![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2002 Aronson and Rayfield; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL. How hyperglycemia promotes atherosclerosis: molecular mechanisms 1Cardiology Division, Rambam Medical Center, 31096 Haifa, Israel 2Clinical Professor of Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029, USA 3USA Visiting Physician, Rockefeller University Hospital, New York, NY 10021, USA Corresponding author.Doron Aronson: daronson/at/netvision.net.il; Elliot J Rayfield: ejrayfield/at/aol.com Received April 2, 2002; Accepted April 8, 2002. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Both type I and type II diabetes are powerful and independent risk factors for coronary artery disease (CAD), stroke, and peripheral arterial disease. Atherosclerosis accounts for virtually 80% of all deaths among diabetic patients. Prolonged exposure to hyperglycemia is now recognized a major factor in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis in diabetes. Hyperglycemia induces a large number of alterations at the cellular level of vascular tissue that potentially accelerate the atherosclerotic process. Animal and human studies have elucidated three major mechanisms that encompass most of the pathological alterations observed in the diabetic vasculature: 1) Nonenzymatic glycosylation of proteins and lipids which can interfere with their normal function by disrupting molecular conformation, alter enzymatic activity, reduce degradative capacity, and interfere with receptor recognition. In addition, glycosylated proteins interact with a specific receptor present on all cells relevant to the atherosclerotic process, including monocyte-derived macrophages, endothelial cells, and smooth muscle cells. The interaction of glycosylated proteins with their receptor results in the induction of oxidative stress and proinflammatory responses 2) oxidative stress 3) protein kinase C (PKC) activation with subsequent alteration in growth factor expression. Importantly, these mechanisms may be interrelated. For example, hyperglycemia-induced oxidative stress promotes both the formation of advanced glycosylation end products and PKC activation. Both type I and type II diabetes are powerful and independent risk factors for coronary artery disease (CAD), stroke, and peripheral arterial disease [1-3]. Atherosclerosis accounts for virtually 80% of all deaths among North American diabetic patients, compared with one third of all deaths in the general North American population [1]. More then 75% of all hospitalizations for diabetic complications are attributable to cardiovascular disease. Prolonged exposure to hyperglycemia is now recognized as the primary casual factor in the pathogenesis of diabetic complications [4-6]. Hyperglycemia induces a large number of alterations in vascular tissue that potentially promote accelerated atherosclerosis. Currently, three major mechanisms have emerged that encompass most of the pathological alterations observed in the vasculature of diabetic animals and humans: 1) Nonenzymatic glycosylation of proteins and lipids 2) oxidative stress 3) protein kinase C (PKC) activation. Importantly, these mechanisms are not independent. For example, hyperglycemia-induced oxidative stress promotes the formation of advanced glycosylation end products and PKC activation [7]. Advanced glycosylation end products The effects of hyperglycemia are often irreversible and lead to progressive cell dysfunction [8]. For example, in diabetic patients with functioning pancreatic transplants renal pathology continues to progress for at least 5 years after diabetes has been cured [8]. The mechanism for these observations is unclear, but suggests that cellular perturbations may persist despite the return of normoglycemia (the so-called memory effect). Thus, persistent rather than transient, acute metabolic changes are of pivotal importance in the pathogenesis of diabetic complications. One of the important mechanisms responsible for the accelerated atherosclerosis in diabetes is the nonenzymatic reaction between glucose and proteins or lipoproteins in arterial walls, collectively known as Maillard, or browning reaction [9]. Glucose forms chemically reversible early glycosylation products with reactive amino groups of circulating or vessel wall proteins (Schiff bases), which subsequently rearrange to form the more stable Amadori-type early glycosylation products. Equilibrium levels of Schiff-base and Amadori products (the best known of which is hemoglobin A1C) are reached in hours and weeks, respectively [10] (Figure (Figure1).1
AGEs accumulate continuously on long-lived vessel wall proteins with aging and at an accelerated rate in diabetes [10]. The degree of nonenzymatic glycation is determined mainly by the glucose concentration and time of exposure [10]. However, another critical factor to the formation of AGEs is the tissue microenvironment redox potential. Thus, situations in which the local redox potential has been shifted to favor oxidant stress, AGEs formation increases substantially [7,13-17]. AGEs can accelerate the atherosclerotic process by diverse mechanism, which can be classified as non-receptor dependent (Table 1) and receptor-mediated (Table 2).
Non-receptor mediated mechanisms Glycosylation of proteins and lipoproteins can interfere with their normal function by disrupting molecular conformation, alter enzymatic activity, reduce degradative capacity, and interfere with receptor recognition (Table 1). Thus, changes in the normal physiology of proteins that are relevant to atherogenesis, may promote atherosclerosis in diabetic individuals. Perhaps the most studied example is interference of the normal physiology of the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particle. The glycosylation process occurs both on the apoprotein B [18] and phospholipid [19] components of LDL, leading to both functional alternations in LDL clearance and increased susceptibility to oxidative modifications. Clinical studies have shown an increased level of AGEs on LDL obtained from diabetics compared with normal individuals [19,20]. Glycosylation of LDL apo B (the surface protein of LDL) occurs mainly on a positively charged lysine residues within the putative LDL receptor binding domain which are essential for the specific recognition of LDL by the LDL receptor [20]. LDL glycosylation is increased in correlation with glucose levels, and AGE-ApoB levels are up to 4-fold higher in diabetic patients [19,20]. Glycosylation of ApoB results in a significant impairment of LDL-receptor-mediated uptake decreasing the in vivo clearance of LDL compared to native LDL [21] (Figure (Figure2).2
Another atherogenic effect of glycation is to confer increased susceptibility of LDL to oxidative modification. Oxidation reactions occur normally during glycation can oxidize the amine-containing phospholipids component of LDL, independently of transition metals or exogenous free radical-generating systems [19]. Advanced glycosylation of an amine-containing phospholipids component of LDL is accompanied by progressive oxidative modification of unsaturated fatty acid residues [21]. LDL oxidation following AGE-LDL formation occurs in direct proportion to glucose concentration and can be inhibited by the AGE formation inhibitor aminoguanidine [19]. Thus, glycation confers increased susceptibility of LDL to oxidative modification [21,24], which is considered a critical step in its atherogenicity. Another example is the alterations in normal function of the complement regulatory protein. Deposition of the membrane attack complex of complement (MAC) in blood vessels stimulates proliferation of fibroblasts and smooth muscle cells, in part by releasing growth factors such as fibroblast growth factor and platelet derived growth factor from MAC-targeted endothelium [25]. MAC deposition is normally restricted because cells express the regulatory membrane protein CD59, which limits complement activation and MAC formation. Glycation of the complement regulatory protein CD59 results in its inactivation [26] and may increased the sensitivity of the diabetic endothelium to MAC-induced release of growth factors and cytokines. Glycosylation of matrix components such as collagen VI, laminin, and vitronectin decreased binding of anionic heparan sulfate, leading to greater turnover of heparan sulfate [10]. The absence of HS is thought to stimulate a compensatory overproduction of other matrix components through altered partitioning of growth-regulatory factors between matrix bound proteoglycans and cells [10]. AGEs on matrix also alter the normal interactions of transmembrane integrin receptors with three specific matrix liganeds. For example, modification of the cell binding domains of type IV collagen causes decreased endothelial cell adhesion [10]. Receptor-mediated mechanisms The cellular interactions of AGEs are mediated through a specific receptor for AGE determinants on cell surfaces [16]. The presence of the AGE receptor (RAGE), a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily of receptors [27], has been demonstrated in all cells relevant to the atherosclerotic process including monocyte-derived macrophages, endothelial cells, and smooth muscle cells [16,28] (Table 2). The macrophage AGE receptor system is closely tied to AGE turnover, and is thought to represent a mechanism that responds to raising AGE levels with aging and degrade senescent proteins [29]. In mature animals, RAGE expression on these cells is low [28]. However, under certain pathological circumstances, sustained upregulation of RAGE occurs. In pathological lesions, abundance of RAGE expressing cells is usually associated with sites of accumulated RAGE ligands. In diabetic vasculature, cells expressing high levels of RAGE are often proximal to areas in which AGEs are abundant [17,30]. AGE interaction with RAGE on endothelial cells results in the induction of oxidative stress and consequently of the transcription factor NF-κB [31,32] and VCAM-1 [33] (Figure (Figure3).3
Binding of soluble AGEs to RAGE-bearing monocytes induces chemotaxis [36], followed by mononuclear infiltration through an intact endothelial monolayer [37,38]. Pathological studies of human atherosclerotic plaques showed infiltration of RAGE-expressing cells in the expanded intima [28]. Monocyte-macrophage interaction with AGEs results also in the production of mediators such as interleukin-1, tumor necrosis factor-α, platelet-derived growth factor, and insulin growth factor-I [37,39,40], which have a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis [41]. In smooth muscle cells, binding of AGE-modified proteins to RAGE is associated with increased cellular proliferation [42]. Although the precise mechanism of this response is unknown, the growth-promoting effects mediated by the RAGE are likely to be cytokine or growth-factor mediated. Thus, under conditions of enhanced tissue AGE deposition, receptor-mediated interaction of AGE-proteins with vascular wall cells facilitate the migration of inflammatory cells into the lesion with the subsequent release of growth-promoting cytokines. The potential role of RAGE in the atherogenic process in diabetes has been demonstrated by Park and associates [43]. In the model of atherosclerosis-prone mice due to homozygous deletion of apolipoprotein E (apoE) gene, the induction of diabetes using streptozotocin resulted in atherosclerosis of increased severity compared to euglycemic apoE controls. The development of vascular was more rapid with the formation of more complex lesions (fibrous caps, extensive monocyte infiltration, etc) and atherosclerosis extending distally in the aorta and major arteries. Increased expression of RAGE and the presence of AGEs in the vessel wall, especially at sites of vascular lesions were also evident. Blockade of AGE-RAGE interaction using a truncated soluble extracellular domain of RAGE resulted in a striking suppression of lesions in diabetic mice, with lesions largely arrested at the fatty streak stage and a large reduction in complex lesions. These effects were independent of glucose and lipid levels [43]. Protein kinase c The metabolic consequences of hyperglycemia can be expressed in cells in which glucose transport is largely independent of insulin. The resulting intracellular hyperglycemia has been implicated in the pathogenesis of diabetic complications through the activation of the protein kinase C (PKC) system [44-46]. High ambient glucose concentrations activate PKC by increasing the formation of diacylglycerol (DAG), the major endogenous cellular co-factor for PKC activation, from glycolytic intermediates such as dihydroxy-acetone phosphate and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate. The elevation of DAG and subsequent activation of PKC in the vasculature can be maintained chronically [47]. PKC is a family of at least 12 isoforms of serine and threonine kinases. Although several PKC isoforms are expressed in vascular tissue, in the rat model of diabetes there is a preferential activation of PKC β2 in the aorta, heart, and retina, and PKC β1 in the glomeruli [48,49]. The PKC system is ubiquitously distributed in cells and is involved in the transcription of several growth factors, and in signal transduction in response to growth factors [48,50,51]. In vascular smooth muscle cells, PKC activation has been shown to modulate growth rate, DNA synthesis, and growth factor receptor turnover [46,48]. For example, hyperglycemia-induced PKC activation also results in increased platelet derived growth factor-β receptor expression on smooth muscle cells and other vascular wall cells (e.g., endothelial cells, monocyte-macrophages) [52,53]. PKC activation increases the expression of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), which is one of the most important growth factor regulating extracellular matrix production by activating gene expression of proteoglycans and collagen and decreasing the synthesis of proteolytic enzymes that degrade matrix proteins [54]. Increased expression of TGF-β is thought to lead to thickening of capillary basement membrane – one of the early structural abnormalities observed in almost all tissues in diabetes. PKC β selective inhibitor (LY333531) attenuates glomerular expression of TGF-β and ECM proteins such as fibronectin and type IV collagen [49,50]. Oxidative stress Oxidative stress is widely invoked as a pathogenic mechanism for atherosclerosis. Among the sequelae of hyperglycemia, oxidative stress has been suggested as a potential mechanism for accelerated atherosclerosis [7,55,56]. Hyperglycemia can increase oxidative stress through several pathways. A major mechanism appears to be the hyperglycemia-induced intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), produced by the proton electromechanical gradient generated by the mitochondrial electron transport chain and resulting in increased production of superoxide [7]. Two other mechanisms have been proposed that may explain how hyperglycemia causes increased ROS formation. One mechanism involves the transition metal-catalyzed autoxidation of free glucose, as described in cell-free systems. Through this mechanism, glucose itself initiates autoxidative reaction and free radical production yielding superoxide anion (O2-) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) [57]. The other mechanism involves the transition metalcatalyzed autoxidation of protein-bound Amadori products, which yields superoxide and hydroxyl radicals and highly reactive dicarbonyl compounds [55] (see Glycoxidation). There is also evidence that hyperglycemia may compromise natural antioxidant defenses. Under normal circumstances, free radicals are rapidly eliminated by antioxidants such as reduced glutathione, vitamin C, and vitamin E. Reduced glutathione content [58,59], as well as reduced vitamin E [60,61] have been reported in diabetic patients. Plasma and tissue levels of vitamin C are 40–50% lower in diabetic patients compared with nondiabetic subjects [62,63]. Importantly, there appears to be a tight pathogenic link between hyperglycemia-induced oxidant stress and the two hyperglycemia-dependent mechanisms of vascular damage described above, namely AGEs formation and PKC activation (Figure (Figure55
Glycoxidation Some of the individual advanced glycosylation products such as Nε-carboxymethyl)lysine (CML) and pentosidine are formed in reactions of protein with glucose only under oxidative conditions [15,64-66]. Thus, some AGEs are produced by combined processes of glycation and oxidation and have been termed glycoxidation products [56]. Each AGE structure has its own formation mechanism and thus its own dependence on oxidative stress. However, since glycoxidation products on proteins are irreversible, it has been suggested that they may be an integrative biomarker for the accumulated oxidative stress the respective tissue has been exposed to [14,55]. As previously discussed, the interaction between AGE epitopes and the cell surface AGE receptor upregulate oxidative stress response genes [31] and release oxygen radicals [67]. Thus, hyperglycemia simultaneously enhances both AGEs formation and oxidative stress, and the mutual facilitatory interactions between glycation and oxidation chemistry can contribute sinergistically to the formation of AGEs, oxidative stress, and diabetic complications (Figure (Figure5).5 Oxidative stress and PKC activation Oxidative stress may also be involved in the activation of DAG-PKC in vascular tissue [7]. Oxidants produced in the setting of hyperglycemia can activate PKC [70]. Furthermore, several studies have shown that antioxidants such as vitamin E can inhibit PKC activation probably by decreasing DAG levels [7,71-73]. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||
Diabetes Care. 1992 Sep; 15(9):1156-67.
[Diabetes Care. 1992]Diabetes. 1999 May; 48(5):937-42.
[Diabetes. 1999]N Engl J Med. 1993 Sep 30; 329(14):977-86.
[N Engl J Med. 1993]Nature. 2000 Apr 13; 404(6779):787-90.
[Nature. 2000]N Engl J Med. 1998 Jul 9; 339(2):69-75.
[N Engl J Med. 1998]N Engl J Med. 1988 May 19; 318(20):1315-21.
[N Engl J Med. 1988]Biochemistry. 1996 Jun 18; 35(24):8075-83.
[Biochemistry. 1996]N Engl J Med. 1988 May 19; 318(20):1315-21.
[N Engl J Med. 1988]Nature. 2000 Apr 13; 404(6779):787-90.
[Nature. 2000]J Clin Invest. 1996 Mar 15; 97(6):1422-8.
[J Clin Invest. 1996]Circ Res. 1999 Mar 19; 84(5):489-97.
[Circ Res. 1999]J Biol Chem. 1995 May 5; 270(18):10828-32.
[J Biol Chem. 1995]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Jul 15; 90(14):6434-8.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Jul 15; 90(14):6434-8.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Sep 27; 91(20):9441-5.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994]Diabetes. 1984 Feb; 33(2):130-4.
[Diabetes. 1984]Diabetes. 1995 Sep; 44(9):1093-8.
[Diabetes. 1995]Atherosclerosis. 1993 Apr; 100(1):41-54.
[Atherosclerosis. 1993]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Jul 15; 90(14):6434-8.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993]Diabetes. 1984 Feb; 33(2):130-4.
[Diabetes. 1984]Atherosclerosis. 1993 Aug; 102(1):63-7.
[Atherosclerosis. 1993]J Exp Med. 1994 Mar 1; 179(3):985-92.
[J Exp Med. 1994]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 May 9; 97(10):5450-5.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000]N Engl J Med. 1988 May 19; 318(20):1315-21.
[N Engl J Med. 1988]Arterioscler Thromb. 1994 Oct; 14(10):1521-8.
[Arterioscler Thromb. 1994]J Biol Chem. 1992 Jul 25; 267(21):14998-5004.
[J Biol Chem. 1992]Am J Pathol. 1993 Dec; 143(6):1699-712.
[Am J Pathol. 1993]Diabetes. 1992 Oct; 41 Suppl 2():52-6.
[Diabetes. 1992]Am J Pathol. 1993 Dec; 143(6):1699-712.
[Am J Pathol. 1993]Circ Res. 1999 Mar 19; 84(5):489-97.
[Circ Res. 1999]Am J Pathol. 1995 Mar; 146(3):688-94.
[Am J Pathol. 1995]J Biol Chem. 1994 Apr 1; 269(13):9889-97.
[J Biol Chem. 1994]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Aug 2; 91(16):7742-6.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994]J Clin Invest. 1995 Sep; 96(3):1395-403.
[J Clin Invest. 1995]J Clin Invest. 1996 Jan 1; 97(1):238-43.
[J Clin Invest. 1996]J Exp Med. 1989 Oct 1; 170(4):1387-407.
[J Exp Med. 1989]J Clin Invest. 1993 May; 91(5):2155-68.
[J Clin Invest. 1993]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Nov; 87(22):9010-4.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Dec 15; 89(24):12043-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992]Am J Pathol. 1993 Dec; 143(6):1699-712.
[Am J Pathol. 1993]Science. 1988 Jun 10; 240(4858):1546-8.
[Science. 1988]Lab Invest. 1994 Feb; 70(2):138-51.
[Lab Invest. 1994]Nat Med. 1998 Sep; 4(9):1025-31.
[Nat Med. 1998]Lancet. 1997 Jul; 350 Suppl 1():SI9-13.
[Lancet. 1997]Diabetes. 1998 Jun; 47(6):859-66.
[Diabetes. 1998]Diabetes. 1994 Sep; 43(9):1122-9.
[Diabetes. 1994]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Nov 15; 89(22):11059-63.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992]J Clin Invest. 1997 Jul 1; 100(1):115-26.
[J Clin Invest. 1997]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Nov 15; 89(22):11059-63.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992]FASEB J. 2000 Mar; 14(3):439-47.
[FASEB J. 2000]Diabetes. 2000 Jul; 49(7):1239-48.
[Diabetes. 2000]Diabetes. 1998 Jun; 47(6):859-66.
[Diabetes. 1998]Eur J Clin Invest. 1993 Feb; 23(2):84-90.
[Eur J Clin Invest. 1993]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Nov 15; 90(22):10759-63.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993]J Clin Invest. 1997 Jul 1; 100(1):115-26.
[J Clin Invest. 1997]FASEB J. 2000 Mar; 14(3):439-47.
[FASEB J. 2000]Nature. 2000 Apr 13; 404(6779):787-90.
[Nature. 2000]Diabetes. 1999 Jan; 48(1):1-9.
[Diabetes. 1999]Diabetes. 1991 Apr; 40(4):405-12.
[Diabetes. 1991]Br Med Bull. 1993 Jul; 49(3):642-52.
[Br Med Bull. 1993]Diabetes. 1999 Jan; 48(1):1-9.
[Diabetes. 1999]Diabetologia. 1995 Feb; 38(2):201-10.
[Diabetologia. 1995]Diabetes Care. 1998 Oct; 21(10):1736-42.
[Diabetes Care. 1998]Diabetologia. 1998 Nov; 41(11):1355-60.
[Diabetologia. 1998]Diabetes. 1985 Jun; 34(6):526-31.
[Diabetes. 1985]Diabetes. 1983 Nov; 32(11):1078-81.
[Diabetes. 1983]Biochemistry. 1990 Dec 11; 29(49):10964-70.
[Biochemistry. 1990]J Biol Chem. 1991 Jun 25; 266(18):11654-60.
[J Biol Chem. 1991]Biochemistry. 1995 Mar 21; 34(11):3702-9.
[Biochemistry. 1995]Diabetes. 1991 Apr; 40(4):405-12.
[Diabetes. 1991]Diabetes. 1992 Oct; 41 Suppl 2():42-8.
[Diabetes. 1992]J Biol Chem. 1994 Apr 1; 269(13):9889-97.
[J Biol Chem. 1994]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Aug 2; 91(16):7787-91.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994]J Clin Invest. 1993 Jul; 92(1):212-7.
[J Clin Invest. 1993]J Clin Invest. 1993 Jun; 91(6):2470-8.
[J Clin Invest. 1993]Nature. 2000 Apr 13; 404(6779):787-90.
[Nature. 2000]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Oct 14; 94(21):11233-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997]Diabetes. 1996 Jul; 45 Suppl 3():S117-9.
[Diabetes. 1996]Am J Physiol. 1995 Aug; 269(2 Pt 1):E239-46.
[Am J Physiol. 1995]