![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2005, The National Academy of Sciences Evolution Variable lymphocyte receptors in hagfish Division of Developmental and Clinical Immunology, Departments of *Medicine, Pediatrics, and **Microbiology, and ††Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL 35294; †Molecular Genetics Program, Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason, Seattle, WA 98101; ‡Department of Biosystems Science, School of Advanced Sciences, Graduate University for Advanced Studies (Sokendai), Hayama, Kanagawa 240-0193, Japan; §Department of Biology, Graduate School of Engineering and Science, Yamagata University, Yamagata 990-8567, Japan; and ¶Department of Pathology, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-8638, Japan‡‡ To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: max.cooper/at/ccc.uab.edu. Contributed by Max D. Cooper, May 6, 2005 This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract A previously uncharacterized type of variable lymphocyte receptors (VLR) was identified recently in the Sea lamprey. This jawless vertebrate generates an extensive VLR repertoire through differential insertion of neighboring diverse leucine-rich repeat (LRR) cassettes into an incomplete germ-line VLR gene. We report here VLR homologs from two additional lamprey species and the presence of two types of VLR genes in hagfish, the only other order of contemporary jawless vertebrates. As in the Sea lamprey, the incomplete hagfish germ-line VLR-A and -B genes are modified in lymphocyte-like cells to generate highly diverse repertoires of VLR-A and -B proteins via a presently undetermined mechanism. This jawless-fish mode of VLR diversification starkly contrasts with the rearrangement of Ig V(D)J gene segments used by all jawed vertebrates to produce diverse repertoires of T and B lymphocyte antigen receptors. The development of two very different strategies for receptor diversification at the dawn of vertebrate evolution ≈500 million years ago attests to the fitness value of a lymphocyte-based system of anticipatory immunity. Keywords: adaptive immunity, agnatha, jawless fish Hagfish are grouped with the lamprey in the cyclostome taxon, representing a phylogenetically ancient lineage that diverged before the jawed vertebrates (1-3). Because of their unique phylogenetic position, these eel-shaped jawless fish have been studied extensively in search for the origin of vertebrate adaptive immunity. Like lamprey, the hagfish have heterogeneous blood leukocyte populations, including cells morphologically similar to mammalian lymphocytes (4-9). Both hagfish and lamprey have been reported to produce specific agglutinins and opsonins in response to particulate antigens (9-12) and to undergo accelerated rejection of second-set skin allografts (10, 13). However, neither agnathan has been shown to possess the essential components that gnathostomes use for adaptive immunity, namely Ig, T cell receptors, recombination activating genes RAG1 and -2 for V(D)J rearrangement, and MHC class I and II molecules (14-18). Recently, we identified a previously undescribed type of variable lymphocyte receptors (VLR) in the Sea lamprey (19). VLR are proteins consisting of leucine-rich repeats (LRR) that are assembled into functional receptors through somatic diversification of the single incomplete germ-line VLR gene (gVLR) in lamprey lymphocytes. Here we describe VLR homologs from species representing two other lamprey families and from two hagfish species, representing the remaining cyclostome order. Materials and Methods Animals. Live specimens of Pacific hagfish Eptatretus stoutii (30-60 cm long) were purchased from Marinus (Long Beach, CA) and maintained for 2 months at 12°C in artificial sea water (Oceanic Systems, Dallas). Larvae (15-20 cm long) of the American brook lamprey (Lampetra appendix) and Northern brook lamprey (Ichthyomyzon fossor) were from tributaries to the Great Lakes (Lamprey Services, Ludington, MI). Hagfish were sedated by immersion for 15 min in 0.5 g/liter MS222 (Sigma) buffered to pH 7 before i.p. injection with an antigen/mitogen mixture in 0.5 ml of hagfish PBS (per liter, 28 g of NaCl/0.2 g of KCL/1.44 g of Na2HPO4/0.24 g of KH2PO4, pH 7.4, 1 osmol). The mixture contained 109 live Escherichia coli TG1 bacteria, 109 sheep erythrocytes (Colorado Serum, Denver) and 100 μg each of phytohemagglutinin and pokeweed mitogen (Sigma). Immune stimulation was repeated at weekly intervals and, 4 days after the fourth stimulation, blood was collected with a syringe from the tail blood sinus and diluted 1:1 with hagfish PBS containing 30 mM EDTA. Buffy coat leukocytes collected after 5-min centrifugation at 50 × g were sorted by their light-scatter characteristics as described (8, 9) by using a MoFlo cytometer (Cytomation, Ft. Collins, CO). Hagfish VLR. Inshore hagfish Eptatretus burgeri VLR homologs were identified by using lamprey VLR as blast queries against the database of expressed sequence tags from leukocyte RNA of unstimulated animals nos. 7 and 8 (16). Clones with significant matches were sequenced on both strands, 64 VLR-A and 15 VLR-B cDNA clones. For the Pacific hagfish, unseparated blood cells and buffy coat leukocytes from three unstimulated individuals (nos. 1-3 and 6) and buffy coat leukocytes from two immunostimulated animals (nos. 4 and 5) were used for extraction of blood genomic DNA and leukocyte RNA. Extraction of RNA was with TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen), and PolyA RNA was selected with the Dynabeads mRNA purification Kit (Dynal, Lake Success, NY). First-strand cDNA synthesis was primed with 20 pmol of HgVLRA.F1 (Table 2, which is published as supporting information on the PNAS web site) for VLR-A or HgVLRB.F1 for VLR-B, using the SuperScript III First-Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (Invitrogen), and the products were column-purified (QIAquick PCR purification, Qiagen, Valencia, CA). VLRs were then PCR-amplified by using Expand High Fidelity PCR (Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis) from the cDNA or from genomic DNA, in 50-μl reactions containing 1 μl each of the sets of forward and reverse primers (F1 or F2 and R1 or R2) at 10 pmol/μl, 5 μl of 10× buffer, 36.25 μl of double distilled water, 5 μl of cDNA or genomic DNA (250 ng), and 0.75 μl of the polymerase. Reactions were amplified by using one cycle of 94°C, 1 min; then 35 cycles of 94°C, 30 sec; 58°C, 30 sec; 72°C, 1 min; and a final 7-min elongation at 72°C. Products were column-purified, cloned in pCRII-TOPO (Invitrogen), and the inserts were sequenced. For the Pacific hagfish, 109 VLR-A RT-PCR clones were sequenced (four contained in-frame stop codons; not shown), and 36 genomic mature VLR-A amplicons (two contained in-frame stop codons). For VLR-B, 37 RT-PCR clones were sequenced (one contained an in-frame stop codon) and 38 genomic mature VLR-B amplicons (four contained in-frame stop codons; not shown). Liver genomic DNA from Inshore hagfish no. 9 (16) was used for PCR cloning and sequencing mature VLRs, four mature VLR-A amplicons (two contained in-frame stop codons), and three mature VLR-B amplicons. Nonparasitic Lamprey VLR. First-strand cDNA was synthesized as above by using the reverse primer VLR_3UT.R (Sea lamprey 3′ UTR primer, Table 2). For the American brook lamprey, the forward primer was Slit.F (Sea lamprey 5′ UTR primer) and for the Northern brook lamprey, LRR_N.F1 (another Sea lamprey 5′ UTR primer). In total, 13 unique VLR clones of the American brook lamprey and seven of the Northern brook lamprey were sequenced. Bacterial Artificial Chromosome (BAC) Libraries and Clones. An Inshore hagfish BAC library (20) was screened by PCR by using VLR primers as above (F1 or F2 and R1 or R2). The Pacific hagfish BAC library (VMRC23) was constructed from EcoRI partial digests of erythrocyte DNA from a single specimen in the vector pCCBACE1 (Epicentre Technologies, Madison, WI). This library consists of ≈184,000 recombinants and encompasses ≈5× coverage of the hagfish genome. The entire library was screened by hybridization with 5′ and 3′ VLR-A and -B probes, and positive clones were authenticated by PCR. One BAC for each VLR type from the Pacific and Inshore hagfish was sequenced at ≈10× coverage and assembled into contigs (Macrogen, Seoul, Korea). In case of incomplete sequence of the inserts, only portions containing the gVLR and LRR cassettes were included with uncaptured gaps in the contigs: Eb_gVLR-A, 43,362 bp; Eb_gVLR-B, 92,072 bp; Es_gVLR-A, 81,648 bp; and Es_gVLR-B, 76,730 bp. Sequence Analysis. Neighbor-joining and Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmatic Mean (UPGMA) trees were constructed with the pairwise deletion option by using mega3 molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software (21). Prediction of genes in the BAC inserts was accomplished by using local blast downloaded from ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/ executables and the GenScan server, genes.mit.edu/GENSCAN.html. Results and Discussion Cyclostome VLR Homologs. Two distinct types of VLR, VLR-A and -B, were identified among expressed sequence tags from 12,000 leukocyte cDNA clones of the Inshore hagfish, E. burgeri (16). Matching VLR were then cloned by RT-PCR from transcripts of lymphocyte-like cells of the Pacific hagfish, E. stoutii. Fig. 1
Transcripts of hagfish VLR are abundant in lymphocyte-like cells but not in myeloid cells or erythrocytes sorted by their light-scatter characteristics. VLR-A transcript levels were ≈3-fold higher than VLR-B levels in blood leukocyte samples (not shown). Both VLR types of the Pacific hagfish are highly heterogeneous (Fig. 2
The dataset of unique sequence Pacific hagfish VLR-A (n = 130) reveals two to six copies per transcript of the 24-residue LRRs (n = 527; average, four). In the VLR-B dataset (n = 69), there are one to six copies of the 24-residue LRRs (n = 195; average, 2.8), whereas in the set of 129 Sea lamprey VLR (ref. 19; GenBank accession nos. AY577943-AY578059), there were one to nine copies of 24-residue LRRs (n = 325; average, 2.5). We then analyzed separately in a neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree the individual components of these VLR, except for LRRNT and LRRCT that were too diverse among the species for reliable alignment (Table 1; 328 LRR1 domains, 328 CP domains, and 1,047 single domains of the 24-residue LRRs). The clusters were nearly exclusively of the same type and species origin, i.e., Pacific hagfish VLR-A, VLR-B, or Sea lamprey VLR clustering. There were no instances of identical LRR domains between the different VLR types. However, a large portion of the LRR1 and CP domains within hagfish VLR-A and lamprey VLR clusters were identical (Table 1). In contrast, the LRR1 domains in hagfish VLR-B were 98% unique; the sets of 24-residue LRRs also consisted predominantly of unique sequences: 97% were unique in hagfish VLR-B, 90% in VLR-A, and 83% in the Sea lamprey VLR. This remarkably high degree of diversity is especially remarkable, given that consensus sequences derived for each of the 24-residue LRR types share at least 10 framework residues.
Hagfish VLR Genes. Genomic organization of the Pacific and Inshore hagfish VLR loci was determined from sequences of large insert genomic clones isolated from BAC libraries, one BAC for each VLR type (Fig. 3
The hagfish gVLR loci harbor cassettes encoding diverse LRR motifs located ≈20-40 kb downstream from the germline genes (Fig. 3 Germ-line VLR genes in hagfish lymphocyte-like cells are actively transcribed before gene rearrangement. PCR amplicons of VLR-A germ-line transcripts are ≈0.7 kb long and ≈0.5 kb long for VLR-B (Fig. 4B VLR Phylogeny. A phylogenetic analysis of the agnathan VLR proteins reveals three distinct clusters, respectively, composed by lamprey VLR and hagfish VLR-A and -B sequences (Fig. 4C Conclusion The presence of VLRs in both of the extant cyclostome orders is indicative of strong evolutionary pressure for vertebrates to develop an anticipatory molecular recognition system. Our analysis indicates that, within <40 million years in the Cambrian, two radically different systems evolved in agnathans and gnathostomes in which either LRR or Ig gene fragments undergo recombinatorial assembly to generate diverse repertoires of lymphocyte receptors. This evolutionary scenario raises many intriguing questions, one of which concerns the issue of whether the two adaptive immune strategies represent convergent evolution or whether one was ancestral to the other. Whether VLRs were forerunner vertebrate immune receptors or the rearranging VLRs and Igs evolved independently will become certain only with an unambiguous resolution of the phylogenetic relationships among the groups of living and extinct jawless and jawed vertebrates (25, 26). In this regard, however, the presence of VLRs in both orders of contemporary agnathans lends additional molecular evidence favoring a monophyletic origin of cyclostomes. Supporting Information
Acknowledgments We thank Larry Gartland for sorting the hagfish cells, Mathew Alder for assistance with the animals and experiments, Igor Rogozin and Lakshminarayan Iyer for helpful discussion, and Ann Brookshire for manuscript preparation. This collaborative study in the laboratories of M.K., C.T.A., and M.D.C. was supported by National Science Foundation Grants MCB-0317460, IBN-0321461, and HG02526-01 and by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan. M.D.C. is an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. Notes Author contributions: Z.P., C.T.A., M.K., and M.D.C. designed research; Z.P., N.R.S., and J.K. performed research; Z.P., T.S., C.T.A., M.K., and M.D.C. analyzed data; and Z.P. and M.D.C. wrote the paper. Abbreviations: VLR, variable lymphocyte receptor; gVLR, germ-line VLR gene; LRR, leucine-rich repeats; LRRNT, N-terminal LRR; LRRCT, C-terminal LRR; BAC, bacterial artificial chromosome; CP, connecting peptide. Data deposition: The sequences reported in this paper have been deposited in the GenBank database (accession nos. AY964719-AY964931, AY965520-AY965612, AY965658-AY965681). References 1. Delarbre, C., Gallut, C, Barriel, V., Janvier, P. & Gachelin, G. (2002. ) Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 22, 184-192. [PubMed] 2. Furlong, R. F. & Holland, P. W. (2002. ) Zool. Sci. 19, 593-599. [PubMed] 3. Takezaki, N., Figueroa, F., Zaleska-Rutczynska. Z. & Klein, J. (2003. ) Mol. Biol. Evol. 20, 287-292. [PubMed] 4. Acton, R. T., Weinheimer, P. F., Hildemann, W. H. & Evans, E. E. (1971. ) Infect. Immunol. 4, 160-166. [PubMed] 5. Zapata, A., Fange, R., Mattisson, A. & Villena, A. (1984. ) Cell Tissue Res. 235, 691-693. [PubMed] 6. Gilbertson, P., Wotherspoon, J. & Raison, R. L. (1986. ) Dev. Comp. Immunol. 10, 1-10. [PubMed] 7. Raison, R. L., Gilbertson, P. & Wotherspoon, J. (1987. ) Immunol. Cell Biol. 65, 183-188. [PubMed] 8. Newton, R. A., Raftos, D. A., Raison, R. L. & Geczy, C. L. (1994. ) Dev. Comp. Immunol. 18, 295-303. [PubMed] 9. Raison, R. L., Coverley, J., Hook, J. W., Towns, P., Weston, K. M. & Raftos, D. A. (1994. ) Immunol. Cell Biol. 72, 326-332. [PubMed] 10. Hildemann, W. H. (1970. ) Transplant. Proc. 2, 253-259. [PubMed] 11. Pollara, B., Litman, G. W., Finstad, J., Howell, J. & Good, R. A. (1970. ) J. Immunol. 105, 738-745. [PubMed] 12. Raison, R. L. & Hildemann, W. H. (1984. ) Dev. Comp. Immunol. 8, 99-108. [PubMed] 13. Good, R. A., Finstad, J. & Litman, G. W. (1972. ) in The Biology of Lampreys, eds Hardisty, M. V. & Potter, I. C. (Academic, London), Vol. II, pp. 405-432. 14. Flajnik, M. F. & Kasahara, M. (2001. ) Immunity 15, 351-362. [PubMed] 15. Flajnik, M. F. (2002. ) Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2, 688-698. [PubMed] 16. Suzuki, T., Shin-I, T., Kohara, Y. & Kasahara, M. (2004. ) Dev. Comp. Immunol. 28, 993-1003. [PubMed] 17. Pancer, Z., Mayer, W. E., Klein, J. & Cooper, M. D. (2004. ) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 13273-13278. [PubMed] 18. Eason, D. D., Cannon, J. P., Haire, R. N., Rast, J. P., Ostrov, D. A. & Litman, G. W. (2004. ) Semin. Immunol. 16, 215-226. [PubMed] 19. Pancer, Z., Amemiya, C. T., Ehrhardt, G. R. A., Ceitlin, J., Gartland, G. L. & Cooper, M. D. (2004. ) Nature 430, 174-180. [PubMed] 20. Suzuki, T., Ota, T., Fujiyama, A. & Kasahara, M. (2004. ) Genes Genet. Syst. 79, 251-253. [PubMed] 21. Kumar, S., Tamura, K. & Nei, M. (2004. ) Brief Bioinform. 5, 150-163. [PubMed] 22. Bottaro, A., Lansford, R., Xu, L., Zhang, J., Rothman, P. & Alt, F. W. (1994. ) EMBO J. 13, 665-674. [PubMed] 23. Hein, K., Lorenz, M. G., Siebenkotten, G., Petry, K., Christine, R. & Radbruch, A. (1998. ) J. Exp. Med. 188, 2369-2374. [PubMed] 24. Hedges, S. B. (2001. ) in Major Events in Early Vertebrate Evolution, Systematics Association Special: Molecular Evidence for the Early History of Living Vertebrates, ed. Ahlberg, P. E. (Taylor & Francis, London), Vol. 61, pp. 119-134. 25. Mallatt, J. & Chen, J. Y. (2003. ) J. Morphol. 258, 1-31. [PubMed] 26. Meyer, A. & Zardoya, R. (2003. ) Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34, 311-338. |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2002 Feb; 22(2):184-92.
[Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2002]Mol Biol Evol. 2003 Feb; 20(2):287-92.
[Mol Biol Evol. 2003]Infect Immun. 1971 Aug; 4(2):160-6.
[Infect Immun. 1971]Immunol Cell Biol. 1994 Aug; 72(4):326-32.
[Immunol Cell Biol. 1994]Dev Comp Immunol. 1984 Winter; 8(1):99-108.
[Dev Comp Immunol. 1984]Nature. 2004 Jul 8; 430(6996):174-80.
[Nature. 2004]Dev Comp Immunol. 1994 Jul-Aug; 18(4):295-303.
[Dev Comp Immunol. 1994]Immunol Cell Biol. 1994 Aug; 72(4):326-32.
[Immunol Cell Biol. 1994]Dev Comp Immunol. 2004 Aug; 28(10):993-1003.
[Dev Comp Immunol. 2004]Genes Genet Syst. 2004 Aug; 79(4):251-3.
[Genes Genet Syst. 2004]Brief Bioinform. 2004 Jun; 5(2):150-63.
[Brief Bioinform. 2004]Dev Comp Immunol. 2004 Aug; 28(10):993-1003.
[Dev Comp Immunol. 2004]Nature. 2004 Jul 8; 430(6996):174-80.
[Nature. 2004]Nature. 2004 Jul 8; 430(6996):174-80.
[Nature. 2004]EMBO J. 1994 Feb 1; 13(3):665-74.
[EMBO J. 1994]J Exp Med. 1998 Dec 21; 188(12):2369-74.
[J Exp Med. 1998]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Sep 7; 101(36):13273-8.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004]J Morphol. 2003 Oct; 258(1):1-31.
[J Morphol. 2003]