145-56.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1995]Biochemistry. 1998 Oct 20; 37(42):14719-35.
[Biochemistry. 1998]Nucleic Acids Res. 1999 Dec 15; 27(24):4816-22.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 1999]RNA. 2005 May; 11(5):578-91.
[RNA. 2005]Mol Biol Evol. 1985 Nov; 2(6):526-38.
[Mol Biol Evol. 1985]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Apr 1; 100(7):3889-94.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003]Mol Cell Proteomics. 2004 Nov; 3(11):1083-92.
[Mol Cell Proteomics. 2004]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Apr 30; 99(9):5860-5.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002]Mol Cell Proteomics. 2004 Nov; 3(11):1083-92.
[Mol Cell Proteomics. 2004]Mol Cell Biol. 1999 Aug; 19(8):5247-56.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1999]Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Apr; 15(4):2145-56.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1995]BMC Bioinformatics. 2004 Dec 9; 5():193.
[BMC Bioinformatics. 2004]Nat Genet. 2003 Feb; 33(2):155-61.
[Nat Genet. 2003]Mol Cell Biol. 1989 Nov; 9(11):5134-42.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1989]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jul 23; 99(15):9697-702.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002]Genome Res. 2003 Sep; 13(9):2042-51.
[Genome Res. 2003]Nat Biotechnol. 2002 Jan; 20(1):58-63.
[Nat Biotechnol. 2002]Genome Res. 1998 May; 8(5):464-78.
[Genome Res. 1998]Mol Cell Biol. 2004 Jun; 24(12):5534-47.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2004]Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Apr; 15(4):2145-56.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1995]Cell. 1985 Mar; 40(3):515-26.
[Cell. 1985]Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Apr; 8(4):1591-601.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1988]RNA. 2001 Mar; 7(3):382-94.
[RNA. 2001]Annu Rev Biochem. 2000; 69():571-95.
[Annu Rev Biochem. 2000]Nature. 1981 Sep 24; 293(5830):311-4.
[Nature. 1981]Mol Cell Biol. 2004 Jun; 24(12):5534-47.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2004]J Biol Chem. 2004 Nov 26; 279(48):49919-30.
[J Biol Chem. 2004]Trends Genet. 2002 Mar; 18(3):150-7.
[Trends Genet. 2002]Trends Genet. 2003 Sep; 19(9):473-6.
[Trends Genet. 2003]Mol Cell. 2003 Dec; 12(6):1439-52.
[Mol Cell. 2003]Gene. 2003 Oct 23; 317(1-2):79-87.
[Gene. 2003]Genome Biol. 2002; 3(3):REVIEWS0004.
[Genome Biol. 2002]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Apr 1; 100(7):3889-94.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Apr 30; 99(9):5860-5.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002]Mol Cell Biol. 2004 Jun; 24(12):5534-47.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2004]Mol Biol Cell. 2000 Dec; 11(12):4241-57.
[Mol Biol Cell. 2000]Genome Biol. 2003; 4(9):117.
[Genome Biol. 2003]RNA. 2005 May; 11(5):578-91.
[RNA. 2005]Mol Biol Evol. 1985 Nov; 2(6):526-38.
[Mol Biol Evol. 1985]Nucleic Acids Res. 1999 Apr 1; 27(7):1578-84.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 1999]BMC Bioinformatics. 2004 Dec 9; 5():193.
[BMC Bioinformatics. 2004]