Logo of plosgenPLoS GeneticsSubmit to PLoSGet E-mail AlertsContact UsPublic Library of Science (PLoS)View this Article
PLoS Genet. Jul 2005; 1(1): e17.
Published online Jul 25, 2005. doi:  10.1371/journal.pgen.0010017
PMCID: PMC1183531

New Genes Tied to Endocrine, Metabolic, and Dietary Regulation of Lifespan from a Caenorhabditis elegans Genomic RNAi Screen

Stuart Kim, Editor

Abstract

Most of our knowledge about the regulation of aging comes from mutants originally isolated for other phenotypes. To ask whether our current view of aging has been affected by selection bias, and to deepen our understanding of known longevity pathways, we screened a genomic Caenorhabditis elegans RNAi library for clones that extend lifespan. We identified 23 new longevity genes affecting signal transduction, the stress response, gene expression, and metabolism and assigned these genes to specific longevity pathways. Our most important findings are (i) that dietary restriction extends C. elegans' lifespan by down-regulating expression of key genes, including a gene required for methylation of many macromolecules, (ii) that integrin signaling is likely to play a general, evolutionarily conserved role in lifespan regulation, and (iii) that specific lipophilic hormones may influence lifespan in a DAF-16/FOXO-dependent fashion. Surprisingly, of the new genes that have conserved sequence domains, only one could not be associated with a known longevity pathway. Thus, our current view of the genetics of aging has probably not been distorted substantially by selection bias.

Synopsis

Lifespan in C. elegans is influenced by several genetic pathways and processes; a great deal of the information about this regulation of aging comes from genetic mutants originally identified because of other phenotypes. Therefore, to ask whether the current view of the genetics of aging has been significantly affected by selection bias, and to deepen the understanding of known longevity pathways, Hansen et al. screened a genome-wide RNAi library for bacterial clones that extend lifespan when fed to the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.

The investigators identified 23 new longevity genes affecting signal transduction, the stress response, gene expression, and metabolism and assigned these genes to specific longevity pathways. Their most important findings were (i) that dietary restriction extended C. elegans' lifespan by down-regulating expression of key genes, including a gene required for methylation of many macromolecules, (ii) that integrin signaling is likely to play a general, evolutionarily conserved role in lifespan regulation, and (iii) that specific lipophilic hormones may influence lifespan through the conserved insulin/IGF-1 signaling pathway.

Surprisingly, the authors found that of the new genes that have conserved sequence domains, only one could not be associated with a known longevity pathway. Thus, the current view of the genetics of aging has probably not been distorted substantially by selection bias. The authors expect the further study of these genes to provide valuable information about the mechanisms of aging, not only in C. elegans but also in higher organisms.

Introduction

A number of mutations and environmental conditions can extend the lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans. Although the underlying mechanisms are not fully understood, these perturbations appear to affect at least three distinct regulatory systems. The first is the insulin/IGF-1/FOXO system [1,56]. Inhibiting insulin/IGF-1 signaling can double the lifespan of the animal [54]. This lifespan extension requires the FOXO transcription factor DAF-16 [54], which, in turn, influences the expression of a diverse set of downstream antioxidant, metabolic, chaperone, antimicrobial, and novel genes that act in a cumulative way to influence lifespan [2,3]. The process of autophagy, which is increased in these long-lived mutants, may also make an important contribution [4]. In addition to DAF-16, the heat-shock transcription factor HSF-1 [57] as well as AMP kinase [8] are required for the lifespan extension of insulin/IGF-1 pathway mutants. The insulin/IGF-1/FOXO pathway acts exclusively during adulthood to influence aging [9] and appears to be regulated by sensory cues [10,11]. The reproductive system also affects insulin/IGF-1 signaling [12]. Killing the germline increases lifespan, and this lifespan increase requires the presence of the somatic gonad [12]. Germline ablation is thought to extend lifespan by activating a steroid hormone pathway and DAF-16/FOXO, and the somatic gonad appears to exert a counterbalancing influence on lifespan by affecting the activity of the insulin/IGF-1 pathway [12,13]. Finally, other regulators, such as the sir-2 deacetylase and Jun kinase, can also increase lifespan in a daf-16-dependent fashion [1417].

Dietary restriction (DR) (i.e., caloric restriction) also extends the lifespan of C. elegans. How this occurs is not clear. This lifespan extension does not require DAF-16 activity, suggesting that it is distinct from the insulin/IGF-1 signaling pathway [18,19] and the sir-2 histone deacetylase [14]. So far, only one gene, the ubiquinone biosynthetic gene clk-1, has been implicated in the response to DR in C. elegans [18].

Third, inhibition of mitochondrial respiration or ATP synthesis increases lifespan [2022]. Like the lifespan extension produced by DR, this lifespan extension is daf-16-independent. However, DR extends lifespan when it is initiated during adulthood, whereas respiratory-chain inhibition does not [21]. Thus, these two types of perturbations may act in different ways to increase lifespan.

In an effort to learn whether additional pathways might influence aging in C. elegans, and to identify additional genes in known pathways, we screened for enhanced longevity using a genomic RNA interference (RNAi) bacterial-feeding library that covers ~87% of the C. elegans open reading frames (total of 16,757) [23,24]. In our screen, we did not expect to identify all of the genes whose normal functions shorten lifespan. In previous Chromosome I RNAi screens, both the Ruvkun lab and our lab identified a number of mitochondrial RNAi clones that increased lifespan, but we identified only one gene in common [21,22] (legend in Table 1). Likewise, the Plasterk group found a high level of false negatives in each of their two RNAi screens [25]. In addition, we would not expect to find functionally redundant genes, genes with essential roles in other biological processes, or neuronal genes (since neurons are refractory to RNAi [24,26,27]). Nevertheless, since most biological pathways involve many genes, we hoped to identify genes that function in most or all of the pathways that influence lifespan.

Table 1
Mean Lifespan Extensions Observed in First Retests of fer-15(b26); fem-1(hc17) and of N2 Worms Grown on Long-Lived Candidate RNAi Clones

Results/Discussion

RNAi Screen for Clones That Increase Longevity

To identify longevity genes, we cultured animals on RNAi bacteria from the time of hatching and then looked for plates containing live individuals at a time when age-matched controls were all dead (see Materials and Methods). We estimate that we screened 70% of the open reading frames of C. elegans (Figure S1). Of the 94 candidate clones retested, 29 caused a highly significant lifespan extension, ranging from ~10–90%. (Five of these clones were published previously in Chromosome I/II screens [21,22], Table 1). These clones were tested a third time, and found to produce similar lifespan extensions (Tables 1 and S1).

Surprisingly, we recovered only one known longevity gene, the insulin/IGF-1-like receptor gene daf-2. To better understand this finding, we tested the RNAi clones of several known longevity genes (Table S2). Of the ten known genes we considered, only five were represented in our RNAi library. RNAi clones for three of these genes, daf-2, age-1, and akt-1 (but not clk-1 or glp-1), extended lifespan significantly (Table S2), indicating that we had a significant level of false negatives in our screen. (False negatives can arise for many reasons, including small sample size at the time of scoring, or censoring because of plate contamination or progeny production; see Materials and Methods. In addition, clones that extend only mean lifespan but not maximal lifespan would qualify as false negatives in our screen.) Together, these findings suggest that although we identified many new longevity genes in our screen, more remain to be found.

Some of the RNAi clones we recovered had relatively small effects on lifespan. Unexpectedly, one of these was the daf-2 library clone (Figure S2), which repeatedly lengthened lifespan ~20% (see Tables 1 and S1). In contrast, a daf-2 RNAi clone we constructed using the same vector but a different daf-2 insert doubled lifespan (data not shown, Figure S2). Thus for daf-2, one could say that the RNAi library contained a “weak allele.” Likewise, for the other genes we analyzed, it is possible that longer lifespans could be produced by further reductions in gene activity.

The 23 new genes affected a wide variety of processes, including signal transduction, gene expression/nucleic-acid metabolism, the stress response, glucose and amino-acid metabolism, mitochondrial function, and regulation of vesicle trafficking (Table 1). We assigned these genes names based on our functional analysis and DNA sequence information (Table 1).

New Components of the Insulin/IGF-1 and Reproductive Pathways

The DAF-16/FOXO transcription factor is required for mutations in the insulin/IGF-1 pathway, or germline ablation, to extend lifespan [1]. We found that seven of the new RNAi clones (ttr-1/K03H1.6, maoc-1/E04F6.3, gpi-1/Y87G2A.8, sinh-1/Y57A10A.20, ddl-1/F59E12.10, ddl-2/Y48E1B.1, and ddl-3/Y54G11A.8), as well as the daf-2/Y55D5A.5 clone, failed, in multiple trials, to extend the lifespan of daf-16(mu86) null mutants (Table 2). Such a failure to extend lifespan could conceivably be due to sickness, but the animals appeared healthy. (This was the case for all the other animals we examined, unless stated otherwise.) Therefore, the simplest explanation is that the activity of daf-16 is specifically required to extend the lifespan of animals treated with these RNAi clones. In principle, these “daf-16-dependent” genes could function in the insulin/IGF-1 pathway, the reproductive pathway, both pathways, or other DAF-16-dependent pathways.

Table 2
Genetic Epistasis Analysis of RNAi Clones Whose Effects Require DAF-16

New genes in the insulin/IGF-1 pathway are particularly interesting because their counterparts in humans could potentially play a role not only in longevity regulation but also in insulin/IGF-1-related metabolic diseases such as diabetes and cancer. To investigate whether the genes identified by these RNAi clones might be part of the insulin/IGF-1 pathway, we carried out two experiments. First, while not a conclusive test (since daf-2 mutants are not null), we were curious to know whether the RNAi clones might be unable to further extend the lifespan of daf-2(e1370) mutants, as is the case with mutations in the downstream gene age-1/PI 3-kinase [28]. We found that this was the case for all but one of these clones (see below; Table 2). In contrast, all but one of the daf-16-independent clones that we examined increased the lifespan of e1370 mutants (see below; Table 3). We also asked whether these RNAi clones might affect a different process regulated by the insulin/IGF-1 pathway: dauer formation. Wild-type juveniles enter dauer, a pre-pubescent growth-arrested state, in response to food limitation. Strong daf-2 mutants become dauers even in the presence of food, in a daf-16-dependent fashion. To assay dauer formation, we asked whether our daf-16-dependent RNAi clones enhanced the weak dauer-constitutive (Daf-c) phenotype of daf-2(e1370) mutants cultured at 22.5 °C. We found that four daf-16-dependent RNAi clones (ttr-1, gpi-1, sinh-1, and ddl-2) enhanced dauer formation to a significant extent, whereas two clones (maoc-1 and ddl-1) did not (Figure 1). (daf-2(e1370) worms grown on ddl-3 RNAi produced almost no progeny. Therefore, this daf-16-dependent RNAi clone was not assayed.) Because ttr-1, gpi-1, sinh-1, and ddl-2 RNAi clones all enhanced dauer formation and their function was daf-16-dependent, these genes are likely to be part of the daf-2 pathway.

Figure 1
The Dauer-Constitutive Phenotype of daf-2(e1370) Is Enhanced by Many RNAi Clones That Extend Lifespan in a daf-16-Dependent Fashion
Table 3
Genetic Epistasis Analysis of RNAi Clones Whose Effects Do Not Require DAF-16

To test whether our daf-16-dependent RNAi clones were part of the germline pathway, we asked whether they could further extend the lifespans of glp-1(e2141ts) animals (which lack a germline when raised at high temperature [29]), and also mutants defective in the putative steroid receptor daf-12 [12]. The germline pathway is distinct from the daf-2 pathway in that it does not appear to affect dauer formation (see data in Materials and Methods). Consistent with this, our daf-2 clone further extended the lifespan of glp-1 mutants (see Table 2). As described below, five of our daf-16-dependent RNAi clones (ttr-1, sinh-1, ddl-1, ddl-2, and ddl-3) failed to extend the lifespan of glp-1 mutants. In principle, these clones could simply prevent the development of the germline. However, this seems unlikely, because none of these RNAi clones reduced brood size (data not shown). Instead, we favor the interpretation that germline ablation extends lifespan, at least in part, by inhibiting the activities of these five genes. These and other daf-16-dependent genes will now be described in more detail.

One of the most interesting daf-16-dependent clones contains a transthyretin-family domain and the corresponding protein is thus predicted to be a member of the transthyretin-related protein family (ttr-1, for transthyretin-related protein). In vertebrates, transthyretin is one of three specific carrier proteins involved in the transport of both thyroid hormones and retinol. These carrier proteins might also play a role in regulating the uptake of the free circulating hormones in various tissues [30,31]. C. elegans TTR-1 is a member of a distinct but related protein family with a completely conserved predicted hydrophobic pocket [32], suggesting that it could function as a carrier of a lipophilic hormone(s) that influences lifespan. We found that ttr-1 RNAi enhanced dauer formation (Figure 1) and failed to further extend the lifespan of daf-2(e1370) mutants (see Table 2), suggesting that it (and the putative lipophilic hormone[s] it binds) acts in the insulin/IGF-1 pathway either upstream of or in parallel to daf-16.

The ttr-1 RNAi clone did not further extend the lifespan of glp-1 mutants (see Table 2), suggesting that it also functions in the germline pathway to influence lifespan. The lifespan extension of germline-ablated animals requires the putative steroid hormone receptor DAF-12 [12], and we found that ttr-1 was unable to extend the lifespan of DAF-12 mutants. Thus, one plausible model is that TTR-1 binds to and limits the availability of a ligand that activates DAF-12.

Another daf-16-dependent RNAi clone, maoc-1, encodes a protein containing a MaoC-like dehydratase domain, which is also found in enzymes such as human type IV estradiol 17-β-dehydrogenase and in the fatty acid synthase β subunit. Therefore, maoc-1 could act in the synthesis of a lipophilic hormone that influences lifespan in a daf-16-dependent fashion. This clone did not further extend the lifespan of daf-2(e1370) mutants (see Table 2), suggesting that the gene acts in the insulin/IGF-1 pathway; however, it failed to enhance the Daf-c phenotype (Figure 1). Furthermore, the clone enhanced the longevity of glp-1 (germline-defective) mutants (see Table 2), arguing that it does not extend lifespan by affecting germline signaling. The clone also increased the lifespan of daf-12-null mutants, so it is unlikely to synthesize a DAF-12 ligand. Since this clone acts differently from ttr-1 to affect lifespan, these findings raise the possibility that multiple lipophilic hormones influence lifespan in a daf-16-dependent fashion.

The third daf-16-dependent gene, gpi-1, encodes a glucose-6-phosphate isomerase/neuroleukin homolog. This RNAi clone enhanced dauer formation (Figure 1) and extended the lifespan of glp-1 and daf-12 mutants (see Table 2). Thus, it probably functions in the insulin/IGF-1 pathway, but not in the reproductive pathway to affect lifespan. In mammals, glucose-6-phosphate isomerase functions in glycolysis and also as a secreted neuronal growth factor. We favor the possibility that glycolysis influences aging, because inhibition of another glycolysis gene, phosphoglycerate mutase, also extends lifespan [22]. One possibility is that this RNAi clone extends lifespan by reducing ATP levels, which in turn inhibits the release of insulin-like DAF-2 ligands—analogous to the effect of ATP on insulin release in mammals [33].

The fourth daf-16-dependent gene, sinh-1, encodes a homolog of Schizosaccharomyces pombe SIN1, stress-activated MAP kinase interacting protein 1 [34], which functions in the response to DNA damage. In S. pombe, SIN1 inactivation increases sensitivity to some environmental stresses, such as high temperature and osmotic stress, but not to oxidative stress [34]. Unexpectedly, we found that sinh-1 RNAi significantly increased both thermotolerance (mean lifespan of wild-type worms at 35 °C: control 16.0 h; sinh-1(RNAi) 20.6 h; p < 0.0001) and the resistance to oxidative stress (mean lifespan of wild-type worms treated with paraquat (free-radical generator): control 4.4 h; sinh-1(RNAi) 7.1 h; p < 0.0001). Thus, in C. elegans (and perhaps other multicellular organisms as well), this gene appears to prevent, rather than promote, stress resistance.

sinh-1 RNAi enhanced dauer formation (Figure 1) and failed to further extend the longevity of daf-2(e1370) mutants (see Table 2), suggesting that it acts in the insulin/IGF-1 pathway. sinh-1 RNAi also failed to extend the longevity of glp-1 mutants, suggesting that sinh-1 functions in the germline pathway (see Table 2). Interestingly, sinh-1 RNAi did extend the lifespan of daf-12/steroid-receptor mutants (see Table 2). The regulatory relationship between DAF-16 and DAF-12 is not known. Thus, one possible explanation is that in response to germline ablation, DAF-12 activates DAF-16/FOXO by inhibiting the activity of SINH-1. Alternatively, germline cells might regulate the activities of DAF-16/FOXO and DAF-12 in parallel, and sinh-1 might act only in the pathway that regulates DAF-16/FOXO.

The protein encoded by the fifth daf-16-dependent RNAi clone, ddl-1 (for daf-16-dependent longevity), has been reported to interact with heat-shock factor binding protein (HSB-1) [35], a negative regulator of C. elegans heat-shock transcription factor (HSF-1) activity [36]. In C. elegans, HSF-1 promotes longevity [57] and is required along with daf-16/FOXO for the increased lifespan of daf-2 receptor mutants [6,7]. Thus, wild-type ddl-1 might inhibit longevity by reducing the activity of HSF-1. ddl-1 RNAi did not further extend the lifespan of daf-2(e1370) mutants (see Table 2), consistent with a role in the insulin/IGF-1 pathway, but it did not enhance dauer formation (Figure 1).

HSF-1 is also required for the longevity of animals lacking a germline (hsf-1(RNAi) mean lifespan, 10.4 d at 20 °C, n=53; glp-1(e2141); hsf-1(RNAi) mean lifespan 11.0 d, n=60; p = 0.25). ddl-1 RNAi did not extend the lifespan of glp-1 mutants, suggesting that it, too, functions in the germline pathway. Interestingly, like sinh-1 RNAi, ddl-1 RNAi was able to extend the lifespans of daf-12 mutants (see Table 2). This finding suggests that ddl-1 and sinh-1, which was also implicated in the stress response, act in the same process to affect longevity.

The sixth daf-16-dependent clone, ddl-2, encodes a protein that has been reported to interact with DDL-1 [35]. This RNAi clone enhanced dauer formation (Figure 1) and failed to increase the longevity of daf-2(e1370) mutants (see Table 2), consistent with a role in the insulin/IGF-1 pathway. Like ddl-1 RNAi, ddl-2 RNAi failed to increase the lifespan of germline-deficient animals (see Table 2), suggesting that it, too, functions in the germline pathway. However, unlike ddl-1 RNAi, in several experiments, this clone failed to extend the lifespan of daf-12 mutants (see Table 2). Assuming that DDL-1 and DDL-2 do interact, this suggests that they function in a complex fashion to influence lifespan.

The final daf-16-dependent clone, (ddl-3), is predicted to have a tetratrico-peptide-repeat (TPR) protein interaction motif. This clone failed to increase the longevity of daf-2 mutants (see Table 2), suggesting that ddl-3 acts in the insulin/IGF-1 pathway. It also failed to further extend the lifespan of glp-1/germline-defective and daf-12/steroid-receptor mutants (see Table 2), suggesting that DDL-3 also acts in the germline pathway, possibly as an adaptor protein in a signaling cascade that regulates DAF-16 and DAF-12.

Mitochondrial RNAi Clones

Given the large number and large effects of Chromosome I/II respiratory-chain RNAi clones [21,22], we were not surprised to find that 12 of our RNAi clones encoded components of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. (Of these, four Chromosome I clones [nuo-2/T10E9.7, cyc-1/C54G4.8, cco-1/F26E4.9, and atp-3/F27C1.7] and one Chromosome II clone [cchl-1/T06D8.6] were published previously [21,22]. The seven new clones were nuo-3/Y57G11C.12, nuo-4/K04G7.4, nuo-5/Y45G12B.1, cco-2/Y37D8A.14, atp-4/T05H4.12, atp-5/C06H2.1, and asb-2/F02E8.1 [see Table 1].) Respiratory-chain RNAi clones are thought to affect a pathway that is independent of the insulin/IGF-1 pathway [21,22]. Consistent with this, we found that all of the new mitochondrial RNAi clones were able to extend the lifespan of daf-2 mutants, and that their activities were daf-16 independent (Table 3).

RNAi of respiratory-chain components decreases body size and slows movement and eating behavior (pumping) [21]. Interestingly, while lifespan and size/pumping rate are inversely correlated for most of the animals in this class, there were several exceptions (see Table S3). For example, we found that animals subjected to nuo-5 (NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase) or cchl-1 (cytochrome C heme-lyase) RNAi had almost normal body size (and, for nuo-5, also normal pumping rate) but substantial lifespan extensions (about 30%; see Table 1). Thus, the longevity of animals with reduced respiration is unlikely to be causally connected to their small size or reduced rate of pumping.

Genes That May Be Involved in the Longevity Response to Dietary Restriction

Nine additional RNAi clones also increased the lifespan of daf-16 mutants (Table 3). DR extends the lifespan of C. elegans in a daf-16-independent manner [18,19]. We therefore asked whether any of these clones might be involved in the response to DR. To do this, we asked whether they might fail to further extend the long lifespan of the eat-2(ad1116) mutant, which is a genetic model for DR [18,37]. We found that this was the case for four (sams-1/C49F5.1, rab-10/T23H2.5, drr-1/F45H10.4, and drr-2/T12D8.2) of the nine genes (Table 3). This was interesting because to date, the lifespan of all but one long-lived mutant examined, clk-1, can be extended further by mutations in eat-2 [18].

One of these genes, sams-1, encodes S-adenosyl methionine synthetase, a protein that functions as a universal methyl group donor in many biochemical reactions. Inhibition of this enzyme can affect methylation of histones, DNA, RNA, proteins, phospholipids, and other small molecules [38]. To further investigate the possibility that C. elegans sams-1 plays a role in the response to DR, we asked whether this RNAi clone, like DR [39] (and D. Crawford and C. Kenyon, unpublished data) reduced brood size and delayed reproduction. We found that brood size was reduced and reproductive timing was slightly delayed (Figure 2). In addition, like DR animals, sams-1 RNAi, worms were slender (see Table S1). The rate of pumping (eating) was not affected (data not shown), suggesting that this RNAi clone exerts its effects via changes in metabolism rather than changes in appetite. Together, these findings suggest that DR may extend lifespan, at least in part, by inhibiting the activity of sams-1. Consistent with this idea, we found that sams-1 mRNA levels were reduced 3-fold in eat-2 mutants (Figure 3). We therefore propose the model that DR may initiate a longevity response, at least in part, by triggering a regulated decrease in sams-1 mRNA levels and, consequently, cellular S-adenosyl methionine levels. Reducing dietary methionine levels is known to increase the lifespan of mice [40] and rats by 40–45% [4143]; however, whether methionine limitation and general DR activate the same longevity mechanisms is not known. Our findings suggest that this might be the case.

Figure 2
sams-1, rab-10, and drr-1 RNAi Affect Reproduction
Figure 3
mRNA Levels of sams-1, rab-10, drr-1, and drr-2 Are Reduced in eat-2(ad1116) Mutants

Another RNAi clone that failed to further extend the lifespan of eat-2 mutants was rab-10, which encodes a Rab-like GTPase similar to those that regulate vesicle transport. Like sams-1 RNAi, this clone did not affect pumping, but did reduce and delay reproduction (see Figure 2) and produced a slender appearance (see Table S1). The expression of this gene, too, was down-regulated in response to DR (2-fold; Figure 3). All of these properties were shared by drr-1 (dietary restriction response), a gene encoding a novel protein with no obvious human homolog (see Table S1 and Figures 2 and and33).

The phenotype of the last DR clone, drr-2, differed from those of the other DR clones in that drr-2(RNAi) worms had a normal, well-fed appearance (see Table S1) and normal reproduction (see Figure 2). DRR-2 is a putative RNA-binding protein, suggesting that it plays a regulatory role in triggering the longevity response (but not the reproductive response) to DR. Expression of this gene was also reduced in eat-2 mutants (2-fold, Figure 3), suggesting that, like the other genes we identified, down-regulation of this gene in response to DR somehow causes lifespan extension. In general, it was striking that expression of all four DR genes was reduced in eat-2 mutants. This suggests that in C. elegans, DR elicits a concerted transcriptional (or mRNA turnover) response that can inhibit multiple lifespan-shortening gene activities and thereby extends lifespan.

We also asked whether the lifespan of eat-2(ad1116) mutants could be increased by respiratory-chain RNAi, and found that it could (D. Crawford and C. Kenyon, unpublished data). Since reducing respiratory chain activity during development is required for lifespan extension [21], whereas reducing food levels only during adulthood extends lifespan [44], it seems likely that mitochondrial respiratory chain components and DR do not extend lifespan in exactly the same way.

Integrin Signaling is Likely to Play an Evolutionarily Conserved Role in Lifespan Limitation

Loss-of-function mutations in β-integrin (myospheroid) extend lifespan in Drosophila [45], and we found that RNAi clones of pat-4/C29F9.7, which encodes integrin-linked kinase, and pat-6/T21D12.4, which encodes actopaxin, a protein known to bind to integrin-linked kinase [46], increased lifespan in C. elegans (see Table 1). Integrin signaling influences insulin-signaling pathways in mammals [47], yet the lifespan extension produced by these two clones was daf-16 independent (Table 3). In addition, the lifespan of daf-2(e1370) mutants was extended when these animals were grown on either pat-4 or pat-6 RNAi (Table 3). Thus, integrin signaling may comprise a novel, conserved lifespan regulatory pathway, though it could potentially function in the insulin/IGF-1 pathway downstream of daf-16—which is known to act cell-non-autonomously [48]—to influence lifespan. (Inactivation of pat-4 and pat-6 impaired the health of eat-2 mutants, making their relationship to DR difficult to interpret.) The finding that genes or pathways already known to influence the lifespan of another organism also affect C. elegans' lifespan is significant, as such ancient, evolutionarily conserved longevity pathways could potentially also influence human lifespan.

Genes That Might Function in Novel Pathways to Influence Longevity

Using genetic epistasis analysis, we were able to associate most of our new genes with known aging-regulatory pathways or processes. However, the roles of three genes remained unclear. Two of these, ril-1/C53A5.1 and ril-2/C14C10.3 (RNAi-induced longevity), encoded novel proteins with no obvious homologs, whereas rha-2/C06E1.10 encoded a DEAH RNA helicase, suggesting that it regulates gene expression or nucleic-acid metabolism. All three RNAi clones extended the lifespan of both daf-16 and eat-2 mutants (Table 3), suggesting that they may function in a novel pathway or pathways to influence longevity.

Summary

In this study, we identified many interesting new genes whose normal function is predicted to inhibit longevity. Although our screen did not reach saturation, an interesting picture emerged. Most of the genes we identified fell into one of three classes: genes that influence lifespan through DAF-16/FOXO (8/29), genes that influence respiration (12/29), and genes that appear to affect the response to DR (4/29). Two more genes affected integrin signaling, which was known to influence lifespan in flies. Like the insulin/IGF-1/FOXO system and the respiratory chain, most biological pathways and systems consist of many genes, and we failed to identify even one component of many such systems (e.g., the TGF-β signaling system). In fact, of the genes that had conserved sequence motifs, only one, the rha-2 RNA helicase homolog, could not be linked to a known pathway. These findings are thought-provoking because until now, we have had no way of knowing whether the longevity pathways we know about represent only the tip of the iceberg. Our findings suggest that, in contrast, at most only one or a few other large multigenic systems influence lifespan in C. elegans. In other words, we may now be aware of most of the major biological pathways in C. elegans that, when inhibited, can produce large extensions in lifespan.

Materials and Methods

Strains.

All strains were maintained as described previously [49]. CF1037: daf-16(mu86)I, DA1116: eat-2(ad1116)II, CF1041: daf-2(e1370)III, CB4037: glp-1(e2141)III, MQ887: isp-1(qm150)IV, AA86: daf-12(rh41rh411)X, CF512: fer-15(b26)II; fem-1(hc17)III. All strains displayed similar Unc phenotypes when grown on unc-52 RNAi bacteria (data not shown).

RNAi aging screen.

The systematic RNAi screen was carried out as described [23,24] with some modifications. Each RNAi bacteria colony was grown at 37 °C in LB with 10 μg/ml tetracycline and 50 μg/ml carbenicillin, and then seeded onto NG-carbenicillin plates supplemented with 100 μl 0.1 M IPTG. For our screen, we employed a sterile strain, CF512 (fer-15(b26); fem-1(hc17)) [5], to avoid transferring aging worms away from their progeny. Approximately 60 eggs of CF512 were added to the RNAi plates and allowed to develop to adults at 25 °C and kept at this temperature (Chromosome I, II, and first half of Chromosome X) or shifted to 20 °C for the rest of their life (Chromosome III, IV, V, and second half of Chromosome X). As a positive control, we used a previously described daf-2 clone (pAD48, [9]), and as a negative control, we used the corresponding empty vector (pAD12, [9]). DAF-2 functions in both neural and non-neural tissues to influence lifespan [48,50,51], and daf-2 RNAi has been shown previously to double the lifespan of the animal [9]. Developmental phenotypes were scored at d 1, and additional 100 μl 0.1 M IPTG was added on d 7. Viability of worms on each plate was scored at d 24 of adulthood (25 °C) or d 30 of adulthood (20 °C), at which time generally all worms on control plates were dead and 75–95% of worms grown on daf-2 RNAi (pAD48) were still alive. RNAi appears to remain effective on older plates, since 30-d-old and newly seeded unc-52 RNAi plates were equally effective at inducing an Unc phenotype (data not shown). Plates were censored due to contamination, progeny production, no bacterial growth, etc. (see Figure S1). We then carried out quantitative survival analysis using both CF512 and N2 with all of the bacterial strains that scored positively in the screen. Unexpectedly, RNAi knockdown of four of the genes we retested, inx-8 (innexin-8), ril-3 (F26F2.1), zig-6 (protein with immunoglobulin domains), and gei-9 (similarity to acyl-CoA dehydrogenase), significantly extended lifespan of CF512 but not N2 animals (see Table S1).

RNAi clone analysis.

The identity of all positive RNAi clones was verified by sequencing of inserts with an M13-forward primer, and, upon every start of a lifespan analysis, by PCR with T7 primers. About half of the genes we identified in our screen are located in operons. Therefore, we considered the possibility that the phenotypes we observed were influenced by RNAi knockdown of co-transcribed genes. This type of “intra-operonic inhibition,” though rare, has been observed [52,53]. However, none of these RNAi clones produced the phenotypes predicted for knockdown of other genes in the same operon (data not shown). All gene annotations were based on WormBase and/or WormPD, and protein accession numbers were from UniProt.

Lifespan analysis.

Lifespan analysis was conducted at 20 °C as described previously unless otherwise stated [10,54]. Eggs were added to plates seeded with RNAi bacteria, and animals were transferred approximately every week to newly seeded plates. At least 60 worms were used for each experiment. More animals were included in the analysis to ensure sufficient power when the lifespan extension of a particular RNAi clone was expected to be minimal. To reduce the chance of false negative results, all RNAi clones that failed to extend the lifespan of a particular mutant strain were retested at least once more with the same strain (except for daf-2(e1370), see Table S1). Because of the large number of lifespan experiments conducted, we did not always perform positive controls with CF512 or N2 animals exactly in parallel with each mutant we examined. However, these controls were running in overlapping time frames, where they consistently extended lifespan, generally (in 21 of 28 repeated experiments for N2/CF512 and in 43 of 57 repeated experiments when including data on all strains used) by magnitudes that did not differ by more than ten percentage points from one another (see Table S1). All positive RNAi clones extended lifespan in at least four independent trials, including analysis of all genetic mutants.

In all experiments, the pre-fertile period of adulthood was used as t = 0 for lifespan analysis. Strains were grown at 20 °C at optimal growth conditions for at least two generations before use in lifespan analysis. Statview 5.01 (SAS, Cary, North Carolina, United States) software was used for statistical analysis and to determine means and percentiles. In all cases, p values were calculated using the Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) method.

Dauer assays.

For RNAi experiments, daf-2(e1370) animals were cultured at 20 °C on plates seeded with various RNAi clones or vector control, and their F1 eggs were transferred to 22.5 °C. Following incubation for four days, the number of dauers was determined using a dissecting microscope. 30–50% of the animals on vector control became dauers at 22.5 °C. Approximately 50–100 animals were scored in each experiment. daf-2(e1370) worms grown on ddl-3 RNAi gave rise to almost no progeny; therefore, this RNAi clone was not assayed.

For addressing whether germline ablation affects dauer formation, the number of dauers induced by either daf-2(e1370) or daf-2(e1370); mes-1(bn7) at 22.5 °C was assayed. This mes-1 allele causes ~50% of animals to lack germ cells and live long [55]: 61 ± 20% of daf-2(e1370) mutants formed dauers (n = 204) and 57 ± 13% of daf-2(e1370); mes-1(bn7) double mutants (n = 267) formed dauers (p = 0.42). (The sterile and fertile daf-2; mes-1 double mutants formed dauers at equal frequency at 22.5 °C.)

Stress response assays.

For the thermotolerance analysis, synchronized N2 animals grown on control or RNAi bacteria were shifted to 35 °C as 3-d-old adults; for the oxidative stress analysis, synchronized animals were exposed to 300 mM paraquat (Sigma, St. Louis, Missouri, United States) as 5-d-old adults. Survival was scored every 2 to 3 h after the treatment. Statview 5.01 (SAS) software was used for statistical analysis and to determine means. In all cases, p values were calculated using the Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) method.

Progeny production assays.

N2 eggs were incubated at 20 °C on plates seeded with various RNAi clones, and 24 late L4 stage worms were picked for each treatment and transferred to fresh RNAi plates every 12 h for 4–5 d. After this period, the worms were transferred every 24 h. Worms that crawled off the plates, bagged, or exploded were censored. All plates were then incubated at 20 °C for about 2 d and shifted to 4 °C. The number of worms that developed was determined at the end of the experiment.

Quantitative RT-PCR analysis.

Total RNA was isolated from approximately 5,000 d 1 adult worms and cDNA was made from 4 μg of RNA using Superscript II RT (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, United States). eat-2(ad1116) animals were harvested 8–18 h after N2, due to their delayed development. TaqMan real-time qPCR experiments were then performed by the Biomolecular Resource Center at UCSF as described in the manual using ABI Prism7900HT (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, United States). Primers and probes designed specifically for act-1, sams-1, rab-10, drr-1, and drr-2 are listed below.

Primers:

Act-1–720F: 5′-CTACGAACTTCCTGACGGACAAG-3′

Act-1–821R: 5′-CCGGCGGACTCCATACC-3′

Sams-1–209F: 5′-TCCGTCGTGTCATCGAAAAG-3′

Sams-1–275R: 5′-TTGCAGGTCTTGTGGTCGAA-3′

Rab-10–514F: 5′-GCTAAGATGCCTGATACCACTGA-3′

Rab-10–585R: 5′-ACTCTGCCTCTGTGGTTGCA-3′

Drr-1–137F: 5′-GGATTCTTTGGTTTACTCTAATTGTTCA-3′

Drr-1–208R: 5′-TCCGCAGGGCGAAGATT-3′

Drr-2–530F: 5′-TGAAGCCCCGTACCACAGA-3′

Drr-2–596R: 5′-CTTGGTCTCCTCTTCTTCTTGCT-3′

Probes (All probes listed here were labeled with FAM at the 5′ end and Black hole Quencher at the 3′ end):

Act-1-T: 5′-AAACGAACGTTTCCGTTGCCCAGAGGCTAT-3′

Sams-1–230T: 5′-TTGGATTCACCGACTCCAGCATTGG-3′

Rab-10–541T: 5′-CAATCCCGCGATACGGTGAATCCA-3′

Drr-1–166T: 5′-TTAATTATTTCCGCGGCGGCAACG-3′

Drr-2–551T: 5′-CGCTGAGATCGAGGCTCGCAA-3′

Supporting Information

Figure S1

Summary of RNAi Longevity Screen:

(45 KB PPT)

Figure S2

Comparison of daf-2 RNAi Clones:

(72 KB PPT)

Table S1

Complete Lifespan Analysis Data of RNAi Clones That Extend Lifespan:

(839 KB DOC)

Table S2

Lifespan Analysis of Library Clones Encoding Known (Non-Neuronal) Longevity Genes:

(48 KB DOC)

Table S3

Pumping Rate and Body Length of N2 Animals Grown on Mitochondrial RNAi Clones:

Found at DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0010017.st003 (49 KB DOC)

Acknowledgments

We thank all Kenyon lab members for discussions and help, Kaveh Ashrafi for comments on the manuscript, and Julie Ahringer, Ravi Kamath, and Andrew Fraser for the RNAi library. MH was supported by the Danish Medical and Natural Science Research Councils. ALH was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. This work was supported by grants from the Ellison Foundation and the NIH to CK, who is an American Cancer Society Professor at UCSF and also a co-founder of the biotechnology company Elixir Pharmaceuticals.

Abbreviations

DR
dietary restriction
RNAi
RNA interference
TPR
tetratrico-peptide-repeat

Footnotes

Competing interests. The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Author contributions. MH, ALH, AD, and CK conceived and designed the experiments. MH and ALH performed the experiments and analyzed the data. MH, ALH, and CK wrote the paper.

Citation: Hansen M, Hsu AL, Dillin A, Kenyon C (2005) New genes tied to endocrine, metabolic, and dietary regulation of lifespan from a Caenorhabditis elegans genomic RNAi screen. PLoS Genet 1(1): e17.

References

  • Tatar M, Bartke A, Antebi A. The endocrine regulation of aging by insulin-like signals. Science. 2003;299:1346–1351. [PubMed]
  • Murphy CT, McCarroll SA, Bargmann CI, Fraser A, Kamath RS, et al. Genes that act downstream of DAF-16 to influence the lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 2003;424:277–283. [PubMed]
  • Lee RY, Hench J, Ruvkun G. Regulation of C. elegans DAF-16 and its human ortholog FKHRL1 by the daf-2 insulin-like signaling pathway. Curr Biol. 2001;11:1950–1957. [PubMed]
  • Melendez A, Talloczy Z, Seaman M, Eskelinen EL, Hall DH, et al. Autophagy genes are essential for dauer development and life-span extension in C. elegans. Science. 2003;301:1387–1391. [PubMed]
  • Garigan D, Hsu AL, Fraser AG, Kamath RS, Ahringer J, et al. Genetic analysis of tissue aging in Caenorhabditis elegans: A role for heat-shock factor and bacterial proliferation. Genetics. 2002;161:1101–1112. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Hsu AL, Murphy CT, Kenyon C. Regulation of aging and age-related disease by DAF-16 and heat-shock factor. Science. 2003;300:1142–1145. [PubMed]
  • Morley JF, Morimoto RI. Regulation of longevity in Caenorhabditis elegans by heat shock factor and molecular chaperones. Mol Biol Cell. 2004;15:657–664. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Apfeld J, O'Connor G, McDonagh T, DiStefano PS, Curtis R. The AMP-activated protein kinase AAK-2 links energy levels and insulin-like signals to lifespan in C. elegans. Genes Dev. 2004;18:3004–3009. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Dillin A, Crawford DK, Kenyon C. Timing requirements for insulin/IGF-1 signaling in C. elegans. Science. 2002;298:830–834. [PubMed]
  • Apfeld J, Kenyon C. Regulation of lifespan by sensory perception in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 1999;402:804–809. [PubMed]
  • Alcedo J, Kenyon C. Regulation of C. elegans longevity by specific gustatory and olfactory neurons. Neuron. 2004;41:45–55. [PubMed]
  • Hsin H, Kenyon C. Signals from the reproductive system regulate the lifespan of C. elegans. Nature. 1999;399:362–366. [PubMed]
  • Gerisch B, Weitzel C, Kober-Eisermann C, Rottiers V, Antebi A. A hormonal signaling pathway influencing C. elegans metabolism, reproductive development, and life span. Dev Cell. 2001;1:841–851. [PubMed]
  • Tissenbaum HA, Guarente L. Increased dosage of a sir-2 gene extends lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 2001;410:227–230. [PubMed]
  • Oh SW, Mukhopadhyay A, Svrzikapa N, Jiang F, Davis RJ, et al. JNK regulates lifespan in Caenorhabditis elegans by modulating nuclear translocation of forkhead transcription factor/DAF-16. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:4494–4499. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Wang MC, Bohmann D, Jasper H. JNK signaling confers tolerance to oxidative stress and extends lifespan in Drosophila. Dev Cell. 2003;5:811–816. [PubMed]
  • Wang MC, Bohmann D, Jasper H. JNK extends life span and limits growth by antagonizing cellular and organism-wide responses to insulin signaling. Cell. 2005;121:115–125. [PubMed]
  • Lakowski B, Hekimi S. The genetics of caloric restriction in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:13091–13096. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Houthoofd K, Braeckman BP, Johnson TE, Vanfleteren JR. Life extension via dietary restriction is independent of the Ins/IGF-1 signalling pathway in Caenorhabditis elegans. Exp Gerontol. 2003;38:947–954. [PubMed]
  • Feng J, Bussiere F, Hekimi S. Mitochondrial electron transport is a key determinant of life span in Caenorhabditis elegans. Dev Cell. 2001;1:633–644. [PubMed]
  • Dillin A, Hsu AL, Arantes-Oliveira N, Lehrer-Graiwer J, Hsin H, et al. Rates of behavior and aging specified by mitochondrial function during development. Science. 2002;298:2398–2401. [PubMed]
  • Lee SS, Lee RY, Fraser AG, Kamath RS, Ahringer J, et al. A systematic RNAi screen identifies a critical role for mitochondria in C. elegans longevity. Nat Genet. 2003;33:40–48. [PubMed]
  • Kamath RS, Ahringer J. Genome-wide RNAi screening in Caenorhabditis elegans. Methods. 2003;30:313–321. [PubMed]
  • Kamath RS, Fraser AG, Dong Y, Poulin G, Durbin R, et al. Systematic functional analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using RNAi. Nature. 2003;421:231–237. [PubMed]
  • Simmer F, Moorman C, van der Linden AM, Kuijk E, van den Berghe PV, et al. Genome-wide RNAi of C. elegans using the hypersensitive rrf-3 strain reveals novel gene functions. PLoS Biol. 2003;1:e12. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kamath RS, Martinez-Campos M, Zipperlen P, Fraser AG, Ahringer J. Effectiveness of specific RNA-mediated interference through ingested double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genome Biol. 2001;2:Research0002. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Tavernarakis N, Wang SL, Dorovkov M, Ryazanov A, Driscoll M. Heritable and inducible genetic interference by double-stranded RNA encoded by transgenes. Nat Genet. 2000;24:180–183. [PubMed]
  • Dorman JB, Albinder B, Shroyer T, Kenyon C. The age-1 and daf-2 genes function in a common pathway to control the lifespan of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1995;141:1399–1406. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Priess JR, Schnabel H, Schnabel R. The glp-1 locus and cellular interactions in early C. elegans embryos. Cell. 1987;51:601–611. [PubMed]
  • Monaco HL. The transthyretin-retinol-binding protein complex. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000;1482:65–72. [PubMed]
  • Palha JA. Transthyretin as a thyroid hormone carrier: Function revisited. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2002;40:1292–1300. [PubMed]
  • Eneqvist T, Lundberg E, Nilsson L, Abagyan R, Sauer-Eriksson AE. The transthyretin-related protein family. Eur J Biochem. 2003;270:518–532. [PubMed]
  • Lowell BB, Shulman GI. Mitochondrial dysfunction and type 2 diabetes. Science. 2005;307:384–387. [PubMed]
  • Wilkinson MG, Pino TS, Tournier S, Buck V, Martin H, et al. Sin1: An evolutionarily conserved component of the eukaryotic SAPK pathway. Embo J. 1999;18:4210–4221. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Li S, Armstrong CM, Bertin N, Ge H, Milstein S, et al. A map of the interactome network of the metazoan C. elegans. Science. 2004;303:540–543. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Satyal SH, Chen D, Fox SG, Kramer JM, Morimoto RI. Negative regulation of the heat shock transcriptional response by HSBP1. Genes Dev. 1998;12:1962–1974. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Raizen DM, Lee RY, Avery L. Interacting genes required for pharyngeal excitation by motor neuron MC in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1995;141:1365–1382. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Chiang PK, Gordon RK, Tal J, Zeng GC, Doctor BP, et al. S-adenosylmethionine and methylation. FASEB J. 1996;10:471–480. [PubMed]
  • Shibata Y, Fujii T, Dent JA, Fujisawa H, Takagi S. EAT-20, a novel transmembrane protein with EGF motifs, is required for efficient feeding in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 2000;154:635–646. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Miller R, Buehner G, Chang Y, Harper JM, Sigler R, et al. Methionine-deficient diet extends mouse lifespan, slows immune and lens aging, alters glucose, T4, IGF-1 and insulin levels, and increases hepatocyte MIF levels and stress resistance. Aging Cell. 2005;4:119–125. [PubMed]
  • Zimmerman JA, Malloy V, Krajcik R, Orentreich N. Nutritional control of aging. Exp Gerontol. 2003;38:47–52. [PubMed]
  • Orentreich N, Matias JR, DeFelice A, Zimmerman JA. Low methionine ingestion by rats extends life span. J Nutr. 1993;123:269–274. [PubMed]
  • Richie JP, Jr., Komninou D, Leutzinger Y, Kleinman W, Orentreich N, et al. Tissue glutathione and cysteine levels in methionine-restricted rats. Nutrition. 2004;20:800–805. [PubMed]
  • Klass MR. Aging in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans: Major biological and environmental factors influencing life span. Mech Ageing Dev. 1977;6:413–429. [PubMed]
  • Goddeeris MM, Cook-Wiens E, Horton WJ, Wolf H, Stoltzfus JR, et al. Delayed behavioural aging and altered mortality in Drosophila beta integrin mutants. Aging Cell. 2003;2:257–264. [PubMed]
  • Lin X, Qadota H, Moerman DG, Williams BD. C. elegans PAT-6/actopaxin plays a critical role in the assembly of integrin adhesion complexes in vivo. Curr Biol. 2003;13:922–932. [PubMed]
  • Dedhar S, Williams B, Hannigan G. Integrin-linked kinase (ILK): A regulator of integrin and growth-factor signalling. Trends Cell Biol. 1999;9:319–323. [PubMed]
  • Libina N, Berman JR, Kenyon C. Tissue-specific activities of C. elegans DAF-16 in the regulation of lifespan. Cell. 2003;115:489–502. [PubMed]
  • Brenner S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1974;77:71–94. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Apfeld J, Kenyon C. Cell nonautonomy of C. elegans daf-2 function in the regulation of diapause and life span. Cell. 1998;95:199–210. [PubMed]
  • Wolkow CA, Kimura KD, Lee MS, Ruvkun G. Regulation of C. elegans life-span by insulinlike signaling in the nervous system. Science. 2000;290:147–150. [PubMed]
  • Montgomery MK, Xu S, Fire A. RNA as a target of double-stranded RNA-mediated genetic interference in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:15502–15507. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Bosher JM, Dufourcq P, Sookhareea S, Labouesse M. RNA interference can target pre-mRNA: Consequences for gene expression in a Caenorhabditis elegans operon. Genetics. 1999;153:1245–1256. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Kenyon C, Chang J, Gensch E, Rudner A, Tabtiang R. A C. elegans mutant that lives twice as long as wild type. Nature. 1993;366:461–464. [PubMed]
  • Strome S, Martin P, Schierenberg E, Paulsen J. Transformation of the germ line into muscle in mes-1 mutant embryos of C. elegans. Development. 1995;121:2961–2972. [PubMed]
  • Kenyon C. The plasticity of aging: insights from long-lived mutants. Cell. 2005;120:449–460. [PubMed]

Articles from PLoS Genetics are provided here courtesy of Public Library of Science
PubReader format: click here to try

Formats:

Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...

Links

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...