![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2002 Hoffmann et al., licensee BioMed Central Ltd Identification of Schistosoma mansoni gender-associated gene transcripts by cDNA microarray profiling 1Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1QP, UK 2Biomedical Parasitology Division, Department of Zoology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK Correspondence: Karl F Hoffmann. E-mail: kfh24@cam.ac.uk Corresponding author.Karl F Hoffmann: kfh24/at/cam.ac.uk Received April 23, 2002; Revised May 24, 2002; Accepted June 11, 2002. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Background Parasitic helminths of the genus Schistosoma mate, achieve sexual maturity and produce eggs in the bloodstream of their definitive hosts, and the most important pathological consequences of the infection are associated with this process. We have used cDNA microarray technology to initiate genome-wide gene-expression studies of sex and sexual development in mature Schistosoma mansoni parasites. Results An S. mansoni-specific cDNA microarray was fabricated using 576 expressed sequence tags selected from three cDNA libraries and originating from two different parasite developmental stages. Five independent cDNA microarray hybridizations were analyzed using stringent filtering criteria and careful quality control, leading to the identification of 12 new female-associated and 4 new male-associated gene transcripts in the mature adult schistosome. Statistical analysis of variation demonstrated high levels of agreement within a cDNA microarray (correlation coefficient 0.91; median coefficient of variation 11.1%) and between cDNA microarrays (correlation coefficient 0.90; median coefficient of variation 14.4%). RT-PCR analysis confirmed the cDNA microarray results, thereby supporting the reliability of the system. Conclusions Our study expands the list of S. mansoni gender-associated gene transcripts from all previous studies by a factor of two. Among the new associations identified, a tyrosinase ortholog was preferentially expressed in the adult female, and a dynein light-chain ortholog was highly induced in the adult male. cDNA microarrays offer the potential for exponential leaps in the understanding of parasite biology and this study shows how molecules involved in sexual biology can be rapidly identified. Background Schistosomes are members of a medically important group of parasitic helminths that contribute to severe morbidity and mortality in people in 74 tropical and subtropical developing nations [1]. A virtually unique trait of all species of Schistosoma (phylum Platyhelminthes) is their evolution from hermaphrodite ancestors into sexually dimorphic species. Although the selective pressures that initiated this heterogametic adaptive radiation are presently unknown, gender-specific gene-expression investigations have begun to shed some light on sexual biology within the schistosomes. Most gender-associated investigations have focused on female gene-expression patterns because this sex produces the eggs that cause the main pathological changes within the infected host. Thus, in developing approaches to prevent egg-induced pathology (as well as blocking transmission), knowledge about the molecules associated with sexual maturation of the female parasite and development of the viable egg will be critical. To this end, past studies have provided insight into eggshell organization [2,3,4], reproductive duct morphology [5] and vitellarium biology [6,7] as well as gastrodermis composition [8], and cysteine-protease enzymatic activity [9]. However, only a few other detailed studies into female gene expression have added to our knowledge of this sex's genetic complexities [10,11]. Even less is known about the expression of male-associated transcripts, although these molecules clearly exist [12]. As female worms of some Schistosoma species (including S. mansoni) are incapable of reaching sexual maturity in the absence of sexually mature males [13], identifying the gene products expressed by adult male schistosomes may uncover molecules integral to female sexual maturation. Therefore, identifying gene transcripts associated with sexually mature male and female adult schistosomes represents an important first step in developing strategies for blocking the worm's reproductive life cycle, blocking their potential to induce host morbidity and ultimately preventing successful transmission. The databases of available schistosome expressed sequence tag (EST) sequence information [14,15,16] offer an excellent source for genomic investigations and have led to the characterization of numerous individual gene products [17,18,19,20,21]. However, the information that can be obtained by this 'molecule by molecule' approach is limited in respect of subsequent interpretation of gene-expression studies in the modern genomic age. Gene discovery and expression studies can now be carried out on a much larger scale through the use of cDNA microarrays [22]. These tools (as well as genomic DNA arrays) have proved a major contributor in various disciplines ranging from cancer phenotyping [23] to host-pathogen interactions [24] and have slowly begun to have an impact on parasite genomic investigations [25,26]. Using DNA sequences deposited in the schistosome EST databases we have fabricated a schistosome-specific cDNA microarray useful for large-scale gender-specific gene discovery studies. This first-generation schistosome cDNA microarray consisted of 576 putatively nonredundant elements from three different cDNA libraries (mixed adult (male/female); female-enriched; cercarial libraries) and two different stages of the parasite's life cycle (adult; cercarial stages). Of the 576 arrayed cDNA elements (representative examples of the S. mansoni EST database), 36% shared sequence similarity to known molecules in the GenBank databases, whereas the remaining 64% had no significant homology matches. The studies described here show that cDNA microarrays are a reproducible, rapid and highly efficient method for profiling schistosome gender-associated gene expression. Furthermore, the genes identified in this study will contribute to our understanding of schistosome sexual biology and will lead to the identification of associations, processes and pathways previously unappreciated during the development of schistosome parasites. Results Male and female gender-specific gene transcripts are reproducibly detected by S. mansoni cDNA microarrays As our report represents the first use of cDNA microarrays to study gene expression in schistosomes, we investigated the reproducible nature of this functional genomics tool. Our first objective, however, was to ensure that similar levels of high-quality total RNA were isolated from each sexually mature parasite population. As differences in the starting quality and/or quantity of input RNA from each sample being compared can have dramatic effects on the measurement of gene expression, we took extreme care in isolating total parasite RNA from 7-week, sexually mature schistosomes. Denaturing gel electrophoresis of equivalent amounts of total male and female RNA showed that each sample pool was harvested intact, was of high quality, and displayed minimal degradation (Figure (Figure1a),1a
Replication of gene-expression measurements is an important aspect of cDNA microarray hybridization experiments [28]. To address this issue, we carried out five independent cDNA microarray hybridizations using the prepared 7-week sexually mature adult male and female schistosome samples (Figure (Figure2).2
Inter-array replication analysis compared the average calibrated ratio (average of duplicate measurements on each microarray) obtained from one representative cDNA microarray hybridization (hybridization 1) to those average calibrated ratios obtained from an independent hybridization (hybridization 2) (Figure (Figure2d).2d Gene-expression profiling reveals several novel gender-specific associations in sexually mature adult S. mansoni After carrying out five independent cDNA microarray hybridizations and subjecting the accumulated data to stringent quality-control measures (summarized in Materials and methods), we assigned novel, sex-associated transcription to 12 female-associated and 4 male-associated transcripts in the 7-week adult schistosome (Figure (Figure3a).3a
Independent confirmation of gender associations predicted by the schistosome cDNA microarrays by reverse transcription PCR To verify the cDNA microarray predictions for a subset of gene products (gray-shaded clone IDs in Figure Figure3a),3a
Discussion The modern tools of this post-genomic age are slowly developing alongside the well-established parasite sequencing efforts and will undoubtedly change the path and scope of all future, genome-wide, functional investigations. We describe the first use of one specific post-genomic tool (cDNA microarrays) in the study of schistosome biology and illustrate several key points. First, our fabricated schistosome cDNA microarrays provided an efficient means to examine gender-associated gene expression en masse. Second, the results obtained with these cDNA microarrays were highly reproducible and capable of independent confirmation, and finally, microarrays provided information previously unappreciated in schistosome sexual biology. Schistosomes are complex parasitic metazoans that have coevolved with humans since before historical records were kept. They have excelled at parasitism by adopting developmental strategies virtually unique amongst the Platyhelminthes. The separation of sexes is one of these traits and so is perfectly suited for the initiation of schistosome cDNA microarray investigations. In this study, we developed a schistosome cDNA microarray from a small subset of EST elements deposited in one of the current schistosome EST databases [14]. The resultant 576-element schistosome cDNA microarray contained only about 4% of the predicted open reading frames (ORFs) encoded by the schistosome genome [33], but was sufficient to identify 23 differentially expressed genes between the sexes. Some of these genes were positive control elements intentionally printed on the cDNA microarray (chorion, p48, mucin-like protein), but 16 genes demonstrated novel sex-specific associations in the adult schistosome (12 female- and 4 male-associated transcripts) (Figure (Figure3a).3a Of the 18 cDNA clones (Figure (Figure3a)3a In addition to these cDNAs, several other clones had novel female-specific associations. One clone had sequence similarity to a 60S ribosomal protein L12 subunit (R95618) and clearly has a role in protein production, but why it is preferentially transcribed in adult female schistosomes is, as yet, unclear. The remaining nine clones possessed no significant database match. The functional roles of these nine novel female-associated cDNA clones in schistosome biology are currently under investigation. They could be newly identified components of the female's egg-producing machinery or be involved in other sex-specific biological processes. These molecules represent a new collection of female-associated transcripts that may be useful in understanding the processes that lead to host immunopathology. Three annotated proteins whose genes show male-associated expression are tropomyosin (clones R95521, R95617, and R95512), actin (clone R95639) and a dynein light-chain ortholog (Sj DLC3 - clone N21858) (Figure (Figure3a).3a The coordinate expression of tropomyosin and actin in the adult male schistosome is probably due to the fact that these two molecules interact intimately. Actin polymers (microfilaments) provide mechanical stability for the cytoskeleton of eukaryotes and serve as tracks for motor proteins such as tropomyosin [45]. As male schistosomes are significantly larger than females, contain a greater volume of tegument and muscle, and are more physically active, our expression results may reflect this bias. It is also possible, however, that the preferential transcription of tropomyosin, actin and dynein light chains in the male has an important developmental role for copulating worm pairs. Evidence for this comes from studies where unpaired female parasites are developmentally and sexually stunted in comparison to paired female parasites [46,47,48]. In the paired state, male schistosomes are thought to provide mechanical (among other types of) support to the maturing female [49]. This mechanical support enables the female to acquire proper nutritional supplements from the hepatic portal system, which allows the development of full sexual maturity. As a function of tropomyosin (binding to actin) is in contractile muscle regulation and a hypothesized function of dynein light chains is in tegument biology [43], our results suggest that these molecules, preferentially transcribed in the male, may participate in this mechanical and support maintenance. With the male firmly securing the female in its gynecophoral canal, she can devote more of her metabolic and transcriptional machinery to egg production (as our results indicate). Several other schistosome tegument-associated transcripts (EST clones corresponding to Sm DLC, Sm 20.8, Sm 22.6, Sm 21.7 and Sm 22) were also differentially expressed in the adult male in our study, further supporting this hypothesis. These molecules narrowly missed inclusion in our final dataset because they failed in one of the applied filtering criteria. Taken together, these data show that tegument-associated gene products are transcribed in a gender-related manner, which may reflect differences in size and/or physical activity, or a differential functional requirement for each of these transcripts. The identity and functional role of the three unknown male-associated transcripts identified in this study await further investigation. A few other critical points were uncovered during this investigation. First, the fabricated cDNA microarrays performed with a high degree of reproducibility (and low variation) when analyzed statistically (Figure (Figure2).2 Conclusions This report describes the first use of cDNA microarrays in functional analyses of schistosome biology. We have shown that these tools were of high quality, capable of reproducibly detecting gene-expression differences between genders, and useful for identifying new biological associations. The 16 novel, gender-associated transcripts identified here serve as starting points for functional investigations. Continued refinement and expansion of schistosome cDNA microarrays (fabrication of a 4,000-element array is underway) and development of new post-genomic techniques will provide the means to initiate numerous other investigations aimed at unraveling the biological complexities of this parasitic helminth and the pathology it induces. Materials and methods Parasites A Puerto Rican strain of S. mansoni was used in this study. Adult male and female schistosomes were perfused from percutaneously infected TO outbred mice (Harlan) challenged 7 weeks earlier with 125 cercaria [51]. The parasite was passaged through Biomphalaria glabrata intermediate snail hosts. Schistosome cDNA microarray fabrication Parasite ESTs deposited on cDNA microarrays were selected from a putatively nonredundant sequence set contained in the March 2000 cluster-analysis database [14]. This particular arrayed clone set was selected for two main reasons: we could successfully grow this subset of bacterial clones at the time of array fabrication; and the set contained similar representative percentages of known and unknown annotated sequences deposited in the schistosome EST database. Clusters were assembled using an exhaustive search-and-compare algorithm in Sequencher v3.1.1 (Gene Codes Corp., Ann Arbor MI), set to assemble contigs from sequences displaying ≥ 90% homology over ≥ 60 bases, with a maximum of two allowable consecutive mismatched bases. EST products were generated via standard PCR techniques from cDNA clones archived by the Schistosome Genome Network and maintained at The Natural History Museum (London). The source libraries were constructed in LambdaZap vectors (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) and inserts were amplified from phage suspension or from lysed bacterial colonies containing excised pBluescript plasmid using M13 forward and reverse primer pairs. EST PCR products were 1,000 bp on average as assessed by DNA gel electrophoresis (over 98% of the PCR reactions generated a single product). PCR products were purified, using Multiscreen-FB 96-well filtering units (Millipore, Bedford, MA), away from primers, salt and other potential contaminants. Purified EST products were diluted (1:4) in 4× spotting buffer (600 mM sodium phosphate, 0.04% sodium dodecyl sulfate) and printed in ordered arrays (8 subarrays composed of 12 columns × 12 rows) on gamma-aminopropyl silane-coated glass slides (Corning) using a Microgrid II robotic arrayer (BioRobotics Ltd, Cambridge, UK). Slides were processed after printing by baking for 2 h at 80°C and UV cross-linking at 450 mJ to permanently fix DNA on the glass slides, followed by boiling for 2 min to denature fixed DNA. The 1,152 elements (576 elements printed in duplicate) arrayed on each glass slide were composed of the PCR-amplified parasite ESTs, positive controls (S. mansoni genomic DNA and known female-specific cDNAs: chorion [2], mucin-like protein [5] and p48 [3]), and negative controls (yeast tRNA, pBluescript DNA, lambda DNA, and spotting buffer only). Total RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis and hybridization After perfusion of experimentally infected mice (7 weeks post-infection), male and female schistosomes were separated manually. Approximately equal numbers of adult male or female worms were pooled and used as the starting material for total RNA isolation. A procedure to isolate total RNA from the parasite was adapted from previous studies [52] and involved both phase extraction (TRIZOL reagent, Invitrogen, Life Technologies, Paisley, UK) and column chromatography (Qiagen RNeasy maxi affinity columns, Qiagen, Crawley, UK). Denaturing gel electrophoresis assessed RNA quality from each sample. Amino-allyl dUTP (Sigma-Aldrich) labeled cDNA targets (nomenclature recommendation described in [53]) were generated from a 10 μg male RNA sample and a 10 μg female RNA sample using Superscript Reverse Transcriptase II (Invitrogen). Cy dye (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Little Chalfont, UK) conjugation to each cDNA target was carried out according to standard protocols [54]. Fluorescent cDNA targets were hybridized to the cDNA microarray probes in a modified hybridization buffer (40% deionized formamide, 5× Denhardt's reagent, 5× SSC, 1 mM sodium pyrophosphate, 50 mM Tris pH 7.4, 0.1% SDS, 0.25 μg/μl mouse Cot1 DNA (Life Technologies), 0.44 μg/μl poly(dA) (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), and 0.22 μg/μl yeast tRNA (Sigma-Aldrich) at 48°C using hybridization chambers (TeleChem, Sunnyvale, CA) for a minimum of 16 h. Post-hybridization processing involved three successive 5-min washes in 0.5× SSC/0.1% SDS, 0.5× SSC/0.01% SDS and 0.06× SSC. Slides were spun dried (500 g for 5 min) to remove all washing buffer, stored at room temperature in the dark, and scanned at 10 μm resolution using a Packard ScanArray Express microarray scanner (Packard BioScience, Pangbourne, UK). RT-PCR analysis For RT-PCR analysis, 1 μg male or female RNA was used for cDNA synthesis to confirm cDNA microarray results. RT-PCR was carried out as described [55] to confirm the cDNA microarray gender-specific gene-expression results for clones AI110935, N21956, N21941, AI11017, R95512, AA559678, AI111005 and AA559631. Additional cDNAs examined by this method included two well characterized controls - alpha-tubulin (housekeeping transcript [56]) and chorion (female-associated transcript [31]). The primers for all transcripts are included in Table 1. Thirty-five cycles of PCR were used to amplify all transcripts except for alpha-tubulin and clone AA559631 (to ensure that amplification was within the linear range of PCR in both male and female cDNA, 23 cycles were used for these clones). All amplicons were electrophoresed on a 1% agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide. Images were captured by a digital camera and analyzed by gel-documentation software (Kodak 1D 2.0 electrophoresis documentation and analysis system 120, Eastman Kodak, New Haven, CT). Semi-quantitative analysis of the differentially expressed transcripts was not carried out owing to the cycling conditions used in this study (35 cycles). RT-PCR was used, therefore, to verify the cDNA microarray results and not used to obtain exact or relative amounts of gene transcript present in each sex.
Statistical analysis Microarray Suite (Scanalytics, Fairfax, VA) software was used to process signal-intensity information from all 16-bit TIFF files generated in the cDNA microarray experiments. Hybridization signals representing gene expression (Cy5/Cy3 ratios) from cDNA microarray experiments were processed by several filtering criteria after global mode normalization (each experiment normalized to itself) and local background subtraction. Filters one and two evaluated target/probe spot morphology and were used to eliminate any questionable data (weak signals, poorly defined spots, and background noise). The first criterion required each spot to be greater in size than the lowest tenth percentile of all spots within an experiment (removal of small or irregularly shaped spots). The second criterion required one fluor (either Cy5 or Cy3) from each spot to be greater in intensity than one standard deviation above the mean intensity from all negative control array elements (removal of spots that were not significantly above background intensities). Intra-array and inter-array reproducibility were next examined as filtering criteria. As each EST was printed twice on every array (intra-array reproducibility), only those ESTs that showed highly reproducible gene-expression ratios (within the 99% confidence interval of each experimental hybridization as predicted by the derived regression equation) were included. Each of the duplicates subsequently had to show expression levels significantly greater than the median gene-expression ratio for each cDNA microarray hybridization (outside the 99% confidence interval derived from all gene-expression ratios). Finally, gene-expression measurements for each cDNA (including duplicates) had to have passed the previous filters in four out of five independent hybridizations to be included in the final dataset. Statistical analysis of gene-expression ratios between two of these five independent hybridizations showed low variation (that is, inter-array reproducibility). The 28 calibrated ratio values surviving these stringent filters were log2 transformed and stored in a table (rows, individual cDNA clones; columns, gene-expression ratios for each independent hybridization). All clones showing differential gene expression were resequenced to confirm their annotated identity, as human error can sometimes lead to well-to-well cross-contamination of bacterially derived clone sets [57]. Additional data files Additional files containing the primary data for the individual microarray experiments are available from the additional data page. Additional data file 1 Primary data for the individual microarray experiments Click here for additional data file(1.9M, ZIP) Acknowledgements We thank Francis Jones, Maureen Laidlaw, Karen Plant, Mike Anderson, Viv Tuffney, and Susan Arnold for excellent technical assistance in maintaining the schistosome life cycle and separation of adult parasites. We also thank Rhian Hayward, Tom Wynn, and Thomas McCarty for critically reviewing this manuscript. Finally, we thank David Latto for many helpful discussions and in the fabrication of the cDNA microarrays. K.F.H. is supported by a 2-year, long-term research fellowship awarded by the European Molecular Biology Organization. This work was also supported by means of Wellcome Trust and Medical Research Council programme grants to the Cambridge laboratory and a UNDP/WORLD BANK/WHO Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases (T.D.R.) grant (ID no 980502) awarded to D.A.J. at The Natural History Museum. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||
Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Aug; 8(8):3008-16.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1988]Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1992 May; 52(1):39-52.
[Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1992]Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1987 Jan 2; 22(1):89-100.
[Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1987]Parasitology. 1995 Nov; 111 ( Pt 4)():477-83.
[Parasitology. 1995]Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1988 Nov; 31(2):183-98.
[Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1988]Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1985 Dec; 17(3):289-98.
[Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1985]Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2001 Jan 15; 112(1):113-23.
[Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2001]Exp Parasitol. 1999 Mar; 91(3):280-3.
[Exp Parasitol. 1999]Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2000 Nov; 111(1):131-42.
[Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2000]Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1999 May 15; 100(1):27-41.
[Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1999]Parasitology. 1999; 118 Suppl():S19-38.
[Parasitology. 1999]Parasitology. 1982 Apr; 84(Pt 2):253-61.
[Parasitology. 1982]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Aug 29; 97(18):9834-9.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000]Arch Biochem Biophys. 2000 Apr 1; 376(1):66-73.
[Arch Biochem Biophys. 2000]Mol Carcinog. 2000 May; 28(1):12-22.
[Mol Carcinog. 2000]Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1992 May; 52(1):39-52.
[Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1992]Parasitology. 1995 Nov; 111 ( Pt 4)():477-83.
[Parasitology. 1995]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Aug; 83(15):5544-8.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986]Braz J Med Biol Res. 2002 Mar; 35(3):377-81.
[Braz J Med Biol Res. 2002]Int J Parasitol. 2000 Apr 10; 30(4):453-63.
[Int J Parasitol. 2000]Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1992 May; 52(1):39-52.
[Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1992]Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1984 Feb 13; 304(1121):551-65.
[Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1984]Mol Reprod Dev. 1995 Jul; 41(3):325-30.
[Mol Reprod Dev. 1995]Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1989 Jan 15; 32(2-3):113-9.
[Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1989]Z Parasitenkd. 1975; 46(1):75-81.
[Z Parasitenkd. 1975]Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1985 Dec; 17(3):289-98.
[Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1985]Exp Parasitol. 1989 Nov; 69(4):373-92.
[Exp Parasitol. 1989]J Biol Chem. 1996 Oct 18; 271(42):26117-23.
[J Biol Chem. 1996]Int J Parasitol. 1990 May; 20(3):279-84.
[Int J Parasitol. 1990]Biophys J. 2001 Dec; 81(6):3146-55.
[Biophys J. 2001]J Parasitol. 1981 Aug; 67(4):535-9.
[J Parasitol. 1981]Int J Parasitol. 1984 Apr; 14(2):183-90.
[Int J Parasitol. 1984]J Exp Zool. 1984 Oct; 232(1):141-50.
[J Exp Zool. 1984]J Parasitol. 1987 Jun; 73(3):481-6.
[J Parasitol. 1987]J Parasitol. 1983 Dec; 69(6):1084-9.
[J Parasitol. 1983]Parasitology. 1965 Nov; 55(4):695-700.
[Parasitology. 1965]Mol Cell Biol. 1988 Aug; 8(8):3008-16.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1988]Parasitology. 1995 Nov; 111 ( Pt 4)():477-83.
[Parasitology. 1995]Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1992 May; 52(1):39-52.
[Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1992]J Immunol. 1993 Aug 1; 151(3):1430-40.
[J Immunol. 1993]Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1992 Mar; 51(1):169-70.
[Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1992]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Aug; 83(15):5544-8.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986]Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 Jan 15; 29(2):582-8.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2001]