![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||
The effects of contingent and noncontingent attention on self-injury and self-restraint. Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA. See commentary "On the function of self-restraint and its relationship to self-injury." on page 93. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Self-restraint and self-injurious behavior (SIB) are two responses that can sometimes be members of the same functional response class (i.e., maintained by the same contingency). In such cases, a single treatment should be effective for both responses. In this investigation, we examined the effects of providing attention (the presumed reinforcer) both noncontingently and contingent upon either SIB or self-restraint. Results were consistent with our hypothesis that both responses were maintained by attention and suggested that noncontingent reinforcement was a potentially effective treatment. Full text Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (418K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References. Selected References These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |