• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of bmjLink to Publisher's site
BMJ. Apr 7, 2001; 322(7290): 865.
PMCID: PMC1120030

Empathy is important for enablement

Stewart W Mercer, health services research training fellow
Graham C M Watt, Norie-Miller professor
Department of General Practice, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 0RR ; moc.loa@recremwetS
David Reilly, consultant physician

Editor—Reilly's editorial on enhancing human healing mentions the pilot work that we have done on the impact of homoeopathic consultations on patient enablement.1 “Enablement” describes the effect of a clinical encounter on a patient's ability to cope with and understand his or her illnesses.2

We collected 200 valid questionnaires from 230 consecutive outpatients attending the Glasgow Homoeopathic Hospital, an NHS facility that integrates complementary and orthodox approaches. Measures included the patient enablement instrument,2 perception of the doctor's empathy,3 and knowing the doctor well.2

The mean consultation length was 56 min for new patients (n=26) and 20 min for follow up patients (n=174). Enablement was not directly related to length of consultation but correlated with the patient's perception of the doctor's empathy (Spearman's correlation 0.371, P<0.001). The overall average enablement score (mean 4.7) was some 50% higher than the average in primary care.2 Overall, 118 of the 200 patients rated the consultations at Glasgow Homoeopathic Hospital as better (n=66) or much better (n=52) than their usual consultations with their general practitioners; 99 of the 118 rated the consultations as better (n=38) or much better (n=61) than consultations with other hospital specialists.

These findings suggest that empathy is important in enabling patients; no patient reported a high enablement score with a low empathy score. Clearly the generalisability of this association needs to be established in other settings. In general practice, enablement is enhanced by longer consultations and continuity of care,2 and we are currently investigating the role of empathy in this.

Empathy is often cited as a core value in the health profession, yet its lack in modern medicine seems to be widespread.4 The call to integrate complementary treatments into the NHS is one issue, but the organisational, structural, and personal limitations that general practitioners and hospital specialists in conventional medicine face in trying to provide holistic care is a wider one. Needing to prove that compassion is not a luxury but a fundamental requirement of a healthcare system is a damning indictment of our current ways of thinking. Yet without the scientific method and focused research, it seems certain to slide from neglect5 to decay.


1. Reilly D. Enhancing human healing. BMJ. 2001;322:120–121. . (20 January.) [PMC free article] [PubMed]
2. Howie JGR, Heaney DJ, Maxwell M, Walker JJ, Freeman GK, Rai H. Quality at general practice consultations: cross sectional survey. BMJ. 1999;319:738–743. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
3. Burns DD, Auerbach A. Therapeutic empathy in cognitive-behavioural therapy: does it really make a difference? In: Salkovskis PM, editor. Frontiers of cognitive therapy. New York: Guilford Press; 1996. pp. 135–164.
4. Reynolds W, Scott PA. Do nurses and other professional helpers normally display much empathy? J Advanced Nursing Studies. 2000;31:226–234. [PubMed]
5. Taylor MB. Compassion: its neglect and importance. Br J Gen Pract. 1997;47:521–523. [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group
PubReader format: click here to try


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


  • PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...