• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of geneticsGeneticsCurrent IssueInformation for AuthorsEditorial BoardSubscribeSubmit a Manuscript
Genetics. Jun 1981; 98(2): 441–459.
PMCID: PMC1214452

Genetic Variability Maintained by Mutation and Overdominant Selection in Finite Populations

Abstract

Mathematical properties of the overdominance model with mutation and random genetic drift are studied by using the method of stochastic differential equations (Itô and McKean 1974). It is shown that overdominant selection is very powerful in increasing the mean heterozygosity as compared with neutral mutations, and if 2Ns (N = effective population size; s = selective disadvantage for homozygotes) is larger than 10, a very low mutation rate is sufficient to explain the observed level of allozyme polymorphism. The distribution of heterozygosity for overdominant genes is considerably different from that of neutral mutations, and if the ratio of selection coefficient (s) to mutation rate (ν) is large and the mean heterozygosity (h) is lower than 0.2, single-locus heterozygosity is either approximately 0 or 0.5. If h increases further, however, heterozygosity shows a multiple-peak distribution. Reflecting this type of distribution, the relationship between the mean and variance of heterozygosity is considerably different from that for neutral genes. When s/v is large, the proportion of polymorphic loci increases approximately linearly with mean heterozygosity. The distribution of allele frequencies is also drastically different from that of neutral genes, and generally shows a peak at the intermediate gene frequency. Implications of these results on the maintenance of allozyme polymorphism are discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.1M).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Franklin I, Lewontin RC. Is the gene the unit of selection? Genetics. 1970 Aug;65(4):707–734. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Fuerst PA, Chakraborty R, Nei M. Statistical studies on protein polymorphism in natural populations. I. Distribution of single locus heterozygosity. Genetics. 1977 Jun;86(2 Pt 1):455–483. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kimura M. RULES FOR TESTING STABILITY OF A SELECTIVE POLYMORPHISM. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1956 Jun;42(6):336–340. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lewontin RC, Ginzburg LR, Tuljapurkar SD. Heterosis as an explanation for large amounts of genic polymorphism. Genetics. 1978 Jan;88(1):149–169. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Stewart FM. Variability in the amount of heterozygosity maintained by neutral mutations. Theor Popul Biol. 1976 Apr;9(2):188–201. [PubMed]
  • Sved JA, Reed TE, Bodmer WF. The number of balanced polymorphisms that can be maintained in a natural population. Genetics. 1967 Mar;55(3):469–481. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Watterson GA. Models for the logarithmic species abundance distributions. Theor Popul Biol. 1974 Oct;6(2):217–250. [PubMed]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Genetics Society of America

Formats:

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...