• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of geneticsGeneticsCurrent IssueInformation for AuthorsEditorial BoardSubscribeSubmit a Manuscript
Genetics. Oct 1991; 129(2): 555–562.
PMCID: PMC1204643

Pairwise Comparisons of Mitochondrial DNA Sequences in Stable and Exponentially Growing Populations


We consider the distribution of pairwise sequence differences of mitochondrial DNA or of other nonrecombining portions of the genome in a population that has been of constant size and in a population that has been growing in size exponentially for a long time. We show that, in a population of constant size, the sample distribution of pairwise differences will typically deviate substantially from the geometric distribution expected, because the history of coalescent events in a single sample of genes imposes a substantial correlation on pairwise differences. Consequently, a goodness-of-fit test of observed pairwise differences to the geometric distribution, which assumes that each pairwise comparison is independent, is not a valid test of the hypothesis that the genes were sampled from a panmictic population of constant size. In an exponentially growing population in which the product of the current population size and the growth rate is substantially larger than one, our analytical and simulation results show that most coalescent events occur relatively early and in a restricted range of times. Hence, the ``gene tree'' will be nearly a ``star phylogeny'' and the distribution of pairwise differences will be nearly a Poisson distribution. In that case, it is possible to estimate r, the population growth rate, if the mutation rate, μ, and current population size, N(0), are assumed known. The estimate of r is the solution to ri/μ = ln(N(0)r) - γ, where i is the average pairwise difference and γ & 0.577 is Euler's constant.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (704K).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Avise JC, Ball RM, Arnold J. Current versus historical population sizes in vertebrate species with high gene flow: a comparison based on mitochondrial DNA lineages and inbreeding theory for neutral mutations. Mol Biol Evol. 1988 Jul;5(4):331–344. [PubMed]
  • Cann RL, Stoneking M, Wilson AC. Mitochondrial DNA and human evolution. Nature. 1987 Jan 1;325(6099):31–36. [PubMed]
  • Di Rienzo A, Wilson AC. Branching pattern in the evolutionary tree for human mitochondrial DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Mar 1;88(5):1597–1601. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kaplan NL, Hudson RR, Langley CH. The "hitchhiking effect" revisited. Genetics. 1989 Dec;123(4):887–899. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Tajima F. Evolutionary relationship of DNA sequences in finite populations. Genetics. 1983 Oct;105(2):437–460. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989 Nov;123(3):585–595. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Watterson GA. On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theor Popul Biol. 1975 Apr;7(2):256–276. [PubMed]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Genetics Society of America


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


  • Cited in Books
    Cited in Books
    PubMed Central articles cited in books
  • MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...