![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||
Analysis of free-time contingencies as positive versus negative reinforcement. Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Providing a short break contingent on completed work may increase responding through positive reinforcement (e.g., access to preferred activities) or negative reinforcement (e.g., escape form work). In this investigation, three analyses conducted with a boy with profound mental retardation showed that (a) a 20-s break increased responding more than a positive reinforcer (cola) did, and (b) the reinforcing effect of a 20-s break were affected by the availability of positive reinforcers during the break were affected by the availability of positive reinforcers during the break. Full text Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (397K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References. Selected References These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |