![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology Note Sindbis Virus Variant with a Deletion in the 6K Gene Shows Defects in Glycoprotein Processing and Trafficking: Lack of Complementation by a Wild-Type 6K Gene in trans Centro de Biología Molecular (CSIC-UAM), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain *Corresponding author. Mailing address: Centro de Biología Molecular (CSIC-UAM), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain. Phone: 34-91-397-8450. Fax: 34-91-397-4799. E-mail: lcarrasco/at/cbm.uam.es. Received February 26, 2001; Accepted May 9, 2001. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract A Sindbis virus (SV) variant with a 6K gene partially deleted has been obtained. This SV Del6K virus is defective in the proteolytic processing of virus glycoprotein precursor, transport of glycoproteins to the plasma membrane, and plaque phenotype. A revertant virus (SV Del6K-revQ21L) containing a point mutation in the deleted 6K gene was isolated and characterized. SV Del6K-revQ21L has corrected the defects of proteolytic processing and transport of virus glycoproteins to the plasma membrane, but it still remains attenuated compared to wild-type (wt) SV, exhibiting defects in virus budding. Neither mutant nor revertant viruses are complemented by the coexpression in trans of a wt SV 6K gene. Alphaviruses are enveloped viruses that contain a single-stranded positive-sense RNA as a genome (23). The alphavirus structural proteins are synthesized from a subgenomic mRNA encoding a polyprotein that is proteolytically processed. The C protein is first synthesized and separated from the rest of the polyprotein by autocatalytic cleavage. Once the C protein has been released to the cytoplasm, further translation of the mRNA continues that is associated with membranes (23). The newly exposed amino terminus contains a signal sequence that interacts with membranes of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and directs this portion of the glycoprotein precursor (E3-E2–6K-E1) into the lumen of the ER. The precursor associates with the ER membrane, spanning the lipid bilayer six times. Soon after synthesis, this precursor is cleaved at both ends of the 6K protein by a cellular protease present in the ER, generating the products PE2 (E3 plus E2), 6K, and E1. Subsequently, PE2 and E1 associate to form dimers that migrate together with 6K through the vesicular system to the plasma membrane. PE2 is cleaved by a furin-like protease present in a post-Golgi compartment, giving rise to glycoproteins E3 and E2 (23). Despite the association of the 6K protein with the plasma membrane and its association with E1-E2, very little 6K is incorporated into the released virus particles (6, 18). The 6K protein is a small hydrophobic polypeptide that is acylated with fatty acids (6, 18). 6K provides the signal sequence for translocation of E1 to the lumen of the ER (15). A Semliki Forest virus (SFV) variant lacking the entire 6K is processed between E2 and E1 (16). E1 is properly translocated to the ER in the 6K-deleted SFV mutant. The major defects of this variant are found in the budding process (16, 17). Similarly, Sindbis virus (SV) variants with single or multiple amino acid substitutions in the 6K gene are defective in virion release, leading to the formation of multinucleated virus particles (5, 7,11, 12). Proper proteolytic processing of the virus glycoproteins is hampered in a SV variant bearing an insertion of 15 amino acids in the 6K protein (22). This SV mutant exhibits a trans-dominant phenotype, but virus particles have a morphology similar to wild-type (wt) virus. On the other hand, the functions of the 6K protein cannot be rescued by the corresponding counterpart from related virus species. Thus, the replacement of the SV 6K gene with the 6K counterpart from Ross River virus produced viruses with a small plaque phenotype and reduced formation of infectious virus (26). This SV variant containing the 6K gene from Ross River virus was able to proteolytically cleave the glycoproteins' precursor and to transport them to the plasma membrane. Although these observations suggest a function for 6K in the release of virions, the precise molecular mechanism by which 6K protein enhances virus particle release remains unknown. Generation of a 6K deletion variant of SV. The role of the 6K protein in the SV replication cycle has been analyzed previously by several laboratories using a number of 6K variants. To further assess the role of 6K protein, a variant of SV that lacks a significant portion of the 6K gene was generated (SV Del6K) (Fig. (Fig.1A).1
pT7 SV Del6K contains an internal deletion in the sequence encoding the 6K protein. The coding sequence corresponding to amino acids 24 to 45 of the 6K protein has been deleted. In addition, it has the mutation altering TTG nucleotides to GCA, predicting a change from L22 to A. The PCR product generated using the oligonucleotides 5′ C CCGGGCATATGGGATGGCCACACGAAATAGTACAG 3′ and 5′ GGCGCCGCATGCCTGGACCCAGAAGAACGGCTGACT 3′ was digested with SphI and ligated to the PCR product generated using the oligonucleotides 5′ CCCGGGGCATGCGCCGGCGCCTACCTGGCGAAGGTA 3′ and 5′ GGCGCCGGATCCTTATTAGACGTACGCCTCACTCATCTGGCT 3′ previously digested with SphI. The new product was digested with BssHII and BsiWI and inserted into BssHII/BsiWI sites of pT7 SV wt. The SV Del6K variant obtained retains the two cleavage signals at either end of the 6K protein. Electroporation of BHK cells with the viral RNA synthesized in vitro led to the production of progeny viruses. A plaque assay of the viruses thus obtained indicated that most of the plaques had a minute phenotype, while a significant number exhibited a size about half that of the wt virus (Fig. (Fig.1B).1 We next isolated viruses from several intermediate-size plaques of SV Del6K. The region corresponding to 6K was sequenced in 12 of these isolates. Seventy percent of the variant viruses contained a point mutation at nucleotide 9961 (A changed to T) affecting residue 21 (Q was replaced by L) in the deleted 6K gene. This point mutation rendered the truncated 6K protein more hydrophobic (Fig. (Fig.1D).1 Glycoprotein synthesis and trafficking in BHK cells electroporated with SV Del6K and SV Del6K-revQ21L RNAs. Since electroporation of cells with Del6K RNA followed by virus harvesting leads to the production of revertant viruses with mutations in the partially deleted 6K gene, it was of interest to directly electroporate cells with viral RNAs. Initially, protein synthesis and glycoprotein processing were tested. To this end, BHK cells were electroporated with wt SV, SV Del6K, or SV Del6K-revQ21L RNAs made by in vitro transcription. Electroporated cells were labeled with [35S]methionine-cysteine at 16 h postelectroporation (h.p.e.) for 30 min and chased by incubation in nonradioactive medium for 1 or 2 h (Fig. (Fig.2A).2
Further insights into the pattern of cleavages between E2–6K and 6K-E1 were obtained by immunodetection. Samples of BHK cells electroporated with the different RNAs were analyzed by Western blotting with previously described anti-6K antibodies (6) (Fig. (Fig.2B).2 Additional analysis of the processing of E1 glycoprotein was carried out by examining endo-β-N-acetylglucosaminidase H (endo H) sensitivity. Extracts from electroporated cells were treated with or without endo H glycosidase and immunoprecipitated with anti-E1 antibodies. The anti-E1 antiserum was raised in rabbits immunized with fusion protein MBP-ΔSV E1. Protein MBP-ΔSV E1 contains amino acids 186 to 343 from E1 sequence fused to maltose-binding protein. The immunoprecipitated material was analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Fig. (Fig.2C).2 After precursor processing, alphavirus glycoproteins are delivered to the plasma membrane ready for virus budding. Subcellular localization of E1 or its precursor products was analyzed in BHK cells electroporated with wt SV, SV Del6K, and SV Del6K-revQ21L RNAs. Immunofluorescence analysis with anti-E1 antibodies was carried out with permeabilized or unpermeabilized cells to determine the proportion of E1 delivered to the plasma membrane. E1 immunofluorescence was clearly visible at the plasma membrane of unpermeabilized wt SV or SV Del6K-revQ21L cells, but not when SV Del6K was tested (results not shown). The presence of E1 (or its precursors) was seen in all three cases when cells were permeabilized to the anti-E1 antibodies (results not shown). In addition, we examined electroporated cells by electron microscopy. At 16 h.p.e., the cells were fixed, dehydrated, embedded, and examined. Representative micrographs are shown in Fig. Fig.3.3
Lack of complementation of SV 6K in trans. The revertant virus SV Del6K-revQ21L partially recovered the capacity to process the P160 precursor proteolytically. In addition, the viral glycoproteins associate with the cell membrane, in contrast to what happens with SV Del6K. However, SV Del6K-revQ21L still shows defects, with an intermediate-plaque-size phenotype. This defect may be due to the impaired activity of the deleted 6K. Since SV Del6K-revQ21L is able to cleave P160, it was of interest to test whether wt 6K provided in trans complemented the plaque size of the revertant virus. To this end, the SV 6K gene was placed under a second subgenomic promoter (see Fig. Fig.1A)1
Conclusions. The main defects associated with the SV Del6K variant described in this work appeared to be a consequence of inefficient proteolytic processing of the viral glycoprotein precursor. The revertant SV Del6K-revQ21L virus has resolved the defects of cleavage by the signalase and the transport of viral glycoproteins to the plasma membrane. This reversion can be ascribed to the substitution Q21L that renders the Del6K protein more hydrophobic. This reversion to a higher hydrophobicity of the Del6K protein may permit stronger association of Del6K with membranes, which may favor the signalase activity. Nevertheless, the revertant SV Del6K-revQ21L still has an attenuated phenotype, with defects in the release of virions from cells. These findings support another function for the 6K protein besides providing the signal sequences to signalase. It was proposed that the 6K protein promotes membrane deformation and bending during the budding process (5, 17). Further evidence for the functioning of 6K comes from membrane permeabilization upon expression of the SFV 6K in Escherichia coli cells (21). The 6K protein of SV behaves similarly in this respect (unpublished results). This permeabilizing activity promotes local changes in membrane potential that would generate forces favoring the budding process. In this regard, there is evidence that budding of alphavirus particles is influenced by ionic gradients (14, 25). However, little is known about the molecular basis underlying this phenomenon. Another possible role for the 6K protein during budding is that it promotes lateral interactions between glycoprotein heterodimers or between spikes by 6K-6K interactions. In this way, 6K could favor glycoprotein concentration in the cytoplasmic membrane before its dissociation from viral glycoproteins. The coexpression of a genuine 6K protein did not revert the SV Del6K or SV Del6K-revQ21L phenotypes. The absence of complementation by 6K expressed in trans could be ascribed to one of the following factors. (i) Association with the PE2-E1 heterodimers is impaired. (ii) The 6K generated in trans contains an additional methionine in its N-terminal end. (iii) The 6K does not fold correctly in the cellular membranes, since it is expressed out of the context of the viral polyprotein. Other animal viruses encode proteins with physical or biological similarities to 6K. These physical characteristics include a low molecular weight in very hydrophobic proteins that oligomerize and interact with membranes. The main biological function of these proteins is to participate in budding of virus particles, although they are excluded from mature virions. Proteins with these features are collectively termed viroporins (3). Typical viroporins are Vpu from human immunodeficiency virus (8, 13), M2 from influenza virus (10, 27), SH from respiratory syncitial virus (19), 2B from picornaviruses (1, 2, 24), or protein E from coronavirus (4, 20). Both M2 and Vpu form ion channels in biological membranes (3). Comparative studies of the biological functioning of these proteins will indicate to what extent they share analogous functions during the replicative cycle of animal viruses. Acknowledgments DGICYT project number PB94-0148 and the institutional grant to the CBM of Fundación Ramón Areces are acknowledged for financial support. REFERENCES 1. Barco A, Carrasco L. A human virus protein, poliovirus protein 2BC, induces membrane proliferation and blocks the exocytic pathway in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 1995;14:3349–3364. [PubMed] 2. Barco A, Carrasco L. Identification of regions of poliovirus 2BC protein that are involved in cytotoxicity. J Virol. 1998;72:3560–3570. [PubMed] 3. Carrasco L. Modification of membrane permeability by animal viruses. Adv Virus Res. 1995;45:61–112. [PubMed] 4. Corse E, Machamer C E. Infectious bronchitis virus E protein is targeted to the Golgi complex and directs release of virus-like particles. J Virol. 2000;74:4319–4326. [PubMed] 5. Gaedigk-Nitschko K, Ding M X, Levy M A, Schlesinger M J. Site-directed mutations in the Sindbis virus 6K protein reveal sites for fatty acylation and the underacylated protein affects virus release and virion structure. Virology. 1990;175:282–291. [PubMed] 6. Gaedigk-Nitschko K, Schlesinger M J. The Sindbis virus 6K protein can be detected in virions and is acylated with fatty acids. Virology. 1990;175:274–281. [PubMed] 7. Gaedigk-Nitschko K, Schlesinger M J. Site-directed mutations in Sindbis virus E2 glycoprotein's cytoplasmic domain and the 6K protein lead to similar defects in virus assembly and budding. Virology. 1991;183:206–214. [PubMed] 8. González M E, Carrasco L. The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Vpu protein enhances membrane permeability. Biochemistry. 1998;37:13710–13719. [PubMed] 9. Hahn C S, Hahn Y S, Braciale T J, Rice C M. Infectious Sindbis virus transient expression vectors for studying antigen processing and presentation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:2679–2683. [PubMed] 10. Hughey P G, Compans R W, Zebedee S L, Lamb R A. Expression of the influenza A virus M2 protein is restricted to apical surfaces of polarized epithelial cells. J Virol. 1992;66:5542–5552. [PubMed] 11. Ivanova L, Le L, Schlesinger M J. Characterization of revertants of a Sindbis virus 6K gene mutant that affects proteolytic processing and virus assembly. Virus Res. 1995;39:165–179. [PubMed] 12. Ivanova L, Lustig S, Schlesinger M J. A pseudo-revertant of a Sindbis virus 6K protein mutant, which corrects for aberrant particle formation, contains two new mutations that map to the ectodomain of the E2 glycoprotein. Virology. 1995;206:1027–1034. [PubMed] 13. Klimkait T, Strebel K, Hoggan M D, Martin M A, Orenstein J M. The human immunodeficiency virus type 1-specific protein vpu is required for efficient virus maturation and release. J Virol. 1990;64:621–629. [PubMed] 14. Li M L, Stollar V. A mutant of Sindbis virus which is released efficiently from cells maintained in low strength medium. Virology. 1995;210:237–243. [PubMed] 15. Liljeström P, Garoff H. Internally located cleavable signal sequences direct the formation of Semliki Forest virus membrane proteins from a polyprotein precursor. J Virol. 1991;65:147–154. [PubMed] 16. Liljeström P, Lusa S, Huylebroeck D, Garoff H. In vitro mutagenesis of a full-length cDNA clone of Semliki Forest virus: the small 6,000-molecular-weight membrane protein modulates virus release. J Virol. 1991;65:4107–4113. [PubMed] 17. Loewy A, Smyth J, Von Bonsdorff C-H, Liljeström P, Schlesinger M J. The 6-kilodalton membrane protein of Semliki Forest virus is involved in the budding process. J Virol. 1995;69:469–475. [PubMed] 18. Lusa S, Garoff H, Liljeström P. Fate of the 6K membrane protein of Semliki Forest virus during virus assembly. Virology. 1991;185:843–846. [PubMed] 19. Pérez M, García-Barreno B, Melero J A, Carrasco L, Guinea R. Membrane permeability changes induced in Escherichia coli by the SH protein of human respiratory syncytial virus. Virology. 1997;235:342–351. [PubMed] 20. Raamsman M J, Locker J K, de Hooge A, de Vries A A, Griffiths G, Vennema H, Rottier P J. Characterization of the coronavirus mouse hepatitis virus strain A59 small membrane protein E. J Virol. 2000;74:2333–2342. [PubMed] 21. Sanz M A, Pérez L, Carrasco L. Semliki Forest virus 6K protein modifies membrane permeability after inducible expression in Escherichia coli cells. J Biol Chem. 1994;269:12106–12110. [PubMed] 22. Schlesinger M J, London S D, Ryan C. An in-frame insertion into the Sindbis virus 6K gene leads to defective proteolytic processing of the virus glycoproteins, a trans-dominant negative inhibition of normal virus formation, and interference in virus shut off of host-cell protein synthesis. Virology. 1993;193:424–432. [PubMed] 23. Strauss J H, Strauss E G. The alphaviruses: gene expression, replication, and evolution. Microbiol Rev. 1994;58:491–562. [PubMed] 24. Van Kuppeveld F J M, Hoenderop J G J, Smeets R L L, Willems P H G M, Kijkman H B P M, Galama J M D, Melchers J G. Coxsackievirus protein 2B modifies endoplasmic reticulum membrane and plasma membrane permeability and facilitates virus release. EMBO J. 1997;16:3519–3532. [PubMed] 25. Waite M R, Pfefferkorn E R. Inhibition of Sindbis virus production by media of low ionic strength: intracellular events and requirements for reversal. J Virol. 1970;5:60–71. [PubMed] 26. Yao J S, Strauss E G, Strauss J H. Interactions between PE2, E1, and 6K required for assembly of alphaviruses studied with chimeric viruses. J Virol. 1996;70:7910–7920. [PubMed] 27. Zebedee S L, Lamb R A. Growth restriction of influenza A virus by M2 protein antibody is genetically linked to the M1 protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1989;86:1061–1065. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||
Microbiol Rev. 1994 Sep; 58(3):491-562.
[Microbiol Rev. 1994]Virology. 1990 Mar; 175(1):274-81.
[Virology. 1990]Virology. 1991 Dec; 185(2):843-6.
[Virology. 1991]Virology. 1990 Mar; 175(1):274-81.
[Virology. 1990]Virology. 1991 Dec; 185(2):843-6.
[Virology. 1991]J Virol. 1991 Jan; 65(1):147-54.
[J Virol. 1991]J Virol. 1991 Aug; 65(8):4107-13.
[J Virol. 1991]J Virol. 1995 Jan; 69(1):469-75.
[J Virol. 1995]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Apr 1; 89(7):2679-83.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992]Virology. 1990 Mar; 175(1):274-81.
[Virology. 1990]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Apr 1; 89(7):2679-83.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992]Virology. 1990 Mar; 175(1):282-91.
[Virology. 1990]J Virol. 1995 Jan; 69(1):469-75.
[J Virol. 1995]J Biol Chem. 1994 Apr 22; 269(16):12106-10.
[J Biol Chem. 1994]Virology. 1995 Jul 10; 210(2):237-43.
[Virology. 1995]J Virol. 1970 Jan; 5(1):60-71.
[J Virol. 1970]Adv Virus Res. 1995; 45():61-112.
[Adv Virus Res. 1995]Biochemistry. 1998 Sep 29; 37(39):13710-9.
[Biochemistry. 1998]J Virol. 1990 Feb; 64(2):621-9.
[J Virol. 1990]J Virol. 1992 Sep; 66(9):5542-52.
[J Virol. 1992]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Feb; 86(3):1061-5.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989]