• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of geneticsGeneticsCurrent IssueInformation for AuthorsEditorial BoardSubscribeSubmit a Manuscript
Genetics. Mar 1981; 97(3-4): 639–666.
PMCID: PMC1214416

The Molecular Basis of Dominance

Abstract

The best known genes of microbes, mice and men are those that specify enzymes. Wild type, mutant and heterozygote for variants of such genes differ in the catalytic activity at the step in the enzyme network specified by the gene in question. The effect on the respective phenotypes of such changes in catalytic activity, however, is not defined by the enzyme change as estimated by in vitro determination of the activities obtained from the extracts of the three types. In vivo enzymes do not act in isolation, but are kinetically linked to other enzymes via their substrates and products. These interactions modify the effect of enzyme variation on the phenotype, depending on the nature and quantity of the other enzymes present. An output of such a system, say a flux, is therefore a systemic property, and its response to variation at one locus must be measured in the whole system. This response is best described by the sensitivity coefficient, Z, which is defined by the fractional change in flux over the fractional change in enzyme activity.

(see PDF)

Its magnitude determines the extent to which a particular enzyme "controls" a particular flux or phenotype and, implicitly, determines the values that the three phenotypes will have. There are as many sensitivity coefficients for a given flux as there are enzymes in the system. It can be shown that the sum of all such coefficients equals unity.

(see PDF)

Since n, the number of enzymes, is large, this summation property results in the individual coefficients being small. The effect of making a large change in enzyme activity therefore usually results in only a negligible change in flux. A reduction to 50% activity in the heterozygote, a common feature for many mutants, is therefore not expected to be detectable in the phenotype. The mutant would therefore be described as "recessive". The widespread occurrence of recessive mutants is thus seen to be the inevitable consequence of the kinetic structure of enzyme networks. The ad hoc hypothesis of "modifiers" selected to maximize the fitness of the heterozygote, as proposed by Fisher, is therefore unnecessary. It is based on the false general expectation of an intermediate phenotype in the heterozygote. Wright's analysis, substantially sound in its approach, proposed selection of a "safety factor" in enzyme activity. The derivation of the summation property explains why such safety factors are automatically present in almost all enzymes without selection.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (1.6M).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Abraham I, Doane WW. Genetic regulation of tissue-specific expression of amylase structural genes in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1978 Sep;75(9):4446–4450. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Bulfield G, Kacser H. Histidinaemia in mouse and man. Arch Dis Child. 1974 Jul;49(7):545–552. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • CLELAND WW. The kinetics of enzyme-catalyzed reactions with two or more substrates or products. I. Nomenclature and rate equations. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1963 Jan 8;67:104–137. [PubMed]
  • Cornish-Bowden A. The effect of natural selection on enzymic catalysis. J Mol Biol. 1976 Feb 15;101(1):1–9. [PubMed]
  • Crosby JL. The evolution and nature of dominance. J Theor Biol. 1963 Jul;5(1):35–51. [PubMed]
  • Heinrich R, Rapoport TA. Mathematical analysis of multienzyme systems. II. Steady state and transient control. Biosystems. 1975 Jul;7(1):130–136. [PubMed]
  • Kacser H, Bulfield G, Wallace ME. Histidinaemic mutant in the mouse. Nature. 1973 Jul 13;244(5411):77–79. [PubMed]
  • Kacser H, Burns JA. MOlecular democracy: who shares the controls? Biochem Soc Trans. 1979 Oct;7(5):1149–1160. [PubMed]
  • KNOX WE, MESSINGER EC. The detection in the heterozygote of the metabolic effect of the recessive gene for phenylketonuria. Am J Hum Genet. 1958 Mar;10(1):53–60. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Lindsley DL, Sandler L, Baker BS, Carpenter AT, Denell RE, Hall JC, Jacobs PA, Miklos GL, Davis BK, Gethmann RC, et al. Segmental aneuploidy and the genetic gross structure of the Drosophila genome. Genetics. 1972 May;71(1):157–184. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Simmons MJ, Crow JF. Mutations affecting fitness in Drosophila populations. Annu Rev Genet. 1977;11:49–78. [PubMed]
  • Sheppard PM, Ford EB. Natural selection and the evoluation of dominance. Heredity (Edinb) 1966 Feb;21(1):139–147. [PubMed]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Genetics Society of America

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

  • Cited in Books
    Cited in Books
    PubMed Central articles cited in books
  • MedGen
    MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...