• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of cmajCMAJ Information for AuthorsCMAJ Home Page
CMAJ. Jul 13, 1999; 161(1): 52–57.
PMCID: PMC1232653

Assessment of physician performance in Alberta: the Physician Achievement Review

Abstract

The College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta, in collaboration with the Universities of Calgary and Alberta, has developed a program to routinely assess the performance of physicians, intended primarily for quality improvement in medical practice. The Physician Achievement Review (PAR) provides a multidimensional view of performance through structured feedback to physicians. The program will also provide a new mechanism for identifying physicians for whom more detailed assessment of practice performance or medical competence may be needed. Questionnaires were created to assess an array of performance attributes, and then appropriate assessors were designated--the physician himself or herself (self-evaluation), patients, medical peers, consultants and referring physicians, and non-physician coworkers. A pilot study with 308 physician volunteers was used to evaluate the psychometric and statistical properties of the questionnaires and to develop operating policies. The pilot surveys showed good statistical validity and technical reliability of the PAR questionnaires. For only 28 (9.1%) of the physicians were the PAR results more than one standard deviation from the peer group means for 3 or more of the 5 major domains of assessment (self, patients, peers, consultants and coworkers). In post-survey feedback, two-thirds of the physicians indicated that they were considering or had implemented changes to their medical practice on the basis of their PAR data. The estimated operating cost of the PAR program is approximately $200 per physician. In February 1999, on the basis of the operating experience and the results of the pilot survey, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta implemented this innovative program, in which all Alberta physicians will be required to participate every 5 years.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (303K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Page GG, Bates J, Dyer SM, Vincent DR, Bordage G, Jacques A, Sindon A, Kaigas T, Norman GR, Kopelow M, et al. Physician-assessment and physician-enhancement programs in Canada. CMAJ. 1995 Dec 15;153(12):1723–1728. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • McAuley RG, Paul WM, Morrison GH, Beckett RF, Goldsmith CH. Five-year results of the peer assessment program of the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. CMAJ. 1990 Dec 1;143(11):1193–1199. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hearnshaw H, Baker R, Cooper A, Eccles M, Soper J. The costs and benefits of asking patients for their opinions about general practice. Fam Pract. 1996 Feb;13(1):52–58. [PubMed]
  • Weaver MJ, Ow CL, Walker DJ, Degenhardt EF. A questionnaire for patients' evaluations of their physicians' humanistic behaviors. J Gen Intern Med. 1993 Mar;8(3):135–139. [PubMed]
  • Ramsey PG, Wenrich MD, Carline JD, Inui TS, Larson EB, LoGerfo JP. Use of peer ratings to evaluate physician performance. JAMA. 1993 Apr 7;269(13):1655–1660. [PubMed]
  • Wenrich MD, Carline JD, Giles LM, Ramsey PG. Ratings of the performances of practicing internists by hospital-based registered nurses. Acad Med. 1993 Sep;68(9):680–687. [PubMed]
  • Woolliscroft JO, Howell JD, Patel BP, Swanson DB. Resident-patient interactions: the humanistic qualities of internal medicine residents assessed by patients, attending physicians, program supervisors, and nurses. Acad Med. 1994 Mar;69(3):216–224. [PubMed]

Articles from CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal are provided here courtesy of Canadian Medical Association

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles