![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||
Copyright © The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved High fidelity TNA synthesis by Therminator polymerase 1Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA 2Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA 3Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA 4Department of Chemistry, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA *To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 617 726 5981; Fax: +1 617 726 6893; Email: szostak/at/molbio.mgh.harvard.edu Received July 25, 2005; Revised August 30, 2005; Accepted August 30, 2005. The online version of this article has been published under an open access model. Users are entitled to use, reproduce, disseminate, or display the open access version of this article for non-commercial purposes provided that: the original authorship is properly and fully attributed; the Journal and Oxford University Press are attributed as the original place of publication with the correct citation details given; if an article is subsequently reproduced or disseminated not in its entirety but only in part or as a derivative work this must be clearly indicated. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions/at/oxfordjournals.org This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Therminator DNA polymerase is an efficient DNA-dependent TNA polymerase capable of polymerizing TNA oligomers of at least 80 nt in length. In order for Therminator to be useful for the in vitro selection of functional TNA sequences, its TNA synthesis fidelity must be high enough to preserve successful sequences. We used sequencing to examine the fidelity of Therminator-catalyzed TNA synthesis at different temperatures, incubation times, tNTP ratios and primer/template combinations. TNA synthesis by Therminator exhibits high fidelity under optimal conditions; the observed fidelity is sufficient to allow in vitro selection with TNA libraries of at least 200 nt in length. INTRODUCTION (3′–2′) α-L-threose nucleic acid (TNA) (Figure 1a
Therminator DNA polymerase, an A485L point mutant of the 9°N DNA polymerase, efficiently synthesizes long TNA oligonucleotides on a DNA template, using threonucleoside triphosphates (tNTPs, Figure 1b We previously estimated Therminator TNA polymerization fidelity by an assay in which rates of polymerization were compared between a reaction with all four tNTPs and others lacking one of the tNTPs (3). This ‘dropout assay’ suggested that the TNA polymerization error rate exceeds that of natural DNA polymerases with dNTPs, but would still allow in vitro selection experiments using short TNA sequences (3). However, the dropout assay is likely to underestimate the fidelity of TNA synthesis, because the extended pausing at sites where the required nucleotide is absent provides more opportunity for misincorporation to occur. Direct sequencing of TNA is not trivial, because there are no highly efficient TNA-directed DNA polymerases. We therefore developed a scheme to sequence TNA polymerization products of 10 nt formed in the presence of all four tNTPs. The fidelity determined by this sequencing assay is the actual accuracy with which full-length TNA is synthesized, and therefore reflects the combined effects of misincorporation and the rate of extension from mismatched primer-termini. In this paper, we use the term fidelity in this operational sense of the accuracy with which full-length TNA is synthesized, as opposed to the more restricted sense of the accuracy of single-nucleotide incorporation. We examined the fidelity of Therminator-mediated TNA synthesis with different templates, reaction temperatures, incubation times and tNTP concentrations. Under optimal reaction conditions with purification of full-length material, Therminator catalyzes TNA polymerization with high fidelity sufficient for in vitro selection with TNA libraries of at least 200 nt in length. MATERIALS AND METHODS TNA polymerization on random sequence templates The 123 nt pool 123 (5′-GTGGTGACGGCCGAGGTTGTAACACGCGAGTGCACGCTGCN40GAGCGGN14CTACACTTGCCAGCGCCCTAGCG-3′) was synthesized at the 0.2 µmol scale (Massachusetts General Hospital DNA Core) and was gel purified. An aliquot of 100 ng of pool was amplified by PCR for 10 cycles with primers 20PCR (GTGGTGACGGCCGAGGTTGT) and biotinylated primer 23 (5′-photocleavable biotin-CGCTAGGGCGCTGGCAAGTGTAG-3′) using either all four natural dNTPs or with diaminopurine-2′-deoxyribose triphosphate (dDTP, Trilink Biotech) substituted for adenosine-2′-deoxyribose triphosphate (dATP) in a total reaction volume of 200 µl. Each PCR was immobilized on Immunopure streptavidin agarose (Pierce Biotechnology) and washed with 40 column volumes of 75 mM NaOH to remove the unbiotinylated strands. The remaining single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) was released from the column by irradiation at 365 nm for 30 min and gel purified by denaturing PAGE, electroeluted in 1× TAE buffer, ethanol precipitated and resuspended in water. An aliquot of 50 nM end-labeled primer 40 (5′-GTGGTGACGGCCGAGGTTGTAACACGCGAGTGCACGCTGC-3′) was annealed to 100 nM ssDNA pool whose sequences contained either adenine or diaminopurine in 1.1× Thermopol buffer (New England Biolabs) plus 60 µM tDTP, 60 µM tTTP, 18 µM tCTP and 2 µM tGTP. TNA polymerization reactions were started by the addition of 1 mM or no MnCl2, 1 U of Tth pyrophosphatase (Roche) and 0.5 U of Therminator DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs). Reactions were incubated at 55 or 75°C for 24 h and stopped by the addition of 7 M urea/40 mM EDTA/400 mM NaOH. Samples were analyzed by denaturing PAGE and phosphorimager (Molecular Dynamics) and quantified by ImageQuant software. TNA sequencing An aliquot of 200 nM primer ‘P1/2’ (5′-GTGGTGACGGCCGAGGTTGTATAGAAAGAGGGTtCGACTCACTATAGGGAGAGG-3′), labeled at the 5′ end by incubation with [γ-32P]ATP and T4 Polynucleotide Kinase (New England Biolabs), was annealed to 300 nM template ‘T1’ (5′-CCATTAGTCTCCTCTCCCTATAGTGAGTCGTACCCTCTTTCTATTGTTGG-3′) or template ‘T2’ (5′-GTDTCGTDCTCCTCTCCCTATAGTGAGTCGTACCCTCTTTCTATTGTTGG-3′) in 1.1× Thermopol buffer. Regions of complementarity between the primer and templates are underlined. The lower case ‘t’ in the primer indicates a marker nucleotide that was intentionally designed to be non-complementary to the template in order to distinguish clones that resulted from amplification of an actual primer extended with TNA from clones that resulted from amplification of leftover template strands. tNTP concentrations were either 120 µM tDTP, 60 µM tTTP, 18 µM tCTP, 2 µM tGTP or 30 µM tDTP, 30 µM tTTP, 30 µM tCTP, 4 µM tGTP. Control reactions contained 250 µM of each dNTP instead of tNTPs. The 5 µl reactions were initiated by the addition of 1 U of Tth pyrophosphatase and 0.5 U of Therminator DNA polymerase. Reactions were incubated at 55 or 75°C for the times specified in Table 2 and stopped by the addition of 7 M urea/40 mM EDTA/400 mM NaOH. Full-length material (~10–25% of reaction) was gel purified by denaturing PAGE, electroeluted, ethanol precipitated and resuspended in water. Purified full-length material was annealed to 100 nM template ‘T1B’ (5′-AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACTTCCCTCCTCTTTCTTCTCTCCATTAGTCTCCTCTCCCTATAGTGAGTCGTACCCTCTTTCTATACAACCTCGGCCGTCACCAC-3′) or template ‘T2B’ (5′-AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACTTCCCTCCTCTTTCTTCTCTGTATCGTACTCCTCTCCCTATAGTGAGTCGTACCCTCTTTCTATACAACCTCGGCCGTCACCAC-3′) in 1.1× Thermopol buffer plus 250 µM dATP and dGTP. Therminator DNA polymerase (0.5 U) was added and the 5 µl reactions were incubated at 55°C for 1 h. Fully extended primer was purified by denaturing PAGE, electroeluted, ethanol precipitated and resuspended in water. One half of each TNA/DNA sample was annealed to 1 nM biotinylated primer ‘RT’ (5′-biotin-CTTCCCTCCTCTTTCTTCTCT-3′) in 1.5× First Strand buffer (Superscript II, Invitrogen) plus 125 µM dNTPs. Aliquots containing 10 mM DTT, 1.5 mM MnCl2 and 1 µl Superscript II reverse transcriptase were added to a total volume of 20 µl and reactions were incubated at 37°C for 5 min followed by 1 h at 42°C and 10 min at 80°C. Reverse-transcribed material was gel purified by denaturing PAGE, electroeluted and immobilized on Immunopure streptavidin agarose overnight. Samples were washed with 100 column volumes of 100 mM NaOH to remove non-biotinylated DNA and TNA, 40 column volumes of water, 60 column volumes of 1× Thermopol buffer, and resuspended in 80 µl 1× Thermopol buffer. An aliquot of 20 µl from each sample was PCR amplified for 25 rounds with dNTPs, a non-biotinylated version of primer ‘RT’, primer ‘PCR’ (5′-GTGGTGACGGCCGAGGTTGT-3′) and Taq polymerase. PCR products were gel purified by agarose gel electrophoresis and Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen) and re-amplified by 10 rounds of PCR with the same primers. Aliquots containing 4 µl of each PCR were TOPO TA cloned (Invitrogen) and 24–72 colonies were sequenced. The presence of the ‘marker’ nucleotide indicated that the product was not a result of DNA template contamination and was confirmed for each sequence counted. Statistical significance probabilities were calculated using the binomial probability mass function
RESULTS TNA polymerization of a 60 nt random pool To determine the optimal conditions for efficient TNA polymerization on long templates, we tested the ability of Therminator to synthesize TNA on a library of random-sequence DNA templates (Figure 1c Polymerization on diaminopurine-containing templates was dramatically better than on adenine-containing templates, as indicated by the synthesis of at least 10 times more full-length product at early time points (Figure 1d
Design of sequencing scheme We sequenced TNA polymerization products by copying the TNA into DNA and sequencing those DNA copies. First, we performed the TNA polymerization reactions using either primer/template pair 1 (P/T1) or primer/template pair 2 (P/T2) (Figure 2a
High fidelity of TNA synthesis We initially measured Therminator TNA polymerization fidelity under conditions we had previously estimated to be most favorable for fidelity (3), namely short reaction times, a reaction temperature of 75°C and highly skewed tNTP concentrations. Under these conditions, Therminator-catalyzed TNA polymerization had a corrected error rate of ~1 × 10−3, below the level that can be accurately measured by our assay (Table 2, column 1). The raw error rate for this reaction was not significantly different from the raw error rate of Taq polymerase with dNTPs (p > 0.1). However, our assay measures Taq fidelity after most of the primer has been fully extended. Thus, most of the mismatches that occurred were incorporated into the full-length product that was eventually sequenced. This is not the case for the Therminator-catalyzed TNA reactions where many of the mutated transcripts were eliminated by stopping the reaction with a low fraction of fully extended primer and gel purifying only the full-length product. Thus, the TNA reactions are enriched for faithful transcripts whereas the DNA reactions are not. For comparison, we also sequenced TNA polymerization products from a different primer/template pair (Figure 2a
Fidelity under conditions optimized for efficient polymerization Given that TNA polymerization is most efficient at 55°C, we compared fidelity at 55°C versus 75°C. Previously, we had determined by the dropout assay that fidelity was higher at 75°C (3), possibly because the higher temperature decreased polymerase extension from mismatches more than from correctly matched termini. However, by the TNA sequencing assay, the fidelity was essentially equivalent at 55 and 75°C (Table 2, columns 2 and 4) (p > 0.05). The fact that fidelity at 55°C as determined by sequencing is much higher than that measured by the dropout assay indicates that Therminator discriminates strongly against incorporating an incorrect base when the correct nucleotide is present. Next, we tested the effect of using more equimolar tNTP ratios, which would allow us to conserve tNTPs during TNA synthesis. The dropout fidelity assay had indicated that tDTP incorporation was very error prone, presumably because of tGTP wobble-pairing with thymine. Our original concentrations therefore included 60-fold more tDTP than tGTP. With these concentrations, a large amount of tDTP would be needed for TNA synthesis. We changed the tNTP concentrations from 120 µM tDTP, 31 µM tTTP, 18 µM tCTP and 2 µM tGTP to 30 µM tDTP, tTTP and tCTP, and 4 µM tGTP. The TNA polymerization fidelity remained above 99% with the new nucleotide concentrations (Table 2, column 5) (p > 0.1), indicating that heavily biased tNTP concentrations are unnecessary to maintain accurate TNA synthesis. The yield of full-length TNA products increases with time, but we expect transcripts completed at later times to have a higher error rate, since molecules that were paused due to a misincorporation event would eventually be extended to full-length product. Indeed, when we incubated a reaction at 55°C for 3 h (~20% full-length) instead of only 40 min (~10% full-length), the error rate increased 10-fold from 4 × 10−3 to 4 × 10−2 (Table 2, columns 5 and 6) (p < 0.001). Surprisingly, the increased error rate was due to a drastic increase in transversion mutations (Table 3). It is possible that most of the mismatches incorporated by Therminator are actually transversions, but since they are extended so slowly compared with transition mutations, they only accumulate in full-length product after long incubations. Assuming equimolar representation of all four TNA bases, a short reaction time with 30 µM tDTP, tTTP, and tCTP and 4 µM tGTP at 55°C would yield a 60mer TNA pool with about half of the molecules free of mutations (Figure 3
The 10 bp sequenced in our study constitute nearly a complete turn of a DNA double helix (12). X-ray crystallography has shown that DNA polymerases make extensive contacts with the primer/template up to 5 nt upstream of the primer terminus (13,14). Therefore, positional analysis of the sequencing results should give information regarding fidelity when the polymerase is partly contacting the DNA section of the primer versus when it is completely contacting the TNA portion. In all of the sequencing results, we observed no decrease in fidelity as the polymerase reached the last few template nucleotides (Table 3), indicating that longer TNA polymerization should remain just as faithful as polymerization near the DNA primer terminus. This is consistent with our previous kinetic studies that indicated that tNTP incorporation remained highly efficient whether a DNA or TNA primer was used (4). DISCUSSION We have determined that TNA synthesized by the Therminator DNA polymerase can have an error rate of <1%, as long as full-length material is purified after a short reaction time. The high fidelity obtained under these conditions means that it should be practical to use TNA pools as large as 200 nt for in vitro selection (Figure 3 The reaction parameter most essential for obtaining accurately synthesized TNA is the reaction time. Long incubations allow mismatches to be extended and incorporated into full-length product, whereas short incubations limit mismatch extension and allow the truncated, error-prone molecules to be purified away. Since shorter incubation times translate into lower yields of full-length product, a balance must be struck between yield and fidelity. This can be done by first performing a time course of the reaction and then stopping the actual reaction when the polymerization starts to slow down significantly. For the short templates used in these experiments, this occurred when 10–25% of the primer was converted to full-length product (data not shown), but the percentage will be lower for longer template sequences due to a higher probability of misincorporation per template. Remarkably, TNA polymerization and polymerization fidelity seem to be relatively unaffected by the length of the transcript even though the distance between phosphorus atoms across a TNA nucleotide within a DNA duplex is 0.5–0.8 Å shorter than the corresponding distance for a DNA nucleotide (17). An elevated level of frame-shift mutations due to slippage might be expected if helical strain builds up along the TNA–DNA heteroduplex. Although we cannot rule out the possibility that a higher frequency of frame-shift mutations would be seen on longer templates, we did not observe an increase in frame-shift mutations as polymerization proceeded downstream from the DNA primer terminus. Moreover, previous kinetic measurements showed that TNA polymerization from a primer ending with 5 TNA residues is more efficient than TNA polymerization from an all DNA primer (4), suggesting that the active site of the Therminator polymerase is able to adapt to the distorted TNA/DNA structure, or that the polymerase alters the TNA conformation when it is at or near the active site. It would be useful to improve the ability of the Therminator polymerase to discriminate against incorrect nucleotides at the incorporation step, because this would increase product yield by reducing the amount of truncated transcripts. Furthermore, the resulting higher fidelity would increase the fraction of error-free TNA transcripts. In addition to the conditions tested here, we tried lower MgCl2 concentrations and lower pH, both of which improve the fidelity of Taq polymerase (18). Unfortunately, these conditions drastically reduce TNA polymerization yields (data not shown). It may be possible to evolve the Therminator polymerase into a more faithful and efficient TNA polymerase by in vitro selection (19–21) or rational design (22). Since Therminator itself was identified by testing a tiny fraction of all possible mutants (9,10), it is likely that other beneficial mutations exist in sequence space. Acknowledgments This work was supported in part by grants from the NIH to J.W.S. (GM053936) and to L.W.M. NIH (GM067986). J.W.S. is an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. J.K.I. was supported in part by a Ford Foundation predoctoral fellowship. Funding to pay the Open Access publication charges for this article was provided by the Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital. Conflict of interest statement. None declared. REFERENCES 1. Eschenmoser A. Chemical etiology of nucleic acid structure. Science. 1999;284:2118–2124. [PubMed] 2. Schoning K., Scholz P., Guntha S., Wu X., Krishnamurthy R., Eschenmoser A. Chemical etiology of nucleic acid structure: the alpha-threofuranosyl-(3′→2′) oligonucleotide system. Science. 2000;290:1347–1351. [PubMed] 3. Ichida J.K., Zou K., Horhota A., Yu B., McLaughlin L.W., Szostak J.W. An in vitro selection system for TNA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:2802–2803. [PubMed] 4. Horhota A., Zou K., Ichida J.K., Yu B., McLaughlin L.W., Szostak J.W., Chaput J.C. Kinetic analysis of an efficient DNA-dependent TNA polymerase. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:7427–7434. [PubMed] 5. Boyer J.C., Bebenek K., Kunkel T.A. Analyzing the fidelity of reverse transcription and transcription. Methods Enzymol. 1996;275:523–537. [PubMed] 6. Chaput J.C., Ichida J.K., Szostak J.W. DNA polymerase-mediated DNA synthesis on a TNA template. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:856–857. [PubMed] 7. Keohavong P., Thilly W.G. Fidelity of DNA polymerases in DNA amplification. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1989;86:9253–9257. [PubMed] 8. Tindall K.R., Kunkel T.A. Fidelity of DNA synthesis by the Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase. Biochemistry. 1988;27:6008–6013. [PubMed] 9. Gardner A.F., Jack W.E. Determinants of nucleotide sugar recognition in an archaeon DNA polymerase. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27:2545–2553. [PubMed] 10. Gardner A.F., Jack W.E. Acyclic and dideoxy terminator preferences denote divergent sugar recognition by archaeon and Taq DNA polymerases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:605–613. [PubMed] 11. Gardner A.F., Joyce C.M., Jack W.E. Comparative kinetics of nucleotide analog incorporation by vent DNA polymerase. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:11834–11842. [PubMed] 12. Wing R., Drew H., Takano T., Broka C., Tanaka S., Itakura K., Dickerson R.E. Crystal structure analysis of a complete turn of B-DNA. Nature. 1980;287:755–758. [PubMed] 13. Kiefer J.R., Mao C., Braman J.C., Beese L.S. Visualizing DNA replication in a catalytically active Bacillus DNA polymerase crystal. Nature. 1998;391:304–307. [PubMed] 14. Li Y., Korolev S., Waksman G. Crystal structures of open and closed forms of binary and ternary complexes of the large fragment of Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase I: structural basis for nucleotide incorporation. EMBO J. 1998;17:7514–7525. [PubMed] 15. Sabeti P.C., Unrau P.J., Bartel D.P. Accessing rare activities from random RNA sequences: the importance of the length of molecules in the starting pool. Chem. Biol. 1997;4:767–774. [PubMed] 16. Gevertz J., Gan H.H., Schlick T. In vitro RNA random pools are not structurally diverse: a computational analysis. RNA. 2005;11:853–863. [PubMed] 17. Wilds C.J., Wawrzak Z., Krishnamurthy R., Eschenmoser A., Egli M. Crystal structure of a B-form DNA duplex containing (l)-alpha-threofuranosyl (3′→2′) nucleosides: a four-carbon sugar is easily accommodated into the backbone of DNA. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002;124:13716–13721. [PubMed] 18. Eckert K.A., Kunkel T.A. High fidelity DNA synthesis by the Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase. Nucleic Acids Res. 1990;18:3739–3744. [PubMed] 19. Fa M., Radeghieri A., Henry A.A., Romesberg F.E. Expanding the substrate repertoire of a DNA polymerase by directed evolution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:1748–1754. [PubMed] 20. Ghadessy F.J., Ramsay N., Boudsocq F., Loakes D., Brown A., Iwai S., Vaisman A., Woodgate R., Holliger P. Generic expansion of the substrate spectrum of a DNA polymerase by directed evolution. Nat. Biotechnol. 2004;22:755–759. [PubMed] 21. Holmberg R.C., Henry A.A., Romesberg F.E. Directed evolution of novel polymerases. Biomol. Eng. 2005;22:39–49. [PubMed] 22. Suzuki M., Yoshida S., Adman E.T., Blank A., Loeb L.A. Thermus aquaticus DNA polymerase I mutants with altered fidelity. Interacting mutations in the O-helix. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:32728–32735. [PubMed] 23. Wu X., Delgado G., Krishnamurthy R., Eschenmoser A. 2,6-Diaminopurine in TNA: effect on duplex stabilities and on the efficiency of template-controlled ligations. Org. Lett. 2002;4:1283–1286. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||
Science. 1999 Jun 25; 284(5423):2118-24.
[Science. 1999]Science. 2000 Nov 17; 290(5495):1347-51.
[Science. 2000]J Am Chem Soc. 2005 Mar 9; 127(9):2802-3.
[J Am Chem Soc. 2005]J Am Chem Soc. 2005 Mar 9; 127(9):2802-3.
[J Am Chem Soc. 2005]J Am Chem Soc. 2005 May 25; 127(20):7427-34.
[J Am Chem Soc. 2005]Methods Enzymol. 1996; 275():523-37.
[Methods Enzymol. 1996]J Am Chem Soc. 2005 Mar 9; 127(9):2802-3.
[J Am Chem Soc. 2005]J Am Chem Soc. 2005 May 25; 127(20):7427-34.
[J Am Chem Soc. 2005]J Am Chem Soc. 2003 Jan 29; 125(4):856-7.
[J Am Chem Soc. 2003]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Dec; 86(23):9253-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989]Biochemistry. 1988 Aug 9; 27(16):6008-13.
[Biochemistry. 1988]Nucleic Acids Res. 1999 Jun 15; 27(12):2545-53.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 1999]J Biol Chem. 2004 Mar 19; 279(12):11834-42.
[J Biol Chem. 2004]J Am Chem Soc. 2005 Mar 9; 127(9):2802-3.
[J Am Chem Soc. 2005]J Am Chem Soc. 2005 Mar 9; 127(9):2802-3.
[J Am Chem Soc. 2005]Nature. 1980 Oct 23; 287(5784):755-8.
[Nature. 1980]Nature. 1998 Jan 15; 391(6664):304-7.
[Nature. 1998]EMBO J. 1998 Dec 15; 17(24):7514-25.
[EMBO J. 1998]J Am Chem Soc. 2005 May 25; 127(20):7427-34.
[J Am Chem Soc. 2005]Chem Biol. 1997 Oct; 4(10):767-74.
[Chem Biol. 1997]RNA. 2005 Jun; 11(6):853-63.
[RNA. 2005]J Am Chem Soc. 2005 Mar 9; 127(9):2802-3.
[J Am Chem Soc. 2005]J Am Chem Soc. 2002 Nov 20; 124(46):13716-21.
[J Am Chem Soc. 2002]J Am Chem Soc. 2005 May 25; 127(20):7427-34.
[J Am Chem Soc. 2005]Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Jul 11; 18(13):3739-44.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 1990]J Am Chem Soc. 2004 Feb 18; 126(6):1748-54.
[J Am Chem Soc. 2004]Biomol Eng. 2005 Jun; 22(1-3):39-49.
[Biomol Eng. 2005]J Biol Chem. 2000 Oct 20; 275(42):32728-35.
[J Biol Chem. 2000]Nucleic Acids Res. 1999 Jun 15; 27(12):2545-53.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 1999]J Am Chem Soc. 2005 May 25; 127(20):7427-34.
[J Am Chem Soc. 2005]Org Lett. 2002 Apr 18; 4(8):1283-6.
[Org Lett. 2002]