![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2005, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Gfi1 functions downstream of Math1 to control intestinal secretory cell subtype allocation and differentiation Departments of 1Molecular and Human Genetics, 2Pediatrics, and 5Neuroscience, 3Howard Hughes Medical Institute, 4Program in Developmental Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA 6Present address: Deeann Wallis Schultz, National Human Genome Research Institute-Contractor, National Institutes of Health, 35 Convent Drive-MSC 3717, Building 35, Room 1B-407, Bethesda, MD 20892-3717, USA. 7Corresponding author. E-MAIL hzoghbi/at/bcm.tmc.edu; FAX (713) 798-8728. Received July 11, 2005; Accepted August 8, 2005. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Gfi1 is a transcriptional repressor implicated in lymphomagenesis, neutropenia, and hematopoietic development, as well as ear and lung development. Here, we demonstrate that Gfi1 functions downstream of Math1 in intestinal secretory lineage differentiation. Gfi1-/- mice lack Paneth cells, have fewer goblet cells, and supernumerary enteroendocrine cells. Gfi1-/- mice show gene expression changes consistent with this altered cell allocation. These data suggest that Gfi1 functions to select goblet/Paneth versus enteroendocrine progenitors. We propose a model of intestinal cell fate choice in which β-catenin and Cdx function upstream of Math1, and lineage-specific genes such as Ngn3 act downstream of Gfi1. Keywords: Intestinal mucosa, developmental gene expression regulation, cell differentiation, Paneth cell, goblet cell, enteroendocrine cell The epithelium of the small intestine is a highly proliferative tissue composed of four distinct cell types: absorptive enterocytes and three secretory lineages consisting of mucus-secreting goblet cells, hormone-secreting enteroendocrine cells, and antimicrobial peptide-secreting Paneth cells. All of these cell types derive from multipotent stem cells residing near the base of the Crypts of Liberkühn, the proliferative compartment of the intestinal epithelium (Madara and Trier 1994). Differentiation within the crypts follows a spatial distribution: The stem cells are located near the base of the crypts and give rise to daughter cells that migrate up as they proliferate. Near the top of the crypt, these daughter cells terminally differentiate into the four main cell types of the intestinal epithelium. Absorptive enterocytes, goblet, and enteroendocrine cells migrate up the villus, whereas Paneth cells migrate down to reside at the crypt base. The molecular mechanisms that underlie crypt formation and intestinal cell fate specification remain incompletely defined. Several genes have been implicated in crypt morphogenesis and proliferation, including Wnt/β-catenin pathway members and target genes such as Cdx1 and Cdx2 (Korinek et al. 1998; Beck et al. 1999; Soubeyran et al. 1999). β-Catenin signaling is also necessary for stem cell renewal, proliferation, and differentiation (Pinto et al. 2003). The current model of intestinal epithelial differentiation suggests that β-catenin drives production of a pool of multipotent progenitors that use Notch signaling to select between Math1 or Hes1 expression (Yang et al. 2001; Sancho et al. 2004). Progenitors that express Hes1 will differentiate into absorptive enterocytes, whereas progenitors that express Math1 are committed to the secretory lineage and thus fated to become goblet, Paneth, or enteroendocrine cells. Additional transcription factors such as Ngn3, Pdx1, and Neurod1 are required for terminal differentiation of enteroendocrine cells (Schonhoff et al. 2004). The mechanism of selection between enteroendocrine, goblet, and Paneth cells remains unclear, and additional factors are hypothesized to direct differentiation of goblet and Paneth cells. Math1 is a basic helix–loop–helix (bHLH) transcription factor important in cell fate determination (Akazawa et al. 1995; Ben-Arie et al. 1997). Math1-null embryos die at birth due to respiratory failure and lack many specific cell lineages, including cerebellar granule neurons, spinal cord interneurons, inner ear hair cells, and intestinal secretory cells (Ben-Arie et al. 1997; Bermingham et al. 1999, 2001; Yang et al. 2001). Gfi1 is a zinc-finger transcriptional repressor essential for hematopoietic stem cell function and differentiation of immune cells and a proto-oncogene that is a frequent target of retroviral insertions in lymphoid tumors (Schmidt et al. 1996; Karsunky et al. 2002; Hock et al. 2003, 2004). Recently, Gfi1 was shown to be essential for formation of lung neuroendocrine cells and may cooperate with Mash1 to promote neuroendocrine lung tumors (Kazanjian et al. 2004). In the inner ear, Gfi1 is dependent on Math1 for its expression, and is important for both differentiation and survival of the sensory hair cells (Wallis et al. 2003). Thus, Gfi1 functions downstream of and cooperates with Notch-regulated bHLHs (Math1 and Mash1) to promote differentiation of bHLH-specified cell types, similar in function to its Drosophila homolog senseless (Jafar-Nejad et al. 2003; Jafar-Nejad and Bellen 2004). Here we show that Gfi1 functions downstream of Math1 in the intestinal epithelium, where it functions to select Paneth/goblet versus enteroendocrine cell fates among intestinal secretory progenitors. Results and Discussion GFI1 is expressed in the secretory lineage of the intestine and is absent in Math1lacZ/lacZ mutant intestine To identify genes regulated by Math1, we assessed gene expression in Math1-/- embryonic intestine using oligonucleotide microarrays and identified 192 genes that were significantly misexpressed in Math1-/- intestine (N.F. Shroyer and H.Y. Zoghbi, unpubl.). We next performed Northern blot and quantitative real-time RT–PCR analysis of gene expression in Math1lacZ/+ and Math1lacZ/lacZ intestines from two embryonic stages, confirming significant expression changes in 11 genes (Supplementary Fig. 1; Supplementary Table 1). We observed reduced expression of secretory lineage-specific transcripts (i.e., Agr2, Neurod1, Ngn3, Pdx1, Sct, Spdef), in agreement with the proposed function for Math1 in intestinal secretory cell specification (Yang et al. 2001). We found that Gfi1 expression was reduced 4.4- to 7.6-fold in Math1lacZ/lacZ embryonic intestine (Supplementary Table 1). Previously, we showed that Gfi1 mRNA is expressed in the developing intestine at embryonic day 12.5 (E12.5) (Wallis et al. 2003). To further investigate GFI1 expression in the intestine, we performed immunohistochemical analyses (Fig. 1
To determine which cell types within the intestinal epithelium express GFI1, we performed double-labeling experiments with cell-type-specific markers. We performed confocal immunofluorescence with antibodies for GFI1 and β-galactosidase in intestines from adult Math1lacZ/+ mice (Fig. 1E–G Expression of GFI1 on villi (Fig. 1C Gfi1 mutant mice have abnormal secretory lineage production Based on the expression pattern of GFI1 in the intestinal epithelium, we hypothesized that Gfi1-/- mice may have differentiation defects. The overall crypt–villus structure of the intestine from Gfi1-/- mice is normal, including the presence of Peyer's patches (Fig. 2
We next examined expression of known intestinal epithelial genes in Gfi1-/- intestine by real-time RT–PCR. As shown in Table 1, expression of genes specific to the four intestinal epithelial lineages reflects the lineage allocation defect in Gfi1-/- intestines. Tff3, encoding a goblet-specific trefoil factor, is reduced threefold across the intestine; Lyzs and Mmp7, encoding Paneth genes, are reduced 5.9- and 5.1-fold, respectively, in the ileum, where Paneth cells are most prominent; no change was detected in expression of the absorptive enterocyte-specific sucrase–isomaltase gene. We analyzed several genes known to be important for enteroendocrine specification and differentiation, including Islet1, Neurod1, and Ngn3. As expected from the increase in enteroendocrine cell numbers, these genes showed significantly increased expression in Gfi1-/- intestines (Table 1). Thus, loss of Gfi1 results in a reduction of the RNA levels of goblet- and Paneth-specific genes and an increase in the RNA levels of genes important for the differentiation of enteroendocrine cells. These results provide strong evidence that Gfi1 is essential for normal lineage allocation in the intestine, and suggest that it functions in early crypt progenitors prior to cell-specific differentiation genes such as Ngn3, Neurod1, and Isl1.
To determine whether the secretory lineage abnormalities in Gfi1-/- mice were due to abnormal proliferation or apoptosis, we performed anti-Ki67, anti-BrdU staining after a 2-h BrdU pulse and TUNEL staining. No significant alteration in Ki67, BrdU, or TUNEL staining was observed (data not shown), indicating an overall normal production of epithelial cells and no evidence of increased apoptosis of crypt progenitors. Although our data cannot exclude the possibility that GFI1 might regulate proliferation of a subset of progenitor cells within the crypt, the data are consistent with a change in secretory progenitor cell fate in Gfi1-/- mice from goblet/Paneth to enteroendocrine. We tested this possibility by examining secretory lineage fate in [Math1lacZ/+; Gfi1-/-] mice. By following the fate of β-galactosidase-positive cells in these Gfi1-/- mice, we show that all MATH1-expressing cells retain their commitment to the secretory fate and do not switch to an absorptive enterocyte fate (Fig. 4A
Pathway analysis for secretory cell production To position Math1 and Gfi1 in the genetic hierarchy of intestinal specification, we examined the expression of genes known to be important for intestinal epithelial differentiation by real-time RT–PCR. Analyses of experimentally induced intestinal metaplasias suggest that β-catenin and Cdx2 can induce Math1 and Gfi1 (Mutoh et al. 2002; Okubo and Hogan 2004). We found that β-catenin target genes Cdx2, Ephb2, and Ephb3 (van de Wetering et al. 2002) are unchanged in Math1lacZ/lacZ embryonic intestine (Supplementary Table 1), supporting the hypothesis that Math1 functions downstream of β-catenin and Cdx2, and consistent with our hypothesis that Math1 is expressed at an early progenitor stage in crypt differentiation in cells that are selecting between absorptive and secretory fates (Yang et al. 2001). In Gfi1-/- intestine we found up-regulated expression of Ephb2 and Ephb3 (Table 1) and continued expression of EPHB3 protein at the crypt base in the absence of mature Paneth cells (data not shown). EPHB3, thought to be Paneth cell-specific, and EPHB2, expressed in proliferating crypt progenitors, are important for vectorial migration of differentiated cells within and out of the crypt—in their absence migration is aberrant and Paneth cells are displaced (Batlle et al. 2002). Our results suggest that expression of Ephb2 and Ephb3 is not dependent upon differentiation of secretory cells, and that crypt morphogenesis and directional migration is independent of normal cellular specification. Further, Ephb3 may not be unique to Paneth cells as suggested by van Es et al. (2005), but rather to cells at the crypt base regardless of identity. Thus, these β-catenin targets may be expressed independently of Paneth cell maturation in Gfi1-/- intestine. Other genes previously implicated in intestinal epithelial differentiation (EfnB1, EfnB2, Klf5, Cdx2, Elf3/Ets1) are unchanged in both Gfi1-/- and Math1lacZ/lacZ intestines. These results suggest that Cdx2, Elf3, and Klf5 are upstream or independent of Math1 and Gfi1. We found a 1.4- to 2.4-fold reduction in Math1 expression in Gfi1-/- intestine, consistent with the overall reduction in secretory cells (which normally continue to express Math1 as they migrate up the villus); this result was confirmed by immunohistochemistry with anti-MATH1 antibodies that show continued expression of MATH1 protein in Gfi1-/- intestines (Table 1; data not shown). This continued expression at near normal levels demonstrates that Math1 is not dependent upon Gfi1 for its expression, although these data do not exclude the potential for GFI1 to regulate Math1 levels. Klf4, required for normal goblet cells and absorptive enterocytes (Katz et al. 2002), is slightly down-regulated in both Math1lacZ/lacZ and Gfi1-/- mice, likely reflecting the loss of goblet cells in these mice. Hes1 is unchanged in Gfi1-/-, consistent with normal Notch-based selection of secretory versus absorptive progenitors in Gfi1 mutant mice. We propose an extended model for differentiation of intestinal secretory cells: Stem cell renewal and normal differentiation is dependent upon Wnt/β-catenin signaling and Cdx genes, specification of a secretory-specific progenitor is dependent on Math1, and selection between goblet/Paneth and enteroendocrine progenitors is dependent on Gfi1 (Fig. 4B In sum, we suggest that Gfi1 functions in a Math1-specified, secretory lineage-committed progenitor to select between goblet/Paneth and enteroendocrine cell fates. These data are the first to demonstrate a step in secretory lineage allocation separating enteroendocrine and Paneth/goblet fates, and provide additional evidence to support the close ontogenic relationship between Paneth and goblet cells. That the oncogene Gfi1 is a key player in the proliferative intestinal crypt suggests a potential role for Gfi1 in intestinal malignancies. Further work to identify additional targets of Math1 and Gfi1 in the intestine will likely identify additional factors important for the differentiation of secretory lineages and clarify the molecular hierarchy of intestinal epithelial differentiation. Our findings support the concept that Gfi1/senseless homologs cooperate with bHLH factors to direct cell fate decisions in multiple tissues, and that this genetic partnership may be utilized throughout the animal kingdom to specify cell fates. Materials and methods Additional materials and methods are available as Supplemental Material. Animals Gfi1 mutant and Math1 mutant mice were bred and genotyped as previously described (Ben-Arie et al. 2000; Hock et al. 2003). Embryo collection, RNA extraction, and gene expression analysis Tissues from Gfi1-/- and Gfi1+/- animals and from Math1lacZ/+ and Math1lacZ/lacZ embryos were dissected and stored in RNAlater (Ambion). RNA was extracted from intestines with Trizol (Invitrogen) followed by purification on RNeasy columns (Qiagen). RNA quality was assessed by formaldehyde-agarose gel electrophoresis and Bioanalyser 2100 (Agilent) analysis. For Northern blots, 5 μg of total RNA was separated, transferred to a nylon membrane, and hybridized with the appropriate 32P-labeled DNA probe corresponding to each gene. Signal intensities were measured by densitometry and expression levels were normalized to Gapdh. For real-time RT–PCR, cDNA equivalent to 100 ng of total RNA was PCR-amplified in an ABI PRISM 7300 detection system. The primers and probes for each gene analyzed are listed in Supplementary Table 2. The relative level of each RNA was calculated using the standard curve method and normalized to the corresponding Gapdh RNA levels. ANOVA and t-tests were performed to measure variations in gene expression between groups. Tissue preparation and Immunohistochemistry Tissues were dissected and fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde, then embedded in paraffin for sectioning. Five-micrometer sections were collected and analyzed by immunohistochemistry. For serial sections, 3-μm sections were collected and alternate sections stained for GFI1 or NGN3. For confocal microscopy, 12-μm frozen sections were collected onto slides, post-fixed in formalin for 1 min, then processed directly for immunofluorescent labeling. Antibodies and concentrations used were as follows: anti-GFI1 at 1:1000 to 1:2000 (Wallis et al. 2003), anti-NGN3 at 1:500 (a gift from Doris Stoffers, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia), anti-CgA at 1:2000 (ImmunoStar, Inc.), anti-Ki67 at 1:1000 (Novacastra Laboratories Ltd.), anti-BrdU at 1:50 (DakoCytomation), anti-muramidase/lysozyme at 1:2000 to 1:10,000 (Novacastra Laboratories Ltd), anti-ATH-1 (MATH1) at 1:200 (Chemicon International), anti-β-galactosidase at 1:250 (Rockland), anti-neurotensin at 1:2000 (ImmunoStar), anti-NPY (which cross-reacts with PYY) at 1:2000 (ImmunoStar), anti-secretin at 1:200 (Chemicon International), anti-CCK at 1:500 (ImmunoStar), anti-serotonin at 1:10,000 (ImmunoStar), and anti-β-galactosidase (1:250, Rockland). Apoptotic cells were identified with the Apoptag peroxidase kit (Chemicon). Quantification of cell numbers and statistical methods Images of alcian blue/nuclear fast red- or antibody/hematoxylin-stained tissue were acquired and counts of villus nuclei and alcian blue-positive or CgA-positive cells were performed. The percentage of alcian blue- or antigen-positive villus cells was determined for each intestinal region from each animal, and an average percentage for Gfi1+/- and Gfi1-/- tissues was determined. A standard deviation was calculated for each average and ANOVA and post-hoc t-tests were performed to measure statistical significance. Acknowledgments We thank Barbara Antalffy for assistance with histology; Karen L. Schulze for assistance with artwork; Stuart Orkin for providing Gfi1-/- mice; Doris Stoffers for the NGN3 antibody; and Susan J. Henning, Michael A. Helmrath, Christopher Dekaney, and members of the Zoghbi and Bellen laboratories for helpful discussions. This work was supported by grants from NASA and NIH (F32 DK63747, T32 DK07664, F32 DC5109, P30 HD24064, and P30 DK56338). H.Y.Z. and H.J.B. are investigators with the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. Notes Supplemental material is available at http://www.genesdev.org. Article and publication are at http://www.genesdev.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gad.1353905. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||
Nat Genet. 1998 Aug; 19(4):379-83.
[Nat Genet. 1998]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Jun 22; 96(13):7318-23.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999]Gastroenterology. 1999 Dec; 117(6):1326-38.
[Gastroenterology. 1999]Genes Dev. 2003 Jul 15; 17(14):1709-13.
[Genes Dev. 2003]Science. 2001 Dec 7; 294(5549):2155-8.
[Science. 2001]J Biol Chem. 1995 Apr 14; 270(15):8730-8.
[J Biol Chem. 1995]Nature. 1997 Nov 13; 390(6656):169-72.
[Nature. 1997]Science. 1999 Jun 11; 284(5421):1837-41.
[Science. 1999]Neuron. 2001 May; 30(2):411-22.
[Neuron. 2001]Science. 2001 Dec 7; 294(5549):2155-8.
[Science. 2001]Nucleic Acids Res. 1996 Jul 1; 24(13):2528-34.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 1996]Nat Genet. 2002 Mar; 30(3):295-300.
[Nat Genet. 2002]Immunity. 2003 Jan; 18(1):109-20.
[Immunity. 2003]Nature. 2004 Oct 21; 431(7011):1002-7.
[Nature. 2004]Cancer Res. 2004 Oct 1; 64(19):6874-82.
[Cancer Res. 2004]Science. 2001 Dec 7; 294(5549):2155-8.
[Science. 2001]Development. 2003 Jan; 130(1):221-32.
[Development. 2003]Development. 2000 Mar; 127(5):1039-48.
[Development. 2000]Am J Anat. 1974 Dec; 141(4):461-79.
[Am J Anat. 1974]Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002 Jun 7; 294(2):470-9.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002]J Biol. 2004; 3(3):11.
[J Biol. 2004]Cell. 2002 Oct 18; 111(2):241-50.
[Cell. 2002]Science. 2001 Dec 7; 294(5549):2155-8.
[Science. 2001]Cell. 2002 Oct 18; 111(2):251-63.
[Cell. 2002]Development. 2002 Jun; 129(11):2619-28.
[Development. 2002]EMBO J. 2002 Dec 2; 21(23):6338-47.
[EMBO J. 2002]Development. 2000 Mar; 127(5):1039-48.
[Development. 2000]Immunity. 2003 Jan; 18(1):109-20.
[Immunity. 2003]Development. 2003 Jan; 130(1):221-32.
[Development. 2003]