pmc logo image
Logo of jabaJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis Web SiteSubscriber LoginJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Web SiteSubscription InformationInformation for AuthorsJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis Web SiteJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis Web Site

Formats:

J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Summer; 29(2): 189–200.
PMCID: PMC1279893
Group versus individual reinforcement contingencies within the context of group study conditions
John Wills Lloyd, Matthew J. Eberhardt, and George P. Drake, Jr.
University of Virginia
Abstract
We investigated the effects of two teaching variables on students' Spanish vocabulary quiz performance: (a) group study and (b) individual versus group contingencies. In Experiment 1, we compared students' quiz scores under conditions in which students either studied independently and received no programmed reinforcement or studied in groups and received individual rewards for high scores. The results showed that, on average, the group-study individual-reward condition produced superior quiz scores. In Experiment 2, we compared individual (i.e., the superior condition in Experiment 1) and group contingencies within the context of the group study condition. On average across the class, group contingencies produced performance superior to individual contingencies. In both studies, however, benefits for the classes as a whole were mitigated by effects on individual students. These results extend the literature on the effects of group-based instructional activities and reinforcement contingencies. Educators who choose such procedures may encounter conflicting findings depending on whether they examine results at the group or individual level.
Full text
Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.4M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Ayllon T, Roberts MD. Eliminating discipline problems by strengthening academic performance. J Appl Behav Anal. 1974 Spring;7(1):71–76. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Belfiore PJ, Skinner CH, Ferkis MA. Effects of response and trial repetition on sight-word training for students with learning disabilities. J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Fall;28(3):347–348. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Biklen D, Zollers N. The focus of advocacy in the LD field. J Learn Disabil. 1986 Dec;19(10):579–586. [PubMed]
  • Dugan E, Kamps D, Leonard B. Effects of cooperative learning groups during social studies for students with autism and fourth-grade peers. J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Summer;28(2):175–188. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lloyd JW, Crowley EP, Kohler FW, Strain PS. Redefining the applied research agenda: cooperative learning, prereferral, teacher consultation, and peer-mediated interventions. J Learn Disabil. 1988 Jan;21(1):43–52. [PubMed]
  • Lynch DC, Cuvo AJ. Stimulus equivalence instruction of fraction-decimal relations. J Appl Behav Anal. 1995 Summer;28(2):115–126. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Neef NA, Shade D, Miller MS. Assessing influential dimensions of reinforcers on choice in students with serious emotional disturbance. J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Winter;27(4):575–583. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Nevin A, Johnson DW, Johnson R. Effects of group and individual contingencies on academic performance and social relations of special needs students. J Soc Psychol. 1982 Feb;116(FIRST):41–59. [PubMed]
  • Pigott HE, Fantuzzo JW, Clement PW. The effects of reciprocal peer tutoring and group contingencies on the academic performance of elementary school children. J Appl Behav Anal. 1986 Spring;19(1):93–98. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Speltz ML, Shimamura JW, McReynolds WT. Procedural variations in group contingencies: effects on children's academic and social behaviors. J Appl Behav Anal. 1982 Winter;15(4):533–544. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Tateyama-Sniezek KM. Cooperative learning: does it improve the academic achievement of students with handicaps? Except Child. 1990 Feb;56(5):426–437. [PubMed]