![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2005, The National Academy of Sciences Medical Sciences MB06322 (CS-917): A potent and selective inhibitor of fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase for controlling gluconeogenesis in type 2 diabetes *Departments of Biochemistry, Medicinal Chemistry, and Molecular Modeling, Metabasis Therapeutics, Inc., 9390 Towne Centre Drive, Building 300, San Diego, CA 92121; and ‡Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138 † To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: erion/at/mbasis.com. Contributed by William N. Lipscomb, April 13, 2005 Freely available online through the PNAS open access option. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract In type 2 diabetes, the liver produces excessive amounts of glucose through the gluconeogenesis (GNG) pathway and consequently is partly responsible for the elevated glucose levels characteristic of the disease. In an effort to find safe and efficacious GNG inhibitors, we targeted the AMP binding site of fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase (FBPase). The hydrophilic nature of AMP binding sites and their widespread use for allosteric regulation of enzymes in metabolic pathways has historically made discovery of AMP mimetics suitable for drug development difficult. By using a structure-based drug design strategy, we discovered a series of compounds that mimic AMP but bear little structural resemblance. The lead compound, MB05032, exhibited high potency and specificity for human FBPase. Oral delivery of MB05032 was achieved by using the bisamidate prodrug MB06322 (CS-917), which is converted to MB05032 in two steps through the action of an esterase and a phosphoramidase. MB06322 inhibited glucose production from a variety of GNG substrates in rat hepatocytes and from bicarbonate in male Zucker diabetic fatty rats. Analysis of liver GNG pathway intermediates confirmed FBPase as the site of action. Oral administration of MB06322 to Zucker diabetic fatty rats led to a dose-dependent decrease in plasma glucose levels independent of insulin levels and nutritional status. Glucose lowering occurred without signs of hypoglycemia or significant elevations in plasma lactate or triglyceride levels. The findings suggest that potent and specific FBPase inhibitors represent a drug class with potential to treat type 2 diabetes through inhibition of GNG. Keywords: endogenous glucose production, AMP mimetic, structure-based drug design, phosphonate prodrug, antihyperglycemic The liver (1, 2) and, to a lesser extent, the kidneys (3) are the primary organs responsible for endogenous glucose production (EGP). In type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), excessive EGP in the fasted state and fed state contributes to the chronic elevation of blood glucose levels found in patients with advanced (4, 5) and mild diabetes (6, 7). Moreover, fasting plasma glucose levels correlate with EGP rates in patients with fasting plasma glucose >180 mg/dl (10 mM) (8) and possibly in patients with lower levels (6, 7). Studies using 13C NMR spectroscopy (9) as well as more recent studies using deuterated water (7, 10) attribute the excessive EGP in T2DM patients to increased flux through the gluconeogenesis (GNG) pathway. Efforts over the past 40 years to discover inhibitors of GNG produced few safe and effective drug candidates (11). Metformin, the only marketed drug that acts, at least partially, through inhibition of GNG (12), inhibits GNG indirectly and only 33–36% at the rarely prescribed maximal human dose (13). Direct GNG inhibitors show more pronounced glucose lowering in animals but not without eliciting safety-related concerns. Hypoglycemia, lactic acidosis, and hypertriglyceridemia are the principle safety risks associated with GNG inhibition as highlighted in studies with phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase inhibitors (14), glucose 6-phosphatase inhibitors (15), and transgenic mice overexpressing 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase (16). Our program targets fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase (FBPase; d-fructose 1,6-bisphosphate 1-phosphohydrolase, EC 3.1.3.11), a highly regulated, rate-limiting enzyme that catalyzes the second to last step in GNG (17). The attractiveness of FBPase as a drug target is largely based on its position in the GNG pathway, which enables inhibition of GNG from all GNG substrates while avoiding direct effects on glycogenolysis, glycolysis, and the tricarboxylic acid cycle. Furthermore, the near normal clinical profile of patients genetically deficient in FBPase who manage their diet and avoid prolonged fasting (18) suggests that FBPase inhibitors may exhibit an adequate safety margin. FBPase is naturally inhibited under certain conditions by the substrate analogue fructose 2,6-bisphosphate (Fru 2,6-P2) (19) and by AMP (IC50 = 1 μM), which acts through an allosteric binding site (20). We focused on the AMP binding site largely because we anticipated difficulties in discovering FBPase inhibitors that bind to the highly hydrophilic substrate binding site with sufficient affinity to compete with the buildup of intrahepatic fructose 1,6-bisphosphate. Targeting the AMP binding site is associated with its own set of well recognized design challenges arising from the hydrophilic nature of AMP sites, their reliance on the negatively charged phosphate group of AMP for binding affinity (21), and the abundance of AMP-binding enzymes controlling key biosynthetic pathways. Previous efforts targeting the AMP site identified several weak FBPase inhibitors (22), including the nonspecific inhibitor aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide riboside monophosphate (ZMP) (23, 24), which lowered glucose and raised lactate levels after reaching millimolar liver levels following systemic administration of aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide riboside to normal mice at high doses (23). Here, we present our discovery of a series of potent and selective inhibitors of FBPase and the ability of the lead compound, MB06322 (CS-917), to dose-dependently inhibit GNG as well as lower basal and postprandial blood glucose levels in Zucker diabetic fatty (ZDF) rats after oral administration. Materials and Methods MB05032, [5-[2-amino-5-(2-methylpropyl)-4-thiazolyl]-2-furanyl]phosphonic acid and MB06322 (CS-917), l-alanine, N,N′-[[5-[2-amino-5-(2-methylpropyl)-4-thiazolyl]-2-furanyl]phosphinylidene]bis-, diethyl ester were synthesized at Metabasis Therapeutics (San Diego). Fru 2,6-P2 and ZMP were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich. Purification of FBPase. The pET3a expression vector containing the human liver FBPase gene was a gift from M. Raafat El-Maghrabi (State University of New York, Stony Brook). The enzyme was expressed in Escherichia coli and purified to homogeneity as described in ref. 25. FBPase was partially purified from male Sprague–Dawley rat (Harlan Laboratories) liver and from human muscle tissue (Analytical Biological Services, Wilmington, DE) by using the procedure referenced above through the first Sephadex G-50 column chromatography step. Enzyme Assays. FBPase activity was measured spectrophotometrically in reactions that coupled the production of fructose 6-phosphate to the reduction of NADP+ (26). AMP-activated protein kinase (rat liver, Upstate Biotechnology, Rochester, NY) was assayed by using the peptide substrate SAMS according to the supplier's instructions. AMP deaminase (porcine heart) was purified and assayed as described in ref. 21. Glycogen phosphorylase (rabbit muscle), phosphofructokinase (rabbit liver), and adenylate kinase (rabbit muscle) were obtained from Sigma–Aldrich and assayed as described in refs. 27–29. Kinetic parameters were calculated by means of four-parameter logistics regression with use of sigmaplot 2000 software (Systat, Richmond, CA) GNG Assays. Hepatocytes were prepared from male Sprague–Dawley rats that were fasted for 24 h or from freely feeding male ZDF rats (Genetics Models, Indianapolis, or Charles River Laboratories) according to the procedure of Berry and Friend (30) as modified by Groen et al. (31). Primary human hepatocytes were obtained from Tissue Transformation Technologies (Edison, NJ). Hepatocytes (10–60 mg/ml) were preincubated with MB06322 or MB05032 in suspension culture for 15–30 min before a 30- to 60-min incubation with gluconeogenic substrate(s). Reactions were terminated by centrifugation. Glucose in cell supernatants was assayed by using a glucose oxidase kit (Sigma) or, in cases for which [14C]lactate [specific activity, 60 mCi/mmol (1 Ci = 37 GBq); Amersham Pharmacia Biosciences] was used, by scintillation counting after deproteination and batch ion-exchange chromatography (32). Cellular viability was assessed by Trypan blue exclusion. Male ZDF rats (10–12 weeks old) were instrumented with tail vein catheters and fasted for 6 h. MB06322 or vehicle (polyethylene glycol 400) was then administered orally by gavage at 1 p.m. and followed 2 h later by an i.v. bolus of [14C]bicarbonate (0.4 μCi per g of body weight; Moravek, Brea, CA). Twenty minutes after radiolabel administration, animals were anesthetized with isoflurane, and blood samples were taken from the inferior vena cava. [14C]Glucose was analyzed in the samples as described above. GNG Intermediates and Precursors. Livers were isolated from male ZDF rats (10 weeks old) that were fasted for 6 h and then treated orally with vehicle (polyethylene glycol 400) or MB06322. Four hours later, animals were anesthetized, and liver biopsies were obtained. Snap-frozen liver samples were extracted in 10% perchloric acid, neutralized, and then analyzed for intermediates and precursors of GNG by means of enzyme-coupled spectrophotometric assays as described in ref. 33. Coupling enzymes for these determinations were obtained from Roche Diagnostics and Sigma. Acute Oral Studies in ZDF Rats. For the dose–response and time course studies, 8- to 9-week-old or 12- to 13-week-old male ZDF rats were randomized into groups of eight animals and dosed orally with MB06322 or vehicle (polyethylene glycol 400) at 10 a.m. Food was removed at this time and withheld throughout the study. Blood samples were obtained from a tail vein at baseline and at regular time intervals for up to 10 h thereafter. Blood glucose was determined by means of an analyzer (Hemocue, Mission Viejo, CA). Lactate and triglycerides were determined at all time points by using standard assays (Trinity Biotech, St. Louis, and ThermoDMA, Arlington, TX, respectively). Insulin was determined by ELISA (Alpco Diagnostics, Windham, NH). For the glucose tolerance tests, male ZDF rats were fasted for 4.5 h before MB06322 or vehicle administration. A bolus of glucose (2 g/kg) was administered orally 1.5 h later. Blood samples were taken from the tail vein and analyzed for glucose, lactate, and insulin as described above. Animal Care. Rats were housed under standard vivarium conditions (12-h light/dark cycle) with free access to Purina 5008 (ZDF rats) or standard chow (Sprague–Dawley rats) and water unless otherwise indicated. All studies were conducted in accordance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee guidelines. Data Analysis. Results are expressed as mean ± standard errors of the mean for all values unless otherwise indicated. Differences between animal groups were evaluated by using ANOVA with Dunnett's post hoc analysis or the unpaired Student t test where appropriate and are considered significant when P < 0.05. Results Design of MB05032. Our initial efforts to identify an AMP mimetic with high FBPase inhibitory potency and specificity focused on the replacement of the phosphate moiety because the negatively charged phosphate not only severely limits oral bioavailability and cell penetration but is also rapidly removed in biological fluids by phosphatases. The dephosphorylated compound exhibits a >106-fold loss in inhibitory potency. The loss in potency was consistent with the x-ray structures of the pig and human FBPase–AMP complexes (34, 25), which showed the phosphate forming a full complement of hydrogen bonds with the protein. Efforts to replace the phosphate group with a carboxylate or other phosphate mimetics consistently led to near complete loss in binding affinity, which likely reflected the binding site architecture and its preference for a negatively charged tetrahedral group. Even the corresponding phosphonate analogue of AMP, i.e., AMP with its 5′ oxygen replaced with a methylene, exhibited a 2,000-fold loss in inhibitor potency, possibly reflecting the importance of the hydrogen bond between 113Tyr and the 5′ oxygen (25). Successful redesign of AMP was ultimately achieved through insights gained by solving and analyzing 10 2.3- to 2.5-Å resolution x-ray structures of FBPase-inhibitor complexes and by conducting numerous free energy perturbation calculations (35, 36). Analysis of the FBPase–AMP complex showed that the AMP binding conformation had a glycosyl bond torsion angle (O4′-C1′-N9-C4) of –155.1°, meaning that the C8–H bond of the purine base pointed directly at the phosphate group and, therefore, that the phosphate binding site was accessible from the purine base (Fig. 1A
Efforts to maximize AMP site specificity exploited differences in binding site interaction patterns derived from analysis of x-ray structures of 25 nucleotide-binding enzymes. Hydrogen bonds formed between the proteins and purine base nitrogens N7, 6NH2, N1, and N3 were found in 26%, 12% (two bonds), 54%, and 43% of the structures, respectively, whereas ligand-scanning results (35) showed that only N7 and the 6NH2 group of AMP formed strong hydrogen bonds with FBPase. These results suggested that replacement of some or all of the nitrogens in the pyrimidine portion of the purine base with CH or removal of the pyrimidine base altogether might improve FBPase binding affinity by decreasing desolvation costs. FBPase specificity was also expected to improve, because hydrogen bond interactions with the pyrimidine base often contribute to AMP binding affinity with other AMP-binding enzymes. By using these concepts, we discovered MB05032 (Fig. 1B FBPase Inhibition and Specificity. MB05032 inhibits human liver FBPase with a potency (IC50 = 16 ± 1.5 nM) significantly greater than the natural inhibitor, AMP (IC50 = 1 μM), and the most well characterized AMP mimetic, ZMP (IC50 = 12 ± 1.4 μM) (Fig. 2
Design of MB06322. MB05032, like most phosphonic acids, exhibits low oral bioavailability in animals (<2%) (data not shown). Accordingly, a large set of known phosphonic acid prodrugs (38) and novel prodrugs (39) were prepared and extensively evaluated in an effort to find a prodrug with improved oral bioavailability, good aqueous stability, and no risk of prodrug byproduct-related toxicity. These efforts led to the discovery of a bisamidate prodrug series, which unlike other phosphonate prodrugs, had all of the desired properties. The lead prodrug, MB06322, is stable in aqueous solutions (t90 > 7 days at pH 3.0–7.4), but cleaves rapidly to MB05032 and the nontoxic byproducts alanine and ethanol in the presence of rat and human liver S9 fractions. Prodrug cleavage begins with an esterase-catalyzed reaction to generate a monoamidate intermediate (MB06633, Fig. 3A
Glucose Production in Hepatocytes. MB06322 and MB05032 exhibit concentration-dependent inhibition of glucose production from all common GNG precursors in rat and human hepatocytes (Table 2). As shown for human hepatocytes in Fig. 3B
Inhibition of GNG in ZDF Rats. Oral administration of MB06322 to fasted male ZDF rats results in dose-dependent inhibition of [14C]bicarbonate incorporation into glucose (Fig. 4A
Glucose Lowering in ZDF Rats. Oral administration of MB06322 to young (8–9 weeks old) ZDF rats with mild diabetes (basal insulin levels of 7.7 ± 0.7 ng/ml) and aged (12–13 weeks) ZDF rats with overt diabetes (basal insulin levels of 0.65 ± 0.16 ng/ml) results in dose-dependent glucose lowering (Fig. 5 A and B
Discussion FBPase has long been recognized as a potential drug target for diabetes (23, 11, 22). Efforts over the past 20 years to discover potent and specific FBPase inhibitors by screening large compound libraries yielded few promising leads probably reflecting the known difficulties in finding high-affinity ligands for hydrophilic binding sites (22, 41, 42). Conversely, our program centered on a structure-guided approach, which we used to identify a series of nonnucleoside inhibitors capable of forming a unique set of interactions with the AMP binding site. The lead compound identified through these efforts, MB05032, shares little structural similarity with AMP (Fig. 1 The negatively charged phosphonic acid moiety, although useful in this case for achieving high FBPase binding affinity, is often associated with low oral bioavailability and poor cell penetration and consequently is not usually considered a desirable feature. Phosphonate prodrug strategies designed to circumvent the low oral bioavailability rarely provide a satisfactory solution, because most known prodrug classes are plagued by aqueous instability, poor conversion rates, and/or byproduct-related toxicities (38). In contrast, the bisamidate prodrug described here, MB06322, exhibits good stability across a broad pH range, generates nontoxic byproducts, and results in satisfactory oral bioavailability in the rat (>20%). Moreover, the bisamidate series is readily synthesized and, unlike earlier phosphoramidate prodrugs (40), enables the phosphonate moiety to remain achiral. Exposure of primary rat hepatocytes to MB06322 leads to dose-dependent inhibition of GNG (Fig. 3 The potential glucose-lowering effects of FBPase inhibitors are evident from studies with ZDF rats administered MB06322 (Fig. 5 The ZDF rat studies also provide the first insight into the therapeutic index of FBPase inhibitors. Hypoglycemia, one of the major safety concerns associated with GNG inhibition, was not observed, even with MB06322 doses 10-fold above the minimum effective dose administered to ZDF rats fasted for 10 h after drug administration. The resistance of ZDF rats to hypoglycemia is presumably related to the availability of hepatic glycogen reserves and possibly some residual GNG activity (7–15%). Elevated lactate and triglyceride levels are two other possible consequences of GNG inhibition that impact the safety potential of FBPase inhibitors. Importantly, neither lactate nor triglycerides increased in 8- to 9-week-old ZDF rats with mild diabetes treated with high doses of MB06322. In ZDF rats with more advanced disease, lactate and triglyceride levels were elevated but only modestly (<2-fold). These results suggest that, unlike inhibitors of other GNG enzymes (14, 15), FBPase inhibitors may lower glucose with an adequate safety margin. The efficacy and safety profile of MB06322 in the ZDF rat suggests that FBPase inhibitors may represent a class of drugs useful for treating early-stage diabetes in which postprandial hyperglycemia is the primary contributor to the elevated HbA1c levels and late stage diabetes in which fasting hyperglycemia becomes the most important contributor (44). Moreover, the independence of the glucose-lowering effect on insulin levels may differentiate FBPase inhibitors from other drug classes used to treat T2DMs (45) whose effects depend on insulin and consequently wane with time because of progressive β cell dysfunction (46). Last, FBPase inhibitors may inhibit GNG and correspondingly lower glucose more than drugs that indirectly inhibit GNG, because these drugs typically modulate only one of the many factors that contribute to elevated GNG in T2DMs, e.g., hepatic insulin resistance, elevated levels of glucagon, free fatty acids, GNG substrates, and hormones such as cortisol (47). In summary, a structure-guided drug design strategy led to the discovery of a series of potent and selective FBPase inhibitors. The lead compound, MB06322, administered to ZDF rats resulted in dose-dependent GNG inhibition and pronounced glucose lowering independent of insulin levels and nutritional status. The favorable efficacy and safety shown in these studies suggest that FBPase inhibitors may represent a class of drugs that could prove useful for treating a broad range of T2DMs either alone or in combination with drugs acting predominantly through insulin secretion or insulin action. Acknowledgments We thank Drs. Gerald Shulman and Alan Cherrington for advice; Drs. Hiroyoshi Horikoshi, Toshihiko Fujiwara, and Akira Okuno (Sankyo, Tokyo) for helpful discussions; Dr. Vellarkad N. Viswanadhan for assistance on molecular modeling studies; Dr. Jeff Stebbins for the AMP displacement studies; Dr. Kristen C. Hart for analysis of liver and plasma levels of GNG substrates and intermediates; Dr. James M. Fujitaki for analysis of drug levels; and Lisa Weston for technical assistance. W.N.L. was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GM06920. Notes Author contributions: M.D.E., P.D.v.P., and Q.D. designed research; P.D.v.P., Q.D., S.R.K., S.C.P., M.R.R., K.R.R., T.J., and W.N.L. performed research; M.D.E., P.D.v.P., Q.D., S.R.K., S.C.P., M.R.R., K.R.R., T.J., and W.N.L. analyzed data; and M.D.E. wrote the paper. Abbreviations: GNG, gluconeogenesis; FBPase, fructose 1,6-bisphosphatase; ZDF, Zucker diabetic fatty; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; ZMP, aminoimidazole-4-carboxamide riboside monophosphate; Fru 2,6-P2, fructose 2,6-bisphosphate. References 1. Cherrington, A. D. (1999. ) Diabetes 48, 1198–1214. [PubMed] 2. DeFronzo, R. A. (1988. ) Diabetes 37, 667–687. [PubMed] 3. Gerich, J. E., Meyer, C., Woerle, H. J. & Stumvoll, M. (2001. ) Diabetes Care 24, 382–391. [PubMed] 4. Kolterman, O. G., Gray, R. S., Griffin, J., Burstein, P., Insel, J., Scarlett, J. A. & Olefsky, J. M. (1981. ) J. Clin. Invest. 68, 957–969. [PubMed] 5. Boden, G., Chen, X. & Stein, T. P. (2001. ) Am. J. Physiol. 280, E23–E30. 6. Perriello, G., Pampanelli, S., Del Sindaco, P., Lalli, C., Ciofetta, M., Volpi, E., Santeusanio, F., Brunetti, P. & Bolli, G. B. (1997. ) Diabetes 46, 1010–1016. [PubMed] 7. Gastaldelli, A., Baldi, S., Pettiti, M., Toschi, E., Camastra, S., Natali, A., Landau, B. R. & Ferrannini, E. (2000. ) Diabetes 49, 1367–1373. [PubMed] 8. Jeng, C. Y., Sheu, W. H., Fuh, M. M., Chen, Y. D. & Reaven, G. M. (1994. ) Diabetes 43, 1440–1444. [PubMed] 9. Magnusson, I., Rothman, D. L., Katz, L. D., Shulman, R. G. & Shulman, G. I. (1992. ) J. Clin. Invest. 90, 1323–1327. [PubMed] 10. Wajngot, A., Chandramouli, V., Schumann, W. C., Ekberg, K., Jones, P. K., Efendic, S. & Landau, B. R. (2001. ) Metabolism 50, 47–52. [PubMed] 11. McCormack, J. G., Westergaard, N., Kristiansen, M., Brand, C. L. & Lau, J. (2001. ) Curr. Pharm. Des. 7, 1451–1474. [PubMed] 12. Stumvoll, M., Nurjhan, N., Perriello, G., Dailey, G. & Gerich, J. E. (1995. ) N. Engl. J. Med. 333, 550–554. [PubMed] 13. Hundal, R. S., Krssak, M., Dufour, S., Laurent, D., Lebon, V., Chandramouli, V., Inzucchi, S. E., Schumann, W. C., Petersen, K. F., Landau, B. R. & Shulman, G. I. (2000. ) Diabetes 49, 2063–2069. [PubMed] 14. Newgard, C. B., Moore, S. V., Foster, D. W. & McGarry, J. D. (1984. ) J. Biol. Chem. 259, 6958–6963. [PubMed] 15. Herling, A. W., Burger, H. J., Schwab, D., Hemmerle, H., Below, P. & Schubert, G. (1998. ) Am. J. Physiol. 274, G1087–G1093. [PubMed] 16. Wu, C., Okar, D. A., Newgard, C. B. & Lange, A. J. (2001. ) J. Clin. Invest. 107, 91–98. [PubMed] 17. Pilkis, S. J. & Claus, T. H. (1991. ) Annu. Rev. Nutr. 11, 465–515. [PubMed] 18. Gitzelmann, R., Steinmann, B. & Van Den Berghe, G. (1995. ) in The Metabolic and Molecular Basis of Inherited Disease, eds. Scriver, C. R., Beaudet, A. L., Sly, W. S. & Valle, D. (McGraw–Hill, New York), Vol. 1, pp. 905–934. 19. Van Schaftingen, E. & Hers, H. G. (1981. ) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78, 2861–2863. [PubMed] 20. Benkovic, S. J. & deMaine, M. M. (1982. ) Adv. Enzymol. Relat. Areas Mol. Biol. 53, 45–82. [PubMed] 21. Erion, M. D., Kasibhatla, S. R., Bookser, B. C., van Poelje, P. D., Reddy, M. R., Gruber, H. E. & Appleman, J. R. (1999. ) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 121, 308–319. 22. Wright, S. W., Carlo, A. A., Danley, D. E., Hageman, D. L., Karam, G. A., Mansour, M. N., McClure, L. D., Pandit, J., Schulte, G. K., Treadway, J. L., et al. (2003. ) Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 13, 2055–2058. [PubMed] 23. Vincent, M. F., Erion, M. D., Gruber, H. E. & Van den Berghe, G. (1996. ) Diabetologia 39, 1148–1155. [PubMed] 24. Bergeron, R., Previs, S. F., Cline, G. W., Perret, P., Russell, R. R., III, Young, L. H. & Shulman, G. I. (2001. ) Diabetes 50, 1076–1082. [PubMed] 25. Gidh-Jain, M., Zhang, Y., van Poelje, P. D., Liang, J. Y., Huang, S., Kim, J., Elliott, J. T., Erion, M. D., Pilkis, S. J., Raafat El-Maghrabi, M. & Lipscomb, W. N. (1994. ) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 27732–27738. [PubMed] 26. El-Maghrabi, M. R., Gidh-Jain, M., Austin, L. R. & Pilkis, S. J. (1993. ) J. Biol. Chem. 268, 9466–9472. [PubMed] 27. Kemp, R. G. (1971. ) J. Biol. Chem. 246, 245–252. [PubMed] 28. Tagaya, M., Yagami, T., Noumi, T., Futai, M., Kishi, F., Nakazawa, A. & Fukui, T. (1989. ) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 990–994. [PubMed] 29. McMahon, R. J. & Frost, S. C. (1996. ) Am. J. Physiol. 270, E640–E645. [PubMed] 30. Berry, M. N. & Friend, D. S. (1969. ) J. Cell Biol. 43, 506–520. [PubMed] 31. Groen, A. K., Sips, H. J., Vervoorn, R. C. & Tager, J. M. (1982. ) Eur. J. Biochem. 122, 87–93. [PubMed] 32. Exton, J. H. & Park, C. R. (1967. ) J. Biol. Chem. 242, 2622–2636. [PubMed] 33. Vincent, M. F., Marangos, P. J., Gruber, H. E. & Van den Berghe, G. (1991. ) Diabetes 40, 1259–1266. [PubMed] 34. Ke, H. M., Liang, J. Y., Zhang, Y. P. & Lipscomb, W. N. (1991. ) Biochemistry 30, 4412–4420. [PubMed] 35. Erion, M. D., van Poelje, P. D. & Reddy, M. R. (2000. ) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 6114–6115. 36. Reddy, M. R. & Erion, M. D. (2001. ) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 6246–6252. [PubMed] 37. Tillmann, H. & Eschrich, K. (1998. ) Gene 212, 295–304. [PubMed] 38. Krise, J. P. & Stella, V. J. (1996. ) Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 19, 287–310. 39. Erion, M. D., Reddy, K. R., Boyer, S. H., Matelich, M. C., Gomez-Galeno, J., Lemus, R. H., Ugarkar, B. G., Colby, T. J., Schanzer, J. & van Poelje, P. D. (2004. ) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 126, 5154–5163. [PubMed] 40. Saboulard, D., Naesens, L., Cahard, D., Salgado, A., Pathirana, R., Velazquez, S., McGuigan, C., De Clercq, E. & Balzarini, J. (1999. ) Mol. Pharmacol. 56, 693–704. [PubMed] 41. Wright, S. W., Carlo, A. A., Carty, M. D., Danley, D. E., Hageman, D. L., Karam, G. A., Levy, C. B., Mansour, M. N., Mathiowetz, A. M., McClure, L. D., et al. (2002. ) J. Med. Chem. 45, 3865–3877. [PubMed] 42. Choe, J.-Y., Nelson, S. W., Arienti, K. L., Axe, F. U., Collins, T. L., Jones, T. K., Kimmich, R. D. A., Newman, M. J., Norvell, K., Ripka, W. C., et al. (2003. ) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 51176–51183. [PubMed] 43. Moore, M. C., Connolly, C. C. & Cherrington, A. D. (1998. ) Eur. J. Endocrinol. 138, 240–248. [PubMed] 44. Monnier, L., Lapinski, H. & Colette, C. (2003. ) Diabetes Care 26, 881–885. [PubMed] 45. Moller, D. E. (2001. ) Nature 414, 821–827. [PubMed] 46. U.K. Prospective Diabetes Study Group. (1998. ) Lancet 352, 837–853. [PubMed] 47. Corssmit, E. P., Romijn, J. A. & Sauerwein, H. P. (2001. ) Metabolism 50, 742–755. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||||
Diabetes. 1999 May; 48(5):1198-214.
[Diabetes. 1999]Diabetes. 1988 Jun; 37(6):667-87.
[Diabetes. 1988]Diabetes Care. 2001 Feb; 24(2):382-91.
[Diabetes Care. 2001]J Clin Invest. 1981 Oct; 68(4):957-69.
[J Clin Invest. 1981]Diabetes. 1997 Jun; 46(6):1010-6.
[Diabetes. 1997]Curr Pharm Des. 2001 Sep; 7(14):1451-74.
[Curr Pharm Des. 2001]N Engl J Med. 1995 Aug 31; 333(9):550-4.
[N Engl J Med. 1995]Diabetes. 2000 Dec; 49(12):2063-9.
[Diabetes. 2000]J Biol Chem. 1984 Jun 10; 259(11):6958-63.
[J Biol Chem. 1984]Am J Physiol. 1998 Jun; 274(6 Pt 1):G1087-93.
[Am J Physiol. 1998]Annu Rev Nutr. 1991; 11():465-515.
[Annu Rev Nutr. 1991]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 May; 78(5):2861-3.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981]Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol. 1982; 53():45-82.
[Adv Enzymol Relat Areas Mol Biol. 1982]Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2003 Jun 16; 13(12):2055-8.
[Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2003]Diabetologia. 1996 Oct; 39(10):1148-55.
[Diabetologia. 1996]Diabetes. 2001 May; 50(5):1076-82.
[Diabetes. 2001]J Biol Chem. 1994 Nov 4; 269(44):27732-8.
[J Biol Chem. 1994]J Biol Chem. 1993 May 5; 268(13):9466-72.
[J Biol Chem. 1993]J Biol Chem. 1971 Jan 10; 246(1):245-52.
[J Biol Chem. 1971]Am J Physiol. 1996 Apr; 270(4 Pt 1):E640-5.
[Am J Physiol. 1996]J Cell Biol. 1969 Dec; 43(3):506-20.
[J Cell Biol. 1969]Eur J Biochem. 1982 Feb; 122(1):87-93.
[Eur J Biochem. 1982]J Biol Chem. 1967 Jun 10; 242(11):2622-36.
[J Biol Chem. 1967]Diabetes. 1991 Oct; 40(10):1259-66.
[Diabetes. 1991]Biochemistry. 1991 May 7; 30(18):4412-20.
[Biochemistry. 1991]J Biol Chem. 1994 Nov 4; 269(44):27732-8.
[J Biol Chem. 1994]J Am Chem Soc. 2001 Jul 4; 123(26):6246-52.
[J Am Chem Soc. 2001]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 May; 78(5):2861-3.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981]Gene. 1998 Jun 8; 212(2):295-304.
[Gene. 1998]J Am Chem Soc. 2004 Apr 28; 126(16):5154-63.
[J Am Chem Soc. 2004]Mol Pharmacol. 1999 Oct; 56(4):693-704.
[Mol Pharmacol. 1999]Diabetologia. 1996 Oct; 39(10):1148-55.
[Diabetologia. 1996]Curr Pharm Des. 2001 Sep; 7(14):1451-74.
[Curr Pharm Des. 2001]Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2003 Jun 16; 13(12):2055-8.
[Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2003]J Med Chem. 2002 Aug 29; 45(18):3865-77.
[J Med Chem. 2002]J Biol Chem. 2003 Dec 19; 278(51):51176-83.
[J Biol Chem. 2003]Mol Pharmacol. 1999 Oct; 56(4):693-704.
[Mol Pharmacol. 1999]Annu Rev Nutr. 1991; 11():465-515.
[Annu Rev Nutr. 1991]Eur J Endocrinol. 1998 Mar; 138(3):240-8.
[Eur J Endocrinol. 1998]J Biol Chem. 1984 Jun 10; 259(11):6958-63.
[J Biol Chem. 1984]Am J Physiol. 1998 Jun; 274(6 Pt 1):G1087-93.
[Am J Physiol. 1998]Diabetes Care. 2003 Mar; 26(3):881-5.
[Diabetes Care. 2003]Nature. 2001 Dec 13; 414(6865):821-7.
[Nature. 2001]Lancet. 1998 Sep 12; 352(9131):837-53.
[Lancet. 1998]Metabolism. 2001 Jul; 50(7):742-55.
[Metabolism. 2001]J Biol Chem. 1994 Nov 4; 269(44):27732-8.
[J Biol Chem. 1994]