![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved Alternative splicing and nonsense-mediated mRNA decay regulate mammalian ribosomal gene expression Dipartimento di Biochimica e Biotecnologie Mediche, Università Federico II, via Sergio Pansini 5, Napoli 80131, Italy *To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +39 081 7463065; Fax: +39 081 7463074; Email: pietropaolo/at/dbbm.unina.it Correspondence may also be addressed to Giulia Russo. Tel: +39 081 7463061; Fax: +39 081 7463074; Email: russog/at/dbbm.unina.it The authors wish it to be known that, in their opinion, the first two authors should be regarded as joint First Authors Received May 30, 2005; Revised September 29, 2005; Accepted September 29, 2005. The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that: the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with the correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions/at/oxfordjournals.org This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Messenger RNAs containing premature stop codons are generally targeted for degradation through nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD). This mechanism degrades aberrant transcripts derived from mutant genes containing nonsense or frameshift mutations. Wild-type genes also give rise to transcripts targeted by NMD. For example, some wild-type genes give rise to alternatively spliced transcripts that are targeted for decay by NMD. In Caenorhabditis elegans, the ribosomal protein (rp) L12 gene generates a nonsense codon-bearing alternatively spliced transcript that is induced in an autoregulatory manner by the rpL12 protein. By pharmacologically blocking the NMD pathway, we identified alternatively spliced mRNA transcripts derived from the human rpL3 and rpL12 genes that are natural targets of NMD. The deduced protein sequence of these alternatively spliced transcripts suggests that they are unlikely to encode functional ribosomal proteins. Overexpression of rpL3 increased the level of the alternatively spliced rpL3 mRNA and decreased the normally expressed rpL3. This indicates that rpL3 regulates its own production by a negative feedback loop and suggests the possibility that NMD participates in this regulatory loop by degrading the non-functional alternatively spliced transcript. INTRODUCTION Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) is a post-transcriptional pathway that recognizes and rapidly degrades mRNA that contains a premature termination codon (PTC) in its open reading frame (ORF) (1), thereby preventing the synthesis of truncated proteins that could be deleterious to the cell. NMD is evolutionarily conserved in all organisms tested, from yeast to humans (2). The NMD process is well understood in yeast, where it is believed to take place in the cytoplasm (3). Cis-acting elements required for PTC recognition include degenerate AU-rich sequences positioned downstream from the PTC (4). Although conforming to the same general strategy as in yeast, there are some relevant differences in the NMD process in higher eukaryotes. Namely, in mammalian cells NMD can occur either in the cytoplasm or in association with the nucleus (5), and is triggered when a stop codon lies >55 nt upstream from an exon-exon junction (6,7). The positions of exon junctions are marked on the mRNA by an exon junction complex (EJC) which is deposited 20–24 nt upstream from exon-exon junctions and is exported to the cytoplasm together with the spliced mRNA (8). A physiological stop codon has no downstream EJC, whereas a PTC is followed by at least one EJC (9). The genetics of NMD has been studied in Saccaromyces cerevisiae and Caenorhabditis elegans. Three yeast (Upf1–Upf3) (10,11) and seven C.elegans (smg1–7) (12,13) genes are known to play an essential role in NMD. The smg2, smg3 and smg4 proteins, which are orthologues of the S.cerevisiae Upf1, Upf2 and Upf3 proteins, respectively, have been characterized (14). Homologues of yeast Upf proteins have been identified also in mammalian cells and their ability to direct aberrant mRNA to NMD has been established (15). However, NMD in higher eukaryotes seems to require a larger number of protein factors and a more complex regulation. In fact, the smg1 protein has not been found in yeast, whereas it is involved in NMD in C.elegans and human cells (16). NMD has been largely studied as a control mechanism that prevents the production of potentially deleterious polypeptides resulting from a mutation in the DNA of germ or somatic cells, or as a result of inefficient splicing during post-transcriptional processing (17,18). However, besides counteracting aberrant gene expression, NMD has been implicated in the regulation of normal gene expression (19,20). Mitrovich and Anderson (20) showed that unproductive mRNA isoforms for four ribosomal proteins, rpL3, rpL7a, rpL10a and rpL12, accumulate in C.elegans mutants that lack a component of the NMD pathway. They also demonstrated that in transgenic worms overexpressing rpL12, a greater proportion of endogenous rpL12 transcript is spliced unproductively. These results indicated that rpL12 autoregulates its splicing and prompted the concept that one of the functions of NMD surveillance might be to eliminate RNA by-products of gene regulation. Mitrovich and Anderson (21) subsequently extended the surveillance role of NMD in C.elegans to transcripts of expressed pseudogenes that encode a small nucleolar RNA (snoRNA). This observation suggested that these transcripts could represent an evolutionary intermediate between snoRNA-encoding host genes that do or do not encode proteins. Alternatively spliced transcripts containing premature termination codons appear to be widespread in mammals, based on analysis of human EST databases (22). Interestingly, 11 ribosomal genes, including human rpL3, rpL10a and rpL12, were predicted to generate aberrant mRNAs. In this study, we directly examined whether human ribosomal genes give rise to alternatively spliced transcripts subject to NMD. Towards this aim, we analyzed the expression pattern of the rpL3-, rpL7a-, rpL10a- and rpL12-encoding genes. This led to the identification of alternatively spliced nonsense codon-bearing transcripts from the rpL3 and rpL12 loci. We showed that these transcripts are degraded by NMD and we uncovered an autoregulatory mechanism that appears to regulate the level of the alternatively spliced rpL3 transcript. MATERIALS AND METHODS Cell culture and transfection conditions The human lung carcinoma Calu-6 cell line (ATCC, HTB 56; ICLC, HTL97003) was cultured in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) with 2 mM l-glutamine and 0.1 mM non-essential amino acids. Cells were grown to 80–90% confluence and then treated with 100 µg/ml cycloheximide for 4 h or with 20 µM wortmannin for 2 h. The rat PC12 (pheochromocytoma cells) Tet-Off cell line (Clontech) was grown in DMEM supplemented with 5% fetal calf serum (FCS), 10% horse serum, 2 mM l-glutamine and 100 µg/ml G418 (Invitrogen). For stable transfection of these cells, 15 µg of pTRE2-hyg/HA-L3 or pTRE2-hyg/HA-L12 expression plasmids were transfected with lipofectAMINE Reagent, according to the manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen). After transfection for 24 h, cells were incubated in fresh medium containing 200 µg/ml hygromycin (USB) and 10 ng/ml doxycycline (Sigma). Resistant clones were isolated 15–20 days later and expanded for further analyses. The expression of HA-L3 or HA-L12 was induced upon removal of doxycyclin. For NMD blockage, drug treatment was used as described above. Origin of probes The GAPDH probe was purchased from Clontech. The p53 probe was derived from a plasmid generously provided by Dr F. Esposito. The rpL3 and rpL12 cDNA probes were generated by RT–PCR of total RNA extracted from HeLa cells, using the SuperScript One-Step RT–PCR kit and gene-specific oligonucleotides. The intronic specific probes, containing the retained region in alternative transcripts, were derived from PCR amplification on the alternative transcript cDNA, using the primer pair 5′-CTCCGCTCGGCTCTGCCC-3′ (forward) and 5′-CTTCAGGAGCAGAGCAGA-3′ (reverse, Int3R) for rpL3 intron 3 (see Figure 1B
Northern and western blot analyses Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen), following the manufacturer's recommendations. Equal amounts (20 µg) of RNA were resolved in a 1.5% (for rpL3 and p53 analysis) or 1.7% (for rpL12 analysis) agarose-formaldehyde gels and transferred to a nylon membrane (Millipore). Hybridations with radiolabeled probes were performed as described by Church and Gilbert (23). The relative amount of RNA loaded per lane was normalized to that of GAPDH. cDNA probes were 32P-labeled by random priming using [α-32P]dCTP. Oligonucleotide probes were 5′ end-labeled with phage T4 polynucleotide kinase (Roche) and [γ-32P]ATP. Signals were detected using a STORM 860 PhosphorImager and quantified using ImageQuant software v5.0 (Molecular Dynamics). Protein samples (100 µg/lane) were subjected to 10% SDS–PAGE and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (Schleicher & Schuell). HA-tagged proteins were revealed with the rabbit HA-probe (Y-11) polyclonal antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and peroxidase-conjugated horseradish anti-rabbit antibody (Amersham Biosciences). An enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) system (Amersham Biosciences) was used for detection. Plasmid construction The 5′-UTR of the human rpL3 gene fused to the HA-tag was cloned as double-strand oligonucleotide in the pTRE2-Hyg inducible expression vector (Clontech) to generate the pTRE2-Hyg/HA plasmid. The rpL3 and rpL12 ORFs were RT–PCR amplified from HeLa RNA and cloned in pTRE2-Hyg/HA to obtain the pTRE2-Hyg/HA-L3 and pTRE2-Hyg/HA-L12 constructs. All recombinant plasmids were verified by sequencing. RT–PCR analysis and sequencing To identify the human alternative transcripts, RT–PCRs were performed using the primers shown in Figures 1B To identify the mouse rpL12 alternative transcript, a RT–PCR was performed as described above, using RNA extracted from heart tissue and the following primer couple: mInt1F (5′-GTGCGTGCCCTCGCCGCG-3′)/mEx2R (5′-CAGACCCAGAGGACCGAT-3′) (see Figure 5B
Sequence analysis and comparison Sequences of rp genes were aligned using the CLUSTAL W algorithm (24), then adjusted manually. Sequence identity for the individual rpL3 introns and exons was established by using the web-based EMBOSS infoalign program. RESULTS Blockade of NMD upregulates alternatively spliced rp transcripts To determine whether the mammalian rpL3, rpL7a, rpL10 and rpL12 genes give rise to alternatively spliced transcripts containing premature termination codons, we exploited the observation that NMD-regulated mRNAs accumulate in cells exposed to NMD-blocking drugs. In this study, we used wortmannin, an inhibitor of the human smg1 kinase (16), cycloheximide (CHX), an inhibitor of protein synthesis that represses NMD (25), and the human cell line Calu-6 (26) in which a nonsense mutation in the p53 gene results in the production of a PTC-containing mRNA that is an NMD substrate (16). Total RNA was prepared from drug-treated and non-treated cells and analyzed in northern blotting experiments. As shown in Figure 1A NMD-substrate transcripts of rp genes are generated by alternative splicing events that lead to retention of intronic sequences As indicated above, some human rp genes have been predicted to produce NMD-candidate mRNA isoforms (22). More specifically, three alternative mRNA isoforms of the rpL3 gene have been predicted to contain a PTC, one of which includes a putative transcript that has a molecular size larger than the canonical (i.e. productive) mRNA. In such a case, the use of the proposed splice sites would result in an alternative mRNA isoform that retains some intronic sequences from intron 3. In an attempt to obtain experimental proof of this predicted alternative mRNA isoform, we evaluated whether rpL3-a mRNA accumulates in treated cells. For this purpose, we examined the rpL3 gene using RT–PCR analysis with Calu-6 RNA as template, and primers flanking the proposed alternatively spliced intron (Figure 1B Sequencing analysis of the RT–PCR product revealed the site of the splicing event that caused the retention of a portion of the intron. In detail, 3′ alternative splicing in intron 3 of rpL3 generated a larger transcript that retained the 3′-most 180 nt of the intron (Figure 1B A DNA probe spanning sequences from the rpL3 intron 3 retained by alternative splicing, and thus specific for the alternative isoform, was hybridized to RNA extracted from Calu-6 cells treated or not with NMD-blocking drugs and fractionated on agarose gel. As shown in Figure 2A
Upon withdrawal of CHX and wortmannin, the rpL3-a mRNA decreased progressively and reached a (low) steady-state level in 6 h, whereas the canonically spliced mRNA was unaffected by drug removal (Figure 2B An NMD candidate mRNA larger than the canonical mRNA has also been predicted for the rpL12 gene (22). In this case, alternative splicing of the primary transcript leads to retention of some intron 1 sequences. We thus looked for NMD-targeted rpL12 mRNA isoforms using the same experimental strategy described for rpL3. In a northern analysis, an rpL12 cDNA probe revealed a major mRNA species of 0.63 kb in untreated as well as in cells treated with NMD-blocking drugs, and a minor species of an apparent size of 0.8 kb, which accumulated after NMD inhibition (rpL12-a in Figure 3A In summary, the human rpL12 and rpL3 genes generated two alternative mRNAs: a canonical transcript that is not affected by NMD, and an isoform produced by alternative splicing that results in incomplete removal of introns 3 and 1, respectively (see schematic representation in Figures 1C rpL3 and rpL12 alternative splicing is conserved among mammalian species Alternative splicing transcripts of these genes could result from a systematic error of the splicing machinery. Alternatively, non-canonical splicing could be functionally relevant for gene expression, and thus regulated to modify the level of the functional ribosomal protein. To test these hypotheses we investigated whether alternative splicing of the type observed in human cells occurs in other organisms. To this aim, we compared the sequences of the human affected introns with the introns of orthologue genes from other eukaryotes. Using the CLUSTAL W algorithm, we aligned the sequence of human rpL3 intron 3 with each intron in the C.elegans and Drosophila melanogaster rpL3 genes, and with the corresponding intron in the murine and bovine rpL3 genes. While we found a low degree of sequence identity between C.elegans and D.melanogaster rpL3 introns, there was a high degree of sequence identity in rpL3 intron 3 in mammals (Figure 4A
To determine whether this degree of conservation applied to other introns of the gene, we compared the whole intron–exon sequence of the rpL3 gene in human, bovine and rodent species. As expected, exon sequences are highly conserved, the nucleotide identity ranging from 80 to 90%, whereas intron sequences have a more complex pattern of conservation (Figure 4B We next searched EST databases for cDNA sequences containing the region of interest. We found that several cDNA clones of Mus musculus and Bos taurus EST (e.g. accession nos CA574552, AW761943, AV612606 etc.) contain sequences spanning 2583–2762 nt of the human intron 3. Taken together, the foregoing results indicate that: (i) the sequence of alternatively spliced rpL3 intron is under strong selective pressure, the retained portion being conserved as well as the exons; (ii) the type of alternative splicing described in the human gene appears to be conserved among mammals. We conducted a similar sequence analysis of alternatively spliced intron 1 of the human rpL12 gene. The exon–intron organization of this gene is known for fewer organisms. However, while the bovine and human sequences of rpL12 intron 1 share a 70% identity, the mouse sequence appears much less conserved. In fact, we found that the human intron 1 is larger than the corresponding intron in the mouse gene, and sequence conservation is restricted to a few short regions (Figure 5A The levels of rpL3 expression regulate the alternative splicing Our demonstration that rpL3 and rpL12 alternative splicing is conserved among mammals strongly suggested that this event is not simply the result of a post-transcriptional processing error, but it could serve to regulate ribosomal protein expression levels. In fact, because the alternative splicing generates an unproductive mRNA isoform, the cellular level of a functional ribosomal protein might be correlated to the regulation of this event. To address this issue, we evaluated whether the amount of the rpL3-generated protein affects the splicing pattern of the rpL3 gene. We used PC12 Tet-Off cells to induce overexpression of the protein. Cells were stably transfected with a vector containing the human rpL3 coding sequence fused to the hemagglutinin (HA) epitope coding sequence, and a hygromycin selection marker. Total cell lysates from 20 hygromycin-resistant clones were analyzed 48 h after removal of doxycyclin by western blotting with an HA-specific antibody to monitor the production of HA-L3 protein, and clones with the highest expression level were selected. Time course analysis of the two most inducible clones (L3–8 and L3–9), at both RNA and protein level, demonstrated that the expression peaks 24 h after the removal of doxycycline (data not shown). In these experiments, total RNA was prepared from control cells (PC12) and from L3–8 and L3–9 clones, with or without doxycycline, each under drug-treatment and non-treatment conditions, and then analyzed by northern blotting (Figure 6A
In control cells (Figure 6A The induction of the HA-L3 protein (lanes 7–9 and 13–15) resulted in relevant differences in the expression levels of both canonical and alternative rpL3 transcripts. In fact, the increase in the alternative isoform was greater in cells in which NMD was blocked than in control cells and in non-induced clones, which suggests that the HA-L3 protein and drugs exert an additive effect on the levels of this mRNA. Interestingly, in cells not exposed to the NMD-inhibiting drug, the overexpression of the protein was associated with accumulation of the alternative transcript. In addition, the expression of the exogenous HA-L3 protein was associated with a relevant decrease (50%) of the amount of canonical mRNA. This effect was drug-independent (lanes 8, 9, 14 and 15) and absent in non-induced clones (lanes 4–6 and 10–12). These results demonstrate that the down-regulation of canonical rpL3 mRNA is related to the expression of the exogenous protein. Moreover, clone L3–8, which expressed the highest amount of HA-L3 at both RNA and protein level, had the largest increase of the alternative transcript and the largest decrease of canonical mRNA. Consequently, we conclude that the pattern of splicing is regulated by exogenous HA-L3 in a dose-dependent manner. To determine whether this regulation is specifically mediated by rpL3, we evaluated whether alternative splicing of the rpL3 gene is affected by overexpression of a different ribosomal protein, i.e. rpL12. We selected stable transfectants inducible for the expression of the HA-tagged rpL12 and measured by northern blotting, the expression of canonical rpL3 and of the alternatively spliced rpL3 transcript when rpL12 was overexpressed. We found no significant change in the expression of the canonical rpL3 mRNA or in accumulation of the alternative NMD-sensitive isoform in HA-L12 overexpressing cells (Figure 6A DISCUSSION NMD is an mRNA surveillance mechanism that leads to selective degradation of PTC-containing mRNA transcripts arising from somatic mutations or errors in gene expression. Considerable light has been shed on the molecular mechanism by which, in vivo, NMD eliminates aberrant mRNAs to prevent the production of harmful polypeptides [for reviews see (7,25,28–30)]. In contrast, little is known about the substrates of mRNA surveillance in wild-type organisms. Mitrovich and Anderson (20) demonstrated, in C.elegans, that ribosomal protein alternative transcripts, which are natural targets of NMD, arise not through errors but through feedback regulation of splicing triggered by the protein product. In humans, an extensive analysis by Lewis et al. (22) of alternatively spliced mRNA isoforms contained in the EST database demonstrated that one-third of the genes analyzed produce alternative transcripts that are candidate targets of NMD. As these authors point out, such a predicted widespread association of alternative splicing and NMD may indicate a need to eliminate a large number of aberrant mRNAs, or else, could play a functional role in regulating protein expression levels. Our data also demonstrate that the alternative transcripts of human ribosomal protein genes are natural targets of NMD and are probably regulated in levels by a negative feedback network. We have identified alternative transcript isoforms of the human rpL3 and rpL12 genes. These isoforms originate from alternative splicing that causes partial removal of intron 3 in rpL3, and of intron 1 in rpL12. The resulting mRNA isoforms carry intronic sequences that contain PTCs, and are stabilized by NMD inhibition (Figures 1 In addition, we found that the rpL3 intron responsible for introducing a PTC in the alternative mRNA isoform is conserved among mammals (human, mouse and bovine species). In fact, there is a high degree of sequence identity along the whole intron, with the highest identity occurring in the region retained consequent to alternative splicing (Figure 4 Our analysis of aberrant mRNA production by the mouse rpL12 provides compelling evidence that NMD target mRNA isoforms are important for gene regulation. In fact, there was no relevant similarity between human and mouse rpL12 intron 1. However, a BLAST search in the mouse EST database and RT–PCR analysis revealed the expression of an alternatively spliced, unproductive mRNA rpL12 isoform. Strikingly, the splicing event generating this isoform occurs in the intron of the mouse gene corresponding to the human intron 1 counterpart, and in a region where the alternative splice site is conserved not withstanding the low degree of identity. It is noteworthy that the alternative splicing event leading to NMD-sensitive transcripts from mammalian rpL3 and rpL12 is conserved in lower eukaryotes. In fact, in C.elegans the orthologue genes produce alternatively spliced isoforms that accumulate in strains in which the NMD pathway is genetically blocked (20). Interestingly, not only the genes targeted but also the type of alternative splicing has been preserved through the evolutionary divergence of nematodes and mammals. In fact, in both, alternative isoforms are generated through the 3′ and 5′ alternative splice sites in the rpL3 and rpL12 genes, respectively. Given these findings, it seems highly unlikely that the unproductive mRNAs are erroneously generated by the cell. Most probably, their expression reflects an evolutionarily conserved function that has yet to be discovered. It is conceivable that the generation of NMD-targeted mRNA isoforms has been conserved because coupling of alternative splicing and NMD might serve to regulate rpL3 and rpL12 expression. In fact, a body of evidence suggests that NMD can function as a means of post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression. For example, in C.elegans the expression of the serin/arginine-rich (SR) proteins SRp20 and SRp30b is modulated by alternative splicing events that produce two isoforms, one of which contains a PTC and is degraded by the NMD pathway (31). In humans, the SR protein SC35 negatively autoregulates its expression via the coupling of modulated alternative splicing and NMD degradation of a PTC-containing isoform (32). A similar mechanism of regulation has been reported for the polypyrimidine tract binding protein (PTB) (33) and for the ATP-binding cassette, subfamily C, member 4 (ABBC4) (34). A proposed model for this mechanism of protein expression down-regulation has been designated ‘regulated unproductive splicing and translation’ (RUST), a process through which gene expression can be regulated post-transcriptionally by the production of splice forms that will be degraded by NMD rather than translated into protein (35). However, most transcripts may not be subject to RUST. In fact, while some genes may acquire the ability to alternatively splice to turn off their expression, the presence of nonsense codons in the alternatively spliced transcript may not be functionally relevant. For example, many alternatively spliced transcripts could have acquired nonsense codons simply because there was no selection pressure to encode a functional protein product. Thus, the ability of NMD to degrade alternatively spliced transcripts may be of no regulatory significance in many circumstances. Given our results on rpL3 and rpL12 mRNA expression, we asked whether the regulation of mammalian ribosomal protein expression could be explained by the RUST model. To address this issue, we investigated whether the splicing pattern was affected by the endogenous level of the functional r-protein in the cell. Using an in vivo overexpressing system, we demonstrate that overexpresssion of rpL3 in PC12 cells alters the rpL3 gene splicing pattern: the alternatively spliced isoform is upregulated, whereas the canonically spliced mRNA decreases. Moreover, the total quantity of rpL3 endogenous mRNA does not change consequent to protein overexpression (data not shown). Thus, only the ratio of canonical versus non-canonical mRNA is altered. These findings suggest that the level of the L3 protein affects (directly or indirectly) a switch in splice-site selection. Our results lend support to and extend a model proposed by Mitrovich and Anderson (20) for rpL12 in C.elegans. Indeed, our model predicts that the quantity of free rpL3, unassembled in ribosomal subunits, acts as a sensor of rpL3 expression either by down-regulating canonical splicing, or by up-regulating non-canonical splicing (Figure 7
We also investigated whether this regulatory mechanism is triggered by a general signal activated by the cell upon accumulation of any other ribosomal protein, or whether it occurs only in response to the rpL3 increase. Our data show that the alternative splicing of the rpL3 gene is not influenced by overexpression of another ribosomal protein (rpL12). Hence, we conclude that the proposed feedback process is specifically modulated by rpL3. To our knowledge, this is the first example of post-transcriptional regulation mediated by alternative splicing that gives rise to natural NMD targets reported for mammalian ribosomal protein genes. Although we do not provide experimental evidence for a similar mechanism in the rpL12 gene, the conserved expression pattern of the human, bovine and mouse genes indicates that the same regulation mode also applies to rpL12. In addition, a mechanism similar to the one we describe for mammalian rpL3 has been reported in C.elegans for rpL12 and inferred for rpL3 (20). The fact that the regulatory mechanism of rp gene expression is widely conserved highlights the relevance of our results. In conclusion, NMD could be viewed as a new component of the complex cellular regulation of ribosomal protein genes. Post-transcriptional feedback loops are known to modulate the expression of other r-proteins. However, in all previous cases, excess r-protein led either to inhibition of splicing and consequent accumulation of unspliced transcript (36,37), or to destabilization of the cognate mRNA (38). Here we report that human rpL3 selects the splicing mode rather than triggering or not splicing. Moreover, we suggest that regulated splicing associated with the NMD pathway might represent a way to fine-tune the amount of an r-protein to the appropriate level. In other words, the NMD pathway might provide a means with which to lower the threshold of gene expression below what would otherwise be possible by modulating the transcription rate alone. Alternatively, or in addition, this type of post-transcriptional regulation could provide a temporal control unattainable by transcription factors. However, in C.elegans (20) and in mammals, the association of splicing and NMD does not appear to be a general mechanism of regulation shared by all r-proteins. Given the global regulation network of ribosomal components, including r-proteins and rRNAs, we suppose that a mechanism like NMD, which acts only on coding RNAs, provides an additional level of modulation, perhaps specifically targeted to the r-proteins that exert extra-ribosomal functions and, as such, require ultrafine tuning. The molecular basis of the autoregulation process identified in this study remains to be established. The striking sequence conservation of rpL3 intron 3 may indicate that it contains cis-elements, recognized by a regulatory protein, that are critical for selecting the type of splicing. Perhaps, as demonstrated for other ribosomal proteins (i.e. rpL32), the free rpL3 might be directly involved in modulating splicing of the rpL3 gene by binding the unprocessed transcript in intron 3. A similar mechanism could apply to rpL12. In this case, however, the critical interaction target could be a common secondary structure assumed by the loosely conserved regions of intron 1. In fact, preliminary analysis of RNA folding, performed using the M-FOLD program on human and mouse rpL12 intron 1, has predicted similar structures for these sequences. It will be interesting to clarify the significance of the different sequence conservation in mammals of rpL3 intron 3 and rpL12 intron 1, and how each intron is functionally involved in the regulated splicing. In conclusion, this report casts light on the regulation of mammalian ribosomal proteins by newly identified molecular strategies, and supports the concept that the NMD pathway plays a more prominent role in the regulation of gene expression than hitherto recognized. Acknowledgments This work has been supported by the Ministero Istruzione, Università, Ricerca (MIUR), Progetti di Ricerca di Interesse Nazionale (PRIN 2003), and Fondo Investimenti Ricerca di Base (FIRB 2001). We are grateful to Jean Gilder for text editing, and to Eliana De Gregorio for help with the figures. Funding to pay the Open Access publication charges for this article was provided by MIUR. Conflict of interest statement. None declared. REFERENCES 1. Wagner E., Lykke-Andersen J. mRNA surveillance: the perfect persist. J. Cell Sci. 2002;115:3033–3038. [PubMed] 2. Culbertson M.R., Leeds P.F. Looking at mRNA decay pathways through the window of molecular evolution. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2003;13:207–214. [PubMed] 3. Gonzalez C.I., Wang W., Peltz S.W. Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a quality control mechanism that degrades transcripts harboring premature termination codons. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 2001;66:321–328. [PubMed] 4. Ruiz-Echevarria M.J., Czaplinski K., Peltz S.W. Making sense of nonsense in yeast. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1996;21:433–438. [PubMed] 5. Maquat L.E. Nonsense-mediated RNA decay in mammalian cells: A splicing dependent means to down-regulate the levels of mRNAs that prematurely terminate translation. In: Sonenberg N., Hershey J.W.B., Mathews M.B., editors. Translation Control of Gene Expression. NY: Cold Spring Harbor; 2000. pp. 849–868. 6. Maquat L.E. Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Curr. Biol. 2002;12:R196–197. [PubMed] 7. Maquat L.E., Carmichael G.G. Quality control of mRNA function. Cell. 2001;104:173–176. [PubMed] 8. Le Hir H., Izaurralde E., Maquat L.E., Moore M.J. The spliceosome deposits multiple proteins 20–24 nucleotides upstream of mRNA exon-exon junctions. EMBO J. 2000;19:6860–6869. [PubMed] 9. Ishigaki Y., Li X., Serin G., Maquat L.E. Evidence for a pioneer round of mRNA translation: mRNAs subject to nonsense-mediated decay in mammalian cells are bound by CBP80 and CBP20. Cell. 2001;106:607–617. [PubMed] 10. Jacobson A., Peltz S.W. Destabilization of nonsense-containing transcripts in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In: Sonenberg N., Hershey J.W.B., Mathews M.B., editors. Translation Control of Gene Expression. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2000. pp. 827–847. 11. Czaplinski K., Ruiz-Echevarria M.J., Gonzalez C.I., Peltz S.W. Should we kill the messenger? The role of the surveillance complex in translation termination and mRNA turnover. Bioessays. 1999;21:685–696. [PubMed] 12. Cali B.M., Kuchma S.L., Latham J., Anderson P. smg-7 is required for mRNA surveillance in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1999;151:605–616. [PubMed] 13. Pulak R., Anderson P. mRNA surveillance by the Caenorhabditis elegans smg genes. Genes Dev. 1993;7:1885–1897. [PubMed] 14. Page M.F., Carr B., Anders K.R., Grimson A., Anderson P. SMG-2 is a phosphorylated protein required for mRNA surveillance in Caenorhabditis elegans and related to Upf1p of yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1999;19:5943–5951. [PubMed] 15. Lykke-Andersen J., Shu M.D., Steitz J.A. Human Upf proteins target an mRNA for nonsense-mediated decay when bound downstream of a termination codon. Cell. 2000;103:1121–1131. [PubMed] 16. Yamashita A., Ohnishi T., Kashima I., Taya Y., Ohno S. Human SMG-1, a novel phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-related protein kinase, associates with components of the mRNA surveillance complex and is involved in the regulation of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Genes Dev. 2001;15:2215–2228. [PubMed] 17. Frischmeyer P.A., Dietz H.C. Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay in health and disease. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1999;8:1893–1900. [PubMed] 18. Hilleren P., Parker R. Mechanisms of mRNA surveillance in eukaryotes. Annu Rev. Genet. 1999;33:229–260. [PubMed] 19. Holbrook J.A., Neu-Yilik G., Hentze M.W., Kulozik A.E. Nonsense-mediated decay approaches the clinic. Nature Genet. 2004;36:801–808. [PubMed] 20. Mitrovich Q.M., Anderson P. Unproductively spliced ribosomal protein mRNAs are natural targets of mRNA surveillance in C.elegans. Genes Dev. 2000;14:2173–2184. [PubMed] 21. Mitrovich Q.M., Anderson P. mRNA surveillance of expressed pseudogenes in C.elegans. Curr. Biol. 2005;15:963–967. [PubMed] 22. Lewis B.P., Green R.E., Brenner S.E. Evidence for the widespread coupling of alternative splicing and nonsense-mediated mRNA decay in humans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2003;100:189–192. [PubMed] 23. Church G.M., Gilbert W. Genomic sequencing. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1984;81:1991–1995. [PubMed] 24. Higgins D.G., Sharp P.M. Fast and sensitive multiple sequence alignments on a microcomputer. Comput. Appl. Biosci. 1989;5:151–153. [PubMed] 25. Gonzalez C.I., Bhattacharya A., Wang W., Peltz S.W. Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Gene. 2001;274:15–25. [PubMed] 26. Bodner S.M., Minna J.D., Jensen S.M., D'Amico D., Carbone D., Mitsudomi T., Fedorko J., Buchhagen D.L., Nau M.M., Gazdar A.F., et al. Expression of mutant p53 proteins in lung cancer correlates with the class of p53 gene mutation. Oncogene. 1992;7:743–749. [PubMed] 27. Duga S., Asselta R., Malcovati M., Tenchini M.L., Ronchi S., Simonic T. The intron-containing L3 ribosomal protein gene (RPL3): sequence analysis and identification of U43 and of two novel intronic small nucleolar RNAs. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2000;1490:225–236. [PubMed] 28. Hentze M.W., Kulozik A.E. A perfect message: RNA surveillance and nonsense-mediated decay. Cell. 1999;96:307–310. [PubMed] 29. Lykke-Andersen J. mRNA quality control: marking the message for life or death. Curr. Biol. 2001;11:R88–91. [PubMed] 30. Mango S.E. Stop making nonSense: the C.elegans smg genes. Trends Genet. 2001;17:646–653. [PubMed] 31. Morrison M., Harris K.S., Roth M.B. smg mutants affect the expression of alternatively spliced SR protein mRNAs in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1997;94:9782–9785. [PubMed] 32. Sureau A., Gattoni R., Dooghe Y., Stevenin J., Soret J. SC35 autoregulates its expression by promoting splicing events that destabilize its mRNAs. EMBO J. 2001;20:1785–1796. [PubMed] 33. Wollerton M.C., Gooding C., Wagner E.J., Garcia-Blanco M.A., Smith C.W. Autoregulation of polypyrimidine tract binding protein by alternative splicing leading to nonsense-mediated decay. Mol. Cell. 2004;13:91–100. [PubMed] 34. Lamba J.K., Adachi M., Sun D., Tammur J., Schuetz E.G., Allikmets R., Schuetz J.D. Nonsense mediated decay downregulates conserved alternatively spliced ABCC4 transcripts bearing nonsense codons. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2003;12:99–109. [PubMed] 35. Hillman R.T., Green R.E., Brenner S.E. An unappreciated role for RNA surveillance. Genome Biol. 2004;5:R8. [PubMed] 36. Vilardell J., Warner J.R. Ribosomal protein L32 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae influences both the splicing of its own transcript and the processing of rRNA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1997;17:1959–1965. [PubMed] 37. Fewell S.W., Woolford J.L., Jr Ribosomal protein S14 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae regulates its expression by binding to RPS14B pre-mRNA and to 18S rRNA. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1999;19:826–834. [PubMed] 38. Presutti C., Ciafre S.A., Bozzoni I. The ribosomal protein L2 in S.cerevisiae controls the level of accumulation of its own mRNA. EMBO J. 1991;10:2215–2221. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||
J Cell Sci. 2002 Aug 1; 115(Pt 15):3033-8.
[J Cell Sci. 2002]Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2003 Apr; 13(2):207-14.
[Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2003]Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2001; 66():321-8.
[Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2001]Trends Biochem Sci. 1996 Nov; 21(11):433-8.
[Trends Biochem Sci. 1996]Curr Biol. 2002 Mar 19; 12(6):R196-7.
[Curr Biol. 2002]Bioessays. 1999 Aug; 21(8):685-96.
[Bioessays. 1999]Genetics. 1999 Feb; 151(2):605-16.
[Genetics. 1999]Genes Dev. 1993 Oct; 7(10):1885-97.
[Genes Dev. 1993]Mol Cell Biol. 1999 Sep; 19(9):5943-51.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1999]Cell. 2000 Dec 22; 103(7):1121-31.
[Cell. 2000]Hum Mol Genet. 1999; 8(10):1893-900.
[Hum Mol Genet. 1999]Annu Rev Genet. 1999; 33():229-60.
[Annu Rev Genet. 1999]Nat Genet. 2004 Aug; 36(8):801-8.
[Nat Genet. 2004]Genes Dev. 2000 Sep 1; 14(17):2173-84.
[Genes Dev. 2000]Genes Dev. 2000 Sep 1; 14(17):2173-84.
[Genes Dev. 2000]Curr Biol. 2005 May 24; 15(10):963-7.
[Curr Biol. 2005]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jan 7; 100(1):189-92.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Apr; 81(7):1991-5.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984]Comput Appl Biosci. 1989 Apr; 5(2):151-3.
[Comput Appl Biosci. 1989]Genes Dev. 2001 Sep 1; 15(17):2215-28.
[Genes Dev. 2001]Gene. 2001 Aug 22; 274(1-2):15-25.
[Gene. 2001]Oncogene. 1992 Apr; 7(4):743-9.
[Oncogene. 1992]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jan 7; 100(1):189-92.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jan 7; 100(1):189-92.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003]Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000 Feb 29; 1490(3):225-36.
[Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000]Cell. 2001 Jan 26; 104(2):173-6.
[Cell. 2001]Gene. 2001 Aug 22; 274(1-2):15-25.
[Gene. 2001]Cell. 1999 Feb 5; 96(3):307-10.
[Cell. 1999]Trends Genet. 2001 Nov; 17(11):646-53.
[Trends Genet. 2001]Genes Dev. 2000 Sep 1; 14(17):2173-84.
[Genes Dev. 2000]Genes Dev. 2000 Sep 1; 14(17):2173-84.
[Genes Dev. 2000]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Sep 2; 94(18):9782-5.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997]EMBO J. 2001 Apr 2; 20(7):1785-96.
[EMBO J. 2001]Mol Cell. 2004 Jan 16; 13(1):91-100.
[Mol Cell. 2004]Hum Mol Genet. 2003 Jan 15; 12(2):99-109.
[Hum Mol Genet. 2003]Genome Biol. 2004; 5(2):R8.
[Genome Biol. 2004]Genes Dev. 2000 Sep 1; 14(17):2173-84.
[Genes Dev. 2000]Genes Dev. 2000 Sep 1; 14(17):2173-84.
[Genes Dev. 2000]Mol Cell Biol. 1997 Apr; 17(4):1959-65.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1997]Mol Cell Biol. 1999 Jan; 19(1):826-34.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1999]EMBO J. 1991 Aug; 10(8):2215-21.
[EMBO J. 1991]Genes Dev. 2000 Sep 1; 14(17):2173-84.
[Genes Dev. 2000]