• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of geneticsGeneticsCurrent IssueInformation for AuthorsEditorial BoardSubscribeSubmit a Manuscript
Genetics. Mar 1993; 133(3): 681–691.
PMCID: PMC1205352

Chiasma Interference as a Function of Genetic Distance

Abstract

For many organisms, meiotic double crossing over is less frequent than expected on the assumption that exchanges occur at random with respect to each other. This ``interference,'' which can be almost total for nearby intervals, diminishes as the intervals in which the double crossovers are scored are moved farther apart. Most models for interference have assumed, at least implicitly, that the intensity of interference depends inversely on the physical distance separating the intervals. However, several observations suggest that interference depends on genetic distance (Morgans) rather than physical distance (base pairs or micrometers). Accordingly, we devise a model in which interference is related directly to genetic distance. Its central feature is that recombinational intermediates (C's) have two fates-they can be resolved with crossing over (Cx) or without (Co). We suppose that C's are distributed at random with respect to each other (no interference); interference results from constraints on the resolution of C's. The basic constraint is that each pair of neighboring Cx's must have between them a certain number of Co's. The required number of intervening Co's for a given organism or chromosome is estimated from the fraction of gene conversions that are unaccompanied by crossover of flanking markers. The predictions of the model are compared with data from Drosophila and Neurospora.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (950K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Amati P, Meselson M. Localized Negative Interference in Bacteriophage. Genetics. 1965 Mar;51(3):369–379. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Beadle GW. A Possible Influence of the Spindle Fibre on Crossing-Over in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1932 Feb;18(2):160–165. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Carpenter AT. Gene conversion, recombination nodules, and the initiation of meiotic synapsis. Bioessays. 1987 May;6(5):232–236. [PubMed]
  • CASE ME, GILES NH. Recombination mechanisms at the pan-2 locus in Neurospora crassa. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1958;23:119–135. [PubMed]
  • Cobbs G. Renewal process approach to the theory of genetic linkage: case of no chromatid interference. Genetics. 1978 Jul;89(3):563–581. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • de Serres FJ. Studies with Purple Adenine Mutants in Neurospora Crassa. IV. Lack of Complementation between Different Ad-3a Mutants in Heterokaryons and Pseudowild Types. Genetics. 1960 May;45(5):555–566. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Fogel S, Mortimer R, Lusnak K, Tavares F. Meiotic gene conversion: a signal of the basic recombination event in yeast. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1979;43(Pt 2):1325–1341. [PubMed]
  • Fox DP. The control of chiasma distribution in the locust, Schistocerca gregaria (Forskal). Chromosoma. 1973 Aug 27;43(3):289–328. [PubMed]
  • Green MM. Conversion as a possible mechanism of high coincidence values in the centromere region of Drosophila. Mol Gen Genet. 1975 Aug 5;139(1):57–66. [PubMed]
  • Hilliker AJ, Chovnick A. Further observations on intragenic recombination in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 1981 Dec;38(3):281–296. [PubMed]
  • Hilliker AJ, Clark SH, Chovnick A. The effect of DNA sequence polymorphisms on intragenic recombination in the rosy locus of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1991 Nov;129(3):779–781. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • King JS, Mortimer RK. A polymerization model of chiasma interference and corresponding computer simulation. Genetics. 1990 Dec;126(4):1127–1138. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kitani Y. Absence of interference in association with gene conversion in Sordaria fimicola, and presence of interference in association with ordinary recombination. Genetics. 1978 Jul;89(3):467–497. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • MERRIAM JR, FROST JN. EXCHANGE AND NONDISJUNCTION OF THE X CHROMOSOMES IN FEMALE DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. Genetics. 1964 Jan;49:109–122. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Meselson MS, Radding CM. A general model for genetic recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Jan;72(1):358–361. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • MURRAY NE. Polarized recombination and fine structure within the me-2 gene of Neurospora crassa. Genetics. 1963 Sep;48:1163–1183. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Perkins DD. Biochemical Mutants in the Smut Fungus Ustilago Maydis. Genetics. 1949 Sep;34(5):607–626. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • PERKINS DD. Crossing-over and interference in a multiply marked chromosome arm of Neurospora. Genetics. 1962 Sep;47:1253–1274. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Stadler DR, Kariya B. Intragenic recombination at the mtr locus of Neurospora with segregation at an unselected site. Genetics. 1969 Oct;63(2):291–316. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • STADLER DR, TOWE AM. RECOMBINATION OF ALLELIC CYSTEINE MUTANTS IN NEUROSPORA. Genetics. 1963 Oct;48:1323–1344. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • WHITEHOUSE HL, HASTINGS PJ. THE ANALYSIS OF GENETIC RECOMBINATION ON THE POLARON HYBRID DNA MODEL. Genet Res. 1965 Feb;10:27–92. [PubMed]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Genetics Society of America

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...