pmc logo image
Logo of genitmedJournal URL: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/tocrender.fcgi?journal=176&action=archive

Formats:

Genitourin Med. 1992 June; 68(3): 162–165.
PMCID: PMC1194847
Lidocaine/prilocaine cream (EMLA(R)) versus infiltration anaesthesia: a comparison of the analgesic efficacy for punch biopsy and electrocoagulation of genital warts in men.
G M vd Berg, S Lillieborg, and E Stolz
Department of Dermatovenereology, University Hospital Rotterdam/Dijkzigt, The Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES--To compare analgesic efficacy and pain caused by administration of lidocaine/prilocaine cream (EMLA(R)) versus xylocaine 1% local infiltration for punch biopsy and electrocoagulation of genital warts in men. DESIGN--Open randomised comparative parallel-group study. SETTING--Department of Dermatovenereology, University Hospital Rotterdam/Dijkzigt, the Netherlands. PATIENTS--63 males with warts on the genital mucosa and/or perianal area. METHODS--EMLA(R) cream (2.5-5 g) was applied during 13-45 minutes before surgery. Xylocaine 1% (0.1-4 ml) was infiltrated 0.5-4 minutes before surgery. Pain during administration and surgery was assessed by the patient on a verbal rating scale and on a visual analogue scale. RESULTS--EMLA(R) application was painless in all patients (n = 31) whereas xylocaine infiltration was slightly painful in 17/29 patients and moderately painful in 10/29 patients. EMLA(R) analgesia was satisfactory for 94% of biopsies and 62% of electrocoagulations. Xylocaine infiltration was satisfactory in all procedures. CONCLUSIONS--EMLA(R) application on the male genital mucosa is painless but it has a lower analgesic efficacy than xylocaine infiltration. However EMLA is a useful anaesthetic for taking biopsies in this area and may be used as premedication for local infiltration.
Full text
Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (572K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Juhlin L, Evers H. EMLA: a new topical anesthetic. Adv Dermatol. 1990;5:75–92. [PubMed]
  • Ljunghall K, Lillieborg S. Local anaesthesia with a lidocaine/prilocaine cream (EMLA) for cautery of condylomata acuminata on the vulval mucosa. The effect of timing of application of the cream. Acta Derm Venereol. 1989;69(4):362–365. [PubMed]
  • Rylander E, Sjöberg I, Lillieborg S, Stockman O. Local anesthesia of the genital mucosa with a lidocaine/prilocaine cream (EMLA) for laser treatment of condylomata acuminata: a placebo-controlled study. Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Feb;75(2):302–306. [PubMed]
  • Byrne MA, Taylor-Robinson D, Harris JR. Topical anaesthesia with lidocaine-prilocaine cream for vulval biopsy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989 Apr;96(4):497–499. [PubMed]
  • Hallén A, Ljunghall K, Wallin J. Topical anaesthesia with local anaesthetic (lidocaine and prilocaine, EMLA) cream for cautery of genital warts. Genitourin Med. 1987 Oct;63(5):316–319. [PubMed]
  • Lassus A, Kartamaa M, Happonen HP. A comparative study of topical analgesia with a lidocaine/prilocaine cream (EMLA) and infiltration anesthesia for laser surgery of genital warts in men. Sex Transm Dis. 1990 Jul–Sep;17(3):130–132. [PubMed]
  • Scott J, Huskisson EC. Graphic representation of pain. Pain. 1976 Jun;2(2):175–184. [PubMed]
  • Kuritz SJ, Landis JR, Koch GG. A general overview of Mantel-Haenszel methods: applications and recent developments. Annu Rev Public Health. 1988;9:123–160. [PubMed]
  • Arendt-Nielsen L, Bjerring P. Laser-induced pain for evaluation of local analgesia: a comparison of topical application (EMLA) and local injection (lidocaine). Anesth Analg. 1988 Feb;67(2):115–123. [PubMed]