• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of brjgenpracRCGP homepageJ R Coll Gen Pract at PubMed CentralBJGP at RCGPBJGP at RCGP
Br J Gen Pract. Mar 1996; 46(404): 161–164.
PMCID: PMC1239576

Incidence and causes of rectal bleeding in general practice as detected by colonoscopy.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Rectal bleeding is common, but it is still unclear which patients require investigation to exclude serious pathology, although it is known that colectoral cancer is very rare under the age of 40 years. Few studies have examined all patients presenting to their primary health physician rather than screening whole populations. AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the view that all patients over the age of 40 who present to their general practitioner with rectal bleeding should undergo investigation by colonoscopy to rule out serious pathology, regardless of symptomatology. METHOD: A prospective study was carried out of 99 consecutive patients over 40 years presenting with rectal bleeding to 17 general practices in Newcastle upon Tyne. RESULTS: Serious pathology was detected by colonoscopy in 44.4% of patients. The diagnoses were: colorectal carcinoma, eight cases (two Dukes' grade A, two Dukes' grade B, four Dukes' grade C); one or more polyps, 25 cases (in 17 cases at least one polyp was 5 mm or greater in diameter); inflammatory bowel disease, 11 cases. In the remaining 55 patients, bleeding was associated with diverticular disease (16 cases) and haemorrhoids (28 cases). No cause was found in 11 patients. This high rate of pathology may be partly caused by selection of cases for referral by the general practitioner, despite efforts to minimize this. Three symptoms as elicited by the colonoscopist were found to be significantly associated with serious disease: blood mixed with stool (P < 0.001); change in bowel habit (P < 0.005); and the presence of abdominal pain (P < 0.025). However, symptoms elicited on primary presentation were less helpful and symptoms changed significantly between consultation with the general practitioner and colonoscopy. CONCLUSION: All patients over the age of 40 years presenting with rectal bleeding should be referred for flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy. Symptoms are unhelpful in deciding who requires investigation.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (796K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Silman AJ, Mitchell P, Nicholls RJ, Macrae FA, Leicester RJ, Bartram CI, Simmons MJ, Campbell PD, Hearn CE, Constable PJ. Self-reported dark red bleeding as a marker comparable with occult blood testing in screening for large bowel neoplasms. Br J Surg. 1983 Dec;70(12):721–724. [PubMed]
  • Chapuis PH, Goulston KJ, Dent OF, Tait AD. Predictive value of rectal bleeding in screening for rectal and sigmoid polyps. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1985 May 25;290(6481):1546–1548. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Goulston KJ, Cook I, Dent OF. How important is rectal bleeding in the diagnosis of bowel cancer and polyps? Lancet. 1986 Aug 2;2(8501):261–265. [PubMed]
  • Mant A, Bokey EL, Chapuis PH, Killingback M, Hughes W, Koorey SG, Cook I, Goulston KJ, Dent OF. Rectal bleeding. Do other symptoms aid in diagnosis? Dis Colon Rectum. 1989 Mar;32(3):191–196. [PubMed]
  • Fijten GH, Muris JW, Starmans R, Knottnerus JA, Blijham GH, Krebber TF. The incidence and outcome of rectal bleeding in general practice. Fam Pract. 1993 Sep;10(3):283–287. [PubMed]
  • Cheung PS, Wong SK, Boey J, Lai CK. Frank rectal bleeding: a prospective study of causes in patients over the age of 40. Postgrad Med J. 1988 May;64(751):364–368. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lindsay DC, Freeman JG, Cobden I, Record CO. Should colonoscopy be the first investigation for colonic disease? Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988 Jan 16;296(6616):167–169. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Atkin WS, Morson BC, Cuzick J. Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas. N Engl J Med. 1992 Mar 5;326(10):658–662. [PubMed]

Articles from The British Journal of General Practice are provided here courtesy of Royal College of General Practitioners

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • Cited in Books
    Cited in Books
    PubMed Central articles cited in books
  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...