![]() | ![]() |
Formats:
|
||||||||||
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology RNase/Anti-RNase Activities of the Bacterial parD Toxin-Antitoxin System Department of Molecular Microbiology, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, CSIC, Ramiro de Maeztu 9, E-28040 Madrid, Spain,1 Instituto de Parasitología y Biomedicina “López-Neyra”, CSIC, Parque Tecnológico de Ciencias de la Salud, Avda. del Conocimiento s/n, Armilla, E-18100 Granada, Spain2 *Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Molecular Microbiology, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, CSIC, Ramiro de Maeztu 9, E-28040 Madrid, Spain. Phone: +34 91 837 31 12. Fax: +34 91 536 04 32. E-mail: mlm/at/cib.csic.es. †These authors contributed equally to this work. ‡Present address: Institut für Biochemische Pharmakologie, Universität Innsbruck, Peter Mayr Strasse 1, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria. Received December 20, 2004; Accepted January 25, 2005. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC.Abstract The bacterial parD toxin-antitoxin system of plasmid R1 encodes two proteins, the Kid toxin and its cognate antitoxin, Kis. Kid cleaves RNA and inhibits protein synthesis and cell growth in Escherichia coli. Here, we show that Kid promotes RNA degradation and inhibition of protein synthesis in rabbit reticulocyte lysates. These new activities of the Kid toxin were counteracted by the Kis antitoxin and were not displayed by the KidR85W variant, which is nontoxic in E. coli. Moreover, while Kid cleaved single- and double-stranded RNA with a preference for UAA or UAC triplets, KidR85W maintained this sequence preference but hardly cleaved double-stranded RNA. Kid was formerly shown to inhibit DNA replication of the ColE1 plasmid. Here we provide in vitro evidence that Kid cleaves the ColE1 RNA II primer, which is required for the initiation of ColE1 replication. In contrast, KidR85W did not affect the stability of RNA II, nor did it inhibit the in vitro replication of ColE1. Thus, the endoribonuclease and the cytotoxic and DNA replication-inhibitory activities of Kid seem tightly correlated. We propose that the spectrum of action of this toxin extends beyond the sole inhibition of protein synthesis to control a broad range of RNA-regulated cellular processes. Programmed cell death in bacteria is mediated by specialized chromosomal modules called the toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems (11, 17, 33). These systems, formerly discovered in bacterial plasmids, were shown to contribute to plasmid maintenance by preventing the growth of plasmid-free progeny through a mechanism called postsegregational killing (13, 18). Later, it was discovered that TA systems were widely conserved in bacterial and archaeal chromosomes (2, 12). Generally, TA systems consist of two genes that encode a stable and potent toxin and an unstable antitoxin, respectively (10, 12). The antitoxins neutralize the toxin by direct protein-protein interaction but are degraded by cellular proteases (12). Among TA systems, one of the best characterized is the parD operon of plasmid R1 (4), also found in plasmid R100 and called pem (38). Its toxin and antitoxin pair of proteins, respectively Kid (PemK) and Kis (PemI), has been shown to form a tight nontoxic complex that autoregulates parD at the level of transcription (34). The Kid toxin inhibits cell growth in Escherichia coli, while the Kis antitoxin reverses this effect (5). Surprisingly, Kid was found to be also toxic in eukaryotic cells, since uncoupled production of Kid and Kis triggered apoptosis in human cells and regulated cell proliferation in yeast and metazoa (9). Moreover, the chpIK system of the spirochete Leptospira interrogans, a close homologue of the E. coli parD system, was reported to be active in yeast (31), while the RelE toxin encoded by the heterologous TA system relBE of E. coli was shown to inhibit cell growth in yeast (24) and to induce apoptosis in human cells (39). These data supported the emerging concept that bacterial TA systems could trigger programmed cell death in prokaryotes and eukaryotes by a conserved mechanism. However, only recently was the mode of action of these TA toxins substantially clarified, despite some discrepancies in the different reports. Kid, as well as the MazF toxin (its homologue from the mazEF [chpA] system of E. coli [27]), cleaves RNA in vitro and in vivo, and these activities are counteracted by their cognate antitoxins (29, 40-42). According to these data, the MazF and Kid toxins cleave RNA in a ribosome-independent manner (29, 40-42) to interfere specifically with mRNA function (40-42) or to inhibit RNA-regulated cellular processes in general (29). Moreover, purified MazF inhibited protein synthesis in E. coli cell extracts (42) and in rabbit reticulocyte lysates (29, 42). To date, inhibition of protein synthesis by Kid has been reported only for E. coli, both in vivo and in cell-free systems (28, 40). On the other hand, it has been proposed that MazF inhibits protein synthesis in E. coli by inducing the cleavage of mRNAs in vivo by a still undefined factor (7), in a manner reminiscent of the mode of action of the RelE toxin, which cleaves translated mRNAs at the ribosomal A site in vivo and in vitro (6, 30). Furthermore, the reports on the specificities of RNA cleavage by MazF in vitro have been basically inconsistent. MazF was shown either to cleave at the 5′ end of ACA sites situated in single-stranded regions in mRNA (42), leaving 5′-OH ends at one side (41), or to cleave at the 5′ end of residue A in NAC sites (where N is U or A) in single- or double-stranded RNA regions (29). By a procedure similar to the one that was used in the former MazF studies (42), Kid was shown to cleave only single-stranded RNA preferentially at UAH sequences, where H is C, A, or U (40). Thus, the mode of action of the Kid toxin and how it accounts for the known in vivo activities of the protein are still an unsolved question. In this paper we approach this issue by providing evidence that the Kid toxin promotes RNA cleavage and inhibits protein synthesis in mammalian cell-free systems. We show that the Kis antitoxin specifically reverses these effects and that a specific Kid variant that is nontoxic in E. coli fails to degrade RNA and to inhibit protein synthesis in the eukaryotic cell-free system. Moreover, we illustrate the inhibition of ColE1 DNA replication by Kid, a phenomenon that was previously described (32, 35), by presenting clues that link this effect to the RNase activity of the toxin. In addition, we provide an independent analysis of RNA cleavage by Kid that further documents and clarifies the mechanisms underlying this activity. MATERIALS AND METHODS Protein purification. The Kid toxin and the His6-Kis antitoxin were purified as described previously (15). The KidR85W mutant was purified by an identical procedure (36). Briefly, lysates were prepared from induced cultures of E. coli C600 strains overproducing the toxin protein together with the His6-tagged antitoxin protein. Lysates were clarified, and the soluble fraction was loaded onto an Ni affinity column. The complexes between the toxin and the His6 antitoxin remained tightly bound to the affinity column. To release the strong interaction between the proteins, it was necessary to denature using 5 M guanidine-HCl. Refolding of the toxin was accomplished by a dialysis procedure (14). Finally, the refolded sample was loaded onto an SP-Sepharose column and the bound toxin was eluted using a KCl gradient. The His6 antitoxin retained in the Ni affinity column after elution of the toxin with 5 M guanidine-HCl was eluted from the Ni column under denaturing conditions by the addition of 50 mM EDTA. The eluted protein was refolded basically as described for the toxin, and then it was further purified by Q-Sepharose chromatography using the same loading buffer and linear gradient used for chromatography of the toxin. The purified proteins were concentrated in the same elution buffer using a 50-ml Amicon cell fitted with a Diaflo PM-10 membrane. The proteins were diluted in 50 mM KCl, 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.8, 100 μg ml−1 BSA before use. Protein synthesis in E. coli. In vitro protein synthesis in E. coli was monitored by using the E. coli S30 Extract System for Circular DNA (Promega). Initial reaction mixtures (10 μl) contained pBESTluc plasmid DNA (400 ng), 3 μl of S30 extract, 4 μl of S30 premix, and 1 μl of a mixture of amino acids minus methionine (1 mM). The assay was started by adding 3 μCi of [35S]methionine and 0.4 μl of dilutions of the purified protein Kid, Kis, or KidR85W followed by incubation for 30 min at 37°C. The reactions were analyzed using sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (12.5%). Protein synthesis and mRNA stability in rabbit reticulocyte lysates. Protein synthesis was monitored using the Rabbit Reticulocyte Lysate system (Promega). Initial reaction mixtures (10 μl) contained 7 μl of rabbit reticulocyte lysate, 0.2 μl of amino acid mixture minus methionine (1 mM), 0.1 μg of luciferase control RNA, and 0.3 μl of KCl (70 mM, final concentration), complemented with 0.2 μl of RNAguard RNase Inhibitor (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The assays were started by adding 4 μCi of [35S]methionine and 3 pmol of the purified proteins and incubating for 1 h at 30°C. The reactions were analyzed using SDS-PAGE (10%). For RNA stability analyses, uniformly labeled luciferase mRNA was obtained from in vitro transcription with T7 RNA polymerase (3) in the presence of [α-32P]UTP and using as a DNA template a PCR-generated product based on the LTRW-LUC plasmid (1) and the pair of primers 5′-ATAGGATCCTTACAATTTGGACTTTCC-3′ and 5′-TAATACGACTCACTATAGGGTACTGTTGGTAAAATGGAAGAC-3′. RNA was fractionated by electrophoresis on a 4% polyacrylamide gel containing 7 M urea in Tris-borate-EDTA (TBE) buffer and was eluted as described previously (3). One-half picomole of RNA was added to reaction mixtures (10 μl) that contained 7 μl of rabbit reticulocyte lysate, 0.2 μl of amino acid mixture (1 mM), KCl at 70 mM, 0.2 μl of RNAguard RNase Inhibitor, and 3 pmol of the diluted purified proteins. The reactions were incubated for 2 min at 30°C and were stopped by chilling quickly in dry ice. The RNAs were extracted with phenol and chloroform and were separated as described above. In vitro RNA cleavage analysis. The CopA, CopT, and TAR RNAs were prepared and 5′ end labeled using [γ-32P]ATP as described previously (29). The cleavage reactions were carried out using 1,000 cpm of 5′-end-labeled RNAs in 10 mM KCl, 10 μg ml−1 bovine serum albumin, 2 mM HEPES, pH 7.8, in the presence of 4 U of SUPERase-In (Ambion). The purified Kid, KidR85W, and His6-Kis were added when appropriate, and the reaction mixtures were incubated for 2 min at 37°C. The reactions were stopped by adding formamide loading buffer and chilling quickly in dry ice. The RNAs were separated on 8% polyacrylamide gels containing 7 M urea in TBE buffer. The control reactions (alkali ladder and digestions with RNase T1) were performed as described previously (29). In vitro ColE1 DNA replication and RNA II stability. DNA replication assays were performed using ColE1 plasmid DNA and type II extracts of the E. coli K-12 strain C600, as described previously (35). For RNA II stability analyses, uniformly labeled RNA II was obtained from in vitro transcription with T7 RNA polymerase and [α-32P]UTP using, as a DNA template, the PCR product generated with the ColE1 plasmid and the pair of primers 5′-TAATACGACTCACTATAGCAAACAAAAAAACCACCGCTAC-3′ and 5′-GGAAGAAGGCCACGTAGCAG-3′. The resulting RNA was purified as described above for the internally labeled luciferase mRNA. The stability assay was performed in reaction mixtures (12 μl) that contained 0.25 pmol of RNA II and 80 cpm of a 5′-labeled PCR DNA fragment (used as a loading control) and, when specified, with the purified Kis, Kid, or KidR85W protein (300 nM each). The reactions were carried out at 37°C for 10 min and were stopped by chilling quickly in dry ice. The RNA was fractionated by electrophoresis on a 4% polyacrylamide gel containing 7 M urea in TBE buffer. RESULTS Correlation between inhibition of protein synthesis and toxicity in E. coli. Since the Kid toxin inhibits protein synthesis in E. coli (40), it was intuitively assumed that this activity accounted for the toxicity of the protein. According to this view, a Kid mutation that would specifically disrupt the toxicity of the protein should also prevent its inhibitory effect on protein synthesis. To test this hypothesis, we used KidR85W, a highly specific nontoxic variant of Kid that has been thoroughly characterized at the genetic, biochemical, and biophysical levels (16, 25, 36). This mutant bears a single R85W amino acid change that completely inactivates the toxicity of the protein in E. coli (25) without significantly affecting its state of association, thermal stability, or overall structure in solution (36). Moreover, the KidR85W protein efficiently interacts with the Kis antitoxin in vitro (see Materials and Methods) and in vivo (as monitored in transcriptional autoregulation assays) (36). To monitor protein synthesis, we used an E. coli cell-free system which allows detecting the products of the coupled transcription/translation of a DNA template expressing the firefly luciferase gene (see Materials and Methods). This yielded several protein products, including the full-length luciferase protein (Fig. (Fig.1A).1A
Kid inhibits protein synthesis in rabbit reticulocyte lysates. Considering that Kid was toxic in eukaryotic cells (9), we examined whether protein synthesis would also be affected by Kid in a eukaryotic cell-free system. We used a rabbit reticulocyte lysate translation system and a purified mRNA encoding the firefly luciferase as a template. In the presence of Kid concentrations that were inhibitory in E. coli extracts, the synthesis of the luciferase protein was dramatically impaired in rabbit reticulocyte lysates (Fig. (Fig.1B).1B RNA cleavage by Kid is modified in cell extracts. Since Kid is an endoribonuclease (40) and this activity was proposed to account for both the inhibition of protein synthesis and the in vivo toxic effects of Kid, we analyzed whether RNA cleavage by Kid would be affected by (i) the nontoxic R85W mutation and (ii) the presence of cell extracts. When Kid was added directly to gel-purified 32P-labeled luciferase mRNA, several cleavage products were produced (Fig. (Fig.1C).1C The R85W mutation affects but does not abolish RNA cleavage by Kid in vitro. To further analyze the endoribonuclease activities of Kid and of its nontoxic variant KidR85W, we performed an RNA cleavage analysis using a panel of three small model RNA molecules (TAR, CopA, and CopT RNAs) that were previously used to characterize the endoribonuclease activity of the MazF toxin (29). The three RNAs were 5′ end labeled with 32P, purified, and challenged with increasing amounts of the purified Kid toxin prior to being fractionated by denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Also included were RNA samples treated either with alkali or with RNase T1 to allow the precise mapping of the cleavage sites. TAR, CopA, and CopT RNAs were present as single RNA species that were cleaved in the three cases by the Kid toxin (Fig. (Fig.2A).2A
Kid processes the ColE1 RNA II primer and inhibits ColE1 replication, while KidR85W lacks both activities. The endoribonuclease activity of the Kid toxin not only provided a molecular basis for Kid toxicity but also gave clues to the mechanisms underlying other described activities of Kid, such as the inhibition of the initiation of DNA replication of the ColE1 plasmid (32, 35). Initiation of ColE1 replication requires the formation of an RNA-DNA hybrid between the RNA II precursor primer molecule and its template sequence around the origin (22). The precursor is then processed by RNase H to yield a mature 550-nucleotide primer that is subsequently elongated by DNA polymerase I to initiate ColE1 replication (22). We first asked whether the R85W mutation, which affects toxicity and RNase activities, would also affect the inhibition of ColE1 replication. We addressed this question by means of in vitro DNA replication assays using the ColE1 plasmid as a template (see Materials and Methods). While Kid inhibited ColE1 replication, consistent with former results (35), addition of KidR85W protein did not affect the replication of the ColE1 plasmid (Fig. (Fig.3A).3A
DISCUSSION In this work we have approached the mechanism of action of the Kid toxin at two levels. The first one, essentially mechanistic, deals with the assessment of the specificity of RNA cleavage by Kid. The second one broadens this analysis to address the question of whether the endoribonuclease activity may account for other known activities of the protein. Formerly, the specificity of RNA cleavage by Kid was addressed by Zhang and collaborators in an independent work to show that (i) Kid cleaves at the 5′ or 3′ side of the A residue in UAC, UAA, or UAU and (ii) only the sites situated in single-stranded regions are cleaved (40). Our results are fully consistent with their first conclusion, with the sole nuance that we also see cleavage at UAG (Fig. (Fig.2C).2C In contrast, our results do not support their second statement. Using three different small, natural RNA substrates, we observed that the Kid toxin cleaves RNA with a preference for UAA or UAC sites present in single-stranded regions. However, the same sequences situated in double-stranded RNA regions were efficiently cleaved by Kid (Fig. (Fig.2).2 Since Kid inhibited the initiation of replication of the ColE1 plasmid and overexpression of the E. coli DnaB helicase neutralized the toxicity of Kid (35), it was suggested that DnaB was the target of Kid. In this paper we show that the ColE1 RNA II primer, which is required for initiation of ColE1 replication, is efficiently cleaved by Kid in vitro. In addition, the nontoxic KidR85W mutant, which inefficiently cleaves this primer, fails to inhibit this replication. These data correlate the cleavage of the RNA primer by Kid and the inhibition of ColE1 replication. However, testing the effects of the toxin on the nascent RNA primer will be required to directly evaluate this correlation, as natural inhibition of ColE1 replication by the antisense RNAI occurs during synthesis and folding of the preprimer (37). Thus, it is possible that the RNase activity of Kid accounts for its inhibitory effect on this and other RNA-dependent processes other than translation. Alternatively, DnaB overexpression could lead to indirect titration of Kid toxicity, perhaps through massive stimulation of primer synthesis, as reported for in vitro studies (23). Although the involvement of DnaB in the mechanism of action of Kid cannot be formally ruled out, we believe that there is increasing evidence, to which this work contributes, that this link is due to circumstantial, indirect effects. In addition, we have shown that Kid inhibits protein synthesis in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cell extracts. Both activities were counteracted by the Kis antitoxin and were not displayed by the KidR85W mutant. which is nontoxic in E. coli cells. Thus, our results show that inhibition of protein synthesis and toxicity in E. coli cells are two tightly linked phenomena. Our data also provide a hint on the possible mechanism that accounts for the cytotoxicity of Kid in eukaryotes. There are other bacterial cytotoxic RNases that inhibit protein synthesis and provoke the death of eukaryotic cells (reviewed in reference 26), such as RNases Sa2 and Sa3 of Streptomyces aureofaciens (19, 20, 26), colicin E3 of E. coli (8), barnase of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens (21), and binase of Bacillus intermedius (21). Although there is no available evidence of structural or functional similarities between these toxins and Kid, it is interesting that in general small, positively charged RNases like Kid have the most potent cytotoxic effect in tumor cell lines (26). Conditional death by apoptosis induced by Kid in such cell lines has been described (9). Whether Kid, MazF, or other toxins of this family will play a valuable role in the field of antitumoral research remains to be tested. However, inasmuch as the RNA cleavages by Kid and MazF are not extremely specific in terms of primary and secondary structure requirements (29; this work), it is doubtful that these enzymes will prove to be useful in the structural mapping of RNA. In contrast, the increased specificity of KidR85W towards single-stranded RNA shows that Kid variants with tight site specificity may be obtained. Together with further structural information on RNA-toxin complexes, this will open the way to the rational design of a second generation of more specific and potent cytotoxic RNases encoded by the parD family. Acknowledgments We thank R. Giraldo for continuous intellectual support of this research and V. Augustin, C. Pardo-Abarrio and A. Serrano-López for excellent technical assistance. This work was supported by grants from the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología (SAF-2002-04649), the CSIC (PIES 200420E006 and 200420E062), and the Spanish REIPI Network of the “Fondo de Investigaciones Sanitarias” (CO314). REFERENCES 1. Alcamí, J., T. Lain de Lera, L. Folgueira, M. A. Pedraza, J. M. Jacque, F. Bachelerie, A. R. Noriega, R. T. Hay, D. Harrich, and R. B. Gaynor. 1995. Absolute dependence on B responsive elements for initiation and Tat-mediated amplification of HIV transcription in blood CD4 T lymphocytes. EMBO J. 14:1552-1560. [PubMed] 2. Anantharaman, V., and L. Aravind. 2003. New connections in the prokaryotic toxin-antitoxin network: relationship with the eukaryotic nonsense-mediated RNA decay system. Genome Biol. 4:R81. [PubMed] 3. Barroso-delJesus, A., M. Tabler, and A. Berzal-Herranz. 1999. Comparative kinetic analysis of structural variants of the hairpin ribozyme reveals further potential to optimize its catalytic performance. Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev. 9:433-440. [PubMed] 4. Bravo, A., G. de Torrontegui, and R. Diaz. 1987. Identification of components of a new stability system of plasmid R1, ParD, that is close to the origin of replication of this plasmid. Mol. Gen. Genet. 210:101-110. [PubMed] 5. Bravo, A., S. Ortega, G. de Torrontegui, and R. Diaz. 1988. Killing of Escherichia coli cells modulated by components of the stability system ParD of plasmid R1. Mol. Gen. Genet. 215:146-151. [PubMed] 6. Christensen, S. K., and K. Gerdes. 2003. RelE toxins from bacteria and Archaea cleave mRNAs on translating ribosomes, which are rescued by tmRNA. Mol. Microbiol. 48:1389-1400. [PubMed] 7. Christensen, S. K., K. Pedersen, F. G. Hansen, and K. Gerdes. 2003. Toxin-antitoxin loci as stress-response-elements: ChpAK/MazF and ChpBK cleave translated RNAs and are counteracted by tmRNA. J. Mol. Biol. 332:809-819. [PubMed] 8. Chumchalova, J., and J. Smarda. 2003. Human tumor cells are selectively inhibited by colicins. Folia Microbiol. 48:111-115. [PubMed] 9. de la Cueva-Mendez, G., A. D. Mills, L. C. Farrace, R. Diaz-Orejas, and R. A. Laskey. 2003. Regulatable killing of eukaryotic cells by the prokaryotic proteins Kid and Kis. EMBO J. 22:246-251. [PubMed] 10. Engelberg-Kulka, H., and G. Glaser. 1999. Addiction modules and programmed cell death and antideath in bacterial cultures. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 53:43-70. [PubMed] 11. Engelberg-Kulka, H., B. Sat, M. Reches, S. Amitai, and R. Hazan. 2004. Bacterial programmed cell death systems as targets for antibiotics. Trends Microbiol. 12:66-71. [PubMed] 12. Gerdes, K. 2000. Toxin-antitoxin modules may regulate synthesis of macromolecules during nutritional stress. J. Bacteriol. 182:561-572. [PubMed] 13. Gerdes, K., P. B. Rasmussen, and S. Molin. 1986. Unique type of plasmid maintenance function: postsegregational killing of plasmid-free cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83:3116-3120. [PubMed] 14. Giraldo, R., J. M. Andreu, and R. Diaz-Orejas. 1998. Protein domains and conformational changes in the activation of RepA, a DNA replication initiator. EMBO J. 17:4511-4526. [PubMed] 15. Hargreaves, D., R. Giraldo, S. Santos-Sierra, R. Boelens, D. W. Rice, R. Díaz-Orejas, and J. B. Rafferty. 2002. Crystallization and preliminary X-ray crystallographic studies on the parD-encoded protein Kid from Escherichia coli plasmid R1. Acta Crystallogr. D 58:355-358. [PubMed] 16. Hargreaves, D., S. Santos-Sierra, R. Giraldo, R. Sabariegos-Jareño, G. de la Cueva-Mendez, R. Boelens, R. Diaz-Orejas, and J. B. Rafferty. 2002. Structural and functional analysis of the kid toxin protein from E. coli plasmid R1. Structure 10:1425-1433. [PubMed] 17. Hayes, F. 2003. Toxins-antitoxins: plasmid maintenance, programmed cell death, and cell cycle arrest. Science 301:1496-1499. [PubMed] 18. Holcik, M., and V. N. Iyer. 1997. Conditionally lethal genes associated with bacterial plasmids. Microbiology 143:3403-3416. [PubMed] 19. Ilinskaya, O. N., F. Dreyer, V. A. Mitkevich, K. L. Shaw, C. N. Pace, and A. A. Makarov. 2002. Changing the net charge from negative to positive makes ribonuclease Sa cytotoxic. Protein Sci. 11:2522-2525. [PubMed] 20. Ilinskaya, O. N., A. Koschinski, V. A. Mitkevich, H. Repp, F. Dreyer, C. N. Pace, and A. A. Makarov. 2004. Cytotoxicity of RNases is increased by cationization and counteracted by K(Ca) channels. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 314:550-554. [PubMed] 21. Ilinskaya, O. N., and S. Vamvakas. 1997. Nephrotoxic effects of bacterial ribonucleases in the isolated perfused rat kidney. Toxicology 120:55-63. [PubMed] 22. Itoh, T., and J. Tomizawa. 1980. Formation of an RNA primer for initiation of replication of ColE1 DNA by ribonuclease H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77:2450-2454. [PubMed] 23. Johnson, S. K., S. Bhattacharyya, and M. A. Griep. 2000. DnaB helicase stimulates primer synthesis activity on short oligonucleotide templates. Biochemistry 39:736-744. [PubMed] 24. Kristoffersen, P., G. B. Jensen, K. Gerdes, and J. Piskur. 2000. Bacterial toxin-antitoxin gene system as containment control in yeast cells. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:5524-5526. [PubMed] 25. Lemonnier, M., S. Santos-Sierra, C. Pardo-Abarrio, and R. Diaz-Orejas. 2004. Identification of residues of the Kid toxin involved in autoregulation of the parD system. J. Bacteriol. 186:240-243. [PubMed] 26. Makarov, A. A., and O. N. Ilinskaya. 2003. Cytotoxic ribonucleases: molecular weapons and their targets. FEBS Lett. 540:15-20. [PubMed] 27. Masuda, Y., K. Miyakawa, Y. Nishimura, and E. Ohtsubo. 1993. chpA and chpB, Escherichia coli chromosomal homologs of the pem locus responsible for stable maintenance of plasmid R100. J. Bacteriol. 175:6850-6856. [PubMed] 28. Muñoz-Gomez, A. J. 2004. Identificación y caracterización de la actividad RNasa de las toxinas bacterianas Kid y ChpAK. PhD Thesis. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. 29. Muñoz-Gomez, A. J., S. Santos-Sierra, A. Berzal-Herranz, M. Lemonnier, and R. Díaz-Orejas. 2004. Insights into the specificity of RNA cleavage by the Escherichia coli MazF toxin. FEBS Lett. 567:316-320. [PubMed] 30. Pedersen, K., A. V. Zavialov, M. Y. Pavlov, J. Elf, K. Gerdes, and M. Ehrenberg. 2003. The bacterial toxin RelE displays codon-specific cleavage of mRNAs in the ribosomal A site. Cell 112:131-140. [PubMed] 31. Picardeau, M., C. Le Dantec, G. F. Richard, and I. Saint Girons. 2003. The spirochetal chpK-chromosomal toxin-antitoxin locus induces growth inhibition of yeast and mycobacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 229:277-281. [PubMed] 32. Potrykus, K., S. Santos, M. Lemonnier, R. Diaz-Orejas, and G. Wegrzyn. 2002. Differential effects of Kid toxin on two modes of replication of lambdoid plasmids suggest that this toxin acts before, but not after, the assembly of the replication complex. Microbiology 148:2489-2495. [PubMed] 33. Rice, K. C., and K. W. Bayles. 2003. Death's toolbox: examining the molecular components of bacterial programmed cell death. Mol. Microbiol. 50:729-738. [PubMed] 34. Ruiz-Echevarria, M. J., A. Berzal-Herranz, K. Gerdes, and R. Diaz-Orejas. 1991. The kis and kid genes of the parD maintenance system of plasmid R1 form an operon that is autoregulated at the level of transcription by the co-ordinated action of the Kis and Kid proteins. Mol. Microbiol. 5:2685-2693. [PubMed] 35. Ruiz-Echevarria, M. J., G. Gimenez-Gallego, R. Sabariegos-Jareno, and R. Diaz-Orejas. 1995. Kid, a small protein of the parD stability system of plasmid R1, is an inhibitor of DNA replication acting at the initiation of DNA synthesis. J. Mol. Biol. 247:568-577. [PubMed] 36. Santos-Sierra, S., M. Lemonnier, B. Nunez, D. Hargreaves, J. Rafferty, R. Giraldo, J. M. Andreu, and R. Diaz-Orejas. 2003. Non-cytotoxic variants of the Kid protein that retain their auto-regulatory activity. Plasmid 50:120-130. [PubMed] 37. Tomizawa, J. 1986. Control of ColE1 plasmid replication: binding of RNA I to RNA II and inhibition of primer formation. Cell 47:89-97. [PubMed] 38. Tsuchimoto, S., H. Ohtsubo, and E. Ohtsubo. 1988. Two genes, pemK and pemI, responsible for stable maintenance of resistance plasmid R100. J. Bacteriol. 170:1461-1466. [PubMed] 39. Yamamoto, T. A., K. Gerdes, and A. Tunnacliffe. 2002. Bacterial toxin RelE induces apoptosis in human cells. FEBS Lett. 519:191-194. [PubMed] 40. Zhang, J., Y. Zhang, L. Zhu, M. Suzuki, and M. Inouye. 2004. Interference of mRNA function by sequence-specific endoribonuclease PemK. J. Biol. Chem. 279:20678-20684. [PubMed] 41. Zhang, Y., J. Zhang, H. Hara, I. Kato, and M. Inouye. 2005. Insights into the mRNA cleavage mechanism by MazF, an mRNA interferase. J. Biol. Chem. 280:3143-3150. [PubMed] 42. Zhang, Y., J. Zhang, K. P. Hoeflich, M. Ikura, G. Qing, and M. Inouye. 2003. MazF cleaves cellular mRNAs specifically at ACA to block protein synthesis in Escherichia coli. Mol. Cell 12:913-923. [PubMed] |
PubMed related articles
Your browsing activity is empty. Activity recording is turned off. |
|||||||||
Trends Microbiol. 2004 Feb; 12(2):66-71.
[Trends Microbiol. 2004]Science. 2003 Sep 12; 301(5639):1496-9.
[Science. 2003]Mol Microbiol. 2003 Nov; 50(3):729-38.
[Mol Microbiol. 2003]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 May; 83(10):3116-20.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986]Microbiology. 1997 Nov; 143 ( Pt 11)():3403-16.
[Microbiology. 1997]Mol Gen Genet. 1987 Nov; 210(1):101-10.
[Mol Gen Genet. 1987]J Bacteriol. 1988 Apr; 170(4):1461-6.
[J Bacteriol. 1988]Mol Microbiol. 1991 Nov; 5(11):2685-93.
[Mol Microbiol. 1991]Mol Gen Genet. 1988 Dec; 215(1):146-51.
[Mol Gen Genet. 1988]EMBO J. 2003 Jan 15; 22(2):246-51.
[EMBO J. 2003]J Bacteriol. 1993 Nov; 175(21):6850-6.
[J Bacteriol. 1993]FEBS Lett. 2004 Jun 4; 567(2-3):316-20.
[FEBS Lett. 2004]J Biol Chem. 2004 May 14; 279(20):20678-84.
[J Biol Chem. 2004]Mol Cell. 2003 Oct; 12(4):913-23.
[Mol Cell. 2003]J Mol Biol. 2003 Sep 26; 332(4):809-19.
[J Mol Biol. 2003]Microbiology. 2002 Aug; 148(Pt 8):2489-95.
[Microbiology. 2002]J Mol Biol. 1995 Apr 7; 247(4):568-77.
[J Mol Biol. 1995]Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2002 Feb; 58(Pt 2):355-8.
[Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr. 2002]Plasmid. 2003 Sep; 50(2):120-30.
[Plasmid. 2003]EMBO J. 1998 Aug 3; 17(15):4511-26.
[EMBO J. 1998]Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev. 1999 Oct; 9(5):433-40.
[Antisense Nucleic Acid Drug Dev. 1999]EMBO J. 1995 Apr 3; 14(7):1552-60.
[EMBO J. 1995]FEBS Lett. 2004 Jun 4; 567(2-3):316-20.
[FEBS Lett. 2004]J Mol Biol. 1995 Apr 7; 247(4):568-77.
[J Mol Biol. 1995]J Biol Chem. 2004 May 14; 279(20):20678-84.
[J Biol Chem. 2004]Structure. 2002 Oct; 10(10):1425-33.
[Structure. 2002]J Bacteriol. 2004 Jan; 186(1):240-3.
[J Bacteriol. 2004]Plasmid. 2003 Sep; 50(2):120-30.
[Plasmid. 2003]EMBO J. 2003 Jan 15; 22(2):246-51.
[EMBO J. 2003]J Biol Chem. 2004 May 14; 279(20):20678-84.
[J Biol Chem. 2004]J Bacteriol. 2004 Jan; 186(1):240-3.
[J Bacteriol. 2004]Plasmid. 2003 Sep; 50(2):120-30.
[Plasmid. 2003]FEBS Lett. 2004 Jun 4; 567(2-3):316-20.
[FEBS Lett. 2004]Microbiology. 2002 Aug; 148(Pt 8):2489-95.
[Microbiology. 2002]J Mol Biol. 1995 Apr 7; 247(4):568-77.
[J Mol Biol. 1995]Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980 May; 77(5):2450-4.
[Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1980]J Biol Chem. 2004 May 14; 279(20):20678-84.
[J Biol Chem. 2004]J Mol Biol. 1995 Apr 7; 247(4):568-77.
[J Mol Biol. 1995]Cell. 1986 Oct 10; 47(1):89-97.
[Cell. 1986]Biochemistry. 2000 Feb 1; 39(4):736-44.
[Biochemistry. 2000]FEBS Lett. 2003 Apr 10; 540(1-3):15-20.
[FEBS Lett. 2003]Protein Sci. 2002 Oct; 11(10):2522-5.
[Protein Sci. 2002]Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004 Feb 6; 314(2):550-4.
[Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004]Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2003; 48(1):111-5.
[Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2003]Toxicology. 1997 Jun 6; 120(1):55-63.
[Toxicology. 1997]