• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of jcinvestThe Journal of Clinical InvestigationCurrent IssueArchiveSubscriptionAbout the Journal
J Clin Invest. Sep 1, 2005; 115(9): 2489–2498.
Published online Aug 11, 2005. doi:  10.1172/JCI25614
PMCID: PMC1184040

Schoenheimer effect explained – feedback regulation of cholesterol synthesis in mice mediated by Insig proteins


End-product feedback inhibition of cholesterol synthesis was first demonstrated in living animals by Schoenheimer 72 years ago. Current studies define Insig proteins as essential elements of this feedback system in mouse liver. In cultured cells, Insig proteins are required for sterol-mediated inhibition of the processing of sterol regulatory element–binding proteins (SREBPs) to their nuclear forms. We produced mice with germline disruption of the Insig2 gene and Cre-mediated disruption of the Insig1 gene in liver. On a chow diet, these double-knockout mice overaccumulated cholesterol and triglycerides in liver. Despite this accumulation, levels of nuclear SREBPs and mRNAs for SREBP target genes in lipogenic pathways were not reduced. Whereas cholesterol feeding reduced nuclear SREBPs and lipogenic mRNAs in wild-type mice, this feedback response was severely blunted in the double-knockout mice, and synthesis of cholesterol and fatty acids was not repressed. The amount of HMG-CoA reductase protein was elevated out of proportion to the mRNA in the double-knockout mice, apparently owing to the failure of cholesterol to accelerate degradation of the enzyme. These studies indicate that the essential elements of the regulatory pathway for lipid synthesis function in liver as they do in cultured cells.


In 1933, Rudolph Schoenheimer, a physician then working in Germany, performed a metabolic balance study in mice and observed that the animals synthesized large amounts of cholesterol when fed a low-cholesterol diet and that synthesis stopped when the mice were fed cholesterol (1). This experiment provided the first evidence for end-product feedback regulation of a biosynthetic pathway, a discovery that predated by 2 decades the demonstration of end-product feedback inhibition in bacteria and prefigured much of modern molecular biology and metabolic science. With the advent of radioisotopes, Gordon Gould showed in the early 1950s that the cholesterol-feedback system operated in the liver of living animals (2, 3).

In subsequent years many details of cholesterol feedback were elucidated, including the identification of HMG-CoA reductase as a highly regulated rate-controlling reaction (reviewed in ref. 4). However, the fundamental molecular mechanism by which liver cells sense cholesterol and use that information to regulate cholesterol production remained obscure until recent studies were conducted in cultured mammalian cells.

The cultured cell studies showed that transcription of HMG-CoA reductase and other genes in the cholesterol biosynthetic pathway is dependent upon sterol regulatory element–binding proteins (SREBPs), a family of sterol-regulated, membrane-bound transcription factors (5). The SREBPs begin life as integral proteins of the ER. To gain access to nuclear DNA, the SREBPs must move in vesicles to the Golgi complex, where they are processed proteolytically (6, 7). ER-to-Golgi complex transport is mediated by Scap, a polytopic ER membrane protein that forms complexes with newly synthesized SREBPs. Scap acts as a nucleation site for COPII proteins, which mediate the incorporation of the Scap-SREBP complex into COPII-coated vesicles that move to the Golgi complex (8, 9).

In cultured cells, feedback inhibition of cholesterol synthesis is mediated by Insigs, polytopic ER membrane proteins that serve as anchors (10, 11). When the cholesterol content of ER membranes rises, cholesterol binds to a membrane-embedded region of Scap designated the sterol-sensing domain (12), thereby causing a conformational change (13, 14). The altered Scap binds to Insigs, thus preventing exit of the Scap-SREBP complex from the ER. As a result, the nuclear content of processed SREBPs declines, the cholesterol biosynthetic genes are not transcribed actively, and cholesterol synthesis ceases. When cultured cells are depleted of cholesterol, Scap undocks from Insigs and the Scap-SREBP complex then moves to the Golgi complex for processing and activation of cholesterol synthesis.

Insigs have a second action in the feedback regulation of cholesterol synthesis, namely, they mediate the rapid proteolytic degradation of HMG-CoA reductase (15, 16). Like Scap, HMG-CoA reductase is synthesized on ER membranes. The catalytic domain of the enzyme is attached to the membrane by virtue of an NH2-terminal segment that contains 8 membrane-spanning helices (17, 18). Like Scap, the membrane-embedded portion of HMG-CoA reductase contains a sterol-sensing domain (19). When sterols accumulate in ER membranes, they trigger the binding of HMG-CoA reductase to Insigs, initiating a process by which HMG-CoA reductase is ubiquitinated and degraded (15, 16). When cells are depleted of sterols, HMG-CoA reductase has an extended lifetime and the amount of active enzyme increases; this contributes to an increase in cholesterol synthesis in sterol-depleted cells (20).

Two mammalian Insig genes have been identified, Insig1 and Insig2 (11). They encode highly similar proteins (59% identity). In cultured cells, the 2 Insig genes have redundant functions. Reduction of both Insig mRNAs, as achieved with RNA interference (14, 16) or by mutational inactivation in hamster cells (21), leads to an increase in nuclear SREBPs (nSREBPs). More important, nSREBPs fail to decline after sterol treatment. The reduction in both Insig1 and Insig2 causes the level of HMG-CoA reductase protein to be elevated to an even greater extent than the level of reductase mRNA, owing to a failure of sterols to stimulate reductase degradation. Mutant hamster cells that are deficient in Insig1 but not Insig2 show partial defects in regulation of reductase degradation and SREBP processing (22).

The regulatory system in mouse liver is more complicated because the 2 Insig genes are under reciprocal regulation (11). Expression of Insig1 in liver is dependent upon nSREBPs, especially 1 isoform, designated SREBP-1c. Transcription of the SREBP-1c gene is induced by insulin (23). Thus, Insig1 mRNA disappears during fasting when insulin levels are low and SREBP-1c is repressed. Conversely, Insig1 mRNA rises to high levels upon refeeding, when insulin rises and nSREBP-1c increases (24). In direct contrast, the Insig2 gene in liver is transcribed by a hepatocyte-specific promoter (Insig2a) that is repressed by insulin (24). Under fasting conditions, when Insig1 falls, Insig2 rises. Upon refeeding, the 2 proteins are switched: Insig2 disappears and is replaced by Insig1.

A regulatory role for Insig proteins in liver was inferred from experiments in transgenic mice that overexpress Insig1 (25). In these mice the content of nSREBPs was reduced, and the target lipogenic mRNAs were all decreased. nSREBPs and target mRNAs declined further in a supersensitive fashion in response to cholesterol feeding. These experiments demonstrated that Insig1 acts in liver when it is overexpressed, but they did not indicate whether Insigs play a role under normal conditions. In the current paper, we have addressed these questions by disrupting the genes for Insig1 and Insig2, together or separately, in livers of mice. The results indicate that Insigs are essential components of the cholesterol-feedback system that was defined by Schoenheimer and Gould.


Figure Figure1A1A shows the gene-targeting strategy for mouse Insig1. A neomycin resistance cassette (neo) flanked by loxP and frt sites was inserted into the 5′-flanking region of the Insig1 gene. An additional loxP site was inserted into the first intron. Cre-mediated recombination removes exon 1 of Insig1. Mice carrying the floxed Insig1 allele were bred to transgenic mice that express Cre recombinase driven from the interferon-responsive MX1 promoter (MX1-Cre) to derive mice homozygous for the floxed Insig1 allele and hemizygous for the MX1-Cre transgene (Insig1f/fMX1-Cre; f/f denotes flox/flox). When injected 4 times with a synthetic double-stranded ribonucleotide polyinosinic acid–polycytidylic acid (pIpC), these mice produced interferon, which activates the MX1 promoter, thereby producing the Cre recombinase in liver and other tissues (26). Figure Figure1B1B shows Southern blot analysis of NcoI-digested genomic DNA extracted from the livers of pIpC-treated mice of the indicated genotypes and probed with a 299-bp genomic fragment at the 5′ end of the Insig1 gene. In wild-type mice and mice hemizygous for the MX1-Cre transgene, a 9-kb band is observed that is unaffected by the expression of the Cre transgene. In Insig1f/f mice, a 3-kb band is observed which is markedly decreased in Insig1f/fMX1-Cre mice and is replaced by a 6-kb band that results from recombination between loxP sites. This recombination eliminates sequences encoding the first 119 of the 259 amino acids of Insig1.

Figure 1
Targeted disruption of Insig1 and Insig2 genes in mice. (A) Schematic of Insig1 gene-targeting strategy. Cre-mediated excision of the sequences between loxP sites deletes exon 1. The location of the probe used for Southern blot analysis is denoted by ...

Figure Figure1,1, C and D, shows the expression of Insig1 by Northern blot analysis of total RNA and by immunoblotting of membrane proteins prepared from the same livers as those represented in Figure Figure1B.1B. Levels of hepatic Insig1 mRNA and protein were identical in wild-type and MX1-Cre mice and were reduced by 20% in Insig1f/f mice, perhaps owing to transcriptional interference from the neo cassette. Insig1 mRNA and protein declined by more than 90% in Insig1f/fMX1-Cre mice injected with pIpC as compared with that in wild-type mice. In other studies using animals that were not injected with pIpC, the expression of Insig1 mRNA in Insig1f/fMX1-Cre was the same as in Insig1f/f mice (data not shown).

Figure Figure1E1E shows the strategy for germline targeting of mouse Insig2. Exons 2 and 3 of Insig2 were replaced by a neo cassette, which eliminated sequences encoding the first 123 of 225 amino acids of Insig2. Mating between Insig2+/– mice yielded Insig2+/+, Insig2+/–, and Insig2–/– mice at the expected 1:2:1 ratio. Figure Figure1F1F shows representative Southern blots of NcoI-digested genomic DNA extracted from the tails of Insig2+/+, Insig2+/–, and Insig2–/– littermates probed with a 505-bp genomic fragment containing exon 6 of the Insig2 gene. The expression of Insig2 mRNA and protein in these mice is shown in Figure Figure1,1, G and H, respectively. When the RNA was probed with a cDNA containing part of the 3′-untranslated region of Insig2, the result is an aberrant transcript in Insig2+/– and Insig2–/– mice, perhaps owing to a transcript initiating in exons 1a or 1b and splicing directly into exons 4, 5, or 6 (Figure (Figure1G).1G). In such a transcript, the first available inframe methionine is located in exon 5. If translated, this transcript would yield a peptide of only 23 amino acids. Levels of hepatic Insig2 protein, as detected by immunoblotting with antiserum raised against full-length mouse Insig2, were reduced by approximately 50% in Insig2+/– livers and were undetectable in Insig2–/– livers (Figure (Figure11H).

Mice carrying the floxed Insig1 allele were also bred to transgenic mice that express Cre recombinase driven from the adenovirus EIIA promoter (EIIA-Cre). EIIA-Cre mice express Cre in germ cells, which results in germline deletion of the floxed Insig1 allele. Insig1+/–Insig2+/– mice were mated to each other in an attempt to produce Insig1–/–Insig2–/– mice. When the surviving adults were genotyped, 0 of 6 expected Insig1–/–Insig2–/– mice were observed, and only 3 of 12 expected Insig1–/–Insig2+/– mice were observed (Table (Table11).

Table 1
Segregation of disrupted Insig1 and Insig2 alleles in mice

Further breeding experiments were conducted in which Insig1+/–Insig2–/– mice were interbred, and pregnant females were killed at 12.5 and 18.5 days post coitum (dpc). At 12.5 dpc, the observed ratio of Insig1+/+Insig2–/–, Insig1+/–Insig2–/–, and Insig1–/–Insig2–/– embryos was 46:81:41, which is consistent with the expected 1:2:1 ratio (Table (Table1).1). At 18.5 dpc, 82% of the expected Insig1–/–Insig2–/– embryos were observed. Further studies into the cause of the neonatal lethality in Insig1–/–Insig2–/– mice are ongoing and are beyond the scope of this work.

In order to study the metabolic effects of total Insig deficiency in adult livers, Insig1f/fMX1-Cre mice were bred with Insig2–/– mice. Mice of 4 genotypes were produced: Insig1f/f (designated control), Insig1f/fMX1-Cre (designated L-Insig1–/– to denote the conditional deficiency of Insig1 in liver when induced with pIpC), Insig1f/fInsig2–/– (hereafter designated Insig2–/–), and Insig1f/fInsig2–/–MX1-Cre (designated L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/–). For the studies described in Figures Figures226, all of the mice in each group were injected 4 times with pIpC and then studied between 7 and 14 days after the last injection.

Figure 2
Immunoblot (A) and lipid analysis (B) of livers from control and Insig-deficient mice. The mice used in this figure are the same as those compared in Table Table2.2. (A) Immunoblot analysis from nuclear extract and membrane fractions obtained ...
Figure 6
In vivo synthesis rates of sterols (A) and fatty acids (B) in livers and brains from control and L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– mice. Mice (20- to 24-week-old males; 5 or 6 per group) were treated with 4 intraperitoneal injections ...

When fed a chow diet ad libitum and sacrificed 14 days after the last pIpC injection, mice from all genotypes were indistinguishable by external appearance and body weight (Table (Table2).2). Plasma cholesterol was slightly elevated, and plasma triglycerides were slightly reduced in L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– mice (P < 0.05, 2-tailed Student’s t test). Levels of plasma insulin, glucose, and free fatty acids were similar among the 4 groups.

Table 2
Comparison of control, L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/–, L-Insig1–/–, and Insig2–/– mice

Figure Figure2A2A shows immunoblots of pooled hepatic membrane fractions and nuclear extracts from pIpC-treated mice of the 4 genotypes compared in Table Table2.2. Mice with single deficiencies of hepatic Insig1 or Insig2 did not compensate by increasing the expression of Insig2 or Insig1, respectively. Levels of hepatic Insig1 protein were dramatically reduced in L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– and L-Insig1–/– mice. Hepatic Insig2 protein was undetectable in L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– and Insig2–/– mice. Levels of the membrane-bound precursors of SREBP-1 and SREBP-2 (pSREBP-1 and -2) were largely unaffected by deficiency of one or both Insig proteins. A small increase in Scap protein was consistently observed in the livers of mice deficient in Insig1. nSREBP-1 levels were increased by 2-fold in L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– mice compared with those in control mice, while nSREBP-2 levels were unchanged. Hepatic HMG-CoA reductase protein levels were slightly elevated in Insig2–/– mice and were dramatically elevated in L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– mice.

Figure Figure2B2B shows liver cholesterol and triglyceride content in the mice compared in Table Table2.2. The hepatic content of total cholesterol and triglycerides was increased by 4- and 6-fold, respectively, in the L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– mice compared with the hepatic content in control mice on the same diet. In the double-knockout livers, the free cholesterol content rose by 1.4-fold, and the cholesteryl ester content rose by 15-fold (data not shown). Hepatic lipid levels were normal in mice of the other genotypes. These data indicate that loss of both Insigs is necessary in order to perturb lipid metabolism grossly in mouse liver. For this reason, in all subsequent studies we used L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– mice.

Table Table33 shows the relative expression of various mRNAs in livers from L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– mice studied in 3 different experiments. The values in control mice for each experiment were assigned as 1. The mean value for Insig1 mRNA was reduced by 95% compared with that of control mice, which reflects the direct action of the Cre recombinase. The Insig2 gene has 2 promoter/enhancer regions that give rise to 2 transcripts, denoted Insig2a and Insig2b (24). The expression of both transcripts was undetectable in L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– livers. The mean mRNA values for SREBP-1a, SREBP-2, and Scap were unaffected by Insig deficiency whereas a small increase in SREBP-1c expression (mean of 1.8-fold) was observed. The mRNAs of 5 SREBP target genes involved in fatty acid synthesis were increased by 2.6- to 7.7-fold, consistent with the increase in nSREBP-1 in L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– livers (see Figure Figure2A).2A). mRNAs of 4 SREBP targets involved in cholesterol synthesis were generally the same as those in the control mice except for a 2-fold increase in HMG-CoA reductase mRNA. When considered in light of the large increase in the cholesterol content of the Insig-deficient livers, these 4 mRNAs were all inappropriately elevated (see below). mRNAs for ABCG5, ABCG8, and lipoprotein lipase — 3 genes known to be stimulated by LXRα and LXRβ (27) — were increased in L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– livers by 3.0- to 5.3-fold. We attribute their increase to the activation of LXRs by the sterols (27) that accumulate in L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– livers. The mRNA for LXRα itself was unaltered.

Table 3
mRNAs in liver of L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– mice as compared with values in control mice

Figure Figure3A3A shows the gross appearance of the livers of control and L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– female mice fed a chow diet ad libitum 12 days after injection with pIpC. The liver of the L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– mouse is pale, owing to the accumulation of lipids. The livers from mice of the other 3 genotypes were normal in appearance (data not shown). When liver sections were stained with oil red O, a fat-specific dye, the increase in lipids in the L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– mice was dramatic (Figure (Figure33B).

Figure 3
Lipid accumulation in livers of L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– mice. Adult female mice were treated with 4 intraperitoneal injections of pIpC (300 μg/injection), and the livers were removed either 12 days (A and B) or 7 days ...

In cultured cells, the reduction of Insig expression creates a relative resistance to the effects of sterols in blocking SREBP processing (14) and accelerating HMG-CoA reductase degradation (21). A similar resistance was apparent in the livers of L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– mice. This resistance can be inferred from the observation that nSREBPs were still present and HMG-CoA reductase protein was increased in these livers despite the accumulation of cholesterol to levels that would have reduced these proteins in wild-type mice.

To enable direct comparison of cholesterol regulation in livers of control and L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– mice, the mice were fed diets containing varying amounts of cholesterol for 2.5 days, after which pSREBPs, nSREBPs, and HMG-CoA reductase were measured by immunoblotting (Figure (Figure4A).4A). Metabolic measurements in these mice are provided in Table Table4.4. When L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– mice consumed the unsupplemented chow diet, levels of nSREBP-1 were elevated by 2-fold, and levels of nSREBP-2 were unaltered. In control mice fed a 2% cholesterol diet, nSREBP-2 was reduced by 93% (Figure (Figure4,4, A and B). This decline was severely blunted in L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– mice, in whom nSREBP-2 decreased only 17%. When mice were fed high-cholesterol diets, nSREBP-1 decreased slightly in controls and even less in L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– mice. nSREBP-1 remained elevated in the knockout animals at all levels of dietary cholesterol.

Figure 4
Markedly elevated levels of nSREBPs and HMG-CoA reductase in the livers of Insig-deficient mice fed high-cholesterol diets. The mice used for this figure are the same as those compared in Table Table4.4. Each mouse was treated with 4 intraperitoneal ...
Table 4
Effects of dietary cholesterol feeding in control and L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– mice

Whereas HMG-CoA reductase protein levels were markedly reduced in control mice fed the 0.2% and 2.0% cholesterol diets, the elevated levels in L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– mice were not affected (Figure (Figure4A).4A). Insig1 and Insig2 protein levels were unaffected by cholesterol feeding in control mice and were undetectable in the knockout animals (Figure (Figure4A).4A). Hepatic cholesterol content was markedly elevated in the knockout mice, and it did not increase further with cholesterol feeding (Figure (Figure4C).4C). Hepatic cholesterol increased in the control mice, but it did not reach the high levels seen in the knockout animals.

To confirm that the elevated levels of HMG-CoA reductase protein in the L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– livers were associated with increases in HMG-CoA reductase activity, we assayed the enzyme activity in liver homogenates. Inasmuch as most HMG-CoA reductase molecules are phosphorylated and inactive (28, 29), we homogenized the livers in 2 different buffers. One of these contained sodium fluoride, which stops dephosphorylation during homogenization and is therefore believed to reveal true endogenous HMG-CoA reductase activity. The other contained sodium chloride, which permits dephosphorylation and therefore represents the maximal activity from the enzyme (28). In control mice, cholesterol feeding markedly reduced HMG-CoA reductase activity regardless of the homogenization buffer (Table (Table5).5). In the L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– mice on a chow diet, reductase activity was markedly elevated, and it failed to decline after cholesterol feeding. The relative results were the same when the livers were homogenized in fluoride or chloride.

Table 5
HMG-CoA reductase activity in livers of cholesterol-fed mice

Relevant hepatic mRNAs were quantified by real-time PCR in the livers of mice fed low-cholesterol chow (0.02%) or the high-cholesterol (2.0%) diet (Figure (Figure5).5). Liver expresses 2 major isoforms of SREBPs: SREBP-1c and SREBP-2 (30). Although their functions overlap, SREBP-1c preferentially activates the genes involved in fatty acid and triglyceride synthesis while SREBP-2 preferentially activates the genes required for cholesterol synthesis (31). mRNAs for both SREBP-1c and -2 are enhanced by nSREBPs themselves in a feed-forward activation loop and, in addition, SREBP-1c mRNA is induced by insulin and by agonists of LXRs (32). In control mice, SREBP-1c mRNA was induced 2-fold by high-cholesterol feeding, which we attribute to the activation of LXRs by oxysterols generated from dietary sterols (33). In the sterol-overloaded livers of L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– mice, SREBP-1c mRNA was elevated by 2-fold and did not rise further after cholesterol feeding. SREBP-2 mRNA was suppressed by 46% in control mice fed the high-cholesterol diet; this decline was blunted in L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– mice. The decline of SREBP-2 mRNA in control mice is likely due to the loss of feed-forward activation as SREBP processing is reduced by the increase in hepatic cholesterol. In the double-knockout mice, the loss of Insigs prevents cholesterol from blocking SREBP processing, and thus the SREBP-2 mRNA does not decline. Consistent with this hypothesis, SREBP-2 target mRNAs for genes involved in cholesterol synthesis (HMG-CoA reductase, HMG-CoA synthase, farnesyl diphosphate [FDP] synthase, and squalene synthase) declined by more than 75% when control mice were fed the high-cholesterol diet. Levels of these mRNAs were elevated by 1.7- to 2.6-fold in L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– mice. They declined partially when the animals were fed the high-cholesterol diet, but remained greater than or equal to levels in control mice fed the low-cholesterol diet.

Figure 5
Relative amounts of various mRNAs in livers from control and L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– mice fed with diets containing a low (L) or high (H) amount of cholesterol (0.02% or 2.0% cholesterol, respectively). The ...

Levels of mRNAs for genes involved in fatty acid and triglyceride synthesis were elevated 2.5- to 5.5-fold in the L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– mice. These mRNA levels declined only slightly with cholesterol feeding in both the control and the knockout animals (Figure (Figure5).5). mRNAs for the LXR-responsive genes ABCG5 and ABCG8 were induced by high-cholesterol feeding in control mice. These mRNAs were elevated in L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– mice, and they did not increase with cholesterol feeding, which is consistent with the hypothesis that hepatic LXRs were already activated by sterols in the livers of the L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– mice.

To test the effect of Insig deficiency on hepatic lipid synthesis, male control and L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– mice were fed diets containing 0.02% (low) or 1.5% (high) cholesterol for 2.5 days, after which in vivo lipid synthesis was determined by measurement of the incorporation of intraperitoneally injected 3H-labeled water into digitonin-precipitable sterols and fatty acids (Figure (Figure6).6). High-cholesterol feeding reduced hepatic sterol synthesis by 93% in control mice. Hepatic sterol synthesis in L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– mice was elevated by 5-fold, and it did not decline with the high-cholesterol diet. Hepatic fatty acid synthesis was 3-fold higher in L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– mice fed the low-cholesterol diet compared with that in control mice. The synthesis of sterols and fatty acids in brain, a tissue with a very low level of interferon-induced MX1-Cre recombination (26), was normal in L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– mice.


The current studies in this paper define Insigs as essential components of the cholesterol feedback response that Schoenheimer discovered in living mice more than 70 years ago (1). Considered together with previous experiments in mouse liver, our data indicate that the entire pathway for SREBP processing functions in this organ and that this pathway is responsible for the synthesis of cholesterol as well as the feedback suppression of synthesis when cholesterol is consumed in the diet.

The first indication that SREBPs control cholesterol synthesis in liver came from the production of transgenic mice expressing truncated versions of SREBPs that lack a membrane-spanning segment and enter the nucleus without a requirement for processing (32). Overexpression of nSREBP-1a or nSREBP-2 markedly increased cholesterol synthesis in liver and led to massive intrahepatic accumulation of cholesterol (34, 35). Overexpression of nSREBP-1c was much less potent in this regard (36). To show that endogenous levels of SREBPs are sufficient for cholesterol overproduction, transgenic mice were created that express a mutant form of Scap that escorts SREBPs normally, but cannot bind to Insigs (10, 37). The livers of these mice also overproduced cholesterol and were resistant to feedback inhibition by dietary cholesterol. Cre-mediated elimination of Scap in the liver (38) or of one of the SREBP-processing proteases (39) reduced the amount of nSREBPs and led to a severe reduction in cholesterol synthesis, indicating that nSREBPs are required for transcription of the genes encoding enzymes of the cholesterol biosynthetic pathway in liver.

Although elimination of Insig1 alone had a minor effect on nSREBPs and its target mRNAs, full derepression of cholesterol synthesis required the elimination of both Insig1 and Insig2. These data indicate that Insig2 plays an important role in liver. Although Insigs are required in sterol-mediated feedback inhibition of the processing of SREBP-1 and SREBP-2, the 2 SREBPs show a differential sensitivity to cholesterol. As shown in Figure Figure4,4, A and B, cholesterol feeding of wild-type mice nearly eliminated nSREBP-2, but it reduced nSREBP-1 by only about 50%. We know that both of these responses were mediated by Insigs since they did not occur in the L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– mice. In wild-type mice, the partial resistance of SREBP-1 may be due in part to an increase in pSREBP-1c, owing to an increase in SREBP-1c mRNA (Figure (Figure5),5), which is produced by sterol-mediated activation of LXRs (31). However, it seems unlikely that the increase in pSREBP-1c is solely responsible for this resistance. Inhibition of SREBP processing is mediated by the binding of the Scap-SREBP complex to Insigs. The possibility therefore exists that the Scap-SREBP-1 complex in liver may have a lower affinity for Insigs than does the Scap-SREBP-2 complex. These possibilities and others are open to study now that the role of Insigs in cholesterol feedback has been demonstrated in liver.


Materials and general methods.

Blood was drawn from the retro-orbital sinus; plasma was separated immediately and stored at –70°C. Plasma glucose was measured with a Glucometer (994-90902; Bayer). Concentrations of plasma and liver cholesterol and triglycerides and of plasma free fatty acids and insulin were measured as described (25). pIpC was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (P1530) and Amersham Biosciences (27–4729–01).

Generation of Insig knockout mice.

The Insig1 gene was conditionally disrupted by the insertion of a loxP, frt-flanked pgkneopA cassette (40) 2.3-kb upstream of the initiator ATG codon of exon 1 of Insig1 and the insertion of a downstream loxP site within intron 1. Regions of homology were generated by PCR using SM-1 ES cell genomic DNA as a template and were then inserted into a targeting vector, pJB1 (kindly provided by Joachim Herz, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center). Cre-mediated recombination removed exon 1, which encodes amino acids 1–119.

The Insig2 gene was disrupted by replacement of exons 2 and 3 with a polIIsneopA cassette (41) to remove sequences that encode amino acids 1–123. Regions of homology were generated by PCR using SM-1 ES cell genomic DNA as a template and inserted into the targeting vector pGEM3Zf(+) containing a polIIsneopA cassette. The integrity of all constructs was confirmed by restriction analysis and DNA sequencing.

SM-1 ES cells, derived from 129S6/SvEv blastocysts, were cultured on leukemia inhibitory factor-producing STO feeder cells and transfected with linearized targeting vectors as described previously (41, 42). ES cell clones that had undergone homologous recombination as determined by PCR and Southern blotting were isolated and injected into C57BL/6J blastocysts. Chimeric males with more than 50% agouti coat color were crossed to C57BL/6NCrl females. From single ES cell lines, 7 chimeric males produced offspring that carried a single copy of the targeted Insig1 allele (referred to as Insig1+/f), and 6 chimeric males produced offspring that carried a single copy of the disrupted Insig2 allele (referred to as Insig2+/_).

To generate mice with inducible disruption of the floxed Insig1 allele, Insig1+/f mice were bred to MX1-Cre transgenic mice to generate Insig1f/fMX1-Cre (L-Insig1–/–) mice (43). Littermates of L-Insig1–/– mice lacking the Cre transgene were used as control mice. L-Insig1–/– mice were bred to Insig2–/– mice to generate Insig1f/fInsig2−/−MX1-Cre (L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/–) mice. Littermates of L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– mice lacking the Cre transgene are referred to as Insig2–/– mice. Disruption of Insig1 in the liver was induced by intraperitoneal injection of pIpC, which induces interferon, which in turn induces the Cre recombinase driven by the MX1 promoter (26). For the studies described here, each mouse (control, L-Insig1–/–, Insig2–/–, or L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/–) received 4 intraperitoneal injections of 300 μl of a 1 mg/ml solution of pIpC in water or PBS administered every 48 hours. Mice were analyzed between 7 and 14 days after the final pIpC injection. Disruption of the floxed Insig1 allele in all mice was confirmed by either Southern blot analysis of NcoI-digested genomic DNA or by measurement of Insig1 mRNA by quantitative real-time PCR of total RNA from livers of pIpC-treated mice. L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– mice demonstrating low levels of disruption of the floxed Insig1 allele were excluded from further analysis (see legend to Table Table4).4). During the course of these studies, we observed batch-to-batch variation in the potency of pIpC, and, in general, higher disruption was seen when the pIpC was administered in PBS rather than water.

To generate mice with disruption of the floxed Insig1 allele in the whole animal, Insig1+/f mice were bred to EIIa-Cre transgenic mice (strain FVB/N/Tg(EIIa-cre)C5379Lmgd/J, 003314; Jackson Laboratory). Cre recombinase driven by the adenovirus EIIA promoter is active in the tissues of the developing animal, including the germ cells (44). Mice carrying a single copy of the disrupted Insig1 allele in all tissues (referred to as Insig1+/– mice) were bred to Insig2+/– mice. Genotypes of the resultant offspring are described in Table Table11.

To genotype knockout animals, genomic DNA was prepared from adult tail or embryonic tissue using a direct lysis kit from Viagen Biotech (102-T) and used for PCR with the following primers: Insig1: 5′ primer-1, 5′-CTCAAGAGGCAGTTGCCAGGGGACAGACTT-3′; 5′ primer-2, 5′-GCCACATAGGCTTCTGCATAGAAACACACT-3′; and 3′ primer (common), 5′-CACTTGACAAATGGTTATCAACGCTGTACA-3′. Insig1 genotyping yielded PCR products of 296, 393, and 567 bp from the wild-type, floxed, and disrupted alleles, respectively. Insig2: 5′ primer-1, 5′-CCTGCATTGACAGGCATCTAGGAGAACCTC-3′; 5′ primer-2, 5′-GATTGGGAAGACAATAGCAGGCATGC-3′; and 3′ primer (common), 5′-AGGGTACTTCTTGGTGCTGACTATAACCAA-3′. Insig2 genotyping yielded PCR products of 477 and 357 bp from the wild-type and disrupted alleles, respectively.

All mice were housed in colony cages with 12-hour light/12-hour dark cycles and fed Teklad Mouse/Rat Diet 7002 from Harlan Teklad Global Diets. Unless otherwise stated, mice were fed a chow diet ad libitum, and tissues were collected at the end of the dark phase. All animal experiments were performed with the approval of the Institutional Animal Care and Research Advisory Committee at University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas.

Diet studies.

For the cholesterol-feeding studies, mice were fed for 2.5 days with a chow diet (0.02% cholesterol) or chow diet containing cholesterol at a final concentration (w/w) of 0.2%, 1.5%, or 2.0%. High-cholesterol diets were prepared by grinding solid cholesterol (101380; MP Biomedicals) directly into the powdered chow diet (Mouse/Rat Diet 7001; Harlan Teklad Global Diets) with a mortar and pestle.

Quantitative real-time PCR and Northern blot analysis.

Total RNA was prepared from mouse tissues using an RNA STAT-60 kit (TEL-TEST “B”). Equal amounts of RNA from 4 to 6 mice were pooled and subjected to quantitative real-time PCR as previously described (25). apoB mRNA was used as the invariant control. The primers for real-time PCR have been previously described (24, 39, 42).

For Northern blot analysis, pooled total RNA was subjected to electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel and transferred to Hybond XL membranes (RPN303S; Amersham Biosciences). cDNA probe preparation and hybridization were carried out as previously described (45). The Insig1 probe consisted of the full-length mouse Insig1 open-reading frame (25). Probes for Insig2 and cyclophilin have previously been described (11, 46).

Immunoblot analyses of liver nuclear extracts and membrane fractions.

To prepare nuclear and membrane fractions for immunoblot analyses, aliquots of frozen liver (~100 mg) were homogenized in 1 ml buffer (20-mM Tris-chloride at pH 7.4, 2-mM MgCl2, 0.25-M sucrose, 10-mM sodium EDTA, and 10-mM sodium EGTA) supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail consisting of 5-mM dithiothreitol, 0.1-mM leupeptin, 1-mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.5-mM Pefabloc, 5-μg/ml pepstatin A, 25-μg/ml N-acetyl-leu-leu-norleucinal, 10-μg/ml aprotinin, and the equivalent of 0.1 tablet of Complete Mini Inhibitor Cocktail (11836170001; Roche Diagnostics Corp.). The liver homogenate was centrifuged at 1000 g for 5 min at 4°C. The supernatant was removed and used to prepare a membrane fraction as previously described (25). To prepare nuclear extracts, the pellet was washed in 2 ml of homogenization buffer and collected by centrifugation at 1000 g for 5 minutes at 4°C. The nuclear pellet was resuspended in 0.3 ml of buffer (20-mM HEPES-NaOH at pH7.6, 2.5% glycerol, 0.42-M NaCl, 1.5-mM MgCl2, 1-mM sodium EDTA, 1-mM sodium EGTA, and the equivalent of 0.03 protease inhibitor tablet). The suspension was rotated at 4°C for 1 hour and centrifuged at 1 × 105 g for 30 minutes at 4°C. The supernatant from this spin was designated the nuclear extract. After aliquots of the nuclear extract and membrane fraction were removed for measuring protein concentration with the BCA Kit (Pierce Biotechnology Inc.), the remainder of each sample was mixed with 4× SDS loading buffer (12% (w/v) SDS, 0.02% bromophenol blue, 30% glycerol, 0.15-M Tris-chloride at pH 6.8, and 6% β-mercaptoethanol). Equal amounts of protein from the livers of 4 to 6 mice were then pooled, and an aliquot of the pooled sample (45 μg) was subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analysis (25, 47).

Rabbit polyclonal antibodies that detect mouse SREBP-1, SREBP-2, Insig1, Insig2, HMG-CoA reductase, and Scap were described previously (25, 29, 48, 49). These antibodies were diluted in 5% bovine serum albumin (A7906; Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS-0.05% Tween-20 (P3563; Sigma-Aldrich) and used at the indicated concentrations: SREBP-1 (IgG fraction, 5-μg/ml), SREBP-2 (IgG, 2.9-μg/ml), Insig1 (1:1000 dilution of serum), Insig2 (1:1000 dilution of serum), HMG-CoA reductase (IgG, 3.4-μg/ml), and Scap (IgG, 3.5-μg/ml). Immunoblots of cAMP-responsive element-binding protein (CREB) and transferrin receptor were used as loading controls for the nuclear extract and membrane fractions, respectively. Anti-CREB (13-6800; Zymed Laboratories Inc.) and antitransferrin receptor antibodies were each used at 0.5-μg/ml (35-0900; Zymed Laboratories Inc.).

Cholesterol and fatty acid synthesis in vivo.

Rates of cholesterol and fatty acid synthesis were measured in control and L-Insig1–/–Insig2–/– mice using 3H-labeled water as previously described (34). The mice were fed ad libitum with chow diets containing 0.02% (low) or 1.5% (high) cholesterol for 2.5 days prior to study. The rates of cholesterol and fatty acid synthesis were calculated as μmoles of 3H-labeled water incorporated into fatty acids or digitonin-precipitable sterols per hour per gram of tissue.

Assay of HMG-CoA reductase activity.

Mice were sacrificed at the end of the dark phase, the livers were immediately removed, and 2 equal pieces of liver (~250 mg/piece) from each mouse were individually homogenized on ice with 10 strokes of a loose Dounce pestle followed by 5 strokes of a tight pestle in 1.5 ml of solution containing 0.3-M sucrose, 10-mM sodium EDTA at pH 7.4, 10-mM β-mercaptoethanol, and either 50-mM NaF or 50-mM NaCl. Homogenates from 5 mice in each group were then pooled and centrifuged for 15 minutes at 12,000 g at 4°C, and the supernatant fraction was again centrifuged for 15 minutes at 12,000 g. The resulting supernatant was centrifuged for 60 minutes at 1 × 105 g, and the resulting microsomal pellet was frozen at –80°C. Before assay of HMG-CoA reductase activity, each pellet was resuspended in 2 ml of assay buffer (20-mM imidazole at pH 7.4, 5-mM dithiothreitol, and either 50-mM NaF or 50 mM-NaCl), and aliquots were removed for protein quantification and enzyme assay as previously described (50). Each assay was carried out for 30 minutes at 37°C in the presence of 87 μM DL[3-14C]HMG-CoA (22,051 dpm/nmol). The amount of [14C]mevalonate formed was quantified by thin-layer chromatography. Reductase activity is expressed as the picomoles of [14C]mevalonate formed per minute per mg of microsomal protein.


Statistical analyses were performed using the Fisher exact test (1-tailed) or the Student’s t test (2-tailed) as described in Table legends.


We thank Monica Mendoza, Isis DeSoto, Richard Gibson, and Liz Lummus for invaluable help with animal studies; Scott Clark, Emily Brown, Deborah Morgan, and Rachael Salas for excellent technical assistance; and Jeff Cormier for DNA sequencing and help with RT-PCR. This research was supported by grants from the NIH (HL-20948), the Perot Family Foundation, and the Moss Heart Foundation.


Nonstandard abbreviations used: CREB, cAMP-responsive element-binding protein; dpc, day(s) post coitum; FDP, farnesyl diphosphate; f/f, flox/flox; L-Insig1–/–, conditional deficiency of Insig1 in liver; nSREBP, nuclear form of SREBP; pIpC, polyinosinic acid–polycytidylic acid; pSREBP, precursor of SREBP; SREBP, sterol regulatory element–binding protein.

Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.


1. Schoenheimer R, Breusch F. Synthesis and destruction of cholesterol in the organism. J. Biol. Chem. 1933;103:439–448.
2. Gould RG. Lipid metabolism and atherosclerosis. Am. J. Med. 1951;11:209–227. [PubMed]
3. Gould RG, Taylor CB, Hagerman JS, Warner I, Campbell DJ. Cholesterol metabolism. I. Effect of dietary cholesterol on the synthesis of cholesterol in dog tissue in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 1953;201:519–523. [PubMed]
4. Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Multivalent feedback regulation of HMG CoA reductase, a control mechanism coordinating isoprenoid synthesis and cell growth. J. Lipid Res. 1980;21:505–517. [PubMed]
5. Brown MS, Goldstein JL. The SREBP pathway: regulation of cholesterol metabolism by proteolysis of a membrane-bound transcription factor [review] Cell. 1997;89:331–340. [PubMed]
6. Nohturfft A, DeBose-Boyd RA, Scheek S, Goldstein JL, Brown MS. Sterols regulate cycling of SREBP cleavage-activating protein (SCAP) between endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999;96:11235–11240. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
7. Nohturfft A, Yabe D, Goldstein JL, Brown MS, Espenshade PJ. Regulated step in cholesterol feedback localized to budding of SCAP from ER membranes. Cell. 2000;102:315–323. [PubMed]
8. Espenshade PJ, Li W-P, Yabe D. Sterols block binding of COPII proteins to SCAP, thereby controlling SCAP sorting in ER. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2002;99:11694–11699. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
9. Sun L-P, Li L, Goldstein JL, Brown MS. Insig required for sterol-mediated inhibition of Scap/SREBP binding to COPII proteins in vitro. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:26483–26490. [PubMed]
10. Yang T, et al. Crucial step in cholesterol homeostasis: sterols promote binding of SCAP to INSIG-1, a membrane protein that facilitates retention of SREBPs in ER. Cell. 2002;110:489–500. [PubMed]
11. Yabe D, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Insig-2, a second endoplasmic reticulum protein that binds SCAP and blocks export of sterol regulatory element-binding proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2002;99:12753–12758. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
12. Radhakrishnan A, Sun L-P, Kwon HJ, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Direct binding of cholesterol to the purified membrane region of SCAP: mechanism for a sterol-sensing domain. Mol. Cell. 2004;15:259–268. [PubMed]
13. Brown AJ, Sun L, Feramisco JD, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Cholesterol addition to ER membranes alters conformation of SCAP, the SREBP escort protein that regulates cholesterol metabolism. Mol. Cell. 2002;10:237–245. [PubMed]
14. Adams CM, et al. Cholesterol and 25-hydroxycholesterol inhibit activation of SREBPs by different mechanisms, both involving SCAP and insigs. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:52772–52780. [PubMed]
15. Sever N, Yang T, Brown MS, Goldstein JL, DeBose-Boyd RA. Accelerated degradation of HMG CoA reductase mediated by binding of Insig-1 to its sterol-sensing domain. Mol. Cell. 2003;11:25–33. [PubMed]
16. Sever N, et al. Insig-dependent ubiquitination and degradation of mammalian 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase stimulated by sterols and geranylgeraniol. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:52479–52490. [PubMed]
17. Gil G, Faust JR, Chin DJ, Goldstein JL, Brown MS. Membrane-bound domain of HMG CoA reductase is required for sterol-enhanced degradation of the enzyme. Cell. 1985;41:249–258. [PubMed]
18. Roitelman J, Olender EH, Bar-Nun S, Dunn WA, Jr, Simoni RD. Immunological evidence for eight spans in the membrane domain of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase: implications for enzyme degradation in the endoplasmic reticulum. J. Cell Biol. 1992;117:959–973. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
19. Brown MS, Goldstein JL. A proteolytic pathway that controls the cholesterol content of membranes, cells, and blood. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999;96:11041–11048. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
20. Nakanishi M, Goldstein JL, Brown MS. Multivalent control of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase: mevalonate-derived product inhibits translation of mRNA and accelerates degradation of enzyme. J. Biol. Chem. 1988;263:8929–8937. [PubMed]
21. Lee PCW, Sever N, DeBose-Boyd RA. Isolation of sterol-resistant Chinese hamster ovary cells with genetic deficiencies in both Insig-1 and Insig-2. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:25242–25249. [PubMed]
22. Sever N, Lee PCW, Song B-L, Rawson RB, DeBose-Boyd RA. Isolation of mutant cells lacking Insig-1 through selection with SR-12813, an agent that stimulates degradation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:43136–43147. [PubMed]
23. Chen G, Liang G, Ou J, Goldstein JL, Brown MS. Central role for liver X receptor in insulin-mediated activation of Srebp-1c transcription and stimulation of fatty acid synthesis in liver. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2004;101:11245–11250. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
24. Yabe D, Komuro R, Liang G, Goldstein JL, Brown MS. Liver-specific mRNA for Insig-2 down-regulated by insulin: Implications for fatty acid synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003;100:3155–3160. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
25. Engelking LJ, et al. Overexpression of Insig-1 in the livers of transgenic mice inhibits SREBP processing and reduces insulin-stimulated lipogenesis. J. Clin. Invest. 2004;113:1168–1175. doi:10.1172/JCI200420978. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
26. Kuhn R, Schwenk F, Aguet M, Rajewsky K. Inducible gene targeting in mice. Science. 1995;269:1427–1429. [PubMed]
27. Repa JJ, Mangelsdorf DJ. The liver X receptor gene team: potential new players in atherosclerosis [review] Nat. Med. 2002;8:1243–1248. [PubMed]
28. Brown MS, Brunschede GY, Goldstein JL. Inactivation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase in vitro: an adenine nucleotide-dependent reaction catalyzed by a factor in human fibroblasts. J. Biol. Chem. 1975;250:2502–2509. [PubMed]
29. Sato R, Goldstein JL, Brown MS. Replacement of serine-871 of hamster 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl CoA reductase prevents phosphorylation by AMP-activated kinase and blocks inhibition of sterol synthesis induced by ATP depletion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1993;90:9261–9265. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
30. Shimomura I, Shimano H, Horton JD, Goldstein JL, Brown MS. Differential expression of exons 1a and 1c in mRNAs for sterol regulatory element binding protein-1 in human and mouse organs and cultured cells. J. Clin. Invest. 1997;99:838–845. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
31. Repa JJ, et al. Regulation of mouse sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c gene (SREBP-1c) by oxysterol receptors, LXRα and LXRβ Genes Dev. 2000;14:2819–2830. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
32. Horton JD, Goldstein JL, Brown MS. SREBPs: activators of the complete program of cholesterol and fatty acid synthesis in the liver. J. Clin. Invest. 2002;109:1125–1131. doi:10.1172/JCI200215593. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
33. DeBose-Boyd RA, Ou J, Goldstein JL, Brown MS. Expression of sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1c (SREBP-1c) mRNA in rat hepatoma cells requires endogenous LXR ligands. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001;98:1477–1482. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
34. Shimano H, et al. Overproduction of cholesterol and fatty acids causes massive liver enlargement in transgenic mice expressing truncated SREBP-1a. J. Clin. Invest. 1996;98:1575–1584. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
35. Horton JD, et al. Activation of cholesterol synthesis in preference to fatty acid synthesis in liver and adipose tissue of transgenic mice overproducing sterol regulatory element-binding protein-2. J. Clin. Invest. 1998;101:2331–2339. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
36. Shimano H, et al. Isoform 1c of sterol regulatory element binding protein is less active than isoform 1a in livers of transgenic mice and in cultured cells. J. Clin. Invest. 1997;99:846–854. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
37. Korn BS, et al. Blunted feedback suppression of SREBP processing by dietary cholesterol in transgenic mice expressing sterol-resistant SCAP(D443N) J. Clin. Invest. 1998;102:2050–2060. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
38. Matsuda M, et al. SREBP cleavage-activating protein (SCAP) is required for increased lipid synthesis in liver induced by cholesterol deprivation and insulin elevation. Genes Dev. 2001;15:1206–1216. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
39. Yang J, et al. Decreased lipid synthesis in livers of mice with disrupted Site-1 protease gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001;98:13607–13612. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
40. Soriano P, Montgomery C, Geske R, Bradley A. Targeted disruption of the c-src proto-oncogene leads to osteopetrosis in mice. Cell. 1991;64:693–702. [PubMed]
41. Ishibashi S, et al. Hypercholesterolemia in LDL receptor knockout mice and its reversal by adenovirus-mediated gene delivery. J. Clin. Invest. 1993;92:883–893. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
42. Liang G, et al. Diminished hepatic response to fasting/refeeding and liver X receptor agonists in mice with selective deficiency of sterol regulatory element-binding protein-1c. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:9520–9528. [PubMed]
43. Rohlmann A, Gotthardt M, Hammer RE, Herz J. Inducible inactivation of hepatic LRP gene by cre-mediated recombination confirms role of LRP in clearance of chylomicron remnants. J. Clin. Invest. 1998;101:689–695. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
44. Lakso M, et al. Efficient in vivo manipulation of mouse genomic sequences at the zygote stage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1996;93:5860–5865. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
45. Shimomura I, et al. Insulin resistance and diabetes mellitus in transgenic mice expressing nuclear SREBP-1c in adipose tissue: model for congenital generalized lipodystrophy. Genes Dev. 1998;12:3182–3194. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
46. Luong A, Hannah VC, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Molecular characterization of human acetyl CoA synthetase, an enzyme regulated by SREBPs. J. Biol. Chem. 2000;275:26458–26466. [PubMed]
47. Shimomura I, et al. Cholesterol feeding reduces nuclear forms of sterol regulatory element binding proteins in hamster liver. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1997;94:12354–12359. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
48. Shimano H, et al. Elevated levels of SREBP-2 and cholesterol synthesis in livers of mice homozygous for a targeted disruption of the SREBP-1 gene. J. Clin. Invest. 1997;100:2115–2124. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
49. Sakai J, et al. Identification of complexes between the COOH-terminal domains of sterol regulatory element binding proteins (SREBPs) and SREBP cleavage-activating protein (SCAP) J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272:20213–20221. [PubMed]
50. Kita T, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Feedback regulation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase in livers of mice treated with mevinolin, a competitive inhibitor of the reductase. J. Clin. Invest. 1980;66:1094–1100. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from The Journal of Clinical Investigation are provided here courtesy of American Society for Clinical Investigation
PubReader format: click here to try


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...


  • Compound
    PubChem Compound links
  • Gene
    Gene links
  • Gene (nucleotide)
    Gene (nucleotide)
    Records in Gene identified from shared sequence links
  • GEO Profiles
    GEO Profiles
    Related GEO records
  • HomoloGene
    HomoloGene links
  • MedGen
    Related information in MedGen
  • Nucleotide
    Published Nucleotide sequences
  • Pathways + GO
    Pathways + GO
    Pathways, annotations and biological systems (BioSystems) that cite the current article.
  • Protein
    Published protein sequences
  • PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles
  • Substance
    PubChem Substance links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...