• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of bmjcredLink to Publisher's site
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). May 9, 1987; 294(6581): 1200–1202.
PMCID: PMC1246362

General practice consultations: is there any point in being positive?

Abstract

A group of 200 patients who presented in general practice with symptoms but no abnormal physical signs and in whom no definite diagnosis was made were randomly selected for one of four consultations: a consultation conducted in a "positive manner," with and without treatment, and a consultation conducted in a "non-positive manner," called a negative consultation, with and without treatment. Two weeks after consultation there was a significant difference in patient satisfaction between the positive and negative groups but not between the treated and untreated groups. Similarly, 64% of those receiving a positive consultation got better, compared with 39% of those who received a negative consultation (p = 0.001) and 53% of those treated got better compared with 50% of those not treated (p = 0.5).

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (576K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Thomas KB. Temporarily dependent patient in general practice. Br Med J. 1974 Mar 30;1(5908):625–626. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Treadway J. Patient satisfaction and the content of general practice consultations. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1983 Dec;33(257):769–771. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Thomas KB. The consultation and the therapeutic illusion. Br Med J. 1978 May 20;1(6123):1327–1328. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Ward T, Knowelden J, Sharrard WJ. Low back pain. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1968 Feb;15(2):128–136. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Howard CRG. The Problem of Defining the Extent of Morbidity in General Practice. J Coll Gen Pract Res Newsl. 1959 May;2(2):119–139. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • LEES DS, COOPER MH. THE WORK OF THE GENERAL PRACTITIONER: AN ANALYTICAL SURVEY OF STUDIES OF GENERAL PRACTICE. J Coll Gen Pract. 1963 Aug;6:408–435. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Stott NC, West RR. Randomised controlled trial of antibiotics in patients with cough and purulent sputum. Br Med J. 1976 Sep 4;2(6035):556–559. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Bain DJ. Can the clinical course of acute otitis media be modified by systemic decongestant or antihistamine treatment? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 Sep 3;287(6393):654–656. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Zander LI. From paternalism to patient autonomy. Can legislation stimulate change? Practitioner. 1985 Dec;229(1410):1087–1089. [PubMed]

Articles from British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.) are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • Cited in Books
    Cited in Books
    PubMed Central articles cited in books
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...