![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Copyright The Biochemical Society, London Gene duplication, gene loss and evolution of expression domains in the vertebrate nuclear receptor NR5A (Ftz-F1) family *Institute of Molecular Biology, Academia Sinica, 128 Academia Road Section 2, Nankang, Taipei, Taiwan 115 †Institute of Fisheries Science, National Taiwan University, 1 Roosevelt Road Section 4, Taipei, Taiwan 106 ‡Institute of Neuroscience, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, U.S.A. §Department of Biological Science, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore 119620 1To whom correspondence should be addressed (email mbchung/at/sinica.edu.tw). The nucleotide sequence data reported are available in DDBJ, EMBL, GenBank® and GSDB Nucleotide Sequence Databases under the accession number NM_212834. Received January 4, 2005; Revised January 28, 2005; Accepted February 22, 2005. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Fushi tarazu factor 1 (Ftz-F1, NR5A) is a zinc-finger transcription factor that belongs to the nuclear receptor superfamily and regulates genes that are involved in sterol and steroid metabolism in gonads, adrenals, liver and other tissues. To understand the evolutionary origins and developmental genetic relationships of the Ftz-F1 genes, we have cloned four homologous Ftz-f1 genes in zebrafish, called ff1a, ff1b, ff1c and ff1d. These four genes have different temporal and spatial expression patterns during development, indicating that they have distinct mechanisms of genetic regulation. Among them, the ff1a expression pattern is similar to mammalian Nr5a2, while the ff1b pattern is similar to that of mammalian Nr5a1. Genetic mapping experiments show that these four ff1 genes are located on chromosome segments conserved between the zebrafish and human genomes, indicating a common ancestral origin. Phylogenetic and conserved synteny analysis show that ff1a is the orthologue of NR5A2, and that ff1b and ff1d genes are co-orthologues of NR5A1 that arose by a gene-duplication event, probably a whole-genome duplication, in the ray-fin lineage, and each gene is located next to an NR6A1 co-orthologue as in humans, showing that the tandem duplication occurred before the divergence of human and zebrafish lineages. ff1c does not have a mammalian counterpart. Thus we have characterized the phylogenetic relationships, expression patterns and chromosomal locations of these Ftz-F1 genes, and have demonstrated their identities as NR5A genes in relation to the orthologous genes in other species. Keywords: ftz-f1, LRH-1, NR5A, nuclear receptor, phylogeny, SF-1 Abbreviations: Ftz-F1, fushi tarazu factor 1; HS, Heat-Shock; MOP, Mother of Pearl; 3′/5′-RACE, rapid amplification of 3′/5′-cDNA ends; RT, reverse transcription INTRODUCTION Nuclear receptors form one of the largest families of transcription factors in the human genome, with 48 members [1]. In contrast, the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans has 284 family members, and the fly Drosophila melanogaster just 21 [2]. What evolutionary forces have shaped the content of the human nuclear receptor family? This is an important question, not only for understanding the general question of how the functions of large gene families evolve, but also because more than 10% of commonly prescribed pharmaceuticals for human disease have nuclear receptors as targets, and understanding the differences in nuclear gene content and function between humans and model organisms may yield information that is critical for the development of novel drugs that target nuclear receptors [1]. One of the seven nuclear receptor subfamilies, the NR5A family, has two members in the human and fly genomes, and just one in C. elegans, while some other subfamilies have several human members for each fly orthologue [1]. NR5A is also called Ftz-F1, because it was first identified as the transcription factor that activates fushi tarazu (ftz) in Drosophila. The ftz-f1 gene has been cloned from Xenopus as well as teleost fish. In mammals, the Ftz-F1 genes can be divided into two subgroups, NR5A1 (SF-1/Ad4BP) and NR5A2 (LRH-1/FTF). NR5A1 is a transcription factor that controls the expression of many genes, such as steroidogenic cytochrome P450s and gonadotropins. NR5A1 is expressed in the adrenal and gonadal primordia, the ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus, and the developing pituitary primordium. Nr5a1-knockout mice fail to form the adrenal glands and gonads. Thus NR5A1 is essential for adrenal and gonadal development, and sexual differentiation [3]. NR5A2 is expressed more broadly than NR5A1. In the liver, it activates genes that are involved in cholesterol metabolism and bile acid synthesis. NR5A2 is also expressed in the pancreas, ovary, intestine, colon, the adrenal gland and pre-adipocytes for a number of different functions in endocrine and metabolic regulation [4]. A major model for the origin of human paralogues, such as NR5A1 and NR5A2, is that many arose during large-scale genome-amplification events, perhaps two whole-genome-duplication events, that occurred around the origin of vertebrate developmental innovations [5–7]. If the nuclear receptor genes arose by two rounds of whole-genome duplication, then four genes might be expected in the human genome, like the NOTCH genes and HOX clusters, rather than the two for the NR5A subfamily. To begin to understand the relationships of nuclear receptor genes to ancient genome duplications, we cloned a new member of the NR5A nuclear receptor gene family from zebrafish. In the present study, we show by phylogenetic analysis, comparative genomic analysis and by gene expression studies that the zebrafish lineage retains an NR5A gene that is lacking in the human genome. This gene arose in the peri-vertebrate-origin genome-amplification events. In addition, the zebrafish genome has duplicate copies of one of the original vertebrate paralogues that arose in a genome-duplication event specific for ray-fin fish [8–11]. MATERIALS AND METHODS cDNA cloning and sequence analysis Total RNA was extracted from zebrafish testis using TRIzol® reagent (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.). To obtain full-length ff1d cDNA, 5′- and 3′-RACE (rapid amplification of 5′- and 3′-cDNA ends) was performed with testis total RNA using the SMART™ cDNA amplification kit (Clontech laboratories, Palo Alto, CA, U.S.A.). For 3′-RACE, the fragments were amplified with the following primers: 5′FTZF1 (5′-TGCGGATAGGATGCGAGGAGGCCGCAAC-3′) for the first PCR and R0 (5′-CATGTATAAGCGAGACCGGGCGTT-3′) for the second PCR. For 5′-RACE, the fragments were amplified with following primers: F01 (5′-CGGCCATGTGGCACATGAGGCCAA-3′) for the first PCR, and F1 (5′-CGGGATGGACTACAGTTATGATGCGGAC-3′) for the second PCR. The RACE products were subcloned and sequenced. The nucleotide sequence was deposited into GenBank® under accession number NM_212834. Phylogenetic analysis DNA sequence alignment and homology analysis were performed using SeqWeb 2.1. All phylogenetic analyses were conducted on amino acid sequences. Ftz-F1 and NR6A genes from different animals were imported into CLUSTAL X, and trees were generated from amino acid sequences by the neighbour-joining method using NJplot (http://pbil.univ-lyon1.fr/software/njplot.html). A CG8676PA sequence from Drosophila melanogaster served as an outgroup to root the tree, and alignments used domains C and E, the DNA-binding and ligand-binding domains, which gave 352 amino acids. A bootstrapping method was used as a measure of the statistical validity of each node in the phylogenetic analysis. Genetic mapping The ff1a and ff1c genes were mapped as SSCPs (single-strand conformation polymorphisms) on the MOP (Mother of Pearl) and the HS (Heat-Shock) meiotic mapping panels [12–14]. Strain distribution patterns were analysed using MapManager. The ff1b and ff1d genes were mapped on the LN54 radiation hybrid panel [15], and intercalated into the map from the HS panel on the basis of nearby markers mapped on both panels. LocusLink [16] and ZFIN provided data for analysis of conserved syntenies. Mapping primers were: ff1a: ff1a+1830 F, 5′-TGGGTTTGCGCTGGGTGGACAT-3′ and ff1a-2149 R, 5′-TTTTTGGTGAGGGGTTGGAATAA-3′; ff1b: ff1b+1711 F, 5′-CATAACATCACCAGAGGGGAGTCA-3′ and ff1b-1968 R, 5′-TGTGCCGTCAGCCAATCGTT-3′; ff1c: ff1c+27 F, 5′-TACAAGTTAAAACGGCACATTC-3′ and ff1c-288 R, 5′-ACTCACTGCTGACTGAAATGCT-3′; and ff1d: ff1d+1882 F, 5′-AGAAGTTCGCATCACCCTCCACAT-3′ and ff1d-2233 R, 5′-CCACGCGAATACAGAAACACCAAC-3′. RT (reverse transcription)-PCR Reverse transcription was performed using the Superscript pre-amplification system (Gibco BRL) with 0.5 μg of oligo(dT)12–18 and 3 μg of each total RNA in a 20 μl reaction mixture as described in [17]. The cDNA product (1 or 2 μl) was used in PCR with ff1a, ff1b, ff1c, ff1d and actin primers for 25–35 cycles at 95 °C for 60 s, 55 °C for 60 s and 72 °C for 60 s. The ff1a primers 5′-GCAGCATCTTCTTCCGGGAACTAAAGG-3′ and 5′-GTACTGTACTCGAGGGCACGTTTGGCGTGCAG-3′ amplified cDNA from nt 1136 to 1674. The ff1b primers 5′-ACACTGCCGTCTGGTTTGTAG-3′ and 5′-GGCAACTGTAACACTACTATGGC-3′ amplified cDNA from nt 1419 to 2063. The ff1c primers 5′-CCCCAACTCCATCACAGAGCTT-3′ and 5′-GCACACATGAGATCATCGCAA-3′ amplified cDNA from nt 842 to 1625. The ff1d primers 5′-GAAAGAAGACGAGGGGAGATGT-3′ and 5′-ACACTCATACGCACTCATACAC-3′ amplified cDNA from nt 1790 to 2321. The actin primers 5′-TCACACCTTCTACAACGAGCTGCG-3′ and 5′-GAAGCTGTAGCCTCTCTCGGTCAG-3′ generated a 340-bp fragment [18]. PCR products were analysed on 1.5% agarose gels. In situ hybridization Whole-mount in situ hybridization was performed using digoxigenin-labelled antisense RNA probe and anti-digoxigenin alkaline-phosphatase-conjugated antibody as described previously [19]. RESULTS Characterization of zebrafish ff1 genes We have previously isolated three zebrafish ftz-f1 genes, ff1a, ff1b and ff1c [20–22]. In an attempt to understand more about the ftz-f1 gene family, we isolated a fourth cDNA, termed ff1d, from zebrafish testis by using 5′-RACE and 3′-RACE (see Supplementary Figure S1 at http://www.BiochemJ.org/bj/389/bj3890019add.htm). The ff1d cDNA is 2554 bp with a predicted open reading frame of 502 amino acids. In addition, a short ff1d transcript was also obtained using 3′-RACE. The ff1d-short form is 1240 bp in length. It differs from the long form at the 3′-region, probably due to alternative splicing of exons at the 3′-region of the ftz-f1 gene. This shorter transcript encodes a smaller Ff1d protein lacking the C-terminal domain. The C-terminal truncation in Ff1d is due to an early stop codon located 22 amino acids downstream from the point of sequence divergence. The presence of long and short proteins has also been observed in zebrafish Ff1a [21]. Ff1a, Ff1b, Ff1c and Ff1d sequences were aligned (see Supplementary Figure S2 at http://www.BiochemJ.org/bj/389/bj3890019add.htm). These sequences are highly conserved throughout the entire coding region, with Ff1c diverging from the other three. The most conserved region is the DNA-binding domain. The D and E domains have approx. 40–70% sequence identity among these four sequences (see Supplementary Figure S3 at http://www.BiochemJ.org/bj/389/bj3890019add.htm). Gene phylogenies Phylogenetic analysis of ff1 genes can help reveal their origins and relationships to human NR5 genes. Ftz-f1 genes from D. melanogaster and the urochordate Ciona intestinalis served as outgroups to root the tree. The results showed that the tetrapod NR5A1 and NR5A2 genes branched as expected from the known evolutionary relationships of the species (Figure 1
One set of teleost ff1 genes, including zebrafish ff1a, was closely related to tetrapod NR5A2 genes with a high bootstrap value (1000/1000). The tree shows that orthologues of zebrafish ff1a exist in the percomorph pufferfish Takifugu rubripes and Odontesthes bonariensis, and several salmonids, and their topology does not contradict the phylogenetic relationships of these species [23]. Each of the three salmonids Oncorhynchus nerka, Oncorhynchus keta and Salvelinus alpinus, has two orthologues of zebrafish ff1a, and they are nested as expected by the species relationship. These results are consistent with a genome duplication event in the salmonid lineage after it diverged from the zebrafish and percomorph lineages [24,25]. A second set of teleost ff1 genes clusters with human NR5A2, but with lower bootstrap values (724/1000). The lower bootstrap values of this set, in contrast with the ff1a set, makes their evolutionary relationships to tetrapod NR5A1 and NR5A2 less clear. Within this set, however, there are two clades, one related to ff1b and the other to ff1d, suggesting that they may come from a gene-duplication event that occurred after the divergence of teleost and tetrapod lineages. Within the ff1b clade, the teleost ff1 genes branch according to their species phylogenies. The third set of teleost ff1 genes include zebrafish ff1c and a pufferfish gene, and these branch with high bootstrap support (991/1000) as outgroups to the other tetrapod and teleost NR5-related genes. This position is consistent with the interpretation that ff1c genes arose in a gene-duplication event before the divergence of tetrapod and teleost lineages, but that the tetrapod orthologue has since been lost. Genome context and conserved syntenies While the phylogenetic analysis showed that ff1a is an orthologue of NR5A2, it left questions about the evolutionary relationships of the other three zebrafish ff1 genes. To discover the chromosomal location of zebrafish Ftz-f1 genes, we performed genetic mapping experiments. We found that zebrafish ff1a, ff1b, ff1c and ff1d mapped to LG22_40.9 cM, LG8_139.1 cM, LG3_80.3 cM and LG21_36.7 cM (see Supplementary Figure S4 at http://www.BiochemJ.org/bj/389/bj3890019add.htm, and Table 1) respectively on the HS meiotic mapping panel [14]. In humans, NR5A paralogues are syntenic with NOTCH paralogues, with NR5A1 at 9q33 and NOTCH1 at 9q34.3, and NR5A2 at 1q32.1 and NOTCH2 at 1p13-p11. Likewise, zebrafish ff1 genes are syntenic with notch paralogues, with ff1b and notch2 on LG8, ff1d and notch1a on LG21, and ff1c and notch3 on LG3 [12,14]. The only zebrafish ff1 gene not known to be syntenic with a notch paralogue is ff1a on LG22, which, however, has conserved syntenies with at least five other loci residing in Hsa1q32.1, syntenic with NOTCH2. Thus conserved long-range syntenies suggest orthologies of ff1a and ff1d with NR5A2 and NR5A1 respectively.
To understand further the evolutionary relationships of the ff1 genes, we investigated ff1 genes in the genome sequencing databases of zebrafish and fugu (http://fugu.hgmp.mrc.ac.uk/blast/, http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Projects/D_rerio/, http://134.174.23.160/compGenomics/). The ff1a genes of zebrafish and fugu are present on contigs ctg10168.1 (transcript ENSDART00000008771) and Scaffold_5225 (transcript SINFRUT00000152923) respectively. There are no other transcripts present on these contigs, and so these do not provide evidence regarding the evolution of these genes, but the phylogenetic analysis and conserved long-range syntenies are clear that ff1a is an orthologue of human NR5A2. The phylogenetic analysis suggested that the ff1b gene of zebrafish is orthologous to fugu predicted protein SINFRUP-00000132871 on scaffold_7529, although the bootstrap value was not high (597/1000). In tBLASTn analysis, zebrafish ff1b hit fugu SINFRUP00000132871 better than ff1d did (e-score of 3.3e-47 compared with 1.1e-38 respectively), consistent with the phylogenetic analysis. Fugu ff1b was the only predicted protein on its scaffold, but the zebrafish ff1b gene is on connoting ctg12124 with four other genes. In tBLASTn analysis, these other genes hit strongly the human genes CYR61 (e-score 1e-73, 1p31-p22, 1_85334k), LMO4 (e-score 2e-70, 1p22.3, 1_87087k), NR6A1 (e-core 0.0, 9q33-q34.1, 9_120736k), and C11orf8 (e-score 1e-69, 11p13, 11_30471k) (Figure 2
The phylogenetic and tBLASTn analysis suggest that ff1d is a duplicate of the ff1b gene. This conclusion is also supported by the genomic analysis for zebrafish (an orthologue of ff1d was not found in the current fugu genomic database). The orthologues of five human genes in addition to ff1d are on the zebrafish contig ctg11365.1, and all are contiguous in human as well (Figure 2 The phylogeny (Figure 1
Expression of ff1 genes during development Gene functions are determined partly by their expression patterns. To understand further the relationships among different ff1 family members and to provide insights into gene functions, we carried out RT-PCR analysis to learn their expression patterns during development. Expression of ff1a and ff1b was first detected at about the segmentation stage, and continued through development (Figure 4
The differential expression patterns of these four ftz-f1 genes were also exemplified in the adult tissues. Earlier work already showed expression of ff1a and ff1b in a variety of different tissues [20,21,28–30]. In the present study, we show that ff1c transcripts are detected in many adult tissues (Figure 4 To examine expression patterns among ff1 orthologues in more detail, we performed whole-mount in situ hybridization with zebrafish embryos (Figure 5
DISCUSSION In the present paper, we describe the characterization of a new zebrafish nr5a gene and genetic mapping experiments that showed that each of the four zebrafish nr5a genes is located on a different chromosome. While teleosts have four nr5a genes, mammals have just two. Phylogenetic analyses showed that the NR5A family can be divided into the NR5A1 and NR5A2 subgroups [34]. Our studies of zebrafish show that these two groups arose before the divergence of teleost and mammalian lineages, probably in genome-amplification events at the base of vertebrate evolution. Zebrafish ff1a and human NR5A2 have highly conserved sequences, and this conservation of sequence suggests the conservation of function maintained since the teleost/tetrapod divergence 450 million years ago. Zebrafish ff1b and ff1d probably arose by the duplication of an ancestral NR5A1 gene in a genome duplication event that punctuated ray-fin fish evolution [8–12,35]. These genes have the distinctive signs of having resulted from a whole-genome-duplication event, in that they are present on paralogous chromosomes and are sisters in a phylogeny compared with the genome of a related species that did not undergo whole-genome duplication [8–12]. And ff1c probably arose in the genome-amplification events at the base of vertebrate evolution and was lost in the human lineage. Based on our phylogenetic analysis, chromosome mapping and comparative genomics, we assign the zebrafish ff1 genes the following names: ff1a becomes nr5a2, ff1b becomes nr5a1a, ff1c becomes nr5a5 and ff1d becomes nr5a1b (Table 1). We previously called the ff1b gene nr5a4 [4,21], but the experiments reported in the present paper make, for the first time, the historical past of the genes evident, allowing us to assign more biologically meaningful names. The assignment of ff1a to nr5a2 is very clear because data from phylogenetic analysis, chromosomal locations and expression patterns all agree that ff1a in zebrafish and NR5A2 in human are derived from a single gene in their last common ancestor. The assignment of ff1b and ff1d to nr5a1 is somewhat more difficult. Our phylogenetic analysis gave ambiguous results, indicating that ff1b could be more similar to NR5A2. The ff1b gene resides in LG8 in a region resembling both Hsa1 and Hsa9, where NR5A1 and NR5A2 reside respectively. Yet ff1b and ff1d genes appear as gene duplicates from phylogenetic analyses. A particularly telling finding is that both genes are adjacent to duplicate copies of nr6a1, whose human counterpart NR6A1 is next to NR5A1 on Hsa9. In addition, many ff1d neighbouring genes are also syntenic to NR5A1 on human Hsa9. Furthermore, our gene expression data and functional analysis also show that ff1b is most similar to mammalian Nr5a1. Expression of ff1b in the head kidney primordia and hypothalamus (Figure 5 It has been suggested that the partitioning of ancestral subfunctions between gene duplicates can permit evolutionary changes in tissue-specific functional domains of encoded proteins [33,37], and that these tissue-specific subfunctions could provide targets for drugs that might be more tissue-specific and thus avoid some undesirable side effects [38]. Future work may reveal whether the duplicated ff1b and ff1d genes might contribute to enhanced design of drugs that target NR5A genes. We demonstrate that the tandem arrangement of NR5A1 and NR6A1 that is found in the human lineage is shared by zebrafish, suggesting its origin by ancient tandem duplication. We propose here a model that can explain the evolutionary relationships of all these genes (Figure 6
Whether vertebrate genome evolves through the whole-genome-duplication or segmental-duplication event, evidence shows that the chromosome segment containing NOTCH and many other genes was duplicated in the vertebrate lineage, in the ‘1/6/9/19p paralogon’ [27,42]. The NR5A gene has just two paralogues in the human genome, with no copy currently on the Hsa19 paralogous chromosome segment. The genetic mapping and phylogenetic analysis reported in the present paper are consistent with the hypothesis that ff1c is the descendent of an NR5A gene present in the last common ancestor of human and zebrafish that has since become lost in the lineage leading to humans. Understanding the functions of the zebrafish copy of the NR5A gene missing from the human genome may be informative about evolutionary differences between members of the ray-fin fish lineage, such as zebrafish, and members of the lobe-fin fish lineage, such as human. This phenomenon – the retention of an ancient paralogue in the fish lineage and its loss in the human lineage – has been recognized only recently. For example, an EVX paralogue lies adjacent to the mammalian HOXA and HOXD clusters, but none exists adjacent to the mammalian HOXB or HOXC clusters [43]. The chromosome segment that duplicated to give rise to the four mammalian HOX clusters undoubtedly had an EVX gene adjacent to the group-13 gene [44–46]. Because eve1 exists at this location in the zebrafish hoxba cluster [9], it must have been present adjacent to the HOXB cluster in the last common ancestor of zebrafish and human, but subsequently became lost in the human lineage. The same situation most likely happened with ff1c. We propose that many teleost genes that are termed ‘novel’ may be found, after subsequent genomic and phylogenetic analysis, to have origins like ff1c and eve1. In addition to gene structure and chromosomal locations, gene expression patterns provide clues to the functions and evolutionary relationships of genes. We showed that the ff1a gene is expressed in many of the same organs in which mammalian NR5A2 is expressed [47]. In contrast with ff1a and ff1b, ff1c and ff1d do not have expression patterns similar to mammalian NR5A genes. For ff1c, this is probably because the gene orthologous to ff1c was lost during mammalian evolution. For ff1d, the duplicate of ff1b, regulatory sequences may have been free to change during evolution because of the maintenance of its duplicate gene ff1b, and perhaps by the retention of ff1c. Many of the NR5A genes have multiple promoters and are differentially spliced. The zebrafish nr5a2 gene has two promoters and is alternatively spliced at the 3′-region, resulting in the formation of four isoforms with identical central protein portions, but different in their N- and C-termini [21]. Both human and mouse NR5A1 genes also have the same structure [48,49]. We find that the zebrafish ff1d gene has two different 3′-sequences (see Supplementary Figure S1 at http://www.BiochemJ.org/bj/389/bj3890019add.htm), which is probably due to alternative splicing, as has been demonstrated for its orthologous genes in the human and mouse lineages. Our investigation has shown that the zebrafish genome has twice the number of NR5A genes as the human genome, and that the developmental genetic functions of these genes, as reflected by their expression patterns, are different between ray-fin (zebrafish) and lobe-fin (human) lineages. Because these genes regulate important developmental functions, including the development of the gonads and adrenals, and control critical functions in the development of sterol metabolism in liver and other tissues, further investigation of the ‘extra’ genes in teleosts may reveal ray-fin-specific functions that could have been involved in the divergence of ray-fin and lobe-fin fishes. Supplementary figures S1, S2, S3, S4 and S5
Click here to view.(212K, pdf) Acknowledgments This work was supported by grants NSC93-2321-B-001-018 from the National Science Council, and AS91IZ2PP from Academia Sinica, Republic of China to B.-c.C., grants R01RR10715 and P01HD22486 from NIH (National Institutes of Health) and IBN-9728587 from NSF (National Science Foundation), U.S.A., to J.P., and R-154-000-076-112 from National University of Singapore, Singapore, to W.K.C. References 1. Maglich J. M., Sluder A. E., Willson T. M., Moore J. T. Beyond the human genome: examples of nuclear receptor analysis in model organisms and potential for drug discovery. Am. J. Pharmacogenomics. 2003;3:345–353. [PubMed] 2. Gissendanner C. R., Crossgrove K., Kraus K. A., Maina C. V., Sluder A. E. Expression and function of conserved nuclear receptor genes in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev. Biol. 2004;266:399–416. [PubMed] 3. Parker K. L., Rice D. A., Lala D. S., Ikeda Y., Luo X., Wong M., Bakke M., Zhao L., Frigeri C., Hanley N. A., et al. Steroidogenic factor 1: an essential mediator of endocrine development. Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 2002;57:19–36. [PubMed] 4. Fayard E., Auwerx J., Schoonjans K. LRH-1: an orphan nuclear receptor involved in development, metabolism and steroidogenesis. Trends Cell Biol. 2004;14:250–260. [PubMed] 5. Wolfe K. H. Yesterday's polyploids and the mystery of diploidization. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2001;2:333–341. [PubMed] 6. Hughes A. L. Phylogenies of developmentally important proteins do not support the hypothesis of two rounds of genome duplication early in vertebrate history. J. Mol. Evol. 1999;48:565–576. [PubMed] 7. Holland P. W., Garcia-Fernandez J., Williams N. A., Sidow A. Gene duplications and the origins of vertebrate development. Dev. Suppl. 1994:125–133. [PubMed] 8. Taylor J. S., Braasch I., Frickey T., Meyer A., Van de Peer Y. Genome duplication, a trait shared by 22000 species of ray-finned fish. Genome Res. 2003;13:382–390. [PubMed] 9. Amores A., Force A., Yan Y. L., Joly L., Amemiya C., Fritz A., Ho R. K., Langeland J., Prince V., Wang Y. L., et al. Zebrafish hox clusters and vertebrate genome evolution. Science. 1998;282:1711–1714. [PubMed] 10. Naruse K., Tanaka M., Mita K., Shima A., Postlethwait J., Mitani H. A medaka gene map: the trace of ancestral vertebrate proto-chromosomes revealed by comparative gene mapping. Genome Res. 2004;14:820–828. [PubMed] 11. Jaillon O., Aury J. M., Brunet F., Petit J. L., Stange-Thomann N., Mauceli E., Bouneau L., Fischer C., Ozouf-Costaz C., Bernot A., et al. Genome duplication in the teleost fish Tetraodon nigroviridis reveals the early vertebrate proto-karyotype. Nature (London). 2004;431:946–957. [PubMed] 12. Postlethwait J. H., Yan Y. L., Gates M. A., Horne S., Amores A., Brownlie A., Donovan A., Egan E. S., Force A., Gong Z., et al. Vertebrate genome evolution and the zebrafish gene map. Nat. Genet. 1998;18:345–349. [PubMed] 13. Kelly P. D., Chu F., Woods I. G., Ngo-Hazelett P., Cardozo T., Huang H., Kimm F., Liao L., Yan Y. L., Zhou Y., et al. Genetic linkage mapping of zebrafish genes and ESTs. Genome Res. 2000;10:558–567. [PubMed] 14. Woods I. G., Kelly P. D., Chu F., Ngo-Hazelett P., Yan Y. L., Huang H., Postlethwait J. H., Talbot W. S. A comparative map of the zebrafish genome. Genome Res. 2000;10:1903–1914. [PubMed] 15. Hukriede N. A., Joly L., Tsang M., Miles J., Tellis P., Epstein J. A., Barbazuk W. B., Li F. N., Paw B., Postlethwait J. H., et al. Radiation hybrid mapping of the zebrafish genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999;96:9745–9750. [PubMed] 16. Pruitt K. D., Maglott D. R. RefSeq and LocusLink: NCBI gene-centered resources. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:137–140. [PubMed] 17. Guo I.-C., Huang C., Chung B.-c. Differential regulation of the CYP11A1 (P450scc) and ferredoxin genes in adrenal and placental cells. DNA Cell Biol. 1993;12:849–860. [PubMed] 18. Hwang S. P. L., Tsou M. F., Lin Y. C., Liu C. H. The zebrafish BMP4 gene: sequence analysis and expression pattern during embryonic development. DNA Cell Biol. 1997;16:1003–1011. [PubMed] 19. Chiang E. F.-L., Pai C.-I., Wyatt M., Yan Y.-L., Postlethwait J., Chung B.-c. Two sox9 genes on duplicated zebrafish chromosomes: expression of similar transcription activators in distinct sites. Dev. Biol. 2001;231:149–163. [PubMed] 20. Lin W., Wang H. W., Sum C., Liu D., Hew C. L., Chung B.-c. Zebrafish ftz-f1 gene has two promoters, is alternatively spliced, and is expressed in digestive organs. Biochem. J. 2000;348:439–446. [PubMed] 21. Chai C., Chan W. K. Developmental expression of a novel Ftz-F1 homologue, ff1b (NR5A4), in the zebrafish Danio rerio. Mech. Dev. 2000;91:421–426. [PubMed] 22. Xia J. M.S. Thesis. Singapore: National University of Singapore; 2003. Characterization of zebrafish ff1c gene. 23. Nelson J. S. Fishes of the World. New York: John Wiley; 1994. 24. Allendorf F. W., Utter F. M., May B. P. Gene duplication within the family Salmonidae: II. Detection and determination of the genetic control of duplicate loci through inheritance studies and the examination of populations. In: Markert C. L., editor. Isozymes. New York: Academic Press; 1975. pp. 415–432. 25. Phillips R., Rab P. Chromosome evolution in the Salmonidae (Pisces): an update. Biol. Rev. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 2001;76:1–25. [PubMed] 26. Kasahara M., Nakaya J., Satta Y., Takahata N. Chromosomal duplication and the emergence of the adaptive immune system. Trends Genet. 1997;13:90–92. [PubMed] 27. Katsanis N., Fitzgibbon J., Fisher E. M. Paralogy mapping: identification of a region in the human MHC triplicated onto human chromosomes 1 and 9 allows the prediction and isolation of novel PBX and NOTCH loci. Genomics. 1996;35:101–108. [PubMed] 28. von Hofsten J., Jones I., Karlsson J., Olsson P. E. Developmental expression patterns of FTZ-F1 homologues in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2001;121:146–155. [PubMed] 29. Hsu H. J., Lin G., Chung B. C. Parallel early development of zebrafish interrenal glands and pronephros: differential control by wt1 and ff1b. Development. 2003;130:2107–2116. [PubMed] 30. Liu Y. W., Gao W., Teh H. L., Tan J. H., Chan W. K. Prox1 is a novel coregulator of Ff1b and is involved in the embryonic development of the zebra fish interrenal primordium. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003;23:7243–7255. [PubMed] 31. Hsu H. J., Hsiao P., Kuo M. W., Chung B. C. Expression of zebrafish cyp11a1 as a maternal transcript and in yolk syncytial layer. Gene Expr. Patterns. 2002;2:219–222. [PubMed] 32. Parker K. L., Schimmer B. P. Steroidogenic factor 1: a key determinant of endocrine development and function. Endocr. Rev. 1997;18:361–377. [PubMed] 33. Force A., Lynch M., Pickett F. B., Amores A., Yan Y. L., Postlethwait J. Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics. 1999;151:1531–1545. [PubMed] 34. Ellinger-Ziegelbauer H., Hihi A. K., Laudet V., Keller H., Wahli W., Dreyer C. FTZ-F1-related orphan receptors in Xenopus laevis: transcriptional regulators differentially expressed during early embryogenesis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1994;14:2786–2797. [PubMed] 35. Meyer A., Schartl M. Gene and genome duplications in vertebrates: the one-to-four (-to-eight in fish) rule and the evolution of novel gene functions. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1999;11:699–704. [PubMed] 36. Chai C., Liu Y., Chan W. K. Ff1b is required for the development of steroidogenic component of the zebrafish interrenal organ. Dev. Biol. 2003;260:226–244. [PubMed] 37. Hughes A. L. The evolution of functionally novel proteins after gene duplication. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B. 1994;256:119–124. 38. Postlethwait J., Amores A., Cresko W., Singer A., Yan Y. L. Subfunction partitioning, the teleost radiation and the annotation of the human genome. Trends Genet. 2004;20:481–490. [PubMed] 39. Gibson T. J., Spring J. Evidence in favour of ancient octaploidy in the vertebrate genome. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2000;28:259–264. [PubMed] 40. Skrabanek L., Wolfe K. H. Eukaryote genome duplication – where's the evidence? Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 1998;8:694–700. [PubMed] 41. Hughes A. L., da Silva J., Friedman R. Ancient genome duplications did not structure the human Hox-bearing chromosomes. Genome Res. 2001;11:771–780. [PubMed] 42. Kasahara M. New insights into the genomic organization and origin of the major histocompatibility complex: role of chromosomal (genome) duplication in the emergence of the adaptive immune system. Hereditas. 1997;127:59–65. [PubMed] 43. Krumlauf R. Hox genes in vertebrate development. Cell. 1994;78:191–201. [PubMed] 44. Ferrier D. E., Minguillon C., Holland P. W., Garcia-Fernandez J. The amphioxus Hox cluster: deuterostome posterior flexibility and Hox14. Evol. Dev. 2000;2:284–293. [PubMed] 45. Minguillon C., Garcia-Fernandez J. Genesis and evolution of the Evx and Mox genes and the extended Hox and ParaHox gene clusters. Genome Biol. 2003;4:R12. [PubMed] 46. Pollard S. L., Holland P. W. Evidence for 14 homeobox gene clusters in human genome ancestry. Curr. Biol. 2000;10:1059–1062. [PubMed] 47. Rausa F. M., Galarneau L., Belanger L., Costa R. H. The nuclear receptor fetoprotein transcription factor is coexpressed with its target gene HNF-3β in the developing murine liver, intestine and pancreas. Mech. Dev. 1999;89:185–188. [PubMed] 48. Oba K., Yanase T., Nomura M., Morohashi K., Takayanagi R., Nawata H. Structural characterization of human Ad4bp (SF-1) gene. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1996;226:261–267. [PubMed] 49. Ninomiya Y., Okada M., Kotomura N., Suzuki K., Tsukiyama T., Niwa O. Genomic organization and isoforms of the mouse ELP gene. J. Biochem. (Tokyo). 1995;118:380–389. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||
Am J Pharmacogenomics. 2003; 3(5):345-53.
[Am J Pharmacogenomics. 2003]Dev Biol. 2004 Feb 15; 266(2):399-416.
[Dev Biol. 2004]Am J Pharmacogenomics. 2003; 3(5):345-53.
[Am J Pharmacogenomics. 2003]Recent Prog Horm Res. 2002; 57():19-36.
[Recent Prog Horm Res. 2002]Trends Cell Biol. 2004 May; 14(5):250-60.
[Trends Cell Biol. 2004]Nat Rev Genet. 2001 May; 2(5):333-41.
[Nat Rev Genet. 2001]Dev Suppl. 1994; ():125-33.
[Dev Suppl. 1994]Genome Res. 2003 Mar; 13(3):382-90.
[Genome Res. 2003]Nature. 2004 Oct 21; 431(7011):946-57.
[Nature. 2004]Nat Genet. 1998 Apr; 18(4):345-9.
[Nat Genet. 1998]Genome Res. 2000 Dec; 10(12):1903-14.
[Genome Res. 2000]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Aug 17; 96(17):9745-50.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999]Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 Jan 1; 29(1):137-40.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 2001]DNA Cell Biol. 1993 Nov; 12(9):849-60.
[DNA Cell Biol. 1993]DNA Cell Biol. 1997 Aug; 16(8):1003-11.
[DNA Cell Biol. 1997]Dev Biol. 2001 Mar 1; 231(1):149-63.
[Dev Biol. 2001]Biochem J. 2000 Jun 1; 348 Pt 2():439-46.
[Biochem J. 2000]Mech Dev. 2000 Mar 1; 91(1-2):421-6.
[Mech Dev. 2000]Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2001 Feb; 76(1):1-25.
[Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2001]Genome Res. 2000 Dec; 10(12):1903-14.
[Genome Res. 2000]Nat Genet. 1998 Apr; 18(4):345-9.
[Nat Genet. 1998]Trends Genet. 1997 Mar; 13(3):90-2.
[Trends Genet. 1997]Genomics. 1996 Jul 1; 35(1):101-8.
[Genomics. 1996]Dev Suppl. 1994; ():125-33.
[Dev Suppl. 1994]Biochem J. 2000 Jun 1; 348 Pt 2():439-46.
[Biochem J. 2000]Mech Dev. 2000 Mar 1; 91(1-2):421-6.
[Mech Dev. 2000]Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2001 Feb; 121(2):146-55.
[Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2001]Mol Cell Biol. 2003 Oct; 23(20):7243-55.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2003]Biochem J. 2000 Jun 1; 348 Pt 2():439-46.
[Biochem J. 2000]Trends Cell Biol. 2004 May; 14(5):250-60.
[Trends Cell Biol. 2004]Gene Expr Patterns. 2002 Dec; 2(3-4):219-22.
[Gene Expr Patterns. 2002]Endocr Rev. 1997 Jun; 18(3):361-77.
[Endocr Rev. 1997]Genetics. 1999 Apr; 151(4):1531-45.
[Genetics. 1999]Mol Cell Biol. 1994 Apr; 14(4):2786-97.
[Mol Cell Biol. 1994]Genome Res. 2003 Mar; 13(3):382-90.
[Genome Res. 2003]Nat Genet. 1998 Apr; 18(4):345-9.
[Nat Genet. 1998]Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1999 Dec; 11(6):699-704.
[Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1999]Trends Cell Biol. 2004 May; 14(5):250-60.
[Trends Cell Biol. 2004]Mech Dev. 2000 Mar 1; 91(1-2):421-6.
[Mech Dev. 2000]Development. 2003 May; 130(10):2107-16.
[Development. 2003]Dev Biol. 2003 Aug 1; 260(1):226-44.
[Dev Biol. 2003]Genetics. 1999 Apr; 151(4):1531-45.
[Genetics. 1999]Trends Genet. 2004 Oct; 20(10):481-90.
[Trends Genet. 2004]Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1999 Dec; 11(6):699-704.
[Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1999]Biochem Soc Trans. 2000 Feb; 28(2):259-64.
[Biochem Soc Trans. 2000]Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1998 Dec; 8(6):694-700.
[Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1998]Genome Res. 2001 May; 11(5):771-80.
[Genome Res. 2001]Genomics. 1996 Jul 1; 35(1):101-8.
[Genomics. 1996]Hereditas. 1997; 127(1-2):59-65.
[Hereditas. 1997]Cell. 1994 Jul 29; 78(2):191-201.
[Cell. 1994]Evol Dev. 2000 Sep-Oct; 2(5):284-93.
[Evol Dev. 2000]Curr Biol. 2000 Sep 7; 10(17):1059-62.
[Curr Biol. 2000]Science. 1998 Nov 27; 282(5394):1711-4.
[Science. 1998]Mech Dev. 1999 Dec; 89(1-2):185-8.
[Mech Dev. 1999]Mech Dev. 2000 Mar 1; 91(1-2):421-6.
[Mech Dev. 2000]Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996 Sep 4; 226(1):261-7.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996]J Biochem. 1995 Aug; 118(2):380-9.
[J Biochem. 1995]