Logo of geneticsGeneticsCurrent IssueInformation for AuthorsEditorial BoardSubscribeSubmit a Manuscript
Genetics. Jul 1995; 140(3): 1149–1159.
PMCID: PMC1206669

The Expression of Additive and Nonadditive Genetic Variation under Stress

Abstract

Experimental lines of Drosophila melanogaster derived from a natural population, which had been isolated in the laboratory for ~70 generations, were crossed to determine if the expression of additive, dominance and epistatic genetic variation in development time and viability was associated with the environment. No association was found between the level of additive genetic effects and environmental value for either trait, but nonadditive genetic effects increased at both extremes of the environmental range for development time. The expression of high levels of dominance and epistatic genetic variation at environmental extremes may be a general expectation for some traits. The disruption of the epistatic gene complexes in the parental lines resulted in hybrid breakdown toward faster development and there was some indication of hybrid breakdown toward higher viability. A combination of genetic drift and natural selection had therefore resulted in different epistatic gene complexes being selected after ~70 generations from a common genetic base. After crossing, the hybrid populations were observed for 10 generations. Epistasis contributed on average 12 hr in development time. Fluctuating asymmetry in sternopleural bristle number also evolved in the hybrid populations, decreasing by >18% in the first seven generations after hybridization.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (972K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Bradley BP. Developmental stability opf Drosophila melanogaster under artificial and natural selection in constant and fluctuating environments. Genetics. 1980 Aug;95(4):1033–1042. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • KING JC. Evidence for the integration of the gene pool from studies of DDT resistance in Drosophila. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1955;20:311–317. [PubMed]
  • Kitgawa O. Genetic divergence in M. Vetukhiv's experimental populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. IV. Relative viability. Genet Res. 1967 Dec;10(3):303–312. [PubMed]
  • Mather K. Complementary and duplicate gene interactions in biometrical genetics. Heredity (Edinb) 1967 Feb;22(1):97–103. [PubMed]
  • Moll RH, Lonnquist JH, Fortuno JV, Johnson EC. The Relationship of Heterosis and Genetic Divergence in Maize. Genetics. 1965 Jul;52(1):139–144. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Parsons PA. Fluctuating asymmetry: an epigenetic measure of stress. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1990 May;65(2):131–145. [PubMed]
  • Vetukhiv M. Viability of Hybrids Between Local Populations of Drosophila Pseudoobscura. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1953 Jan;39(1):30–34. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Genetics Society of America

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...