![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright : © 2005 Saito et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Processing of Pre-microRNAs by the Dicer-1–Loquacious Complex in Drosophila Cells 1Institute for Genome Research, University of Tokushima, Kuramoto, Tokushima, Japan James C. Carrington, Academic Editor Oregon State University, United States of America Corresponding author.#Contributed equally. Haruhiko Siomi: siomi/at/genome.tokushima-u.ac.jp; Mikiko C Siomi: siomim/at/genome.tokushima-u.ac.jp Received March 16, 2005; Accepted April 30, 2005. See "miRNA Processing: Dicer-1 Meets Its Match" , e244. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract microRNAs (miRNAs) are a large family of 21- to 22-nucleotide non-coding RNAs that interact with target mRNAs at specific sites to induce cleavage of the message or inhibit translation. miRNAs are excised in a stepwise process from primary miRNA (pri-miRNA) transcripts. The Drosha-Pasha/DGCR8 complex in the nucleus cleaves pri-miRNAs to release hairpin-shaped precursor miRNAs (pre-miRNAs). These pre-miRNAs are then exported to the cytoplasm and further processed by Dicer to mature miRNAs. Here we show that Drosophila Dicer-1 interacts with Loquacious, a double-stranded RNA-binding domain protein. Depletion of Loquacious results in pre-miRNA accumulation in Drosophila S2 cells, as is the case for depletion of Dicer-1. Immuno-affinity purification experiments revealed that along with Dicer-1, Loquacious resides in a functional pre-miRNA processing complex, and stimulates and directs the specific pre-miRNA processing activity. These results support a model in which Loquacious mediates miRNA biogenesis and, thereby, the expression of genes regulated by miRNAs. Introduction microRNAs (miRNAs) act as RNA guides by binding to complementary sites on target mRNAs to regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level in plants and animals [1−12], much as small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) do in the RNA interference (RNAi) pathway [13−15]. The expression of miRNAs is often developmentally regulated in a tissue-specific manner, suggesting an important role for miRNAs in the regulation of endogenous gene expression [16–30]. The importance of miRNAs for development is also highlighted by a recent computer-based analysis that predicted nearly a thousand miRNA genes in the human genome [31]. Furthermore, recent studies have revealed that miRNAs regulate a large fraction of the protein-coding genes [32–34]. miRNAs are transcribed as long primary miRNA (pri-miRNA) transcripts by RNA polymerase II [35]. miRNA maturation begins with cleavage of the pri-miRNAs by the nuclear RNase III Drosha [36–38] to release approximately 70-nucleotide hairpin-shaped structures, called precursor miRNAs (pre-miRNAs). Pre-miRNAs are then exported to the cytoplasm by the protein Exportin 5, which recognizes the two-nucleotide 3′ overhang that is a signature of RNase III-mediated cleavage [39–41]. In the cytoplasm, pre-miRNAs are subsequently cleaved by a second RNase III enzyme, Dicer, into approximately 22-nucleotide miRNA duplexes, with an end structure characteristic of RNase III cleavage [42–44]. Only one of the two strands is predominantly transferred to the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) [45], which mediates either cleavage of the target mRNA or translation silencing, depending on the complementarity of the target [46] by a mechanism that remains unclear [47]. There is a growing list of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA)-binding proteins that play important yet distinct roles in the RNAi pathway [48]. Both Drosha and Dicer contain dsRNA-binding domains (dsRBDs). Drosha requires a dsRNA-binding protein partner known as Pasha in flies and Caenorhabditis elegans, and its ortholog DGCR8 in mammals to convert pri-miRNAs to pre-miRNAs [49–52]. In plants, the predominantly nuclear Dicer-like-1, equipped with two dsRBDs, is thought to catalyze both pri-miRNA and pre-miRNA processing [53,54]. The HYL1 protein, which also contains a tandem dsRBD, is required for miRNA accumulation and may play the same molecular role as Pasha/DGCR8 for Dicer-like-1 in plants [55,56]. In Drosophila, Dicer-2 is required for production of siRNAs [57,58], and forms a heterodimeric complex with the dsRNA-binding protein R2D2, which is required for its function in RISC assembly, although Dicer-2 alone suffices to convert long dsRNA into siRNAs [59]. Drosophila Dicer-1 is associated with the processing of pre-miRNAs [58,60]. However, if there is a dsRNA-binding protein partner for Dicer-1, it has not been identified. Here, we show that Drosophila Dicer-1 interacts with the dsRBD protein Loquacious (Loqs). Depletion of Loqs results in accumulation of pre-miRNAs in Drosophila S2 cells. Loqs is predominantly cytoplasmic and is conserved in mammals. Immuno-affinity purification experiments, together with the use of recombinant Loqs, reveal that along with Dicer-1, Loqs resides in a functional pre-miRNA processing complex, and stimulates and directs specific pre-miRNA processing activity. These results support a model in which Loqs mediates miRNA biogenesis and, thereby, the expression of genes regulated by miRNAs. Results We have used RNAi-based reverse-genetic methods [61] to screen a list of Drosophila dsRBD proteins [62] for a protein(s) that has an effect on miRNA biogenesis in Drosophila S2 cells and found a novel protein equipped with three dsRBDs (two canonical dsRBDs at the N-terminal half, and one non-canonical dsRBD at the C-terminal), originally dubbed CG6866 (candidate gene 6866), which has a role in pre-miRNA processing (data presented below). This protein bears high similarity to R2D2 and to the C. elegans RNAi protein RDE-4 (Figure 1
Depletion of Loqs and Dicer-1 by RNAi Resultsin Pre-miRNA Accumulation Dicer-1 has been shown to be the pre-miRNA processing factor in Drosophila [58]. We have previously shown that depletion of Dicer-1 by RNAi resulted in a marked accumulation of pre-miR-bantam (pre-miR-ban) [60]. Depletion of Loqs by RNAi resulted in a similar effect to Dicer-1 depletion for miR-ban (Figure 2
Loqs Associates with Dicer-1 In Vivo and In Vitro This observation prompted us to ask if Loqs forms a complex in vivo with Dicer-1. For these studies, we simultaneously expressed Dicer-1 tagged with the Flag epitope and Loqs tagged with the myc epitope in S2 cells. We then immunoprecipitated Dicer-1 with anti-Flag antibodies, and Loqs with anti-myc antibody and then analyzed the precipitates by immunoblotting (Figure 3
We further investigated whether Loqs can bind to Dicer-1 in vitro. Dicer-1 was produced by an in vitro translation system and used in binding assays with recombinant Loqs fused to glutathione S-transferase (GST). GST–Loqs interacted with Dicer-1 even in the presence of RNase A, whereas GST itself showed no detectable binding (Figure 3 Dicer-1 and Loqs Are Present in a Functional Complex That Mediates Pre-miRNA Processing To examine the functional connection between the Dicer-1–Loqs complex and pre-miRNA processing, we investigated if depletion of Dicer-1 or Loqs had any effect on the production of mature miRNA from the precursor. We first tested if cytoplasmic lysates of S2 cells were capable of processing synthetic Drosophila melanogasterlet-7 precursor RNA into functional mature let-7. In this experiment, the synthetic let-7 precursor RNA was converted to mature let-7 in S2 cytoplasmic lysates (Figure 4
We next used pre-miR-ban as a substrate for pre-miRNA processing assays. It was shown recently that S2 cell extracts contained pri-miRNA processing activity that cleaved pri-miRNA into an approximately 60- to 70-bp pre-miRNA precursor [49]. This processing is known to occur in the nucleus; thus pre-miR-ban was prepared by in vitro processing of pri-miR-ban incubated with S2 nuclear extracts (Figure 5
Loqs Stimulates and Confers upon Dicer-1 the Specific Processing of Pre-miRNAs To further examine the requirement for Loqs in pre-miRNA processing, we purified Flag–Dicer-1 complex under a harsher condition (high salt), where Dicer-1 was stripped of most Loqs protein (Figure 6
Dicer-1–Loqs Complexes Associate with Pre- and Mature miRNAs In Vivo We examined the presence of endogenous miRNA in RNA preparations from Flag–Dicer-1 and Flag–Loqs complexes obtained from S2 cells using anti-Flag antibodies. Complexes were prepared as in Figure 3
An AGO1-Associated Complex Contains Dicer-1 and Loqs, and Is Capable of Pre-miRNA Processing We have previously shown that Argonaute protein AGO1 is required for stable production of mature miRNAs and associates with Dicer-1 [60]. Thus, we sought to ascertain if Loqs was also present in an AGO1-associated complex, and if so, if the AGO1 complex was capable of processing pre-miRNA in vitro. We simultaneously expressed Flag–Loqs and AGO1 tagged with TAP in S2 cells and purified the AGO1–TAP complex through immunoglobulin G (IgG) bead-binding. The IgG bound was then subjected to Western blot analysis using anti-Dicer-1, anti-AGO1, or anti-Flag (for Loqs detection) antibodies. Not only Dicer-1 but also Loqs was detected in the AGO1 complex (Figure 7 Discussion Our results indicate that Loqs and Dicer-1 form a complex that converts pre-miRNAs into mature miRNAs; so how do they act together in pre-miRNA processing? Sequence comparison reveals that Loqs is a paralog of R2D2 (see Figure 1 It can be envisioned that Loqs may have one of several roles in pre-miRNA processing. Dicer-1 contains only one dsRBD, which may not be sufficient for strong interaction with and/or specific recognition of the pre-miRNA substrate (see Figure 6 Sequence analysis revealed that protein activator of protein kinase dsRNA dependent (PKR) (PACT) [69] and HIV TAR RNA binding protein (TRBP) [70] in mammals bear 34% identity to Loqs, and share a highly similar domain structure with it (Figure 8
Materials and Methods RNAi dsRNAs were introduced to S2 cells by soaking essentially as described [75]. Briefly, approximately 5 × 106 cells were soaked in 1 ml of serum-free medium containing 15 μg of dsRNA for 30 min at room temperature followed by addition of 2 ml of the medium containing 15% serum, 3 mM glutamine, and penicillin-streptomycin. After 4 d, cells were harvested and subjected to total RNA preparation for Northern blot analysis, or cytoplasmic lysate preparation for in vitro processing assays. dsRNAs used in RNAi were: double-stranded RNA for enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP), homologous to nucleotides 11–717 of the EGFP coding sequence; dsDcr-2, 4091–4888 of the Dicer-2 coding; dsR2D2, 1–936; dsDcr-1, 10–950 of the Dicer-2 coding; dsLoqs, 330-1342. Northern blot analysis Total RNA was isolated from S2 cells with ISOGEN (Nippon Gene, Toyama, Japan). 20 μg of total RNA was separated on 12% acrylamide-denaturing gel and transferred onto Hybond-N+ membrane (Amersham Bioscience, Little Chalfont, United Kingdom). After UV-crosslinking, the hybridization was performed at 42 °C in 0.2 M sodium phosphate (pH 7.2), 7 % SDS, and 1 mM EDTA with end-labeled antisense oligodeoxynucleotide, and washed at 42 °C in 2× saline sodium citrate and 0.1% SDS. Oligodeoxynucleotides used as probes were: bantam, 5′-
CAGCTTTCAAAATGATCTCAC-3′; miR-8, 5′-
GACATCTTTACCTGACAGTATTA-3′; U6 snRNA, 5′-
GGGCCATGCTAATCTTCTCTGTA-3′; and let-7, 5′-
AACTATACAACCTACTACCTCA-3.′ The blots were exposed on BAS-MS2040 imaging plates, and signals were quantified using BAS-2500 (Fuji, Tokyo, Japan).
RT-PCR analysis One μg of total RNA was used for the first-strand cDNA synthesis with Stratascript RT and random primers (Stratagene, La Jolla, California, United States). Sequences of the oligonucleotide primers for RT-PCR were: Dicer-1, 5′-
ACCAATGTACTGCGTTTGCA and 5′-
GTTTGCTGATCACAGAACTTAACGTT; Loqs, 5′-
ATGGACCAGGAGAATTTCCACGG-3′ and 5′-
CTACTTCTTGGTCATGATCTTCAAGTAC-3′; and AGO2, 5′-
GCACAAGTGTGCGGTCTTGTATT-3′ and 5′-
GTGAACTGCTTAATGCATTG-3′.
Immunofluorescence analysis Immunofluorescence analysis was performed by fixing S2 cells with 2% formaldehyde for 15 min. Cells were permeabilized using 0.1% Triton X-100. Flag-tagged proteins were stained for 30 min with anti-Flag M2 (1:1,000 dilution) antibody (Sigma, St. Louis, Missouri, United States). After extensive wash in PBS, cells were treated with 100 μg/ml RNaseA for 30 min and then stained with 0.4 μg/ml propidium iodide. Alexa-488 anti-mouse IgG was used as secondary antibody. All images were collected using a Zeiss (Oberkochen, Germany) LSM510 laser scanning microscope. Immunoprecipitation of Flag–Dicer-1, Flag–Loqs, and myc-Loqs S2 cell lines, stably expressed 3× Flag-tagged Dicer-1 or Loqs, or myc-tagged-Loqs under the control of metallothionein promoter (originally from pRmHa-3 vector), were established. The expression of each protein was induced by adding copper ions into the medium. After overnight incubation, the whole cell extract was prepared in Buffer A (30 mM HEPES pH 7.4, 150 mM KOAc, 2 mM MgOAc, 5 mM DTT, 2 μg/ml Leupeptin, 2 μg/ml Pepstatin, 0.5% Aprotinin) containing 0.1% NP-40 by sonication, and followed by centrifugation. Flag–Dicer-1 and Flag–Loqs were bound to anti-Flag M2 agarose beads at 4 °C for 1 h. Immunoprecipitated proteins were then recovered with 2× SDS sample buffer or Elution buffer (Buffer A containing 400 μg/ml of 3× Flag peptides, 10% glycerol, and 100 mM KOAc). For Northern blot analysis of RNAs co-purified with Flag–Dicer-1 or Flag–Loqs, immunoprecipitates on beads were treated with ISOGEN and subjected to RNA purification. Protein–protein interaction assays To produce [35S]methionine-labeled proteins by a TNT in vitro transcription and translation kit (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, United States), the Dicer-1 cDNA was inserted into an expression vector, pET-28 (Novagen, Madison, Wisconsin, United States). GST pull-down assays were carried out using GST–Loqs and GST itself that were bound to glutathione Sepharose 4B resins (Amersham Biosciences) in Buffer A containing 0.1% NP-40. After incubation with TNT products and extensive washing, the bound proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE. RNaseA treatment was carried out by adding the enzyme to the binding mixture. To produce GST fusion protein, Loqs cDNA was subcloned into a pGEX-5X expression vector (Amersham Biosciences). The fusion proteins, as well as GST itself, were induced and purified as described by the manufacturer. Preparation of nuclear and cytoplasmic lysate for in vitro processing assays S2 cells were suspended at approximately 1 × 108 cells/ml into Hypotonic buffer (Buffer A without KOAc) and lysed by passing through a 30G needle. After centrifugation at 500 × g for 20 min, the supernatant and the precipitate were separated. The supernatant was centrifuged to obtain the supernatant as a cytoplasmic lysate. The pellet was washed twice with Hypotonic buffer and lysed by sonication in Buffer A containing 100 mM KOAc and 20% glycerol, followed by centrifugation to obtain the supernatant as a nuclear lysate. Total protein concentration in each lysate was determined with Protein assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, California, United States) and adjusted to be equal. Preparation of pre-miR-ban A DNA fragment coding pri-miR-ban was obtained from PCR reaction (primers used are: 5′-
CGCTCAGATGCAGATGTTGTTGAT-3′ and 5′-
GATCGGTCGGCATAAG
TTCAAAGC-3′) and cloned into the SmaI site of pBluescriptSK vector in the same direction with the T3 promoter. The plasmid was digested with ClaI, gel-isolated, and used as a template for in vitro transcription reaction with MEGAscript T3 Kit (Ambion, Austin, Texas, United States) in the presence of [α32P]GTP. In vitro processing reaction of pri-miRNAs was performed with some modifications to previously reported method [36]. Briefly, in 1 ml reaction, 10 mM creatine phosphate, 0.5 mM ATP, 30 μg/ml creatine kinase, 0.1 U/ul RNasin, 0.1 μg yeast RNA, and 500 μl nuclear lysate were added, and pri-miR-bantam in 0.5× Buffer A with 100 mM KOAc was further added to the mixture. After 2 h incubation at 26 °C, RNAs were purified with ISOGEN LS (Nippon Gene) and separated on 7.5% acrylamide denaturing gel, from which pre-miR-ban (about 60 nucleotides in length) was recovered.
In Vitro pre-miRNA processing assays The condition used for in vitro pre-miRNA processing with cytoplasmic lysates was the same as that for the in vitro pri-miR-bantam processing. Cytoplasmic lysate used in this assay was 5 μl in a 10-μl reaction. For processing assays with purified complexes, immuno-purified Flag–Dicer-1 or Flag–Loqs was used instead of crude cytoplasmic lysate and the final concentration of buffer adjusted. For Mg++-depletion assay, 10 mM EDTA was added instead of Mg++. For the processing by Flag–Dicer-1, high-salt purified (800 mM KOAc) Flag–Dicer-1 was added in the presence or absence of bacterially produced GST–Loqs and the final concentration of buffer adjusted. In Vitro cleavage assay Preparation of cap-labeled ftz RNA with a let-7 target site and RNAi reaction were carried out essentially as described [60]. In brief, 104 cpm of cap-labeled let-7 target RNA was incubated with 200 nM in vitro transcribed pre-let-7 RNA in Buffer A containing 100 mM KOAc, 10 mM creatine phosphate, 0.5 mM ATP, 30 μg/ml creatine kinase, and 0.1 U/ul RNasin. Reactions were allowed to proceed for 3 h at 26 °C. Cleavage products of the RNAi reaction were analyzed by electrophoresis on 4% denaturing polyacrylamide gels. TAP purification The expression of AGO1–TAP or AGO2–TAP in S2 cells was induced by adding copper ion into the medium [60]. After overnight incubation, the cytoplasmic lysate was prepared in a Buffer A containing 150 mM KOAc. AGO1–TAP or AGO2–TAP and associated materials to the TAP-tagged fusion protein were bound to IgG Sepharose (Amersham Biosciences). Bound proteins on IgG beads were directly used for in vitro pre-miRNA processing assay, or eluted with SDS sample buffer for Western blotting analysis. The polyclonal antibodies against AGO1 were a kind gift from T. Uemura (Kyoto University) [76]. The anti-Dicer-1 antibody (AB4735) was purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, United Kingdom). Accession Numbers The GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nih.gov/Genbank/) accession numbers for the genes and gene products discussed in this paper are: ago-1 (NM_079010), ago-2 (NM_140518), dicer-1 (NM_079729), dicer-2 (NM_079054), loqs/cg6866 (NM_135802), and r2d2 (NM_135308). The Rfam (http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Software/Rfam/mirna/index.shtml) accession numbers for the genes and gene products discussed in this paper are: bantam (MI0000387), let-7 (MI0000416), and miR-8 (MI0000128). Acknowledgments We thank members of the Siomi laboratory for discussions and comments on the manuscript. KS was supported in part by a fellowship from the Fragile X Research Foundation (FRAXA). AI is a predoctoral fellow (DC1) of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS). This work was supported by grants to MCS and HS from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (MEXT) and the JSPS. Competing interests. The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. Abbreviations
Footnotes Author contributions. KS, AI, HS, and MCS conceived and designed the experiments. KS, AI, and MCS performed the experiments. KS, AI, HS, and MCS analyzed the data. HS, KS, AI, and MCS wrote the paper. Citation: Saito K, Ishizuka A, Siomi H, Siomi MC (2005) Processing of pre-microRNAs by the Dicer-1-loquacious complex in Drosophila cells. PLoS Biol 3(7): e235. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cell. 1993 Dec 3; 75(5):843-54.
[Cell. 1993]Nature. 2004 Sep 16; 431(7006):343-9.
[Nature. 2004]Nature. 2000 Nov 2; 408(6808):86-9.
[Nature. 2000]Cell. 2005 Jan 14; 120(1):21-4.
[Cell. 2005]PLoS Biol. 2004 Nov; 2(11):e363.
[PLoS Biol. 2004]EMBO J. 2004 Oct 13; 23(20):4051-60.
[EMBO J. 2004]EMBO J. 2002 Sep 2; 21(17):4663-70.
[EMBO J. 2002]Genes Dev. 2003 Dec 15; 17(24):3011-6.
[Genes Dev. 2003]Science. 2001 Aug 3; 293(5531):834-8.
[Science. 2001]Cell. 2003 Oct 17; 115(2):199-208.
[Cell. 2003]Curr Biol. 2005 Jan 26; 15(2):R61-4.
[Curr Biol. 2005]Nature. 2004 Nov 11; 432(7014):231-5.
[Nature. 2004]Plant Physiol. 2003 Jul; 132(3):1382-90.
[Plant Physiol. 2003]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Aug 24; 101(34):12753-8.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004]Curr Biol. 2004 Feb 17; 14(4):346-51.
[Curr Biol. 2004]Science. 2004 Feb 6; 303(5659):832-5.
[Science. 2004]J Cell Biol. 2000 Jul 24; 150(2):F51-6.
[J Cell Biol. 2000]Science. 2003 Sep 26; 301(5641):1921-5.
[Science. 2003]Cell. 2002 Jun 28; 109(7):861-71.
[Cell. 2002]Cell. 2004 Apr 2; 117(1):69-81.
[Cell. 2004]Genes Dev. 2004 Jul 15; 18(14):1655-66.
[Genes Dev. 2004]Science. 2003 Sep 26; 301(5641):1921-5.
[Science. 2003]Genes Dev. 2004 Jul 15; 18(14):1655-66.
[Genes Dev. 2004]Nature. 2004 Nov 11; 432(7014):231-5.
[Nature. 2004]Curr Biol. 2004 May 4; 14(9):787-91.
[Curr Biol. 2004]Cell. 2004 Apr 2; 117(1):69-81.
[Cell. 2004]Genes Dev. 2004 Jul 15; 18(14):1655-66.
[Genes Dev. 2004]Science. 2003 Sep 26; 301(5641):1921-5.
[Science. 2003]Science. 2004 Nov 19; 306(5700):1377-80.
[Science. 2004]Mol Cell Biol. 2001 Mar; 21(6):1908-20.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2001]Nature. 2004 Nov 11; 432(7014):235-40.
[Nature. 2004]Cell. 2004 Jul 9; 118(1):57-68.
[Cell. 2004]EMBO J. 1998 Aug 3; 17(15):4379-90.
[EMBO J. 1998]Science. 1991 Mar 29; 251(5001):1597-600.
[Science. 1991]Trends Biochem Sci. 2000 May; 25(5):241-6.
[Trends Biochem Sci. 2000]Mol Cell Biol. 2001 Mar; 21(6):1908-20.
[Mol Cell Biol. 2001]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 May 24; 91(11):4713-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Jun 6; 97(12):6499-503.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000]EMBO J. 2002 Sep 2; 21(17):4663-70.
[EMBO J. 2002]Genes Dev. 2004 Jul 15; 18(14):1655-66.
[Genes Dev. 2004]Genes Dev. 2004 Jul 15; 18(14):1655-66.
[Genes Dev. 2004]Genes Cells. 2001 Apr; 6(4):313-25.
[Genes Cells. 2001]J Cell Biol. 1997 Jul 28; 138(2):239-53.
[J Cell Biol. 1997]