![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2005 Perrella and Bhavnani; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. Protection of cortical cells by equine estrogens against glutamate-induced excitotoxicity is mediated through a calcium independent mechanism 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada 2Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada 3Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada Corresponding author.Joel Perrella: joel.perrella/at/utoronto.ca; Bhagu R Bhavnani: bhavnani/at/smh.toronto.on.ca Received November 10, 2004; Accepted May 10, 2005. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Background High concentrations of glutamate can accumulate in the brain and may be involved in the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease. This form of neurotoxicity involves changes in the regulation of cellular calcium (Ca2+) and generation of free radicals such as peroxynitrite (ONOO-). Estrogen may protect against glutamate-induced cell death by reducing the excitotoxic Ca2+ influx associated with glutamate excitotoxicity. In this study, the inhibition of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor and nitric oxide synthase (NOS) along with the effect of 17β-estradiol (17β-E2) and a more potent antioxidant Δ8, 17β-estradiol (Δ8, 17β-E2) on cell viability and intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i), following treatment of rat cortical cells with glutamate, was investigated. Results Primary rat cortical cells were cultured for 7–12 days in Neurobasal medium containing B27 supplements. Addition of glutamate (200 μM) decreased cell viability to 51.3 ± 0.7% compared to control. Treatment with the noncompetitive NMDAR antagonist, MK-801, and the NOS inhibitor, L-NAME, completely prevented cell death. Pretreatment (24 hrs) with 17β-E2 and Δ8, 17β-E2 (0.01 to 10 μM) significantly reduced cell death. 17β-E2 was more potent than Δ8, 17β-E2. Glutamate caused a rapid 2.5 fold increase in [Ca2+]i. Treatment with 0.001 to 10 μM MK-801 reduced the initial Ca2+ influx by 14–41% and increased cell viability significantly. Pretreatment with 17β-E2 and Δ8, 17β-E2 had no effect on Ca2+ influx but protected the cortical cells against glutamate-induced cell death. Conclusion Glutamate-induced cell death in cortical cultures can occur through NMDAR and NOS-linked mechanisms by increasing nitric oxide and ONOO-. Equine estrogens: 17β-E2 and Δ8, 17β-E2, significantly protected cortical cells against glutamate-induced excitotoxicity by a mechanism that appears to be independent of Ca2+ influx. To our knowledge, this is a first such observation. Whether the decrease in NOS related products such as ONOO-, is a mechanism by which estrogens protect against glutamate toxicity, remains to be investigated. Estrogen replacement therapy in healthy and young postmenopausal women may protect against neurodegenerative diseases by these mechanisms. Background A number of neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's disease (AD) have been proposed to involve a dysregulation in the brain's glutamatergic system [1-4]. In addition, high (mM) glutamate concentrations have been documented to cause neuronal degeneration in various in vivo and in vitro models [1]. Although glutamate-induced cell death is associated with both apoptotic and necrotic changes [5] the mechanism of cell death remains to be established. Two distinct pathways for glutamate-induced cell death have been described: the excitotoxic pathway and the oxidative pathway. The excitotoxic pathway involves the overactivation of glutamate receptors that leads to both rapid and slowly triggered cytotoxic events. The rapid effects involve the activation of the N-Methyl-D-Aspartate receptor (NMDAR) that lead to a large Ca2+ influx that may be detrimental to cell viability [6]. The oxidative pathway involves the breakdown of the glutamate-cystine antiporter and a drop in glutathione levels that allows for aberrant formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that are neurotoxic [7,8]. Although intracellular Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) is necessary for a number of physiological processes, excessive amounts may lead to neuronal dysfunction and cell death. Neuronal increases in Ca2+ can activate a number of enzymes, such as phospholipases, proteases, endonucleases and nitric oxide synthase (NOS). Increase in the activity of these enzymes is associated with neuronal cell death [9,10]. Excessive glutamatergic stimulation is also associated with an increase in [Ca2+]i required for neuronal NOS (nNOS) activation and nitric oxide (NO) production within the neuron and this can result in increased cell death [9,11,12]. Therefore, the maintenance of proper Ca2+ homeostasis may be effective in preventing the progression of glutamate associated neuronal degeneration. Previous studies demonstrate that estrogens are neuroprotective against the oxidative pathway of glutamate-induced cell death in a mouse hippocampal cell line, HT22 [13,14]. This finding, along with other studies describing estrogen's neuroprotective and neurotrophic action [13,15,16] support results from observational studies that exogenous estrogen use by postmenopausal women is neuroprotective [17-20]. Although estrogens are potent antioxidants [21,22] that can prevent oxidative damage in cell culture systems, recent evidence also suggests that estrogen may inhibit glutamate-induced excitotoxicity [23]. Moreover, estrogen can lower cytotoxic Ca2+ influxes induced by glutamate in hippocampal cells [24,25]. Whether this Ca2+ lowering, or buffering effect occurs in other neuronal cell types, such as cortical cells, that are known to be estrogen sensitive, and whether this effect is involved in estrogen's neuroprotective effects remains to be established. In this study, the effect of 17β-estradiol (17β-E2) and a novel ring-B unsaturated equine estrogen with less feminizing effects [26,27] and greater antioxidant potential, Δ8, 17β-estradiol (Δ8, 17β-E2) [21,22] on cell viability and [Ca2+]i, following treatment of rat cortical cells with glutamate was studied. The concentrations of glutamate used in the present study are relatively lower than those used in previous studies where cell death may have occurred mainly via the oxidative pathway. It is hypothesized that both estrogens will protect cortical cells from glutamate induced excitotoxicity by modifying the initial Ca2+ influx in addition to acting as antioxidants. Results Purity of neuronal cultures Freshly isolated embryonic cortical cells obtained from day 17–19 pregnant rats were cultured and maintained in serum-free neurobasal medium containing B27 supplements for 7 days as described under "Materials and Methods". Phase contrast microscopy indicated that the cells had characteristic morphology of neurons and their cellular extensions (dendrites) were clearly visible (Figure (Figure1B).1B
Effect of glutamate on cell viability Cortical neuronal cells (4 × 104) cultured for 7 days in 96-well plates were treated with increasing concentrations (0.1 to1000 μM) of glutamate for 20 min and cell viability was measured after 24 hrs and compared with vehicle-treated samples. As depicted in Figure Figure2,2
Kinetics of glutamate-induced cell death In order to determine the kinetics of glutamate excitotoxicity, rat primary cortical neurons were cultured for 7 days and then treated with 200 μM glutamate for 20 min. Cell death was then assessed at 2, 4, 8, and 24 hrs as described under "Materials and Methods". The results depicted in Figure Figure33
Effect of estrogen on glutamate-induced cell death To determine whether the neurotoxic effect of glutamate can be prevented by estrogen treatment, cells were pretreated for 24 hrs with various concentrations, 0.01 to 10 μM, of 17β-E2 or Δ8, 17β-E2, glutamate treatment was then initiated and cell viability was measured after 24 hrs. An acute (20 minute), 200 μM glutamate exposure resulted in a 50% decrease in cell viability. As depicted in Figure Figure4,4
Effect of NMDA and NOS inhibitors on glutamate-induced cell death To determine whether the neurotoxic effect of acute glutamate treatment on rat primary cortical neurons is mediated through the NMDAR or NO, cell viability was determined following inhibition of NMDAR function or inhibition of NOS activity in cells treated acutely with 200 μM glutamate. As can be seen in Figure Figure5,5
Effect of glutamate on intracellular calcium levels To evaluate the effect of glutamate on [Ca2+]i concentrations in cortical neurons various glutamate concentrations, (0.1 to 200 μM), were added to wells and changes in relative fluorescence units (RFU) were recorded. Baseline readings were taken every 15 seconds for a total of 60 seconds prior to an injection (10 μl) of glutamate into each well (indicated by glu Figure Figure6A).6A
Effect of NMDAR antagonist, MK-801, on glutamate-induced Ca2+ influx In order to evaluate the contribution of glutamate-induced Ca2+ influx on cell viability the effect of NMDAR antagonist MK-801 on Ca2+ influx and cell viability was measured 24 hours later in the same cell population after glutamate treatment. The maximum initial Ca2+ influx was reached 15 seconds after glutamate (200 μM) injection and percent of maximum initial Ca2+ influx was calculated for each concentration of MK-801 (0.001 to 10 μM). As can be seen in Figure Figure7,7
Effect of estrogen on glutamate-induced calcium influx The effect of estrogen on acute, glutamate (200 μM) induced Ca2+ influx was measured at various concentrations (0.01 to 10 μM) of 17β-E2 and Δ8, 17β-E2. Representative traces for the effect of 5 μM 17β-E2 and Δ8, 17β-E2 on the glutamate-induced Ca2+ influx are presented in Figure Figure9.9
Discussion In this study, we demonstrate that in primary cultures of pure rat embryonic cortical neurons, acute (20 min) treatment with glutamate results in a dose and time-dependent cell death. Over 50% of cells die at a glutamate concentration of 50 μM. Higher concentrations (> 50 μM) of glutamate did not result in any further increase in cell death. These findings are in keeping with previous observations with cultures of purified embryonic rat spinal cord motor neurons where NMDA and non-NMDA glutamate receptor agonists kill a maximum of 40% of the neurons [28]. In contrast to these findings some studies with immortalized hippocampal cells (HT22) cultured in media containing serum have reported glutamate-induced cell death to occur only at concentrations in the millimolar range [8,13,14]. Taken together, these findings suggests that the cell type and culture conditions may play an important role in the sensitivity of cells towards glutamate-induced cell death. In addition, a main difference between rat primary cortical neuronal cells and the HT22 cells used, is that the HT22 cells are devoid of functional NMDARs and thus the cell death induced in these cells at high concentrations of glutamate is thought to proceed mainly through the oxidative pathway rather than the excitotoxic pathway [7,8]. Although the primary cortical neurons used in our study are sensitive to small changes in glutamate concentrations (0.1 to 50 μM), the extent of neuronal death under our experimental conditions (50%) is lower than that reported in a number of studies where mixed cell cultures containing neuronal, glial and other cell types were used. In these mixed cultures over 85% of motor neurons died following treatment with glutamate [29,30]. It has further been demonstrated that in such mixed cell cultures, glutamate receptor agonists may induce cell death by activating receptors on the susceptible neurons or by activating receptors in non-neuronal cells. This results in the release of substances such as NO that are toxic to neurons [31,32]. Thus, the lower extent (50%) of cell death observed in cultures maintained in neurobasal medium containing B27 supplements is most likely due to the high purity (absence of glia) of the neuronal cultures used in our study. The absence of glia in our neuronal cultures (Figure (Figure1)1 Alternatively, it is also possible that the lower extent of cell death after a short (20 min) exposure to excitotoxic levels of glutamate (200 μM) may be due to the presence of glutamate sensitive and insensitive neurons in our cultures and this has also been reported by others [23,28,35]. It has further been demonstrated in pure motor neuronal cultures (7 day old) that survival (60%) of a subset of neurons treated with glutamate was unlikely to be due to the lack of differential glutamate receptor expression [28]. These authors further suggest that selective vulnerability may be down stream of the rise in intracellular Ca2+ that occurs after treatment with glutamate or agonists [28]. Previous studies, in particular with mixed cortical cultures or spinal cord neurons, have indicated that the age or maturation of neurons is important in the extent of neuronal death following treatment with glutamate. Thus, in mixed 18 day old cultures of neurons, glutamate treatment resulted in over 80% neuronal cell death compared to only 25% cell death in 4 day old cultures [36]. Since we have used cortical neurons that have been maintained in culture for only 7 days, it is possible that the extent of neuronal cell death induced by glutamate may further increase in longer-term cultures. Although we have been able to maintain some neurons for longer periods than one week, these neurons, even in the absence of glutamate, continue to die at variable rates. In keeping with our observations, Fryer et al [28] reported that 95% of pure motor neurons in culture die by 7 days. It appears that long-term cultures of pure neurons maintained in absence of serum cannot at present be used to address the question of the effect of glutamate on neurons maintained in culture for extended periods of time. The kinetics of glutamate-induced cell death indicated that while an acute (20 minute) exposure to glutamate was sufficient to cause cell death, cell death did not occur until 4 to 8 hours following glutamate treatment. This delay in cell death is suggestive of apoptosis. Indeed, recent evidence indicates that apoptotic mechanisms can play an important role in glutamate-induced neuronal cell death [13,14,37-40]. Thus, we have demonstrated in HT22 mouse hippocampal cells that glutamate induced apoptosis was associated with DNA fragmentation, morphological changes and up-regulation of the pro-apoptotic protein Bax and down-regulation of the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2. Moreover, this process was reversed by estrogens [14]. We have further shown that in primary cortical neurons glutamate-induced apoptosis by caspase-3 dependent and independent mechanisms involves mitochondrial release of cytochrome C and apoptosis inducing factor (AIF) and these apoptotic changes were reversed by equine estrogens [37]. While the mechanism of glutamate-induced cell death has not been fully elucidated, results from the present study clearly indicate that glutamate-induced cell death in primary cortical cells is NMDAR and NOS linked. The relatively short time required for glutamate to initiate the cell death process and the requirement for NMDAR activation and NO production, suggest that this cell death is primarily excitotoxic. These findings are in keeping with previous observations that suggest excitotoxic cell death in cortical cultures is dependent on NMDAR and NOS activity [11,12]. Furthermore, it has been suggested that it is the production of ONOO- from increased NO formation that may be responsible for cell death and that this increase in NO is dependent on NMDA associated Ca2+ influx [9]. Therefore, reduction in Ca2+ influx or NO production are two potential mechanisms by which neuroprotective agents may act. The data from the present study clearly indicates that estrogen can protect against glutamate-induced excitotoxicity in primary cortical cells and a 24 hour pretreatment prior to glutamate insult is sufficient to provide this protection. In a previous study [23] protective effects of 17β-E2 were observed at physiological concentrations, while the concentrations we used were pharmacological. The differences are most likely due to culture conditions used: their media [23] contained antioxidants, higher cell density and lower glutamate concentrations. Since estrogens are potent antioxidants [21,22], the presence of other antioxidants in the media may explain the differences between our findings and those reported previously [23]. Although the concentrations of estrogen used in our study are high, significantly high levels [70 ng/hr/mL] were found in postmenopausal women taking a single therapeutic dose of conjugated equine estrogen [41]. Whether the levels used in the present study are attained in women taking these estrogens daily for extended periods of time remains to be determined. It has been previously suggested that the antioxidant property of estrogen may be one possible mechanism by which estrogens exert their neuroprotective activity. Therefore, if estrogen mediated neuroprotection occurs solely through an antioxidant mechanism, then Δ8, 17β-E2 (a more potent antioxidant estrogen) [21,22,42] would be expected to be much more effective in preventing glutamate-induced cell death than 17β-E2. However, in the present study 17β-E2 was significantly more potent than Δ8, 17β-E2. The difference in neuroprotective potency suggests that the protective effect under the experimental conditions used in the present study are not solely dependent on the estrogen's antioxidant potency. The difference may also be due to the experimental design used in the present study (ex in vivo versus whole cell). Although Δ8, 17β-E2 is less potent than 17β-E2, its use as a potential neuroprotective agent warrants further investigation. This estrogen is a weaker uterotropic estrogen than 17β-E2 and its effects appear to be mediated mainly via the estrogen receptor β (ERβ) [26,27,43]. Thus, Δ8, 17β-E2 may have therapeutic applications in both women and men for prevention of neurodegeneration. Whether this neuroprotection also occurs through the well characterized genomic mechanism involving ERs (ERα and ERβ) or through the putative membrane receptor pathways [44] remains to be investigated. As we have shown, glutamate-induced excitotoxicity is dependent on NMDAR activity and therefore, changes in Ca2+ influx across the cell membrane may trigger mechanisms involved in cell death [6]. Indeed, it was observed in the present study that following glutamate stimulation, a rapid dose-dependent increase in [Ca2+]i occurs that is associated with a dose-dependent decrease in cell viability. However, stimulation with glutamate above 10 μM did not further increase [Ca2+]i again suggesting that glutamate insensitive and sensitive cells may have been present in these primary cortical cultures. The observation that glutamate-induced Ca2+ influx decreased significantly by MK-801 suggests that this to some extent occurs via NMDAR. Increasing concentrations of MK-801 resulted in a gradual lowering of the [Ca2+]i concentration within 15 seconds after glutamate treatment. Thus MK-801 (10 μM) reduced the [Ca2+]i from 350 nM to 200 nM in 15 seconds (Figure (Figure7).7 In the present study the effect of estrogen on excitotoxic Ca2+ influx was investigated and although 17β-E2 and Δ8, 17β-E2 both provided significant protection (Figure (Figure9),9 There are many other effects of estrogen on the central nervous system that have been described, for example, estrogen can alter NOS expression throughout the brain and potentially upregulate antioxidant proteins through cyclic guanosine monophosphate linked mechanisms [48,49]. Such alterations may play a role in glutamate excitotoxicity by affecting subsequent events in the cell death pathway, downstream of the initial Ca2+ influx. In addition, the rapid activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) by estrogen has been shown to be necessary for estrogenic protection although how and what the function of MAPK is in preventing cell death remains to be established [50]. Similarly, the phosphorylation of CREB (cAMP [cyclic adenosine monophospate] response element-binding protein) and upregulation of neurotrophic factors such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor [51], may play a role in neuronal protection [52]. Whether these factors are involved in prevention of glutamate-induced excitotoxicity by equine estrogens remains to be determined. Conclusion Glutamate-induced cell death in cortical cultures occurs through NMDAR and NOS-linked mechanisms, presumably through elevated [Ca2+]i levels that activate NOS and increase the levels of NO and subsequently ONOO-free radicals. Equine estrogens, 17β-E2 and Δ8, 17β-E2, significantly protect against glutamate-induced excitotoxicity through a mechanism that is independent of Ca2+. This is to our knowledge a first such observation. Whether a decrease in NOS related products, such as ONOO-, may be one mechanism by which estrogen provides neuroprotection against glutamate toxicity, remain to be investigated. Methods Isolation and culture of cortical cells Day 17–19 pregnant Sprague Dawley rats were anesthetized and sacrificed by cervical dislocation. The fetuses were delivered, decapitated and the brains were dissected out. Each cortex was isolated and individual cells were cultured essentially according to Brewer et al [33,34] with the following modifications. Briefly, the tissue was maintained in Hank's balanced salt solution (HBSS) (Invitrogen, Life Technologies, Burlington, ON, Canada) until enough tissue to give sufficient cell numbers for plating was collected. The tissue was then dispersed by mechanical dissociation through a series of constricted fire polished, siliconized Pasteur pipettes to obtain a suspension of single cells. The suspension was then centrifuged and the cells were washed to remove red blood cells and other impurities. An aliquot was stained with 4% trypan blue, live cells were counted using a hemocytometer and the suspension was then diluted accordingly with neurobasal defined medium (Invitrogen, Life Technologies, Burlington, ON, Canada) supplemented with 2% of B27 containing antioxidants (Invitrogen, Life Technologies, Burlington, ON, Canada), 0.5 mM glutamine, penicillin G (10 U/mL) and streptomycin (13 μg/mL) purchased all from Sigma, Canada. This medium was labeled as neurobasal complete (NBC). Cells, 40,000 per well, were seeded onto poly-D-lysine coated 96 well plates (BD Biosciences, Discovery Labware, Bedford, MA, USA) and were maintained in NBC. Under these culture conditions, it has been previously demonstrated (16,23,33,34) that only neurons survive while glia are essentially absent. The purity of our cortical neuronal cultures is described separately. After day 1 of plating the media was completely replaced and on subsequent days 50% of the media was replaced. Cell cultures were maintained for 7–12 days at which time glutamate experiments were initiated. Preliminary experiments carried out during the standardization of the methods indicated that the cell viability decreased and was variable after day 7 in culture. Although some neurons were viable up to day 12, all experiments described in the manuscript were carried out in cultures maintained for only 7 days. Detection of neuronal specific enolase (NSE) and glia-specific glial fibrillary acid protein (GFAP) by immunocytochemistry Cortical cells on poly-D-lysine coated plates were cultured in NBC medium as described above. After seven days, cells were washed twice with PBS and then fixed with 4% formaldehyde in PBS for 15 minutes. Cells were then washed three times with PBS and non-specific binding was blocked for 5 mins with PBS containing 1% BSA (Sigma, Canada), 5% normal goat serum (Sigma, Canada), 0.05% Triton-X100 (BDH, Canada). Cells were incubated for 2 hrs at room temperature with rabbit anti-rat neuron specific enolase (anti NSE; Polyscience, PA, USA) 1:1000 dilution in block solution. After rinsing 4 times with PBS, the cells were incubated at room temperature with Alexa Fluor 488 F(ab')2 fragment of goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) secondary antibody (Molecular Probes, Invitrogen, Canada) 1:400 dilution in block solution. Cells were then rinsed 4 times with PBS and the fluorescence labeling was visualized and photographed using Olympus IMT-2 microscope, equipped with a mercury light source and spot slider digital camera (Diagnosis Instruments, MI, USA). The neuronal cells displayed characteristic green fluorescence (Figure 10A
The neuronal cells maintained in NBC are devoid of glial cells and to obtain cultures containing glia, the cortical cells were prepared as described above but were maintained in Dubelcco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM, Sigma Canada) containing 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS; Invitrogen Canada Inc; On, Canada). After 7 days in culture, the mixture of cells were processed for immunocytology by incubating with the primary antibody mouse anti-GFAP (1:4000 dilution; Sigma Canada) and then with Texas Red dye conjugated AffiniPure F (ab')2 fragment goat anti-mouse IgG (H+L) (1:100 dilution; Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories, PA, USA) as described above for NSE, (data not shown). The GFAP positive glial cells stain red as seen in Figure 10B Treatment of cells For determination of the effect of glutamate on the viability of rat primary cortical cells, the cells were washed twice with a modified Locke's buffer (154 mM NaCl, 5.6 mM KCl, 3.6 mM NaHCO3, 2.3 mM CaCl2, 5.6 mM Glucose, 5 mM HEPES, 10 μM Glycine, pH 7.4) and incubated for 24 hours at 37°C and 5% CO2 in NBC medium, plus 0.5 mM glutamine and 2% B27 minus antioxidants (NBC AO-). Following this, the cells were washed 3 times with modified Locke's buffer and glutamate exposure was initiated. All glutamate treatments were conducted in modified Locke's buffer. Various concentrations of glutamate were added to a final concentration of 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 50, 100, 200, 500 and 1000 μM for a total of 20 minutes and changes in [Ca2+]i were recorded. The cells were then washed with modified Locke's buffer and NBC AO- was added and cells were incubated at 37°C, 5% CO2 for 24 hours, following which cell death/viability was measured. Measurement for Ca2+ and cell death/viability were performed on the same culture of cells. The kinetics of glutamate-induced cell death following a 20 minute exposure to glutamate was also measured using a concentration of glutamate found to be toxic to 50% of the cells. Cell death measurements were made at 2, 4, 8 and 24 hours post glutamate treatment and comparisons between glutamate treated samples and vehicle (modified Locke's buffer) treated samples were made. For the determination of the effects of estrogen on glutamate induced changes, cells were washed twice with modified Locke's buffer and then fresh NBC AO- and estrogens were added to final concentrations of 0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1 and 10 μM and the cells were incubated for 24 hours at 37°C and 5% CO2. Estrogens were dissolved in ethanol and diluted to working concentrations with NBC AO- medium. The final concentration of ethanol was 0.2% for control and estrogen treated samples. Following incubation with estrogen and prior to glutamate exposure cells were prepared for [Ca2+]i measurements as outlined below. The cells were washed and incubated in Locke's buffer containing sufficient (200 μM) glutamate (pre-determined) to give 50% cell death. Incubations were carried out at 37°C for 20 minutes and changes in [Ca2+]i were recorded. Following glutamate treatment cells were washed with fresh Locke's buffer and NBC AO- was added. The cells were again incubated for 24 hours at 37°C and 5% CO2, following which cell viability was determined. In some experiments various concentrations of MK-801, an NMDAR antagonist, and 10 mM of L-NAME [53], a NOS inhibitor, were added 15 minutes prior to glutamate exposure following which changes in [Ca2+]i and cell viability were measured. Evaluation of cell death and viability The Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) cytotoxicity assay (Promega G1780, VWR, Toronto, Ontario, Canada) and the CellTiter 96® AQueous Non-Radioactive cell proliferation assay (MTS method) (Promega G5430) were used to assess cell death and viability respectively. The LDH assay measures the amount of lactate dehydrogenase that is released from dead cells while the MTS method measures the formation of a formazan product in live cells. Changes in optical density (O.D.) at 490 nm were measured using the SpectraMax 340 microplate reader and SOFTmax® PRO software (Molecular Devices, California, U.S.A.) and comparisons of treated to control values were made. Both of these methods provide a reliable measure of cell death/viability. Measurement of intracellular calcium levels Intracellular Calcium levels were assessed using the fluorescent probe Fluo-3 AM (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA). Changes in relative fluorescence units (RFU) were monitored with the Fluoroskan Ascent FL fluorescent plate reader equipped with a micro-injection syringe pump (Labsystems, Helsinki, Finland). The protocol for intracellular dye loading was based on the method provided by the manufacturer (Molecular Probes and Labsystems Fluo-3 AM Application Note) with minor modifications. Briefly, cells were loaded with 5 μM Fluo-3 AM for 2 hours and then washed three times with Locke's buffer to remove excess dye. Cell plates were then placed in the Fluoroskan and incubated for an additional 15 minutes at 37°C to allow for complete de-esterification of dye. Measurements of relative fluorescence units (RFU) were made using an excitation and emission wavelength of 485 and 527 nm respectively. Change in [Ca2+]i (nM) was calculated by multiplying the ratio of ΔF-Fmin and Fmax-ΔF by Kd. Where ΔF is the change in RFU, Fmax is the maximum observed RFU following NP40 treatment, Fmin is the minimum observed RFU following EGTA Ca2+ chelation and Kd is the dissociation constant for Fluo-3 AM, 390 nM, provided by supplier (Molecular Probes). Data analysis The dose-response curves for effects of glutamate and estrogen on cell viability and [Ca2+]i were developed using Slide Write Plus V6 Software (Advanced Graphics Software, Inc., Encinitas, CA) using the non-linear curve fitting functions. Each estrogen experiment was carried out a minimum of six times with eight replicates per treatment condition and all values shown in figures are the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). All treatment conditions were compared to the respective controls and an effect was determined significant if p < 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using Instat® Software (Graph Pad, San Diego, CA). To establish the effect of estrogen against glutamate induced cell death and [Ca2+]i, nonparametric statistical analyses were performed using the Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric analysis of variance test with the Dunn post hoc test to compare each estrogen concentration against the glutamate alone control. Authors' contributions JP is a graduate student who participated in the development of the hypothesis, study design and carried out most of the experimental work and preparation of the manuscript. BB conceived the study and participated in the development of the hypothesis, the study design, and overall direction of the study and preparation of the manuscript. Both authors have read and approved the final preparation of the manuscript and its submission to BMC Neuroscience. Acknowledgements This work was supported by the Medical Research Council of Canada Grant MT-11929 and a basic research grant from Women's Health Care Research, Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Philadelphia, PA, USA References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Neuron. 1988 Oct; 1(8):623-34.
[Neuron. 1988]Restor Neurol Neurosci. 1998; 13(1-2):75-83.
[Restor Neurol Neurosci. 1998]Neuron. 1995 Oct; 15(4):961-73.
[Neuron. 1995]J Neurobiol. 1992 Nov; 23(9):1261-76.
[J Neurobiol. 1992]Neuron. 1989 Jun; 2(6):1547-58.
[Neuron. 1989]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Jun 23; 95(13):7748-53.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998]J Mol Med. 2000; 78(1):3-13.
[J Mol Med. 2000]Brain Res. 1998 Jan 12; 780(2):253-9.
[Brain Res. 1998]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Jul 15; 88(14):6368-71.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991]J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2003 Jul; 10(5):302-8.
[J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2003]BMC Neurosci. 2003 Dec 23; 4():32.
[BMC Neurosci. 2003]Maturitas. 2000 Apr 1; 34 Suppl 2():S35-52.
[Maturitas. 2000]Exp Neurol. 1997 Oct; 147(2):211-20.
[Exp Neurol. 1997]Am J Epidemiol. 1994 Aug 1; 140(3):256-61.
[Am J Epidemiol. 1994]Lipids Health Dis. 2003 Jun 20; 2():4.
[Lipids Health Dis. 2003]Menopause. 2001 Nov-Dec; 8(6):408-19.
[Menopause. 2001]Neurosci Lett. 1996 Jul 5; 212(1):13-6.
[Neurosci Lett. 1996]Brain Res. 2002 Mar 15; 930(1-2):216-34.
[Brain Res. 2002]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Mar 4; 100(5):2842-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003]J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1998 Oct; 67(2):119-31.
[J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1998]J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2003 Jul; 10(5):298-301.
[J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2003]Lipids Health Dis. 2003 Jun 20; 2():4.
[Lipids Health Dis. 2003]Menopause. 2001 Nov-Dec; 8(6):408-19.
[Menopause. 2001]J Neurochem. 1999 Feb; 72(2):500-13.
[J Neurochem. 1999]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Jun 23; 95(13):7748-53.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998]J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2003 Jul; 10(5):302-8.
[J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2003]BMC Neurosci. 2003 Dec 23; 4():32.
[BMC Neurosci. 2003]Neuron. 1989 Jun; 2(6):1547-58.
[Neuron. 1989]Neuroreport. 1995 Apr 19; 6(6):945-8.
[Neuroreport. 1995]J Neurosci. 1996 Jul 1; 16(13):4069-79.
[J Neurosci. 1996]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Aug 1; 92(16):7162-6.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995]J Neurosci. 1997 Jun 15; 17(12):4633-41.
[J Neurosci. 1997]Exp Neurol. 1997 Oct; 147(2):211-20.
[Exp Neurol. 1997]Neurosci Lett. 1996 Jul 5; 212(1):13-6.
[Neurosci Lett. 1996]J Neurochem. 1999 Feb; 72(2):500-13.
[J Neurochem. 1999]J Neurosci. 2001 Oct 1; 21(19):7455-62.
[J Neurosci. 2001]Neuroscience. 1991; 43(2-3):585-91.
[Neuroscience. 1991]J Neurochem. 1999 Feb; 72(2):500-13.
[J Neurochem. 1999]J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2003 Jul; 10(5):302-8.
[J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2003]BMC Neurosci. 2003 Dec 23; 4():32.
[BMC Neurosci. 2003]Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2001 Oct 19; 94(1-2):25-34.
[Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2001]Brain Res. 1998 Jan 12; 780(2):253-9.
[Brain Res. 1998]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Jul 15; 88(14):6368-71.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991]J Mol Med. 2000; 78(1):3-13.
[J Mol Med. 2000]Neurosci Lett. 1996 Jul 5; 212(1):13-6.
[Neurosci Lett. 1996]Lipids Health Dis. 2003 Jun 20; 2():4.
[Lipids Health Dis. 2003]Menopause. 2001 Nov-Dec; 8(6):408-19.
[Menopause. 2001]J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2000 May-Jun; 7(3):175-83.
[J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2000]Lipids Health Dis. 2003 Jun 20; 2():4.
[Lipids Health Dis. 2003]Menopause. 2001 Nov-Dec; 8(6):408-19.
[Menopause. 2001]J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2001 Jul-Aug; 8(4):245-54.
[J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2001]J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1998 Oct; 67(2):119-31.
[J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1998]J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2003 Jul; 10(5):298-301.
[J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2003]J Neurobiol. 1992 Nov; 23(9):1261-76.
[J Neurobiol. 1992]J Neurosci. 1993 May; 13(5):1993-2000.
[J Neurosci. 1993]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Mar 4; 100(5):2842-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Sep 3; 93(18):9893-8.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996]Am J Physiol. 1998 Sep; 275(3 Pt 1):C832-9.
[Am J Physiol. 1998]BMC Neurosci. 2003 Dec 23; 4():32.
[BMC Neurosci. 2003]FASEB J. 2003 May; 17(8):947-8.
[FASEB J. 2003]J Comp Neurol. 2002 Nov 25; 453(4):336-44.
[J Comp Neurol. 2002]J Neurosci. 1999 Apr 1; 19(7):2455-63.
[J Neurosci. 1999]Endocrinology. 1995 May; 136(5):2320-4.
[Endocrinology. 1995]J Neurobiol. 1997 Dec; 33(7):961-7.
[J Neurobiol. 1997]J Neurosci Res. 1993 Aug 1; 35(5):567-76.
[J Neurosci Res. 1993]J Neurosci Res. 1995 Dec; 42(5):674-83.
[J Neurosci Res. 1995]Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995 Sep 25; 214(3):1152-6.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1995]