![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2005, American Society of Plant Biologists MicroRNA Directs mRNA Cleavage of the Transcription Factor NAC1 to Downregulate Auxin Signals for Arabidopsis Lateral Root Development aLaboratory of Molecular Cell Biology, Temasek Life Science Laboratory, National University of Singapore, 117604 Singapore bNational Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China cNational Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China dLaboratory of Plant Molecular Biology, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021 1Current address: Huttner Group, Max-Planck-Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany. 2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail chua/at/mail.rockefeller.edu; fax 212-327-8327. Received January 13, 2005; Accepted February 24, 2005. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract Although several plant microRNAs (miRNAs) have been shown to play a role in plant development, no phenotype has yet been associated with a reduction or loss of expression of any plant miRNA. Arabidopsis thaliana miR164 was predicted to target five NAM/ATAF/CUC (NAC) domain–encoding mRNAs, including NAC1, which transduces auxin signals for lateral root emergence. Here, we show that miR164 guides the cleavage of endogenous and transgenic NAC1 mRNA, producing 3′-specific fragments. Cleavage was blocked by NAC1 mutations that disrupt base pairing with miR164. Compared with wild-type plants, Arabidopsis mir164a and mir164b mutant plants expressed less miR164 and more NAC1 mRNA and produced more lateral roots. These mutant phenotypes can be complemented by expression of the appropriate MIR164a and MIR164b genomic sequences. By contrast, inducible expression of miR164 in wild-type plants led to decreased NAC1 mRNA levels and reduced lateral root emergence. Auxin induction of miR164 was mirrored by an increase in the NAC1 mRNA 3′ fragment, which was not observed in the auxin-insensitive mutants auxin resistant1 (axr1-12), axr2-1, and transport inhibitor response1. Moreover, the cleavage-resistant form of NAC1 mRNA was unaffected by auxin treatment. Our results indicate that auxin induction of miR164 provides a homeostatic mechanism to clear NAC1 mRNA to downregulate auxin signals. INTRODUCTION First discovered in Caenorhabditis elegans, microRNAs (miRNAs) were found recently to be expressed in several eukaryotes as well (Carrington and Ambros, 2003; Ambros, 2004). The initial cloning experiments of Reinhart et al. (2002) recovered 16 miRNAs from Arabidopsis thaliana, some of which were encoded by more than one genomic locus. These miRNAs were predicted to target mRNAs encoding transcription factors involved in plant development (Rhoades et al., 2002), and many such candidate mRNAs have been experimentally verified to be bona fide targets (Llave et al., 2002; Bartel, 2004). Subsequent computational analyses by three independent groups increased the number of potential Arabidopsis miRNAs to more than 100 (Bonnet et al., 2004; Jones-Rhoades and Bartel, 2004; Wang et al., 2004). The increasing biological importance of this group of small RNAs is illustrated by the expanded list of target mRNAs, including those encoding proteins implicated in proteolysis, signaling, metabolism, ion transport, etc. These results suggest that besides controlling transcription factor mRNA abundance, miRNAs may also regulate a large number of other cellular processes (e.g., signaling pathways). In addition, direct sequencing of small RNAs from a stress-induced library has revealed several new miRNA families (Sunkar and Zhu, 2004), suggesting a role of these small RNAs in abiotic stress responses. Expression of miR393 and miR159 has been shown to be regulated by abscisic acid (Sunkar and Zhu, 2004) and gibberellin (Achard et al., 2004), respectively. To date, the functions of plant miRNAs have been deduced from overexpression of precursor sequences encoding miRNAs and/or expression of target mRNAs that have been rendered cleavage-resistant by mutations (Bartel and Bartel, 2003; Bartel, 2004; Dugas and Bartel, 2004). Overexpression of miRNA precursors in transgenic plants leads to increased miRNA levels and decreased target mRNA levels; as expected, such transgenic plants phenocopy mutants with deficiencies of the target mRNA. Conversely, expression/overexpression of miRNA-resistant mutant mRNAs stabilizes the message and causes transgenic plants to display a phenotype similar to that obtained with target wild-type mRNA overexpression. Further clarification of the biological role of miRNAs in plants will be aided by analysis of loss-of-function mutants that are directly affected in miRNA genes. Unfortunately, no complete loss-of-function mutant in any plant miRNA has yet been described. A recently characterized Arabidopsis T-DNA insertion mutant in the MIR164b locus (mir164b-1) produced 15-fold less miR164 than did the wild type, but no aerial phenotype was associated with this deficiency (Mallory et al., 2004a). This finding could be attributed to the fact that miR164 is encoded by at least three genomic loci in Arabidopsis (Reinhart et al., 2002). It should be pointed out that several Arabidopsis miRNAs are encoded by more than one genomic locus, thus rendering recovery of complete loss-of-function mutants difficult. Predicted targets of miR164 include mRNAs encoding five members of the NAM/ATAF/CUC (NAC) domain transcription factor family (Rhoades et al., 2002). Of these, NAC1 is involved in transmitting auxin signals for lateral root development (Xie et al., 2000, 2002) and CUP-SHAPED COTYLEDON1 (CUC1)/CUC2 are implicated in meristem development and separation of aerial organs (Aida et al., 1997), whereas the functions of At5g07680 and At5g61430 have not yet been defined. Recent work by two independent groups has provided evidence for miRNA-mediated regulation of CUC1 (Mallory et al., 2004a) and CUC2 (Laufs et al., 2004) mRNA levels in vivo. Transgenic plants overexpressing miR164 display altered floral organ numbers and fused vegetative and floral organs. By contrast, transgenic plants expressing miRNA164-resistant CUC1 (Mallory et al., 2004a) or CUC2 (Laufs et al., 2004) are defective in leaf development, and in the case of CUC2 plants, they possess an enlarged boundary between sepals (Laufs et al., 2004). Whereas NAC1 mRNA was cleaved at the expected site in wild-type plants (Mallory et al., 2004a), no changes in NAC1 mRNA levels were detected in transgenic plants overexpressing miR164 (Laufs et al., 2004). The root phenotype of transgenic plants overexpressing miR164 was not investigated in these studies (Laufs et al., 2004; Mallory et al., 2004a). We previously found that the transcription regulator NAC1 acts downstream of TRANSPORT INHIBITOR RESPONSE1 (TIR1) to transmit auxin signals promoting lateral root emergence (Xie et al., 2000) and that there is a positive correlation between NAC1 mRNA levels and lateral root numbers. NAC1 was subsequently found to be an unstable protein, with its stability being regulated by the RING motif E3 ligase, SINAT5 (for Arabidopsis homolog of Drosophila protein SINA) (Xie et al., 2002). Because it is an unstable protein, we asked whether its mRNA stability is also regulated. Here, we confirm that NAC1 mRNA is a target of miR164 in vivo (Rhoades et al., 2002; Mallory et al., 2004a). Analysis of transgenic plants and four mir164 mutant alleles reveals that modest changes in miR164 levels can result in substantial changes in NAC1 mRNA levels, and the transgenic plants and mir164 mutants have the expected lateral root phenotypes correlating with NAC1 mRNA abundance. Finally, we found that miR164 expression is late-auxin-responsive and that a major role of this miRNA is to clear NAC1 mRNA to attenuate auxin signaling. RESULTS NAC1 mRNA Is Cleaved in Vivo NAC1 is a transcription activator in the auxin signaling pathway for Arabidopsis lateral root development (Xie et al., 2000, 2002). NAC1 mRNA accumulates mainly in roots (Figure 1
Plant miRNAs have recently been proposed to guide mRNAs for cleavage (Llave et al., 2002; Kasschau et al., 2003; Palatnik et al., 2003), and mRNAs for five NAC domain proteins, including NAC1, were predicted to be targets of miR164 (Rhoades et al., 2002; Laufs et al., 2004; Mallory et al., 2004a). RNA gel blot analysis showed that in Arabidopsis, miR164 expression levels were higher in roots and inflorescences compared with other organs (Figure 1 NAC1 mRNA Cleavage Is Directed by miR164 To obtain direct evidence that miR164 can mediate the cleavage of NAC1 mRNA, we used a transient expression system involving Agrobacterium tumefaciens infiltration of Nicotiana benthamiana leaves (English et al., 1997). miR164 is presumably encoded by three genomic loci, MIR164a, MIR164b, and MIR164c (Reinhart et al., 2002; Dugas and Bartel, 2004; http://www.sanger.ac.uk/cgi-bin/Rfam/mirna/browse.pl). It has been shown that transcription of genomic sequences (~2 kb) containing the miRNA foldback region by a 35S promoter can produce the mature miRNA (Llave et al., 2002; Aukerman and Sakai, 2003; Chen, 2004; Parizotto et al., 2004). In our experiments, we used a 153-bp sequence derived from MIR164b as a synthetic precursor of miR164 (Figure 2B Transgenic Plants Expressing a Cleavage-Resistant Form of NAC1 mRNA We generated Arabidopsis transgenic plants expressing 35S-Myc-NAC1 and 35S-Myc-NAC1m. Figure 3A
Overexpression of miR164 To further confirm the regulation of NAC1 mRNA by miR164, we introduced the synthetic precursor MIR164b into the 17-β-estradiol–inducible system, pX7 (Guo et al., 2003). The resulting construct, pX7-MIR164 (pX7-164), was used to retransform Arabidopsis transgenic plants (Landsberg erecta [Ler]) expressing either 35S-Myc-NAC1 or 35S-Myc (vector control) (Xie et al., 2002). Figure 4A
Because NAC1 mRNA is expressed in lateral root initials, it could be argued that the reduction of NAC1 mRNA levels in the induced pX7-164 plants was attributable to the fewer number of lateral roots in the inducer-treated transgenic plants and not to the direct action of miR164. To investigate this possibility, we performed a shorter time course of induction with two independent lines of 35S-Myc/pX7-164 plants. Figure 4C Phenotypes of T-DNA Insertion Mutants in MIR164a and MIR164b To investigate possible loss-of-function phenotypes, we obtained three T-DNA insertion mutants in MIR164a and one in MIR164b from the SALK collection of T-DNA insertion mutants. At 7 d after germination, seedlings of all four insertion mutants (mir164a-1, mir164a-2, mir164a-3, and mir164b-1) but not wild-type (Col) seedlings developed lateral roots (Figure 5A
We introduced into the four T-DNA insertion mutants ~2.2 kb of the appropriate genomic sequences, including the miR164 coding region (Figure 2B Phenotypes of Plants with Disrupted miRNA Metabolism The Arabidopsis mutant dicer-like1 (dcl1-9) displays reduced miRNA accumulation (Park et al., 2002) because of a defect in miRNA biogenesis. Increased miRNA accumulation was seen in transgenic plants expressing P1/HC-Pro, a viral suppressor, but these plants phenocopy the miRNA-deficient dcl1-9 because P1/HC-Pro interferes with miRNA functions (Kasschau et al., 2003). Figure 5D miR164 Clears NAC1 mRNA during Auxin Response As an early auxin-responsive gene, an increase in NAC1 mRNA was evident within 30 min of 2 μM 1-naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) treatment and reached a maximum level after 2 h (Xie et al., 2000, 2002). We found that under this condition, there was no change in miR164 levels (data not shown). However, at 10 μM NAA, we consistently detected an increase of miR164, but not of miR163, by ~1.5-fold at 6 to 8 h after treatment (Figure 6A
The specificity and reproducibility of this auxin-induced cleavage were further confirmed by analysis of transgenic plants expressing 35S-Myc-NAC1m. Figure 6A DISCUSSION miR164 Mediates NAC1 mRNA Cleavage in Vivo Plant miRNAs have been implicated in the control of leaf morphogenesis (Palatnik et al., 2003), leaf polarity (Kidner and Martienssen, 2004; Juarez et al., 2004; Mallory et al., 2004b), flowering time (Aukerman and Sakai, 2003; Achard et al., 2004; Chen, 2004), and flower development (Laufs et al., 2004; Mallory et al., 2004a). In contrast with animal miRNAs, most plant miRNAs have been shown to mediate cleavage of their target mRNAs (Dugas and Bartel, 2004), whereas only miRNA172 has been implicated in translational control (Aukerman and Sakai, 2003; Chen, 2004). Using coexpression in N. benthamiana, we show here that miR164 directs NAC1 mRNA cleavage in vivo at a position complementary to the 10th nucleotide from the 5′ end of miR164 and that disruption of the base-pairing region compromises cleavage. These results confirm and extend previous findings (Rhoades et al., 2002; Mallory et al., 2004a). It is possible that NAC1 mRNA cleavage might be developmentally regulated in Arabidopsis, because no cleavage was detected in flowers of transgenic plants overexpressing miR164 (Laufs et al., 2004). miR164 Negatively Regulates Lateral Root Development By manipulating miR164 levels or expressing the cleavage-resistant NAC1m mRNA in vivo, we have provided several lines of evidence that this miRNA functions as a negative regulator of auxin-mediated lateral root development by controlling NAC1 mRNA levels. (1) Plants overexpressing NAC1m produce more lateral roots compared with NAC1-overexpressing plants. (2) Mutant plants (dcl1-9) defective in miRNA biogenesis possess higher NAC1 mRNA levels and develop more lateral roots. (3) Conditional overexpression of miR164 reduces NAC1 mRNA levels as well as lateral root numbers. (4) Mutants partially affected in miR164 production accumulate higher levels of NAC1 mRNA and produce more lateral roots. In all of these instances, there is a strict inverse correlation between changes in miR164 levels and changes in both NAC1 mRNA levels and lateral root initials. An exception is seen in P1/HC-Pro transgenic plants, which accumulate miR164 but in which cleavage of NAC1 mRNA is blocked by the viral suppressor. Therefore, it is not surprising that these plants maintain high NAC1 mRNA levels and develop more lateral roots. We have characterized four T-DNA insertion mutants of Arabidopsis that accumulate reduced miR164 levels. All of these mutants have a single T-DNA insertion in either MIR164a (three alleles) or MIR164b (one allele), and the phenotype segregates with the T-DNA. In addition to these two loci, Arabidopsis contains a third locus, MIR164c, which can potentially produce miR164 (Dugas and Bartel, 2004). However, their relative contributions to miR164 expression are not clear. Nonetheless, our results show that both MIR164a and MIR164b contribute to miR164 expression in roots, as mutations in these loci reduce miR164 levels but do not eliminate expression totally. Based on the site of T-DNA disruption (Figure 5B Recent results have shown that in both animals and plants, miRNAs are transcribed from Pol II promoters (Kurihara and Watanabe, 2004; Parizotto et al., 2004). In our complementation experiments, we used genomic fragments with ~1.9- to 2.25-kb upstream sequences. Because rescue of molecular and morphological phenotypes was seen in the complemented lines, we conclude that these genomic fragments contain the requisite signals for miR164a and miR164b expression. Auxin Regulation of miR164 Several plant miRNAs regulate or are predicted to regulate mRNAs involved in various phytohormone signaling pathways (Rhoades et al., 2002; Bonnet et al., 2004; Jones-Rhoades and Bartel, 2004; Wang et al., 2004). To date, however, only miR159 has been shown to respond to gibberellins (Achard et al., 2004) and miR393 to abscisic acid (Sunkar and Zhu, 2004). Here, we show that miR164 levels in Arabidopsis roots can be increased by another phytohormone, auxin, through a signaling pathway dependent on AXR1, AXR2, and TIR1. These signaling components are known to be required for auxin-mediated lateral root development (Timpte et al., 1994; del Pozo and Estelle, 1999; Gray et al., 2001; del Pozo et al., 2002). Time-course studies showed that the miR164 increase, which occurs late in auxin treatment (after 6 h), is rather modest, being only 1.5-fold. Nevertheless, there is a clear and concomitant effect on NAC1 mRNA, whereas cleavage-resistant NAC1m mRNA is unaffected (Figure 6A NAC1 is a transcriptional activator for auxin-induced lateral root initiation (Xie et al., 2000) that has been shown to be unstable (Xie et al., 2002). The NAC1 instability is attributable to its polyubiquitination by the SINAT5 E3 ligase, which targets it for degradation by 26S proteasomes (Xie et al., 2002). Our work here extends the signal desensitization to NAC1 mRNA levels, which, together with targeted NAC1 degradation, ensures a more rapid signal suppression. The induction of miR164, at least in part, by auxin suggests an autoregulatory loop by which the miRNA mediates the clearance of NAC1 mRNA to attenuate and terminate auxin signaling. A corollary of this observation is that we expect many mRNA targets of miRNAs to encode unstable proteins such as NAC1, because unstable mRNAs are less likely to encode stable proteins. Among the five NAC domain mRNAs targeted by miR164, CUC1 and CUC2 are involved in cotyledon separation and meristem formation (Aida et al., 1997; Furutani et al., 2004). Expression of these two genes is repressed by auxin, and a localized increase in auxin concentration has been shown to phenocopy cuc1 cuc2 double mutant plants (Furutani et al., 2004). Transgenic plants overexpressing miR164 also have a similar phenotype (Laufs et al., 2004; Mallory et al., 2004a). It is possible that the CUC1/CUC2 repression is brought about, at least in part, by an auxin-induced increase in miR164 expression, as shown here. Future work should be directed toward understanding the mechanism of miRNA164 regulation by phytohormones. METHODS Plasmid Construction Genomic sequence (153 bp) containing the MIR164b foldback was used as a synthetic precursor sequence (Figure 2B Site-directed mutagenesis of the NAC1 cDNA in the nucleotide sequence of the miR164 complementary site was performed with two primers in opposite orientations: NAC1m5′ (5′-CATCATCAATGAACATGTACCGTGTTTTTCGAATTTGTCACAGAACCAAACC-3′) and NAC1m3′ (5′-CTGTGACAAATTCGAAAAACACGGTACATGTTCATTGATGATGTAGTGATG-3′). NAC1 cDNA intermediate plasmid pBS-NAC1 (Xie et al., 2000) was used as template, using the QuickChange Multi Site-Directed Mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). The resulting DNA was digested with DpnI to eliminate the methylated, nonmutated original template DNA before transformation of Escherichia coli DH5α. Correct mutagenesis was verified by sequencing. A HincII-XhoI (586 bp) fragment from pBS-NAC1m, which contains the mutations, was cloned into 35S-Myc-NAC1 (Xie et al., 2000) digested with SpeI/Klenow+XhoI to replace the corresponding original wild-type sequence. The resulting clone was designated 35S-Myc-NAC1m. Plant Materials and Transformation Arabidopsis (Ler) plants expressing either 35S-Myc-NAC1 or 35S-Myc (vector control) (Xie et al., 2002) were used for retransformation with pX7-MIR164 (Guo et al., 2003). Wild-type Arabidopsis (Col) was used for 35S-Myc-NAC1 and 35S-Myc-NAC1m transformation. Transgenic plants were generated by the floral dip method (Clough and Bent, 1998). Double transgenic plants (Myc-NAC1/pX7-164 and Myc/pX7-164) were selected on MS medium (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) containing 10 μg/mL Basta and 20 μg/mL hygromycin B. For chemical-induced expression of miRNA, 6-d-old T2 seedlings germinated on selective medium were transferred to inductive medium containing 2 μM 17-β-estradiol. Myc-NAC1 and Myc-NAC1m transgenic Arabidopsis (Col) plants were selected on MS medium containing 10 μg/mL Basta. Twelve Myc-NAC1 and 18 Myc-NAC1m T2 single-copy lines were selected for the population study of lateral root phenotype. The T-DNA insertion mutants mir164b-1 (SALK_136105), mir164a-1 (SALK_061177), mir164a-2 (SALK_068270), and mir164a-3 (SALK_047619) were obtained from the ABRC. The SALK_136105 line obtained from the ABRC was homozygous with respect to kanamycin resistance, and the single-copy T-DNA was inserted into the loop of the predicted hairpin structure (Mallory et al., 2004a) (Figure 2B The mutants dcl1-9 (Park et al., 2002), axr1-12 (del Pozo and Estelle, 1999), axr2-1 (Timpte et al., 1994), and tir1-1 (Gray et al., 2001) and P1/HC-Pro transgenic plants (Kasschau et al., 2003) have been described. Plant Growth Conditions, Auxin Treatment, and Observation of Root Phenotypes Arabidopsis seeds were surface sterilized with 20% bleach and 0.01% Triton X-100 and washed three times with sterile water. Sterilized seeds were suspended in 0.15% agarose and plated on MS medium. Plates were vernalized in darkness for 2 d at 4°C and then transferred to a tissue culture room at 22°C under a 16-h-light/8-h-dark photoperiod. For observation of root phenotypes, seedlings were grown on vertical MS agar medium containing 2% sucrose. Lateral root initials were identified by staining whole seedlings with a mixture of toluidine blue and basic fuchsin and counted with a binocular microscope. For auxin treatment, seedlings were grown vertically on MS agar medium for 12 d, then incubated with 10 μM NAA. Root samples were collected at various times for RNA analysis. Potted plants were grown in growth chambers at 22°C and 75% humidity under a 16-h-light/8-h-dark photoperiod. Agrobacterium tumefaciens Infiltration in Nicotiana benthamiana The constructs 35S-MIR164b, 35S-MIRΔ164, 35S-Myc-NAC1, and 35S-Myc-NAC1m were transformed into A. tumefaciens strain EHA105 by electroporation and selected on Luria-Bertani medium containing rifampicin at 10 μg/mL and kanamycin at 50 μg/mL (for 35S-MIR164b and 35S-MIRΔ164) or spectinomycin at 100 μg/mL (for 35S-Myc-NAC1 and 35S-Myc-NAC1m). Agrobacterial cells were infiltrated into leaves of N. benthamiana as described (English et al., 1997). For coinfiltration experiments, equal volumes of an Agrobacterium culture containing 35S-MIR164b or 35S-MIRΔ164 (OD600 = 1.75) and 35S-Myc-NAC1 or 35S-Myc-NAC1m (OD600 = 0.25) were mixed before infiltration into N. benthamiana leaves. RNA Isolation and Analysis Total RNA was isolated from plant tissues by LiCl precipitation (Verwoerd et al., 1989). For RNA gel blot analysis, total RNA was separated on a 1.2% agarose gel containing 6% formaldehyde and transferred to Hybond-N+ membranes. To specifically detect NAC1 transcripts, blots were hybridized with a BamHI-SalI fragment from pBS-NAC1 encoding the NAC1 C-terminal domain labeled with [α-32P]dCTP using a Ready-primed labeling kit (Amersham International, Buckinghamshire, UK). To specifically detect CUC3 transcripts, the membrane was stripped and reprobed with a PCR fragment encoding the CUC3 C-terminal domain. Low-molecular-weight RNAs were precipitated from the LiCl supernatant fraction of total RNA extraction with three volumes of ethanol. Low-molecular-weight RNAs were separated by electrophoresis on denaturing 17% polyacrylamide gels, and miRNA gel blot hybridizations were performed as described (Reinhart et al., 2002). DNA oligonucleotides complementary to miR164 or miR163 were end-labeled using T4 polynucleotide kinase (Roche Applied Science, Penzberg, Germany) and used for hybridizations. Signal intensity was measured using a PhosphorImager (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Mapping of miRNA-Guided Cleavage Site The FirstChoice RLM-RACE kit (Ambion, Austin, TX) was used for RLM-RACE assay according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, total RNAs were extracted from roots of wild-type Arabidopsis (Col) seedlings, and poly(A) mRNA was purified using an Oligotex mRNA mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Poly(A) mRNA was directly ligated to the RLM-RACE 5′ RACE RNA Oligo adaptor (45 nucleotides) from the FirstChoice RLM-RACE kit (Ambion). The oligo(dT) (15-mer) primer was used to prime cDNA synthesis with reverse transcriptase. The resulting cDNA was used for the first round of nested PCR using the 5′ RACE Outer Primer together with a NAC1 gene-specific primer (5′-GCAATTCCAAACAGTGCTTGG-3′) complementary to nucleotides 1040 to 1060 of the NAC1 mRNA sequence. The 5′ RACE Inner Primer and the NAC1 gene-specific primer were used for the second round of nested PCR. Gel-purified PCR products were cloned into pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega) for sequencing. Acknowledgments We thank Peter Hare and Jose Reyes for discussion, Vicki Vance for P1/HC-Pro transgenic seeds, and the ABRC for dc11-9 and the mir164 insertion mutants. N.-H.C. was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant GM-44640. Q.X. was partially supported by Chinese MST 973 Project 2003CB114304. Notes The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantcell.org) is: Nam-Hai Chua (chua/at/mail.rockefeller.edu). Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.105.030841. References
|
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||||||||
Science. 2003 Jul 18; 301(5631):336-8.
[Science. 2003]Nature. 2004 Sep 16; 431(7006):350-5.
[Nature. 2004]Genes Dev. 2002 Jul 1; 16(13):1616-26.
[Genes Dev. 2002]Cell. 2002 Aug 23; 110(4):513-20.
[Cell. 2002]Science. 2002 Sep 20; 297(5589):2053-6.
[Science. 2002]Plant Physiol. 2003 Jun; 132(2):709-17.
[Plant Physiol. 2003]Cell. 2004 Jan 23; 116(2):281-97.
[Cell. 2004]Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004 Oct; 7(5):512-20.
[Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004]Curr Biol. 2004 Jun 22; 14(12):1035-46.
[Curr Biol. 2004]Genes Dev. 2002 Jul 1; 16(13):1616-26.
[Genes Dev. 2002]Cell. 2002 Aug 23; 110(4):513-20.
[Cell. 2002]Genes Dev. 2000 Dec 1; 14(23):3024-36.
[Genes Dev. 2000]Nature. 2002 Sep 12; 419(6903):167-70.
[Nature. 2002]Plant Cell. 1997 Jun; 9(6):841-57.
[Plant Cell. 1997]Curr Biol. 2004 Jun 22; 14(12):1035-46.
[Curr Biol. 2004]Genes Dev. 2000 Dec 1; 14(23):3024-36.
[Genes Dev. 2000]Nature. 2002 Sep 12; 419(6903):167-70.
[Nature. 2002]Cell. 2002 Aug 23; 110(4):513-20.
[Cell. 2002]Curr Biol. 2004 Jun 22; 14(12):1035-46.
[Curr Biol. 2004]Genes Dev. 2000 Dec 1; 14(23):3024-36.
[Genes Dev. 2000]Nature. 2002 Sep 12; 419(6903):167-70.
[Nature. 2002]Cell. 2002 Aug 23; 110(4):513-20.
[Cell. 2002]Curr Biol. 2004 Jun 22; 14(12):1035-46.
[Curr Biol. 2004]Science. 2002 Sep 20; 297(5589):2053-6.
[Science. 2002]Dev Cell. 2003 Feb; 4(2):205-17.
[Dev Cell. 2003]Nature. 2003 Sep 18; 425(6955):257-63.
[Nature. 2003]Cell. 2002 Aug 23; 110(4):513-20.
[Cell. 2002]Development. 2004 Sep; 131(17):4311-22.
[Development. 2004]Genes Dev. 2002 Jul 1; 16(13):1616-26.
[Genes Dev. 2002]Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004 Oct; 7(5):512-20.
[Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004]Science. 2002 Sep 20; 297(5589):2053-6.
[Science. 2002]Plant Cell. 2003 Nov; 15(11):2730-41.
[Plant Cell. 2003]Science. 2004 Mar 26; 303(5666):2022-5.
[Science. 2004]Plant J. 2003 May; 34(3):383-92.
[Plant J. 2003]Nature. 2002 Sep 12; 419(6903):167-70.
[Nature. 2002]Development. 2004 Sep; 131(17):4311-22.
[Development. 2004]Curr Biol. 2004 Jun 22; 14(12):1035-46.
[Curr Biol. 2004]Curr Biol. 2004 Jun 22; 14(12):1035-46.
[Curr Biol. 2004]Curr Biol. 2002 Sep 3; 12(17):1484-95.
[Curr Biol. 2002]Dev Cell. 2003 Feb; 4(2):205-17.
[Dev Cell. 2003]Genes Dev. 2000 Dec 1; 14(23):3024-36.
[Genes Dev. 2000]Nature. 2002 Sep 12; 419(6903):167-70.
[Nature. 2002]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Dec 21; 96(26):15342-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999]Plant Cell. 2002 Feb; 14(2):421-33.
[Plant Cell. 2002]Genetics. 1994 Dec; 138(4):1239-49.
[Genetics. 1994]Nature. 2001 Nov 15; 414(6861):271-6.
[Nature. 2001]Nature. 2003 Sep 18; 425(6955):257-63.
[Nature. 2003]Nature. 2004 Mar 4; 428(6978):81-4.
[Nature. 2004]Nature. 2004 Mar 4; 428(6978):84-8.
[Nature. 2004]EMBO J. 2004 Aug 18; 23(16):3356-64.
[EMBO J. 2004]Plant Cell. 2003 Nov; 15(11):2730-41.
[Plant Cell. 2003]Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004 Oct; 7(5):512-20.
[Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004]Curr Biol. 2004 Jun 22; 14(12):1035-46.
[Curr Biol. 2004]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Aug 24; 101(34):12753-8.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004]Genes Dev. 2004 Sep 15; 18(18):2237-42.
[Genes Dev. 2004]Cell. 2002 Aug 23; 110(4):513-20.
[Cell. 2002]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Aug 3; 101(31):11511-6.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004]Mol Cell. 2004 Jun 18; 14(6):787-99.
[Mol Cell. 2004]Genome Biol. 2004; 5(9):R65.
[Genome Biol. 2004]Development. 2004 Jul; 131(14):3357-65.
[Development. 2004]Genes Dev. 2000 Dec 1; 14(23):3024-36.
[Genes Dev. 2000]Nature. 2002 Sep 12; 419(6903):167-70.
[Nature. 2002]Plant Cell. 1997 Jun; 9(6):841-57.
[Plant Cell. 1997]Development. 2004 Oct; 131(20):5021-30.
[Development. 2004]Development. 2004 Sep; 131(17):4311-22.
[Development. 2004]Curr Biol. 2004 Jun 22; 14(12):1035-46.
[Curr Biol. 2004]Plant J. 2003 May; 34(3):383-92.
[Plant J. 2003]Genes Dev. 2000 Dec 1; 14(23):3024-36.
[Genes Dev. 2000]Nature. 2002 Sep 12; 419(6903):167-70.
[Nature. 2002]Plant J. 2003 May; 34(3):383-92.
[Plant J. 2003]Plant J. 1998 Dec; 16(6):735-43.
[Plant J. 1998]Curr Biol. 2004 Jun 22; 14(12):1035-46.
[Curr Biol. 2004]Curr Biol. 2002 Sep 3; 12(17):1484-95.
[Curr Biol. 2002]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Dec 21; 96(26):15342-7.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999]Genetics. 1994 Dec; 138(4):1239-49.
[Genetics. 1994]Nature. 2001 Nov 15; 414(6861):271-6.
[Nature. 2001]Dev Cell. 2003 Feb; 4(2):205-17.
[Dev Cell. 2003]Nucleic Acids Res. 1989 Mar 25; 17(6):2362.
[Nucleic Acids Res. 1989]Genes Dev. 2002 Jul 1; 16(13):1616-26.
[Genes Dev. 2002]