• We are sorry, but NCBI web applications do not support your browser and may not function properly. More information
Logo of injprevInjury PreventionVisit this articleVisit this journalSubmit a manuscriptReceive email alertsContact usBMJ
Inj Prev. Jun 1997; 3(2): 120–123.
PMCID: PMC1067793

A seven item scale for the assessment of disabilities after child and adolescent injuries.


OBJECTIVES: To develop a scale to assess physical disabilities after child or adolescent injuries. SETTING: The three main hospitals of Jerusalem. METHODS: Telephone interviews pertaining to the injury's effect on the functioning of children 4-17 years old (n = 281) were carried out six months after an injury. Disabilities were recalled by the parents for the period immediately after the injury (short term) and at the time of interview (long term). Of 25 questions derived from the International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps, seven were selected: limitations in walking, running, getting up/lying down, moving in bed, going to the toilet, bathing/keeping personal hygiene, and dressing. Construct validity was tested using the usual, sport, school, and leisure time activities as the gold standard. RESULTS: The prevalence of short term disabilities ranged from 23.8% to 37.7% and of long term disabilities from 0.4% to 11.8%. Cronbach's alpha was 0.91 for the short term scale and over 0.90 for the different categories of the sociodemographic variables. It decreased to 0.66 for the long term scale. Sensitivity of the short term scale ranged from 77% to 89%, but was lower for the long term scale. Specificity varied from 72% to 84% and increased to 88% to 90%, six months after the injury. CONCLUSIONS: This scale could be used to study disability after injury among children and adolescents in different cultures. It is a simple method that does not require expert personnel and has relatively high validity and internal reliability.

Full text

Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (815K), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Rivara FP, Calonge N, Thompson RS. Population-based study of unintentional injury incidence and impact during childhood. Am J Public Health. 1989 Aug;79(8):990–994. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Barker M, Power C, Roberts I. Injuries and the risk of disability in teenagers and young adults. Arch Dis Child. 1996 Aug;75(2):156–158. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • Msall ME, DiGaudio K, Duffy LC, LaForest S, Braun S, Granger CV. WeeFIM. Normative sample of an instrument for tracking functional independence in children. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1994 Jul;33(7):431–438. [PubMed]
  • Thorburn MJ, Desai P, Durkin M. A comparison of efficacy of the key informant and community survey methods in the identification of childhood disability in Jamaica. Ann Epidemiol. 1991 Feb;1(3):255–261. [PubMed]
  • Young NL, Yoshida KK, Williams JI, Bombardier C, Wright JG. The role of children in reporting their physical disability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995 Oct;76(10):913–918. [PubMed]
  • Yates DW, Heath DF, Mars E, Taylor RJ. A system for measuring the severity of temporary and permanent disability after injury. Accid Anal Prev. 1991 Aug;23(4):323–329. [PubMed]
  • States JD, Viano DC. Injury impairment and disability scales to assess the permanent consequences of trauma. Accid Anal Prev. 1990 Apr;22(2):151–160. [PubMed]
  • Jennett B, Teasdale G, Braakman R, Minderhoud J, Heiden J, Kurze T. Prognosis of patients with severe head injury. Neurosurgery. 1979 Apr;4(4):283–289. [PubMed]
  • Furrie AD. The Canadian database on disability issues: a national application of the ICIDH. Disabil Rehabil. 1995 Oct;17(7):344–349. [PubMed]
  • Durkin MS, Wang W, Shrout PE, Zaman SS, Hasan ZM, Desai P, Davidson LL. Evaluating a ten questions screen for childhood disability: reliability and internal structure in different cultures. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 May;48(5):657–666. [PubMed]
  • Langley JD, Stanton WR, McGee RO, Murdoch JC. Disability in late adolescence. I: Introduction, methods, and overview. Disabil Rehabil. 1995 Jan;17(1):35–42. [PubMed]
  • Gofin R, Hass T, Adler B. The development of disability scales for childhood and adolescent injuries. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Jul;48(7):977–984. [PubMed]
  • Gorter KA. Survey methods for the assessment of physical disability among children. Disabil Rehabil. 1993 Jan-Mar;15(1):47–51. [PubMed]
  • Zaman SS, Khan NZ, Islam S, Banu S, Dixit S, Shrout P, Durkin M. Validity of the 'Ten Questions' for screening serious childhood disability: results from urban Bangladesh. Int J Epidemiol. 1990 Sep;19(3):613–620. [PubMed]

Articles from Injury Prevention are provided here courtesy of BMJ Group


Related citations in PubMed

See reviews...See all...

Cited by other articles in PMC

See all...


  • PubMed
    PubMed citations for these articles

Recent Activity

Your browsing activity is empty.

Activity recording is turned off.

Turn recording back on

See more...