• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of biophysjLink to Publisher's site
Biophys J. Oct 1998; 75(4): 2015–2024.
PMCID: PMC1299873

Multiphoton excitation provides optical sections from deeper within scattering specimens than confocal imaging.


Multiphoton excitation fluorescence imaging generates an optical section of sample by restricting fluorophore excitation to the plane of focus. High photon densities, achieved only in the focal volume of the objective, are sufficient to excite the fluorescent probe molecules by density-dependent, multiphoton excitation processes. We present comparisons of confocal with multiphoton excitation imaging of identical optical sections within a sample. These side-by-side comparisons of imaging modes demonstrate a significant advantage of multiphoton imaging; data can be obtained from deeper within biological specimens. Observations on a variety of biological samples showed that in all cases there was at least a twofold improvement in the imaging penetration depth obtained with multiphoton excitation relative to confocal imaging. The more pronounced degradation in image contrast deep within a confocally imaged sample is primarily due to scattered emission photons, which reduce the signal and increase the local background as measurements of point spread functions indicated that resolution does not significantly change with increasing depth for either mode of microscopy. Multiphoton imaging does not suffer from degradation of signal-to-background to nearly the same extent as confocal imaging because this method is insensitive to scatter of the emitted signal. Direct detection of emitted photons using an external photodetector mounted close to the objective (possible only in a multiphoton imaging system) improves system sensitivity and the utilization of scattered emission photons for imaging. We demonstrate that this technique provides yet further improvements in the capability of multiphoton excitation imaging to produce good quality images from deeper within tissue relative to confocal imaging.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (437K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Brakenhoff GJ, van der Voort HT, van Spronsen EA, Linnemans WA, Nanninga N. Three-dimensional chromatin distribution in neuroblastoma nuclei shown by confocal scanning laser microscopy. Nature. 1985 Oct 24;317(6039):748–749. [PubMed]
  • Denk W, Delaney KR, Gelperin A, Kleinfeld D, Strowbridge BW, Tank DW, Yuste R. Anatomical and functional imaging of neurons using 2-photon laser scanning microscopy. J Neurosci Methods. 1994 Oct;54(2):151–162. [PubMed]
  • Denk W, Strickler JH, Webb WW. Two-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy. Science. 1990 Apr 6;248(4951):73–76. [PubMed]
  • Denk W, Sugimori M, Llinás R. Two types of calcium response limited to single spines in cerebellar Purkinje cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Aug 29;92(18):8279–8282. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Denk W, Svoboda K. Photon upmanship: why multiphoton imaging is more than a gimmick. Neuron. 1997 Mar;18(3):351–357. [PubMed]
  • Halliwell B. Mechanisms involved in the generation of free radicals. Pathol Biol (Paris) 1996 Jan;44(1):6–13. [PubMed]
  • Liang H, Vu KT, Krishnan P, Trang TC, Shin D, Kimel S, Berns MW. Wavelength dependence of cell cloning efficiency after optical trapping. Biophys J. 1996 Mar;70(3):1529–1533. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Potter SM, Wang CM, Garrity PA, Fraser SE. Intravital imaging of green fluorescent protein using two-photon laser-scanning microscopy. Gene. 1996;173(1 Spec No):25–31. [PubMed]
  • Schmitt JM, Knüttel A, Yadlowsky M. Confocal microscopy in turbid media. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1994 Aug;11(8):2226–2235. [PubMed]
  • Svoboda K, Denk W, Kleinfeld D, Tank DW. In vivo dendritic calcium dynamics in neocortical pyramidal neurons. Nature. 1997 Jan 9;385(6612):161–165. [PubMed]
  • Svoboda K, Tank DW, Denk W. Direct measurement of coupling between dendritic spines and shafts. Science. 1996 May 3;272(5262):716–719. [PubMed]
  • White JG, Amos WB, Fordham M. An evaluation of confocal versus conventional imaging of biological structures by fluorescence light microscopy. J Cell Biol. 1987 Jul;105(1):41–48. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Williams RM, Piston DW, Webb WW. Two-photon molecular excitation provides intrinsic 3-dimensional resolution for laser-based microscopy and microphotochemistry. FASEB J. 1994 Aug;8(11):804–813. [PubMed]
  • Yuste R, Denk W. Dendritic spines as basic functional units of neuronal integration. Nature. 1995 Jun 22;375(6533):682–684. [PubMed]

Articles from Biophysical Journal are provided here courtesy of The Biophysical Society


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


  • Cited in Books
    Cited in Books
    PubMed Central articles cited in books
  • PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...